We are watching a AAA team

[Ozziesfan41]

Here we go again, another thread hi-jacked about how great Matheny was as a manager.

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

How did they attempt to get better? they won 83 games last season and Mo did nothing in the off season except try to trade Areando which he failed at

[desertrat23]

Here we go again, another thread hi-jacked about how great Matheny was as a manager.

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

Right on, hugeCardfan.

I believe the lack fans attending games this have spoken. Not just two random posters.

Well, one can constantly complain (which solves nothing), or one can dig into the facts to see how the higher level prospects are responding to the increase in traveling specialty instructors and enhanced training equipment.

It’s always amazing to me how eager you are to give these people credit for putting out a fire that they intentionally started.

Constant negativity solves nothing. Unless it’s just for you if you need the continuously vent.

Neither my pessimism nor your optimism solve anything. We’re a couple of clowns who spout off on a message board.

[WLTFE]

Exactly...the vast majority of posters are Cards fans and have opinions...nothing more...and then you have a few who claim to have inside information and challenge anyone who is critical of DeTwit and Mo-ran...methinks they are full of [shirt]!

[Cranny]

Here we go again, another thread hi-jacked about how great Matheny was as a manager.

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

Right on, hugeCardfan.

I believe the lack fans attending games this have spoken. Not just two random posters.

Well, one can constantly complain (which solves nothing), or one can dig into the facts to see how the higher level prospects are responding to the increase in traveling specialty instructors and enhanced training equipment.

It’s always amazing to me how eager you are to give these people credit for putting out a fire that they intentionally started.

Constant negativity solves nothing. Unless it’s just for you if you need the continuously vent.

Neither my pessimism nor your optimism solve anything. We’re a couple of clowns who spout off on a message board.

Just looking at guys worth saving, and prospects coming up.
A look to the future. Far from wallowing in negativity about the present.

[OldRed]

Here we go again, another thread hi-jacked about how great Matheny was as a manager.

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

Right on, hugeCardfan.

I believe the lack fans attending games this have spoken. Not just two random posters.

Well, one can constantly complain (which solves nothing), or one can dig into the facts to see how the higher level prospects are responding to the increase in traveling specialty instructors and enhanced training equipment.

It’s always amazing to me how eager you are to give these people credit for putting out a fire that they intentionally started.

Constant negativity solves nothing. Unless it’s just for you if you need the continuously vent.

Neither my pessimism nor your optimism solve anything. We’re a couple of clowns who spout off on a message board.

Just looking at guys worth saving, and prospects coming up.
A look to the future. Far from wallowing in negativity about the present.

You just can't see what has happened. Again, Cranny's Follies.

[Cranny]

Here we go again, another thread hi-jacked about how great Matheny was as a manager.

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

Right on, hugeCardfan.

I believe the lack fans attending games this have spoken. Not just two random posters.

Well, one can constantly complain (which solves nothing), or one can dig into the facts to see how the higher level prospects are responding to the increase in traveling specialty instructors and enhanced training equipment.

It’s always amazing to me how eager you are to give these people credit for putting out a fire that they intentionally started.

Constant negativity solves nothing. Unless it’s just for you if you need the continuously vent.

Neither my pessimism nor your optimism solve anything. We’re a couple of clowns who spout off on a message board.

Just looking at guys worth saving, and prospects coming up.
A look to the future. Far from wallowing in negativity about the present.

You just can't see what has happened. Again, Cranny's Follies.

You just can't help yourself, can you Red? Dissing/trolling a fellow fan/poster instead of talking baseball? Which adds zero value. And coming up with "follies"? No one wants to read that kind of senseless tripe. It's a waste of their time.

[OldRed]

Here we go again, another thread hi-jacked about how great Matheny was as a manager.

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

Right on, hugeCardfan.

I believe the lack fans attending games this have spoken. Not just two random posters.

Well, one can constantly complain (which solves nothing), or one can dig into the facts to see how the higher level prospects are responding to the increase in traveling specialty instructors and enhanced training equipment.

It’s always amazing to me how eager you are to give these people credit for putting out a fire that they intentionally started.

Constant negativity solves nothing. Unless it’s just for you if you need the continuously vent.

Neither my pessimism nor your optimism solve anything. We’re a couple of clowns who spout off on a message board.

Just looking at guys worth saving, and prospects coming up.
A look to the future. Far from wallowing in negativity about the present.

You just can't see what has happened. Again, Cranny's Follies.

You just can't help yourself, can you Red? Dissing/trolling a fellow fan/poster instead of talking baseball? Which adds zero value. And coming up with "follies"? No one wants to read that kind of senseless tripe. It's a waste of their time.

No one wants to read our follies. You have gotten very old with your posts.

[Cranny]

Here we go again, another thread hi-jacked about how great Matheny was as a manager.

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

Right on, hugeCardfan.

I believe the lack fans attending games this have spoken. Not just two random posters.

Well, one can constantly complain (which solves nothing), or one can dig into the facts to see how the higher level prospects are responding to the increase in traveling specialty instructors and enhanced training equipment.

It’s always amazing to me how eager you are to give these people credit for putting out a fire that they intentionally started.

Constant negativity solves nothing. Unless it’s just for you if you need the continuously vent.

Neither my pessimism nor your optimism solve anything. We’re a couple of clowns who spout off on a message board.

Just looking at guys worth saving, and prospects coming up.
A look to the future. Far from wallowing in negativity about the present.

You just can't see what has happened. Again, Cranny's Follies.

You just can't help yourself, can you Red? Dissing/trolling a fellow fan/poster instead of talking baseball? Which adds zero value. And coming up with "follies"? No one wants to read that kind of senseless tripe. It's a waste of their time.

No one wants to read our follies. You have gotten very old with your posts.

Doubt that, when I talk about positive progress by some of our minor leaguers. And post facts to back that up. You have never followed or cared about that. Probably never will, even though that's where the majority of our future successes may come from. You're still stuck in the mode of signing big time free agents, and that's going to continue to be very frustrating for you. That's what's gotten "very old".

[desertrat23]

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

Right on, hugeCardfan.

I believe the lack fans attending games this have spoken. Not just two random posters.

Well, one can constantly complain (which solves nothing), or one can dig into the facts to see how the higher level prospects are responding to the increase in traveling specialty instructors and enhanced training equipment.

It’s always amazing to me how eager you are to give these people credit for putting out a fire that they intentionally started.

Constant negativity solves nothing. Unless it’s just for you if you need the continuously vent.

Neither my pessimism nor your optimism solve anything. We’re a couple of clowns who spout off on a message board.

Just looking at guys worth saving, and prospects coming up.
A look to the future. Far from wallowing in negativity about the present.

You just can't see what has happened. Again, Cranny's Follies.

You just can't help yourself, can you Red? Dissing/trolling a fellow fan/poster instead of talking baseball? Which adds zero value. And coming up with "follies"? No one wants to read that kind of senseless tripe. It's a waste of their time.

No one wants to read our follies. You have gotten very old with your posts.

Doubt that, when I talk about positive progress by some of our minor leaguers. And post facts to back that up. You have never followed or cared about that. Probably never will, even though that's where the majority of our future successes may come from. You're still stuck in the mode of signing big time free agents, and that's going to continue to be very frustrating for you. That's what's gotten "very old".

Most people want a winning team. They don’t care where the players come from, and don’t think you get bonus points for drafting them instead of signing them.

[WLTFE]

Meanwhile, everyone is still patiently waiting for Cranny’s answer to the legitimate question posed earlier in the thread (and reposted, quoted, or referenced by several other posters since):

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?

See here:

apparently Baghdad Bob doesn't like poopie words and is a self appointed mod!

I can’t read your post, but you’ve been warned to stop stalking by the moderators (like I’ve been warned) so I suggest you stop before you’re banned.

And here:

Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.

So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.

You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.

As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?

Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.

What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?

The post I quoted above was at 11:01am. You posted IN THIS THREAD at 3:25pm. Don't lie, it's quite unbecoming. You have no intention of answering the question.

I am participating because I'm curious what the answer is, even though I know we'll never get it.

The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

I guess this is the rare exception when Cranny doesn’t have to have (and doesn’t want) the last word . . .

Any response from Baghdad Bob?

[Cranny]

Meanwhile, everyone is still patiently waiting for Cranny’s answer to the legitimate question posed earlier in the thread (and reposted, quoted, or referenced by several other posters since):

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?

See here:

apparently Baghdad Bob doesn't like poopie words and is a self appointed mod!

I can’t read your post, but you’ve been warned to stop stalking by the moderators (like I’ve been warned) so I suggest you stop before you’re banned.

And here:

Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.

So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.

You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.

As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?

Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.

What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?

The post I quoted above was at 11:01am. You posted IN THIS THREAD at 3:25pm. Don't lie, it's quite unbecoming. You have no intention of answering the question.

I am participating because I'm curious what the answer is, even though I know we'll never get it.

The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

I guess this is the rare exception when Cranny doesn’t have to have (and doesn’t want) the last word . . .

Any response from Baghdad Bob?

Hey, NY! Simply wonderful to see you post. Have a delightful evening. All the best to you.

[Braund241]

How far did you want a thread claiming that a club playing .500 was AAA caliber to go?

In the old days when we had a mediocre club we simply grinned and bore it until the team got better which it always did....eventually. This team will do the same in a few years. There's plenty of talent waiting in the wings.

I get that an 80 year old doesn't have much patience for mediocrity, but it isn't like the team isn't competitive or isn't attempting to get better. Denying that is disingenuous.

Right on, hugeCardfan.

I believe the lack fans attending games this have spoken. Not just two random posters.

Well, one can constantly complain (which solves nothing), or one can dig into the facts to see how the higher level prospects are responding to the increase in traveling specialty instructors and enhanced training equipment.

It’s always amazing to me how eager you are to give these people credit for putting out a fire that they intentionally started.

Constant negativity solves nothing. Unless it’s just for you if you need the continuously vent.

Neither my pessimism nor your optimism solve anything. We’re a couple of clowns who spout off on a message board.

Just looking at guys worth saving, and prospects coming up.
A look to the future. Far from wallowing in negativity about the present.

You just can't see what has happened. Again, Cranny's Follies.

You just can't help yourself, can you Red? Dissing/trolling a fellow fan/poster instead of talking baseball? Which adds zero value. And coming up with "follies"? No one wants to read that kind of senseless tripe. It's a waste of their time.

No one wants to read our follies. You have gotten very old with your posts.

Doubt that, when I talk about positive progress by some of our minor leaguers. And post facts to back that up. You have never followed or cared about that. Probably never will, even though that's where the majority of our future successes may come from. You're still stuck in the mode of signing big time free agents, and that's going to continue to be very frustrating for you. That's what's gotten "very old".

Who’s the last minor league player who made a difference at the major league level.

[NYCardsFan]

Meanwhile, everyone is still patiently waiting for Cranny’s answer to the legitimate question posed earlier in the thread (and reposted, quoted, or referenced by several other posters since):

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?

See here:

apparently Baghdad Bob doesn't like poopie words and is a self appointed mod!

I can’t read your post, but you’ve been warned to stop stalking by the moderators (like I’ve been warned) so I suggest you stop before you’re banned.

And here:

Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.

So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.

You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.

As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?

Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.

What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?

The post I quoted above was at 11:01am. You posted IN THIS THREAD at 3:25pm. Don't lie, it's quite unbecoming. You have no intention of answering the question.

I am participating because I'm curious what the answer is, even though I know we'll never get it.

The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

I guess this is the rare exception when Cranny doesn’t have to have (and doesn’t want) the last word . . .

Any response from Baghdad Bob?

Hey, NY! Simply wonderful to see you post. Have a delightful evening. All the best to you.

Why are you addressing me? I didn’t post that this evening, WLTFE did. You’re replying to his post, not mine. (But how is that possible if you “have him on ignore” and “can’t see his posts”?)

But congratulations on yet another miraculous direct quote-reply (with no intervening “chain of posts”) to someone you claim to have on your Foe List.

Or should I say Faux List?

[WLTFE]

Meanwhile, everyone is still patiently waiting for Cranny’s answer to the legitimate question posed earlier in the thread (and reposted, quoted, or referenced by several other posters since):

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?

See here:

apparently Baghdad Bob doesn't like poopie words and is a self appointed mod!

I can’t read your post, but you’ve been warned to stop stalking by the moderators (like I’ve been warned) so I suggest you stop before you’re banned.

And here:

Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.

So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.

You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.

As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?

Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.

What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?

The post I quoted above was at 11:01am. You posted IN THIS THREAD at 3:25pm. Don't lie, it's quite unbecoming. You have no intention of answering the question.

I am participating because I'm curious what the answer is, even though I know we'll never get it.

The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

I guess this is the rare exception when Cranny doesn’t have to have (and doesn’t want) the last word . . .

Any response from Baghdad Bob?

Hey, NY! Simply wonderful to see you post. Have a delightful evening. All the best to you.

Why are you addressing me? I didn’t post that this evening, WLTFE did. You’re replying to his post, not mine. (But how is that possible if you “have him on ignore” and “can’t see his posts”?)

But congratulations on yet another miraculous direct quote-reply (with no intervening “chain of posts”) to someone you claim to have on your Foe List.

Or should I say Faux List?

Baghdad Bob continues to lie ..and troll Red...sad and pathetic!

[sikeston bulldog2]

Meanwhile, everyone is still patiently waiting for Cranny’s answer to the legitimate question posed earlier in the thread (and reposted, quoted, or referenced by several other posters since):

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?

See here:

apparently Baghdad Bob doesn't like poopie words and is a self appointed mod!

I can’t read your post, but you’ve been warned to stop stalking by the moderators (like I’ve been warned) so I suggest you stop before you’re banned.

And here:

Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.

So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.

You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.

As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?

Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.

What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?

The post I quoted above was at 11:01am. You posted IN THIS THREAD at 3:25pm. Don't lie, it's quite unbecoming. You have no intention of answering the question.

I am participating because I'm curious what the answer is, even though I know we'll never get it.

The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

I guess this is the rare exception when Cranny doesn’t have to have (and doesn’t want) the last word . . .

Any response from Baghdad Bob?

Hey, NY! Simply wonderful to see you post. Have a delightful evening. All the best to you.

I guess he did try and get the last word. Albeit quite meager.

[WLTFE]

Meanwhile, everyone is still patiently waiting for Cranny’s answer to the legitimate question posed earlier in the thread (and reposted, quoted, or referenced by several other posters since):

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?

See here:

apparently Baghdad Bob doesn't like poopie words and is a self appointed mod!

I can’t read your post, but you’ve been warned to stop stalking by the moderators (like I’ve been warned) so I suggest you stop before you’re banned.

And here:

Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.

So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.

You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.

As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?

Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.

What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?

The post I quoted above was at 11:01am. You posted IN THIS THREAD at 3:25pm. Don't lie, it's quite unbecoming. You have no intention of answering the question.

I am participating because I'm curious what the answer is, even though I know we'll never get it.

The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

I guess this is the rare exception when Cranny doesn’t have to have (and doesn’t want) the last word . . .

Any response from Baghdad Bob?

Hey, NY! Simply wonderful to see you post. Have a delightful evening. All the best to you.

I guess he did try and get the last word. Albeit quite meager.

...betting he's not done...