Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Post Reply
Bubble4427
Forum User
Posts: 1149
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by Bubble4427 »

2forDiving wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:15 pm
zamadoo wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:05 pm
IsDurbanodoingtime wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:02 pm
2forDiving wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:53 pm
juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:40 pm
Hockey Pete wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:46 pm Wow, if it happens there's a lot to take in.

First, solid return but Colton is a VERY solid top pairing defensive defender (with a great contract) so this should be the package.

Second, we have NO ONE that can skate his minutes. A lot of folks just don't understand how much ice he skates, and how many errors from other players he covers for. Not saying we shouldn't take this package, but this IMO is a complete rebuild move.

Finally, it now makes me believe that there could be something to the Thomas rumors, as it's going to be at least 3 years (probably 5) before I consider us a consistent competitive hockey team...
100% best take.
If they move Thomas for kids and picks you are looking at a decade before they are remotely competitive. Sure they may squeeze in a playoff year here and there, but it’s an established failed business and on ice model. Everyone thought a couple years ago New Jersey had arrived….guess again. Same with Columbus. Ottawa? Nope. Detroit? Maybe. Buffalo? Chicago? Utah/Phoenix? Vancouver? Philly? The teams at the top stay there. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas, Dallas, we’ll see what Florida does, but if healthy they probably go back to the top. Boston sells off last year and then right back to a playoff contender. Bottom line, if the Blues sell Thomas for more young prospects and picks, this team will be circling the drain until the early to mid 30s based on recent trends unless they are the exception. I’d bet against that.
This. I have not lived in the area for many decades. But even with the Cup win is this franchise solid enough to be a nonplayoff team for the next five years? Will the fanbase turn out?
Solid case for keeping Thomas building here
I go back to the Winnipeg owner when asked why they chose to extend Hellebuyck and Scheifele when everyone was expecting them to start a rebuild and he flat out said the franchise would be unsustainable if they incurred a Buffalo or at that time, Phoenix rebuild.
The loss at the gate is one thing….the loss of the Bally’s television deal is another. That revenue is GONE. Blues might be cutting costs in the short term until they figure things out.
IsDurbanodoingtime
Forum User
Posts: 905
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by IsDurbanodoingtime »

2forDiving wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:10 pm
IsDurbanodoingtime wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:02 pm
2forDiving wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:53 pm
juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:40 pm
Hockey Pete wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:46 pm Wow, if it happens there's a lot to take in.

First, solid return but Colton is a VERY solid top pairing defensive defender (with a great contract) so this should be the package.

Second, we have NO ONE that can skate his minutes. A lot of folks just don't understand how much ice he skates, and how many errors from other players he covers for. Not saying we shouldn't take this package, but this IMO is a complete rebuild move.

Finally, it now makes me believe that there could be something to the Thomas rumors, as it's going to be at least 3 years (probably 5) before I consider us a consistent competitive hockey team...
100% best take.
If they move Thomas for kids and picks you are looking at a decade before they are remotely competitive. Sure they may squeeze in a playoff year here and there, but it’s an established failed business and on ice model. Everyone thought a couple years ago New Jersey had arrived….guess again. Same with Columbus. Ottawa? Nope. Detroit? Maybe. Buffalo? Chicago? Utah/Phoenix? Vancouver? Philly? The teams at the top stay there. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas, Dallas, we’ll see what Florida does, but if healthy they probably go back to the top. Boston sells off last year and then right back to a playoff contender. Bottom line, if the Blues sell Thomas for more young prospects and picks, this team will be circling the drain until the early to mid 30s based on recent trends unless they are the exception. I’d bet against that.
This. I have not lived in the area for many decades. But even with the Cup win is this franchise solid enough to be a nonplayoff team for the next five years? Will the fanbase turn out?
Not sure, look 10 blocks east for the potential answer and the team two blocks west of Enterprise will be seeing the same thing in about two months and many thought they’d still be in the honeymoon stage - not the case at all.
And the first e.g. are suppose to be the best fans in baseball. I do remember supposed virtuous corp citizen ralson purina and their bluebood asshat chairman ed stiritz shivving the city and fans though. Different times but not like there isn't a history of that as well with bill bidwell and stan kroenke.
Maplebutterworth
Forum User
Posts: 361
Joined: 14 May 2022 16:52 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by Maplebutterworth »

LuvthaBlues wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:41 pm
Maplebutterworth wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:33 pm
dman1 wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:32 pm Does anyone know if CP55 is in tonight's lineup? If he is, maybe he vetoed the deal.
Not in the lineup.
He’s out with back spasms.
Regardless he's not in the lineup.
IsDurbanodoingtime
Forum User
Posts: 905
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by IsDurbanodoingtime »

So what is binner thinking at this moment (and tonite backing up hofer)? Supposedly carolina was making enquiries. Edminton and Montreal shopping. If bob moves does he leverage his ntc to get to florida?
juan good eye
Forum User
Posts: 412
Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by juan good eye »

the miracle wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:49 pm
juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:42 pm While I'm onboard for a quick retool (move Faulk and Kyrou) and finish blowing it up next year if the team doesnt improve significantly (50/50 odds imo) -- trading CP55 forces a min 2-3 yr rebuild. Probably best long term.

If Parayko doesnt accept this trade that likely hurts any return for him going forward.

Regardless of what happens, Faulk has to go by the TDL.
IDK - I could see the Blues keeping Faulk if Parayko leaves.
just to (bleep) me off :lol:
the miracle
Forum User
Posts: 367
Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by the miracle »

juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:01 pm
the miracle wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:49 pm
juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:42 pm While I'm onboard for a quick retool (move Faulk and Kyrou) and finish blowing it up next year if the team doesnt improve significantly (50/50 odds imo) -- trading CP55 forces a min 2-3 yr rebuild. Probably best long term.

If Parayko doesnt accept this trade that likely hurts any return for him going forward.

Regardless of what happens, Faulk has to go by the TDL.
IDK - I could see the Blues keeping Faulk if Parayko leaves.
just to (bleep) me off :lol:
Oh shoot, had no idea you weren't a fan of Faulk. Lol, my condolences if my prediction comes true :D
Lefty2seam
Forum User
Posts: 85
Joined: 08 Jun 2018 10:55 am

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by Lefty2seam »

TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 3173
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by TheJackBurton »

Ace wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:39 pm Has Jack Burton been frozen in time? He thinks we are a cup contender?
What? How in the world did you come to that conclusion?

How does that even make sense?
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 3173
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by TheJackBurton »

noted wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:50 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:20 pm
Ace wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:37 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:33 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:12 pm
Backesdraft wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:59 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:53 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:51 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:46 pm
noted wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:44 pm
sdaltons wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:40 pm Mrtka and a 1st at least part of the return
Yes - This is return per Dreger
That would be outstanding.
Love it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
And he doesn't play on the PP

Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
Am I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?
The other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD

If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
Faulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.
You don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?
Yes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.

A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
Would you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?
Are those the only two options?
The Average Gatsby
Forum User
Posts: 303
Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by The Average Gatsby »

2forDiving wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:15 pm
zamadoo wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:05 pm
IsDurbanodoingtime wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:02 pm
2forDiving wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:53 pm
juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:40 pm
Hockey Pete wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:46 pm Wow, if it happens there's a lot to take in.

First, solid return but Colton is a VERY solid top pairing defensive defender (with a great contract) so this should be the package.

Second, we have NO ONE that can skate his minutes. A lot of folks just don't understand how much ice he skates, and how many errors from other players he covers for. Not saying we shouldn't take this package, but this IMO is a complete rebuild move.

Finally, it now makes me believe that there could be something to the Thomas rumors, as it's going to be at least 3 years (probably 5) before I consider us a consistent competitive hockey team...
100% best take.
If they move Thomas for kids and picks you are looking at a decade before they are remotely competitive. Sure they may squeeze in a playoff year here and there, but it’s an established failed business and on ice model. Everyone thought a couple years ago New Jersey had arrived….guess again. Same with Columbus. Ottawa? Nope. Detroit? Maybe. Buffalo? Chicago? Utah/Phoenix? Vancouver? Philly? The teams at the top stay there. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas, Dallas, we’ll see what Florida does, but if healthy they probably go back to the top. Boston sells off last year and then right back to a playoff contender. Bottom line, if the Blues sell Thomas for more young prospects and picks, this team will be circling the drain until the early to mid 30s based on recent trends unless they are the exception. I’d bet against that.
This. I have not lived in the area for many decades. But even with the Cup win is this franchise solid enough to be a nonplayoff team for the next five years? Will the fanbase turn out?
Solid case for keeping Thomas building here
I go back to the Winnipeg owner when asked why they chose to extend Hellebuyck and Scheifele when everyone was expecting them to start a rebuild and he flat out said the franchise would be unsustainable if they incurred a Buffalo or at that time, Phoenix rebuild.
How’s that working out for them?
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 3173
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by TheJackBurton »

The Average Gatsby wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:48 pm
2forDiving wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:15 pm
zamadoo wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:05 pm
IsDurbanodoingtime wrote: 04 Mar 2026 20:02 pm
2forDiving wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:53 pm
juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:40 pm
Hockey Pete wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:46 pm Wow, if it happens there's a lot to take in.

First, solid return but Colton is a VERY solid top pairing defensive defender (with a great contract) so this should be the package.

Second, we have NO ONE that can skate his minutes. A lot of folks just don't understand how much ice he skates, and how many errors from other players he covers for. Not saying we shouldn't take this package, but this IMO is a complete rebuild move.

Finally, it now makes me believe that there could be something to the Thomas rumors, as it's going to be at least 3 years (probably 5) before I consider us a consistent competitive hockey team...
100% best take.
If they move Thomas for kids and picks you are looking at a decade before they are remotely competitive. Sure they may squeeze in a playoff year here and there, but it’s an established failed business and on ice model. Everyone thought a couple years ago New Jersey had arrived….guess again. Same with Columbus. Ottawa? Nope. Detroit? Maybe. Buffalo? Chicago? Utah/Phoenix? Vancouver? Philly? The teams at the top stay there. Tampa, Colorado, Vegas, Dallas, we’ll see what Florida does, but if healthy they probably go back to the top. Boston sells off last year and then right back to a playoff contender. Bottom line, if the Blues sell Thomas for more young prospects and picks, this team will be circling the drain until the early to mid 30s based on recent trends unless they are the exception. I’d bet against that.
This. I have not lived in the area for many decades. But even with the Cup win is this franchise solid enough to be a nonplayoff team for the next five years? Will the fanbase turn out?
Solid case for keeping Thomas building here
I go back to the Winnipeg owner when asked why they chose to extend Hellebuyck and Scheifele when everyone was expecting them to start a rebuild and he flat out said the franchise would be unsustainable if they incurred a Buffalo or at that time, Phoenix rebuild.
How’s that working out for them?
They were the Presidents trophy winning team last year.
juan good eye
Forum User
Posts: 412
Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by juan good eye »

the miracle wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:25 pm
juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:01 pm
the miracle wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:49 pm
juan good eye wrote: 04 Mar 2026 19:42 pm While I'm onboard for a quick retool (move Faulk and Kyrou) and finish blowing it up next year if the team doesnt improve significantly (50/50 odds imo) -- trading CP55 forces a min 2-3 yr rebuild. Probably best long term.

If Parayko doesnt accept this trade that likely hurts any return for him going forward.

Regardless of what happens, Faulk has to go by the TDL.
IDK - I could see the Blues keeping Faulk if Parayko leaves.
just to (bleep) me off :lol:
Oh shoot, had no idea you weren't a fan of Faulk. Lol, my condolences if my prediction comes true :D
thanks :D btw not a faulk hater but now is the opportune time to move him. the only player I dont really like as a player is kyrou
The Average Gatsby
Forum User
Posts: 303
Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by The Average Gatsby »

TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:46 pm
noted wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:50 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:20 pm
Ace wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:37 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:33 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:12 pm
Backesdraft wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:59 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:53 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:51 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:46 pm
noted wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:44 pm
sdaltons wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:40 pm Mrtka and a 1st at least part of the return
Yes - This is return per Dreger
That would be outstanding.
Love it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
And he doesn't play on the PP

Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
Am I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?
The other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD

If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
Faulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.
You don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?
Yes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.

A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
Would you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?
Are those the only two options?
Pretty much. Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee it will work but continuing to stay just in or just out of the playoffs forever definitely won’t.
Last edited by The Average Gatsby on 04 Mar 2026 21:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 3173
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by TheJackBurton »

The Average Gatsby wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:54 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:46 pm
noted wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:50 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:20 pm
Ace wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:37 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:33 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:12 pm
Backesdraft wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:59 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:53 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:51 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:46 pm
noted wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:44 pm

Yes - This is return per Dreger
That would be outstanding.
Love it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
And he doesn't play on the PP

Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
Am I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?
The other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD

If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
Faulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.
You don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?
Yes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.

A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
Would you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?
Are those the only two options?
Pretty much. Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee it will work but continuing to stay just in or just out of the playoffs forever is a definitely won’t.
So those aren't the only two options then. Got it.
The Average Gatsby
Forum User
Posts: 303
Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by The Average Gatsby »

TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:54 pm
The Average Gatsby wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:54 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:46 pm
noted wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:50 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:20 pm
Ace wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:37 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:33 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:12 pm
Backesdraft wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:59 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:53 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:51 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:46 pm
That would be outstanding.
Love it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
And he doesn't play on the PP

Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
Am I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?
The other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD

If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
Faulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.
You don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?
Yes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.

A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
Would you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?
Are those the only two options?
Pretty much. Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee it will work but continuing to stay just in or just out of the playoffs forever is a definitely won’t.
So those aren't the only two options then. Got it.
What’s your big plan?
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 3173
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Parayko going to Buffalo if approves

Post by TheJackBurton »

The Average Gatsby wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:55 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:54 pm
The Average Gatsby wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:54 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 21:46 pm
noted wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:50 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 17:20 pm
Ace wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:37 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:33 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 16:12 pm
Backesdraft wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:59 pm
TheHighHat wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:53 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Mar 2026 15:51 pm

Love it! Paryako is on the wrong side of 30 and has 1 goal in 58 games. I respect him as a great Blue, but hell yes, love that return if that’s legit.
And he doesn't play on the PP

Samuelsson-Dahlin
Byram-Parayko
Power-Kesselring
Am I underestimating another team in the East, or is it possible that might be the best top 6 in the conference now?
The other team in the conversation would have to be Tampa, but I agree with you because of the age and miles on Hedman and McD.
I still think the Bolts may add a RHD to round that veteran group out.
Detroit will also look to add a RHD

If CP55 approves, does Army keep Faulk to play big minutes on the right side and hold the hands of the youngsters next year?
Faulk isn't nearly good enough anymore to handle those minutes. I don't understand this one at all.
You don't understand this potential trade? Are you in loser denial?
Yes i don't understand this potential trade because we don't have anyone good enough to take his place. Faulk certainly isn't, the cost to get a 1st line RHD is extremely expensive as displayed by this potential trade. Mailloux, Jiricek, and Mrtka certainly aren't it at this point in their careers, so yes I don't understand this trade.

A trade that might make us better in 5 years is not a great trade.
Would you rather be a middling team for 5 years or be bad for a few and then be a contender?
Are those the only two options?
Pretty much. Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee it will work but continuing to stay just in or just out of the playoffs forever is a definitely won’t.
So those aren't the only two options then. Got it.
What’s your big plan?
I'm not a GM, why would I need a plan?
Post Reply