Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:49 pm
That’s a shame. He was ranked our #2, #3, #2 prospect the three years previous to 2026.
Good point.
And I was the only person on the planet who correctly advised in the fall of 2022 (and the years which followed) that the Cardinals should trade him.
Said he would never be an effective MLB starter.
Said he was simply too slight of build and stature to make it.
I was, of course, correct.
The trick is to be free of bias, free of agenda, and free of personal investment.
Simply follow available facts to the most like outcome.
That is why my accuracy rate now stands at 96.91%.
Hence will be 24 in a couple of weeks.
Still young enough for another team to take a chance on his as organizational filler.
Wish him well.
Perhaps he shows up as a middle inning relief pitcher and gets to make it to the show - even if only briefly.
My advice to everyone else?
Keep reading.
Keep learning.
You keep an accuracy rate?
An algorithm.
I’d like to see your data.
Done!
Simply read my posts.
The data is there for you.
I’m not searching 5 years of posts.
He’s running 96.91 in his head and 10% in reality
Breaking news, man predicts prospect to fail, declares self genius after opinion potentially correct.
Didn't he also predict Herrera to fail? Gorman to succeed? That's just off the top of my head and it's 33%.
Absolutely did.
Unicorn!!!!
Easy
Correct
Keep reading for more laughs
He Said cardinals should keep Donovan And Jo Jo because their trade values would be higher at the deadline said Matthew’s should have been traded in the offseason when his value was at its lowest said helsley should have been kept and extended for 5 years was wrong on when arenado would be traded 4 times before he finally right but if you say he’s going to be traded at every deadline and offseason eventually you will be right and was wrong about a thousand times on the unicorn. If you want to be right 90% of the time disagree with him on everything he will also be wrong on the cardinals trading for gray at the deadline
But....but..but...but....
Easy
Not about me
Blah....blah...blah
Voldemort wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 17:50 pm
Let's make this clear. ME ville did not say that about Tink Hence years ago. If Liar Liar Pants on Fire were true, his as s would be burnt crisp from being burned so often.
What bothers you is not that I didn't say it.
What bothers you that you know full well that I did - and was the ONLY person saying it that early.
Which is unfortunate.
It is never about me.
Only and always about the game.
In this case, the game itself dictated the odds were against Hence from day one.
Making the outcome not just easy to predict, but nearly inevitable.
Adam2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 14:00 pm
He should have been moved to a reliever years ago, I said it then. That frame rarely holds up to starters innings. Others on here have said the same
100%. I thought that 2 or so years ago. A strong bullpen is just a critical as starting pitching.
Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:49 pm
That’s a shame. He was ranked our #2, #3, #2 prospect the three years previous to 2026.
Good point.
And I was the only person on the planet who correctly advised in the fall of 2022 (and the years which followed) that the Cardinals should trade him.
Said he would never be an effective MLB starter.
Said he was simply too slight of build and stature to make it.
I was, of course, correct.
The trick is to be free of bias, free of agenda, and free of personal investment.
Simply follow available facts to the most like outcome.
That is why my accuracy rate now stands at 96.91%.
Hence will be 24 in a couple of weeks.
Still young enough for another team to take a chance on his as organizational filler.
Wish him well.
Perhaps he shows up as a middle inning relief pitcher and gets to make it to the show - even if only briefly.
My advice to everyone else?
Keep reading.
Keep learning.
You're such a tool lmao
+1000
no 1 but you melville cares what you said on the internet almost 5yrs ago, so for you to pimp it like you did is so lame. how about you start your own internet forum for this lame act of pimping out yourself (since thats all you really do on CT) if you care so much about posterity
I am gratified that you enjoy my posts.
I cordially invite you to continue your education.
Never about me.
Only and always about the game - and the best analysis you will find anytime, anywhere, from anyone.
you just proved how delusional you are. you took what i said about you being lame and pimping yourself like a sick ego maniac as "enjoying your posts" ? definitely wrong
get over yourself. no one likes you and no one gives a [shirt] about what you say...especially when you make everything about yourself like a pompous self righteous tool.
Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:49 pm
That’s a shame. He was ranked our #2, #3, #2 prospect the three years previous to 2026.
Good point.
And I was the only person on the planet who correctly advised in the fall of 2022 (and the years which followed) that the Cardinals should trade him.
Said he would never be an effective MLB starter.
Said he was simply too slight of build and stature to make it.
I was, of course, correct.
The trick is to be free of bias, free of agenda, and free of personal investment.
Simply follow available facts to the most like outcome.
That is why my accuracy rate now stands at 96.91%.
Hence will be 24 in a couple of weeks.
Still young enough for another team to take a chance on his as organizational filler.
Wish him well.
Perhaps he shows up as a middle inning relief pitcher and gets to make it to the show - even if only briefly.
My advice to everyone else?
Keep reading.
Keep learning.
You're such a tool lmao
+1000
no 1 but you melville cares what you said on the internet almost 5yrs ago, so for you to pimp it like you did is so lame. how about you start your own internet forum for this lame act of pimping out yourself (since thats all you really do on CT) if you care so much about posterity
I am gratified that you enjoy my posts.
I cordially invite you to continue your education.
Never about me.
Only and always about the game - and the best analysis you will find anytime, anywhere, from anyone.
you just proved how delusional you are. you took what i said about you being lame and pimping yourself like a sick ego maniac as "enjoying your posts" ? definitely wrong
get over yourself. no one likes you and no one gives a [shirt] about what you say...especially when you make everything about yourself like a pompous self righteous tool.
Never about me.
But your enjoyment of my posts could not possibly be any more obvious.
You are cordially invited to continue in that habit.
Though I knew with certainty Hence would never thrive in STL as a MLB starting pitcher, I do wish whatever limited success may be available to him with other teams in the future.
I suspect another organization will take a flyer.
Aren’t young children supposed to be the ones obsessed with “negative attention”???
I guess we need to add ME-ville the Sideshow Clown to the list?
Easy
Obvious
Correct
Voldemort wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 17:50 pm
Let's make this clear. ME ville did not say that about Tink Hence years ago. If Liar Liar Pants on Fire were true, his as s would be burnt crisp from being burned so often.
What bothers you is not that I didn't say it.
What bothers you that you know full well that I did - and was the ONLY person saying it that early.
Which is unfortunate.
It is never about me.
Only and always about the game.
In this case, the game itself dictated the odds were against Hence from day one.
Making the outcome not just easy to predict, but nearly inevitable.
Voldemort wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 17:50 pm
Let's make this clear. ME ville did not say that about Tink Hence years ago. If Liar Liar Pants on Fire were true, his as s would be burnt crisp from being burned so often.
What bothers you is not that I didn't say it.
What bothers you that you know full well that I did - and was the ONLY person saying it that early.
Which is unfortunate.
It is never about me.
Only and always about the game.
In this case, the game itself dictated the odds were against Hence from day one.
Making the outcome not just easy to predict, but nearly inevitable.
What bothers you is that I told the truth. Prove me wrong and produce that post! Of course, you can't.
Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:49 pm
That’s a shame. He was ranked our #2, #3, #2 prospect the three years previous to 2026.
Good point.
And I was the only person on the planet who correctly advised in the fall of 2022 (and the years which followed) that the Cardinals should trade him.
Said he would never be an effective MLB starter.
Said he was simply too slight of build and stature to make it.
I was, of course, correct.
The trick is to be free of bias, free of agenda, and free of personal investment.
Simply follow available facts to the most like outcome.
That is why my accuracy rate now stands at 96.91%.
Hence will be 24 in a couple of weeks.
Still young enough for another team to take a chance on his as organizational filler.
Wish him well.
Perhaps he shows up as a middle inning relief pitcher and gets to make it to the show - even if only briefly.
My advice to everyone else?
Keep reading.
Keep learning.
You're such a tool lmao
+1000
no 1 but you melville cares what you said on the internet almost 5yrs ago, so for you to pimp it like you did is so lame. how about you start your own internet forum for this lame act of pimping out yourself (since thats all you really do on CT) if you care so much about posterity
I am gratified that you enjoy my posts.
I cordially invite you to continue your education.
Never about me.
Only and always about the game - and the best analysis you will find anytime, anywhere, from anyone.
you just proved how delusional you are. you took what i said about you being lame and pimping yourself like a sick ego maniac as "enjoying your posts" ? definitely wrong
get over yourself. no one likes you and no one gives a [shirt] about what you say...especially when you make everything about yourself like a pompous self righteous tool.
He's extremely pathetic but obnoxious at the same time. So you can't even begin to feel sorry for him.