We have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pmActually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:12 pmTrue but the debate is Wetherholt vs Donovan at second base. Wetherholt made 12 errors in 2025 mostly at shortstop. If he had made 12 errors at second base in MLB he would be tied for worst in MLB. If we do a complete dump and rebuild trying prospects to see how they do that's a repeat of last place from 3 years ago.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:02 pmDonovan won a gold glove as a utility player, not as a 2B. He was the most serviceable defensively at multiple positions, not the best defensive second baseman. This is not to say he isn't a good defensive second baseman.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:50 pmI see. Donovan is a gold glove second baseman. We don't have to speculate about that. We have differing ideas of how to build a championship team.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:28 pmWinn made 24 errors in his first minor league season (2021).ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:18 pm
Wetherholt made 12 errors at SS and 2B in 100 games. Donovan made 4 and is a Gold glove second baseman.
I'd build around one of the few strengths on the team but it wouldn't surprise me if the Cardinals do something different given the recent trajectory.
14 the next.
Then 11 in 2023.
Then jumped up to 18 in his first full year in STL.
But only 3 this past season.
Good reminder that it may not be wise to make any conclusions concerning the 10 errors Wetherholt made in 2025, his first full pro season, while playing 3 different positions across 2 minor league levels.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 995
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 995
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
Not even Frank Lane - nickname "trading lane" would trade a 23 year old shortstop who is a frontrunner for gold glove.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:24 pmOK my bad. I can see trading Winn but it isn't what I would prefer. I would prefer Winn/JJ up the middle the next 5 years. If Scott improves OBP, and if one of Bernal/Rodriguez turns into the real deal the cCards would be set up the middle for a long time.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:58 amI was responding to someone asserting we trade Winn and give the job to Wetherholt. The 2025 Cardinals are a last place team without Winn and Donovan up the middle. McGreevy's H/9 was better in St Louis this season than his career milb H/9. Add to our strength. That's how we build a winner.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:36 amYou seem to have a bee in your bonnet about JJ playing SS in the minors. Just to clear a few things up.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:54 pm
The most important thing at SS is defense. Wetherholt 12 errors in 100 games. Winn 3 errors in 129 games. Led MLB in fielding percentage.
First, every team challenges their prospects to play the hardest position they can in the minors to determine their limits even if they expect to move him to an easier slot by the times he reaches the majors. And any player capable of playing SS is able to play 2B.
And comparing JJ's defense this year against Winn defense is a bit unfair since Winn merits the gold glove this year IMO. He was elite on defense. To be fair look at Winn's defensive numbers in the minors with lesser 1Bs taking throws and rougher infields. They produced about the same defensive performance. I'm not saying JJ is Winn's equal on defense. Few are. Just saying his actual performance indicates he COULD play SS in the majors. Knowing this is valuable. It allows the team to not carry a backup able to play SS. JJ becomes the backup SS and the utility player a 2b/3b.
Unless something drastic happens to Winn he clearly owns SS for the foreseeable future. As such I expect spring to see JJ playing a lot of 2B with the big guys. Hopefully, since I view 2026 as another rebuild year, they send him down to AAA at season open. Only reason they shouldn't is if they invest heavily in an attempt to compete, or, JJ is so dominant in spring he might win ROY.
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
No offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pmActually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:12 pmTrue but the debate is Wetherholt vs Donovan at second base. Wetherholt made 12 errors in 2025 mostly at shortstop. If he had made 12 errors at second base in MLB he would be tied for worst in MLB. If we do a complete dump and rebuild trying prospects to see how they do that's a repeat of last place from 3 years ago.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:02 pmDonovan won a gold glove as a utility player, not as a 2B. He was the most serviceable defensively at multiple positions, not the best defensive second baseman. This is not to say he isn't a good defensive second baseman.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:50 pmI see. Donovan is a gold glove second baseman. We don't have to speculate about that. We have differing ideas of how to build a championship team.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:28 pm
Winn made 24 errors in his first minor league season (2021).
14 the next.
Then 11 in 2023.
Then jumped up to 18 in his first full year in STL.
But only 3 this past season.
Good reminder that it may not be wise to make any conclusions concerning the 10 errors Wetherholt made in 2025, his first full pro season, while playing 3 different positions across 2 minor league levels.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
agreed, That is a strange group there.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025 22:31 pm It'll be strange if Bloom actually leaves his hotel suite and interacts with other POBOs/GMs. Johnny bow ties always hid in his with Girsch and Flores. Very awkward and strange.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 995
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
Royals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pmActually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:12 pmTrue but the debate is Wetherholt vs Donovan at second base. Wetherholt made 12 errors in 2025 mostly at shortstop. If he had made 12 errors at second base in MLB he would be tied for worst in MLB. If we do a complete dump and rebuild trying prospects to see how they do that's a repeat of last place from 3 years ago.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:02 pmDonovan won a gold glove as a utility player, not as a 2B. He was the most serviceable defensively at multiple positions, not the best defensive second baseman. This is not to say he isn't a good defensive second baseman.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:50 pm
I see. Donovan is a gold glove second baseman. We don't have to speculate about that. We have differing ideas of how to build a championship team.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6324
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
So they should trade Donovan then sign him backScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pmActually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:12 pmTrue but the debate is Wetherholt vs Donovan at second base. Wetherholt made 12 errors in 2025 mostly at shortstop. If he had made 12 errors at second base in MLB he would be tied for worst in MLB. If we do a complete dump and rebuild trying prospects to see how they do that's a repeat of last place from 3 years ago.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:02 pm
Donovan won a gold glove as a utility player, not as a 2B. He was the most serviceable defensively at multiple positions, not the best defensive second baseman. This is not to say he isn't a good defensive second baseman.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 995
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
If he gets traded it's probably because Bloom can't afford him. A lot of teams regretting letting the Cubs get Hammel back including the Cardinals.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:27 pmSo they should trade Donovan then sign him backScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pmActually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:12 pm
True but the debate is Wetherholt vs Donovan at second base. Wetherholt made 12 errors in 2025 mostly at shortstop. If he had made 12 errors at second base in MLB he would be tied for worst in MLB. If we do a complete dump and rebuild trying prospects to see how they do that's a repeat of last place from 3 years ago.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
You: “cubs and royals were in last place!”ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pmActually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:12 pmTrue but the debate is Wetherholt vs Donovan at second base. Wetherholt made 12 errors in 2025 mostly at shortstop. If he had made 12 errors at second base in MLB he would be tied for worst in MLB. If we do a complete dump and rebuild trying prospects to see how they do that's a repeat of last place from 3 years ago.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:02 pm
Donovan won a gold glove as a utility player, not as a 2B. He was the most serviceable defensively at multiple positions, not the best defensive second baseman. This is not to say he isn't a good defensive second baseman.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Me: “cards were in 2nd to last place in 2025.”
You: “JS had 1 1/2 year left, hammel walk year.”
Me: Donovan has two years left. Why is that a huge difference?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6324
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
Hey he did make some good points on why they should be traded lolecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 22:31 pmYou: “cubs and royals were in last place!”ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pmActually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:12 pm
True but the debate is Wetherholt vs Donovan at second base. Wetherholt made 12 errors in 2025 mostly at shortstop. If he had made 12 errors at second base in MLB he would be tied for worst in MLB. If we do a complete dump and rebuild trying prospects to see how they do that's a repeat of last place from 3 years ago.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Me: “cards were in 2nd to last place in 2025.”
You: “JS had 1 1/2 year left, hammel walk year.”
Me: Donovan has two years left. Why is that a huge difference?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 995
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
Your point is what? Chapman was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old? Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million per year of what he signed for. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 22:31 pmYou: “cubs and royals were in last place!”ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pmActually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:12 pm
True but the debate is Wetherholt vs Donovan at second base. Wetherholt made 12 errors in 2025 mostly at shortstop. If he had made 12 errors at second base in MLB he would be tied for worst in MLB. If we do a complete dump and rebuild trying prospects to see how they do that's a repeat of last place from 3 years ago.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Me: “cards were in 2nd to last place in 2025.”
You: “JS had 1 1/2 year left, hammel walk year.”
Me: Donovan has two years left. Why is that a huge difference?
I'm unclear as to what you are saying.
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
We are talking Hammel and Jeff S.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:32 amYour point is what? Chapman was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old? Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million per year of what he signed for. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 22:31 pmYou: “cubs and royals were in last place!”ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 amHow has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.Melville wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 20:42 pm
Actually, the debate is not about Donovan vs. Wetherholt at second base.
Rather, it is a matter of strategic priorities as Bloom begins to put his vision of the future in place.
Who will be the better bat or better glove in 2026 is not all that relevant.
Can Wetherholt and Winn be the middle infield for the next several years?
That is one of the questions Bloom will seek an answer to.
And Donovan simply is not part of that specific question.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Me: “cards were in 2nd to last place in 2025.”
You: “JS had 1 1/2 year left, hammel walk year.”
Me: Donovan has two years left. Why is that a huge difference?
I'm unclear as to what you are saying.
You realize the Cubs had a REALLY good starting staff in 2014 and were in year 3 of a crazy rebuild. Why would they trade Jeff S and Hammel? 40% OF THEIR STARTING STAFF???
You said Jeff S. rejected a deal. So? There's like nearly two years to offer another deal. YET, they traded him.
WHY?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 995
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
You asked about the Royals trading Chapman. He was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old. Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million a year of what he got from the Giants. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract? They traded Hammel because they planned to re-sign him and did.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:38 amWe are talking Hammel and Jeff S.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:32 amYour point is what? Chapman was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old? Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million per year of what he signed for. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 22:31 pmYou: “cubs and royals were in last place!”ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 amBut then, that is not what I am advocating at all.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 06:25 am
How has that formula worked for the Pirates? Get rid of the all star and try a prospect.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Me: “cards were in 2nd to last place in 2025.”
You: “JS had 1 1/2 year left, hammel walk year.”
Me: Donovan has two years left. Why is that a huge difference?
I'm unclear as to what you are saying.
You realize the Cubs had a REALLY good starting staff in 2014 and were in year 3 of a crazy rebuild. Why would they trade Jeff S and Hammel? 40% OF THEIR STARTING STAFF???
You said Jeff S. rejected a deal. So? There's like nearly two years to offer another deal. YET, they traded him.
WHY?
What is your point as it relates to Bloom shopping Donovan?
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
Answer my question.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:49 amYou asked about the Royals trading Chapman. He was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old. Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million a year of what he got from the Giants. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract? They traded Hammel because they planned to re-sign him and did.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:38 amWe are talking Hammel and Jeff S.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:32 amYour point is what? Chapman was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old? Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million per year of what he signed for. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 22:31 pmYou: “cubs and royals were in last place!”ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pmA factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.Melville wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 09:56 am
But then, that is not what I am advocating at all.
In fact, I have very specifically said that Mootbaar and Walker should be traded this off-season.
Not Donovan.
Instead, I have said Donovan should move to LF, serving as insurance at both 2b and 3b through July.
Then, evaluate.
In the meanwhile, determine Donovan's interest in an extension.
Ultimately, perhaps Donovan stays long term, or perhaps he does not.
But that should be decided in July.
Strategically, that is the right decision.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Me: “cards were in 2nd to last place in 2025.”
You: “JS had 1 1/2 year left, hammel walk year.”
Me: Donovan has two years left. Why is that a huge difference?
I'm unclear as to what you are saying.
You realize the Cubs had a REALLY good starting staff in 2014 and were in year 3 of a crazy rebuild. Why would they trade Jeff S and Hammel? 40% OF THEIR STARTING STAFF???
You said Jeff S. rejected a deal. So? There's like nearly two years to offer another deal. YET, they traded him.
WHY?
What is your point as it relates to Bloom shopping Donovan?
Why would the ascending 2014 cubs trade 40% of their really good pitching staff????
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 995
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
You asked why the Royals traded Chapman and why the Cubs traded Samardzija and Hammel. I researched and explained in great detail why they traded them. What part of my explanation do you fail to comprehend?ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:52 amAnswer my question.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:49 amYou asked about the Royals trading Chapman. He was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old. Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million a year of what he got from the Giants. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract? They traded Hammel because they planned to re-sign him and did.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:38 amWe are talking Hammel and Jeff S.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:32 amYour point is what? Chapman was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old? Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million per year of what he signed for. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 22:31 pmYou: “cubs and royals were in last place!”ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 11:51 amThat's what the Pirates would do.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 10:35 amHere is the solution to the quandary posed in your post:ramfandan wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025 18:45 pm
A factor not being addressed currently is how Donovan's camp plays this scenario . It's mentioned that the Cardinals should decide in July . While that may be a great time for the team to decide , Donovan's agent could press for an extention this offseason and if Cardinals do not do one, they may say OK , but Donovan will play out this year and next on the final two arb years.
The Cardinals would risk the chance of signing him long term and if he plays lights out from March til July , Donovan's side could say Well you had your shot at signing him long term this past winter and you passed on it , so he played for less again this year than what the first year of the long term deal would have been. so too bad.
Then sure Bloom could trade him in July (and a big 2026 may help recoup something good ) but also the trading team will be stingy on the return offer since they have him for 1 yr & 2 months instead of 2 full years .
Donovan is in a pretty good position too on this situation and we can't assume that come next July if Cardinals want to keep him long term that he will necessarily do that . He may elect to go to free agency after the Cardinals passed both last year and then this offseason to sign him long term. Nobody would blame Donovan for going that route. Other players who wanted extensions with the Cardinals and did not get them have gone the free agent route ie Jack Flaherty
Sometimes fans will only consider what's in the best interest of the team in these timetables. The player also can play the game too . They are looking out for No. 1 . Of course Bloom has been around the block a few times and he certainly knows that Donovan has some leverage in this situation too IF Cardinals want him long term.
Trade Donovan now.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Me: “cards were in 2nd to last place in 2025.”
You: “JS had 1 1/2 year left, hammel walk year.”
Me: Donovan has two years left. Why is that a huge difference?
I'm unclear as to what you are saying.
You realize the Cubs had a REALLY good starting staff in 2014 and were in year 3 of a crazy rebuild. Why would they trade Jeff S and Hammel? 40% OF THEIR STARTING STAFF???
You said Jeff S. rejected a deal. So? There's like nearly two years to offer another deal. YET, they traded him.
WHY?
What is your point as it relates to Bloom shopping Donovan?
Why would the ascending 2014 cubs trade 40% of their really good pitching staff????
More detail. They were traded on July 4, 2014. The Cubs 38-46 and in last place. Are you saying the Cardinals who were 5 games over .500 at the all star break should have traded Donovan?
I'm confused.
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
Why would a team, the 2014 cubs, who are building for the future trade two really good starters? One, Jeff, being an all star?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 09:11 amYou asked why the Royals traded Chapman and why the Cubs traded Samardzija and Hammel. I researched and explained in great detail why they traded them. What part of my explanation do you fail to comprehend?ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:52 amAnswer my question.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:49 amYou asked about the Royals trading Chapman. He was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old. Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million a year of what he got from the Giants. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract? They traded Hammel because they planned to re-sign him and did.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:38 amWe are talking Hammel and Jeff S.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 08:32 amYour point is what? Chapman was 35 years old. Is Donovan 35 years old? Cubs offered Samardzija within $1 million per year of what he signed for. Have the Cardinals offered Donovan a market value contract?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 22:31 pmYou: “cubs and royals were in last place!”ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 20:25 pmRoyals were in last place and Chapman was 35 years old.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 17:51 pmNo offense, but I feel like I'm talking to someone who just started following baseball.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:45 pmWe have no Pujols. Donovan is top 5 at his position in MLB. Build from our strengths. Subtract one place to add another = more losing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025 13:23 pmBrendan Donovan is not the key to the Cardinals’ future success despite your infatuation with him.
He is a solid player but not some cornerstone player.
The Cardinals will not be contending for anything meaningful during the next couple years.
Trade Donovan now while his value is high.
Why did the Royals trade Chapman in 2023?
Why did the 2014 Cubs trade Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel?
Cubs were in last place.
Samardzija had one year left Cubs offered 5 @ $85 and he turned it down so they traded him. Signed for the Giants for 5 @ $90.
Hammel was in his walk year. They traded him in late July and then signed him as a free agent. Shrewd move. They got 2 good years out of him @ $10 per year and he sports a world series ring.
Me: “cards were in 2nd to last place in 2025.”
You: “JS had 1 1/2 year left, hammel walk year.”
Me: Donovan has two years left. Why is that a huge difference?
I'm unclear as to what you are saying.
You realize the Cubs had a REALLY good starting staff in 2014 and were in year 3 of a crazy rebuild. Why would they trade Jeff S and Hammel? 40% OF THEIR STARTING STAFF???
You said Jeff S. rejected a deal. So? There's like nearly two years to offer another deal. YET, they traded him.
WHY?
What is your point as it relates to Bloom shopping Donovan?
Why would the ascending 2014 cubs trade 40% of their really good pitching staff????
More detail. They were traded on July 4, 2014. The Cubs 38-46 and in last place. Are you saying the Cardinals who were 5 games over .500 at the all star break should have traded Donovan?
I'm confused.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 257
- Joined: 24 May 2024 11:01 am
Re: Bloom will listen to interest for Donovan and Noot
Because of his age, years left and the teams severe lack of a couple of cornerstone marquee players andddddd a pending lockout in 2027. I feel the team should try to sign Donovan to a team friendly 12 to 14 mill a year deal for 5 years to play the OF. He will most likely pass on that. The team should then pursue the best trade they can get immediately. The impending lockout is what no one is considering here. It will cost the team development and chemistry building time. Even if they lock out for half a season it will make 2027 a wasted year and the real fun begins after. I think Bloom and Dewitt are planning for this.