Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
TheHighHat
- Forum User
- Posts: 715
- Joined: 26 Aug 2019 17:52 pm
- Location: The Hills of STL
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
At pick 11 we would be giving up Gustafsson or Cullen.
If both of those guys go top 10, that means Smits and/or Verhoeff drop to 11.
If both of those guys go top 10, that means Smits and/or Verhoeff drop to 11.
-
zamadoo
- Forum User
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
TheHighHat wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:35 amMaybe they want those 1st rounders to flip to Vancouver for Hronek.zamadoo wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:30 am I just think, what do the Ducks want, and why do they want to move McTavish?
As far as what he offers that we could use, I've identified one specific skill: shootouts. If he's a competitor who is hard to play against, I could see him as a fit, even on the wing.
Would a swap with NYR of Lafrenriere be in consideration? Or has he regained favor in NY? I've heard they're shopping Trocheck, but do the Ducks want him? I would.
Again, what do the Ducks want? Just a pick or two? Which would mean just to get him off their team...
I hope Army woke up this morning with a clear head.
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 3253
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
There is nothing certain with an offer sheet. Still not giving up a first on a player that is likely already at his ceiling range at this point. This is a player that Anaheim doesn’t even want.
-
UMR-alum-05
- Forum User
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: 21 May 2026 07:22 am
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
A year ago he was a hot commodity and viewed in a totally different light. His coach at that time is now a blues assistant.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:45 amThere is nothing certain with an offer sheet. Still not giving up a first on a player that is likely already at his ceiling range at this point. This is a player that Anaheim doesn’t even want.
-
Ty Webb
- Forum User
- Posts: 282
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:59 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
I agree. Especially #11. Was just wondering if the second would be enough of a sweetener.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:45 amThere is nothing certain with an offer sheet. Still not giving up a first on a player that is likely already at his ceiling range at this point. This is a player that Anaheim doesn’t even want.
I feel if he wasn’t the third overall pick that his return wouldn’t be anywhere near a mid first round pick. Maybe 29. But Q benching him and moving him to the wing tells me enough to not want to go in big for this kid.
-
BluesDom
- Forum User
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: 19 Jun 2024 18:16 pm
-
Ty Webb
- Forum User
- Posts: 282
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:59 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
True. But that coach got fired and the new coach benched him and moved him to the wing. I’m not giving them #11 for him.UMR-alum-05 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:49 amA year ago he was a hot commodity and viewed in a totally different light. His coach at that time is now a blues assistant.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:45 amThere is nothing certain with an offer sheet. Still not giving up a first on a player that is likely already at his ceiling range at this point. This is a player that Anaheim doesn’t even want.
Who knows, maybe the Rags come in with a better offer and this is all for nothing
Last edited by Ty Webb on 26 Jun 2026 07:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 3253
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
Just because he’s a center doesn’t make it a good deal. I’d rather have Zary at this point, he can play center and he’s a gamer and you can get him for a lot lessskilles wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:11 amThe reality is Mctavish is far less of a risk than any of our draft picks, While I'd rather combine assets and get a bigger fish I'm don't know if that is even an option. I gotta think we have already explored other better options with no success.Harry S Deals wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 06:38 amI trust the amateur dept more than the pro side. I dunno I feel like the Blues can get a better player with #11 or jump up to 7th ish. I hate to use that much capital on a guy with red flags. Do we believe MM is a star? Seems over drafted at #3. I'm more comfortable with McMichael at center with his flags or a lesser move for another 2/3C tweener or just make the picksDyadicEffect wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 06:28 amI will hate if we do this. My only thought is we want our second back in the deal to offer sheet another player we have our eyes on?TBone wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 06:16 am Here is what Elliot Friedman is reporting.
This would be a HELL no from me, btw.
Thomas Welch
@twelcher15
.
@FriedgeHNIC reporting that he thinks a key part of the Blues offer is the 11th overall pick
Would you trade:
11th overall
For
McTavish
2027 2nd Round (Blues)?
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 3253
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
Sure you can deal for him but I’m not giving up the first…that’s desperation.UMR-alum-05 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:49 amA year ago he was a hot commodity and viewed in a totally different light. His coach at that time is now a blues assistant.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:45 amThere is nothing certain with an offer sheet. Still not giving up a first on a player that is likely already at his ceiling range at this point. This is a player that Anaheim doesn’t even want.
-
WilliamWestcliffe
- Forum User
- Posts: 317
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:46 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
I would 100% roll the dice on McTavish.
That said if the Blues really offered #11 we’d be talking about this trade in past tense.
NYR supposedly offered #26. If its taking Anaheim this long to decide, I’m guessing Blues are offering #29+.
That said if the Blues really offered #11 we’d be talking about this trade in past tense.
NYR supposedly offered #26. If its taking Anaheim this long to decide, I’m guessing Blues are offering #29+.
-
David S. Pumpkins
- Forum User
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 08 Jul 2018 08:11 am
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
Probably a dumb question. I see everyone talking about using 11th pick to get McTavish and our 2nd round pick back and then offer sheeting Don’t we have to keep 11 to include in the offer sheet since it is also our original pick?Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:45 amThere is nothing certain with an offer sheet. Still not giving up a first on a player that is likely already at his ceiling range at this point. This is a player that Anaheim doesn’t even want.
-
UMR-alum-05
- Forum User
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: 21 May 2026 07:22 am
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
What if we offered 11 and BuchWilliamWestcliffe wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:57 am I would 100% roll the dice on McTavish.
That said if the Blues really offered #11 we’d be talking about this trade in past tense.
NYR supposedly offered #26. If its taking Anaheim this long to decide, I’m guessing Blues are offering #29+.
-
WilliamWestcliffe
- Forum User
- Posts: 317
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:46 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
An offer sheet in 2026 would utilize your 2027 draft picks as compensation.David S. Pumpkins wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:58 amProbably a dumb question. I see everyone talking about using 11th pick to get McTavish and our 2nd round pick back and then offer sheeting Don’t we have to keep 11 to include in the offer sheet since it is also our original pick?Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:45 amThere is nothing certain with an offer sheet. Still not giving up a first on a player that is likely already at his ceiling range at this point. This is a player that Anaheim doesn’t even want.
-
David S. Pumpkins
- Forum User
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 08 Jul 2018 08:11 am
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
Didn’t realize the 2nd was next years draft. Thanks for the clarification. Knew I was missing something.
-
Ty Webb
- Forum User
- Posts: 282
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:59 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
UMR-alum-05 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 08:00 amWhat if we offered 11 and BuchWilliamWestcliffe wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 07:57 am I would 100% roll the dice on McTavish.
That said if the Blues really offered #11 we’d be talking about this trade in past tense.
NYR supposedly offered #26. If its taking Anaheim this long to decide, I’m guessing Blues are offering #29+.
For McTavish? If so that’s a no for me
-
TBone
- Forum User
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: 28 May 2024 09:00 am
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
If he's not a center or a poor one, where would he slot in as a LW? 2nd line? 3rd line? And do we want a LW at $7 mil x 5 for 20 goals?
It feels like a younger Buchnevich unless the Blues have a real way to fix his deficiencies as a center. Hope they've got it figured out.