Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 3555
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by Harry S Deals »

BleedingBleu wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:20 am
Harry S Deals wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:08 am
kimzey59 wrote: 25 Jun 2026 21:30 pm What other center's are available?

We're not on Dylan Larkin's list.
We want no part of Elias Petersson.
NJ isn't shopping Hischier that we've heard of.

The only other center I've seen on the block is JT Compher. And I MUCH prefer MacTavish to Compher.
I believe it was Confuscious who said sometimes it's better to skip prom than take the fat girl
Confuscious never saw what a low self esteem & Ozempic can do…
Lol good one first thing in the morning
DyadicEffect
Forum User
Posts: 38
Joined: 28 Apr 2020 09:18 am

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by DyadicEffect »

TBone wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:16 am Here is what Elliot Friedman is reporting.

This would be a HELL no from me, btw.
Thomas Welch
@twelcher15
.
@FriedgeHNIC reporting that he thinks a key part of the Blues offer is the 11th overall pick

Would you trade:

11th overall

For

McTavish
2027 2nd Round (Blues)?
I will hate if we do this. My only thought is we want our second back in the deal to offer sheet another player we have our eyes on?
TBone
Forum User
Posts: 1612
Joined: 28 May 2024 09:00 am

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by TBone »

UMR-alum-05 wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:19 am Holding out any commentary until we know something.

Id be all right with 11 for McTavish and our 2027 2nd back. I'd rather be shipping them something else in addition that we don't want, like Drouin.

I'll withhold judgement until we have details.
I wouldn't until I've exhausted my efforts to trade up and/or see what's available at 11.

If played as a center who would be his facilitator since he's really not one?

These centers who are really forwards feel like a recipe to underproductive money. More Pavel Buchnevich's.
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 3555
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by Harry S Deals »

DyadicEffect wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:28 am
TBone wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:16 am Here is what Elliot Friedman is reporting.

This would be a HELL no from me, btw.
Thomas Welch
@twelcher15
.
@FriedgeHNIC reporting that he thinks a key part of the Blues offer is the 11th overall pick

Would you trade:

11th overall

For

McTavish
2027 2nd Round (Blues)?
I will hate if we do this. My only thought is we want our second back in the deal to offer sheet another player we have our eyes on?
I trust the amateur dept more than the pro side. I dunno I feel like the Blues can get a better player with #11 or jump up to 7th ish. I hate to use that much capital on a guy with red flags. Do we believe MM is a star? Seems over drafted at #3. I'm more comfortable with McMichael at center with his flags or a lesser move for another 2/3C tweener or just make the picks
UMR-alum-05
Forum User
Posts: 1382
Joined: 21 May 2026 07:22 am

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by UMR-alum-05 »

TBone wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:36 am
UMR-alum-05 wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:19 am Holding out any commentary until we know something.

Id be all right with 11 for McTavish and our 2027 2nd back. I'd rather be shipping them something else in addition that we don't want, like Drouin.

I'll withhold judgement until we have details.
I wouldn't until I've exhausted my efforts to trade up and/or see what's available at 11.

If played as a center who would be his facilitator since he's really not one?

These centers who are really forwards feel like a recipe to underproductive money. More Pavel Buchnevich's.
End of the day I'm just not sure there is really that much difference between 11 and 15. Especially with the way the Blues have scouted the draft recently and had success wherever they've picked.

So I'm inclined to giving them the benefit of the doubt.

And if they truly go for that 2nd rounder back, that tells me they're thinking offer sheet. And thus i couldn't even completely judge this trade until that plays out
swatski
Forum User
Posts: 1589
Joined: 25 May 2024 21:40 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by swatski »

DyadicEffect wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:28 am
TBone wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:16 am Here is what Elliot Friedman is reporting.

This would be a HELL no from me, btw.
Thomas Welch
@twelcher15
.
@FriedgeHNIC reporting that he thinks a key part of the Blues offer is the 11th overall pick

Would you trade:

11th overall

For

McTavish
2027 2nd Round (Blues)?
I will hate if we do this. My only thought is we want our second back in the deal to offer sheet another player we have our eyes on?
So the result could be McTavish and Bourque for 11.
Frank Underwood
Forum User
Posts: 1313
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by Frank Underwood »

UMR-alum-05 wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:41 am
TBone wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:36 am
UMR-alum-05 wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:19 am Holding out any commentary until we know something.

Id be all right with 11 for McTavish and our 2027 2nd back. I'd rather be shipping them something else in addition that we don't want, like Drouin.

I'll withhold judgement until we have details.
I wouldn't until I've exhausted my efforts to trade up and/or see what's available at 11.

If played as a center who would be his facilitator since he's really not one?

These centers who are really forwards feel like a recipe to underproductive money. More Pavel Buchnevich's.
End of the day I'm just not sure there is really that much difference between 11 and 15. Especially with the way the Blues have scouted the draft recently and had success wherever they've picked.

So I'm inclined to giving them the benefit of the doubt.

And if they truly go for that 2nd rounder back, that tells me they're thinking offer sheet. And thus i couldn't even completely judge this trade until that plays out
Getting the 2nd back would be interesting, and guessing Dorofeyev would be a possible target. Army could work out a trade with Vegas instead of going the offer sheet route, something Vegas would probably be open to since they know they are vulnerable. Vegas doesn’t seem to have any attachment to specific players - they are just a means to an end, so they aren’t keeping Dorofeyev at any cost.

Not sure I believe these Robertson rumors, by the way, as he would have wrecked our salary structure, where as Dorofeyev would probably fit in with what we currently have. It’s obviously inevitable that we have to pay someone more than $8 million, but if you suddenly drop $14 mil on Robertson, guys like Thomas are probably going to feel very underpaid.
Last edited by Frank Underwood on 26 Jun 2026 07:03 am, edited 3 times in total.
TBone
Forum User
Posts: 1612
Joined: 28 May 2024 09:00 am

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by TBone »

UMR-alum-05 wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:41 am And if they truly go for that 2nd rounder back, that tells me they're thinking offer sheet. And thus i couldn't even completely judge this trade until that plays out
This occured to me too.

Is that our 2nd or theirs? It has to be ours to propose an offer sheet, yes?
UMR-alum-05
Forum User
Posts: 1382
Joined: 21 May 2026 07:22 am

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by UMR-alum-05 »

TBone wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:57 am
UMR-alum-05 wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:41 am And if they truly go for that 2nd rounder back, that tells me they're thinking offer sheet. And thus i couldn't even completely judge this trade until that plays out
This occured to me too.

Is that our 2nd or theirs? It has to be ours to propose an offer sheet, yes?
Yeah would have to be our 2027 second rounder back from Anaheim that we traded them for Fowler.

Somebody like Dorofeyev is probably looking at the 1st-2nd-3rd compensation bracket. Has to be all your original picks.
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 2774
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by skilles »

Harry S Deals wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:38 am
DyadicEffect wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:28 am
TBone wrote: 26 Jun 2026 06:16 am Here is what Elliot Friedman is reporting.

This would be a HELL no from me, btw.
Thomas Welch
@twelcher15
.
@FriedgeHNIC reporting that he thinks a key part of the Blues offer is the 11th overall pick

Would you trade:

11th overall

For

McTavish
2027 2nd Round (Blues)?
I will hate if we do this. My only thought is we want our second back in the deal to offer sheet another player we have our eyes on?
I trust the amateur dept more than the pro side. I dunno I feel like the Blues can get a better player with #11 or jump up to 7th ish. I hate to use that much capital on a guy with red flags. Do we believe MM is a star? Seems over drafted at #3. I'm more comfortable with McMichael at center with his flags or a lesser move for another 2/3C tweener or just make the picks
The reality is Mctavish is far less of a risk than any of our draft picks, While I'd rather combine assets and get a bigger fish I'm don't know if that is even an option. I gotta think we have already explored other better options with no success.
juan good eye
Forum User
Posts: 782
Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by juan good eye »

Unfathomable wrote: 26 Jun 2026 04:41 am Friedman said he believes our package for mctavish centers around the 11th.. Don't like that 1 bit... better be more coming back hope nyr win. F sake
i swear if that happens fire army and steen on the spot
zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 2682
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by zamadoo »

I just think, what do the Ducks want, and why do they want to move McTavish?

As far as what he offers that we could use, I've identified one specific skill: shootouts. If he's a competitor who is hard to play against, I could see him as a fit, even on the wing.

Would a swap with NYR of Lafrenriere be in consideration? Or has he regained favor in NY? I've heard they're shopping Trocheck, but do the Ducks want him? I would.

Again, what do the Ducks want? Just a pick or two? Which would mean just to get him off their team...
Pierre McGuire
Forum User
Posts: 3253
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by Pierre McGuire »

I wouldn’t be giving up any firsts for McTavish.
TheHighHat
Forum User
Posts: 715
Joined: 26 Aug 2019 17:52 pm
Location: The Hills of STL

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by TheHighHat »

zamadoo wrote: 26 Jun 2026 07:30 am I just think, what do the Ducks want, and why do they want to move McTavish?

As far as what he offers that we could use, I've identified one specific skill: shootouts. If he's a competitor who is hard to play against, I could see him as a fit, even on the wing.

Would a swap with NYR of Lafrenriere be in consideration? Or has he regained favor in NY? I've heard they're shopping Trocheck, but do the Ducks want him? I would.

Again, what do the Ducks want? Just a pick or two? Which would mean just to get him off their team...
Maybe they want those 1st rounders to flip to Vancouver for Hronek.
I hope Army woke up this morning with a clear head.
Ty Webb
Forum User
Posts: 282
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:59 pm

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by Ty Webb »

Pierre McGuire wrote: 26 Jun 2026 07:33 am I wouldn’t be giving up any firsts for McTavish.
What about, as suggested above, 11 for McTavish and our second? With the thought that pick would be used for an offer sheet/trade
UMR-alum-05
Forum User
Posts: 1382
Joined: 21 May 2026 07:22 am

Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish

Post by UMR-alum-05 »

zamadoo wrote: 26 Jun 2026 07:30 am I just think, what do the Ducks want, and why do they want to move McTavish?

As far as what he offers that we could use, I've identified one specific skill: shootouts. If he's a competitor who is hard to play against, I could see him as a fit, even on the wing.

Would a swap with NYR of Lafrenriere be in consideration? Or has he regained favor in NY? I've heard they're shopping Trocheck, but do the Ducks want him? I would.

Again, what do the Ducks want? Just a pick or two? Which would mean just to get him off their team...
Didn't we just essentially want Kyrou off our team?

Players sometimes don't work out with teams or coaches. It happens.