The loss at the gate is one thing….the loss of the Bally’s television deal is another. That revenue is GONE. Blues might be cutting costs in the short term until they figure things out.2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:15 pmI go back to the Winnipeg owner when asked why they chose to extend Hellebuyck and Scheifele when everyone was expecting them to start a rebuild and he flat out said the franchise would be unsustainable if they incurred a Buffalo or at that time, Phoenix rebuild.zamadoo wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:05 pmSolid case for keeping Thomas building hereIsDurbanodoingtime wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:02 pmThis. I have not lived in the area for many decades. But even with the Cup win is this franchise solid enough to be a nonplayoff team for the next five years? Will the fanbase turn out?2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:53 pmIf they move Thomas for kids and picks you are looking at a decade before they are remotely competitive. Sure they may squeeze in a playoff year here and there, but it’s an established failed business and on ice model. Everyone thought a couple years ago New Jersey had arrived….guess again. Same with Columbus. Ottawa? Nope. Detroit? Maybe. Buffalo? Chicago? Utah/Phoenix? Vancouver? Philly? The teams at the top stay there. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas, Dallas, we’ll see what Florida does, but if healthy they probably go back to the top. Boston sells off last year and then right back to a playoff contender. Bottom line, if the Blues sell Thomas for more young prospects and picks, this team will be circling the drain until the early to mid 30s based on recent trends unless they are the exception. I’d bet against that.juan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:40 pm100% best take.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:46 pm Wow, if it happens there's a lot to take in.
First, solid return but Colton is a VERY solid top pairing defensive defender (with a great contract) so this should be the package.
Second, we have NO ONE that can skate his minutes. A lot of folks just don't understand how much ice he skates, and how many errors from other players he covers for. Not saying we shouldn't take this package, but this IMO is a complete rebuild move.
Finally, it now makes me believe that there could be something to the Thomas rumors, as it's going to be at least 3 years (probably 5) before I consider us a consistent competitive hockey team...
Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
Bubble4427
- Forum User
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
-
IsDurbanodoingtime
- Forum User
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
And the first e.g. are suppose to be the best fans in baseball. I do remember supposed virtuous corp citizen ralson purina and their bluebood asshat chairman ed stiritz shivving the city and fans though. Different times but not like there isn't a history of that as well with bill bidwell and stan kroenke.2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:10 pmNot sure, look 10 blocks east for the potential answer and the team two blocks west of Enterprise will be seeing the same thing in about two months and many thought they’d still be in the honeymoon stage - not the case at all.IsDurbanodoingtime wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:02 pmThis. I have not lived in the area for many decades. But even with the Cup win is this franchise solid enough to be a nonplayoff team for the next five years? Will the fanbase turn out?2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:53 pmIf they move Thomas for kids and picks you are looking at a decade before they are remotely competitive. Sure they may squeeze in a playoff year here and there, but it’s an established failed business and on ice model. Everyone thought a couple years ago New Jersey had arrived….guess again. Same with Columbus. Ottawa? Nope. Detroit? Maybe. Buffalo? Chicago? Utah/Phoenix? Vancouver? Philly? The teams at the top stay there. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas, Dallas, we’ll see what Florida does, but if healthy they probably go back to the top. Boston sells off last year and then right back to a playoff contender. Bottom line, if the Blues sell Thomas for more young prospects and picks, this team will be circling the drain until the early to mid 30s based on recent trends unless they are the exception. I’d bet against that.juan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:40 pm100% best take.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:46 pm Wow, if it happens there's a lot to take in.
First, solid return but Colton is a VERY solid top pairing defensive defender (with a great contract) so this should be the package.
Second, we have NO ONE that can skate his minutes. A lot of folks just don't understand how much ice he skates, and how many errors from other players he covers for. Not saying we shouldn't take this package, but this IMO is a complete rebuild move.
Finally, it now makes me believe that there could be something to the Thomas rumors, as it's going to be at least 3 years (probably 5) before I consider us a consistent competitive hockey team...
-
Maplebutterworth
- Forum User
- Posts: 361
- Joined: 14 May 2022 16:52 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
Regardless he's not in the lineup.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:41 pmHe’s out with back spasms.
-
IsDurbanodoingtime
- Forum User
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
So what is binner thinking at this moment (and tonite backing up hofer)? Supposedly carolina was making enquiries. Edminton and Montreal shopping. If bob moves does he leverage his ntc to get to florida?
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 412
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
just to (bleep) me offthe miracle wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:49 pmIDK - I could see the Blues keeping Faulk if Parayko leaves.juan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:42 pm While I'm onboard for a quick retool (move Faulk and Kyrou) and finish blowing it up next year if the team doesnt improve significantly (50/50 odds imo) -- trading CP55 forces a min 2-3 yr rebuild. Probably best long term.
If Parayko doesnt accept this trade that likely hurts any return for him going forward.
Regardless of what happens, Faulk has to go by the TDL.
-
the miracle
- Forum User
- Posts: 367
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
Oh shoot, had no idea you weren't a fan of Faulk. Lol, my condolences if my prediction comes truejuan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:01 pmjust to (bleep) me offthe miracle wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:49 pmIDK - I could see the Blues keeping Faulk if Parayko leaves.juan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:42 pm While I'm onboard for a quick retool (move Faulk and Kyrou) and finish blowing it up next year if the team doesnt improve significantly (50/50 odds imo) -- trading CP55 forces a min 2-3 yr rebuild. Probably best long term.
If Parayko doesnt accept this trade that likely hurts any return for him going forward.
Regardless of what happens, Faulk has to go by the TDL.![]()
-
Lefty2seam
- Forum User
- Posts: 85
- Joined: 08 Jun 2018 10:55 am
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 3173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 3173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
Are those the only two options?noted wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:50 pmWould you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:20 pmYes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.Ace wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:37 pmYou don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:33 pmFaulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:12 pmThe other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.Backesdraft wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:59 pmAm I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:53 pmAnd he doesn't play on the PPShakeyWalton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:51 pmLove it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD
If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
How’s that working out for them?2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:15 pmI go back to the Winnipeg owner when asked why they chose to extend Hellebuyck and Scheifele when everyone was expecting them to start a rebuild and he flat out said the franchise would be unsustainable if they incurred a Buffalo or at that time, Phoenix rebuild.zamadoo wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:05 pmSolid case for keeping Thomas building hereIsDurbanodoingtime wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:02 pmThis. I have not lived in the area for many decades. But even with the Cup win is this franchise solid enough to be a nonplayoff team for the next five years? Will the fanbase turn out?2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:53 pmIf they move Thomas for kids and picks you are looking at a decade before they are remotely competitive. Sure they may squeeze in a playoff year here and there, but it’s an established failed business and on ice model. Everyone thought a couple years ago New Jersey had arrived….guess again. Same with Columbus. Ottawa? Nope. Detroit? Maybe. Buffalo? Chicago? Utah/Phoenix? Vancouver? Philly? The teams at the top stay there. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas, Dallas, we’ll see what Florida does, but if healthy they probably go back to the top. Boston sells off last year and then right back to a playoff contender. Bottom line, if the Blues sell Thomas for more young prospects and picks, this team will be circling the drain until the early to mid 30s based on recent trends unless they are the exception. I’d bet against that.juan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:40 pm100% best take.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:46 pm Wow, if it happens there's a lot to take in.
First, solid return but Colton is a VERY solid top pairing defensive defender (with a great contract) so this should be the package.
Second, we have NO ONE that can skate his minutes. A lot of folks just don't understand how much ice he skates, and how many errors from other players he covers for. Not saying we shouldn't take this package, but this IMO is a complete rebuild move.
Finally, it now makes me believe that there could be something to the Thomas rumors, as it's going to be at least 3 years (probably 5) before I consider us a consistent competitive hockey team...
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 3173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
They were the Presidents trophy winning team last year.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:48 pmHow’s that working out for them?2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:15 pmI go back to the Winnipeg owner when asked why they chose to extend Hellebuyck and Scheifele when everyone was expecting them to start a rebuild and he flat out said the franchise would be unsustainable if they incurred a Buffalo or at that time, Phoenix rebuild.zamadoo wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:05 pmSolid case for keeping Thomas building hereIsDurbanodoingtime wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 20:02 pmThis. I have not lived in the area for many decades. But even with the Cup win is this franchise solid enough to be a nonplayoff team for the next five years? Will the fanbase turn out?2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:53 pmIf they move Thomas for kids and picks you are looking at a decade before they are remotely competitive. Sure they may squeeze in a playoff year here and there, but it’s an established failed business and on ice model. Everyone thought a couple years ago New Jersey had arrived….guess again. Same with Columbus. Ottawa? Nope. Detroit? Maybe. Buffalo? Chicago? Utah/Phoenix? Vancouver? Philly? The teams at the top stay there. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas, Dallas, we’ll see what Florida does, but if healthy they probably go back to the top. Boston sells off last year and then right back to a playoff contender. Bottom line, if the Blues sell Thomas for more young prospects and picks, this team will be circling the drain until the early to mid 30s based on recent trends unless they are the exception. I’d bet against that.juan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:40 pm100% best take.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:46 pm Wow, if it happens there's a lot to take in.
First, solid return but Colton is a VERY solid top pairing defensive defender (with a great contract) so this should be the package.
Second, we have NO ONE that can skate his minutes. A lot of folks just don't understand how much ice he skates, and how many errors from other players he covers for. Not saying we shouldn't take this package, but this IMO is a complete rebuild move.
Finally, it now makes me believe that there could be something to the Thomas rumors, as it's going to be at least 3 years (probably 5) before I consider us a consistent competitive hockey team...
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 412
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
thanksthe miracle wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:25 pmOh shoot, had no idea you weren't a fan of Faulk. Lol, my condolences if my prediction comes truejuan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:01 pmjust to (bleep) me offthe miracle wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:49 pmIDK - I could see the Blues keeping Faulk if Parayko leaves.juan good eye wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:42 pm While I'm onboard for a quick retool (move Faulk and Kyrou) and finish blowing it up next year if the team doesnt improve significantly (50/50 odds imo) -- trading CP55 forces a min 2-3 yr rebuild. Probably best long term.
If Parayko doesnt accept this trade that likely hurts any return for him going forward.
Regardless of what happens, Faulk has to go by the TDL.![]()
![]()
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
Pretty much. Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee it will work but continuing to stay just in or just out of the playoffs forever definitely won’t.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:46 pmAre those the only two options?noted wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:50 pmWould you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:20 pmYes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.Ace wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:37 pmYou don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:33 pmFaulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:12 pmThe other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.Backesdraft wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:59 pmAm I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:53 pmAnd he doesn't play on the PPShakeyWalton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:51 pmLove it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD
If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
Last edited by The Average Gatsby on 04 Mar 2026 21:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 3173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
So those aren't the only two options then. Got it.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:54 pmPretty much. Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee it will work but continuing to stay just in or just out of the playoffs forever is a definitely won’t.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:46 pmAre those the only two options?noted wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:50 pmWould you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:20 pmYes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.Ace wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:37 pmYou don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:33 pmFaulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:12 pmThe other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.Backesdraft wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:59 pmAm I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:53 pmAnd he doesn't play on the PPShakeyWalton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:51 pmLove it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD
If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
What’s your big plan?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:54 pmSo those aren't the only two options then. Got it.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:54 pmPretty much. Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee it will work but continuing to stay just in or just out of the playoffs forever is a definitely won’t.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:46 pmAre those the only two options?noted wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:50 pmWould you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:20 pmYes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.Ace wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:37 pmYou don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:33 pmFaulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:12 pmThe other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.Backesdraft wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:59 pmAm I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:53 pmAnd he doesn't play on the PPShakeyWalton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:51 pmLove it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD
If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 3173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves
I'm not a GM, why would I need a plan?The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:55 pmWhat’s your big plan?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:54 pmSo those aren't the only two options then. Got it.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:54 pmPretty much. Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee it will work but continuing to stay just in or just out of the playoffs forever is a definitely won’t.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:46 pmAre those the only two options?noted wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:50 pmWould you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:20 pmYes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.Ace wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:37 pmYou don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:33 pmFaulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:12 pmThe other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.Backesdraft wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:59 pmAm I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?TheHighHat wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:53 pmAnd he doesn't play on the PPShakeyWalton wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:51 pm
Love it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD
If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.