Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 10:22 am
They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.
Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?
Cranny wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 08:09 am
Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.
So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.
You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.
As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?
Can confirm it's impossible, you can't even see what FOEs have written when they quote your post and you get a notification... looking forward to Cranny's response I'm sure it will resolve all our confusion
WLTFE wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 06:27 am
Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD
I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.
Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.
I thought you were too sophisticated and holy to resort to name calling, Cranny. Disappointing. Very disappointing.
Sorry, QV. When a guy shadows me and trolls me after every time I post over the past year or so, it gets old. My apologies. Lost my own composure.
desertrat23 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 21:49 pm
Getting shut out at home by a team 58 games under .500 before mid-August sounds pretty AAA to me.
This thread, although slightly hyperbolic, shows why fans are staying away....boring, and in the 9th...did you feel like they had anyone who would step up?...
desertrat23 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 21:49 pm
Getting shut out at home by a team 58 games under .500 before mid-August sounds pretty AAA to me.
This thread, although slightly hyperbolic, shows why fans are staying away....boring, and in the 9th...did you feel like they had anyone who would step up?...
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:36 am
Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.
Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.
He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?
Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?
They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.
Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?
Cranny wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 08:09 am
Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.
So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.
You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.
As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?
Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.
The Cardinals may not be a AAA team, but they sure as hell have had their fair share of trouble beating the (all but) AAA team out of Denver this season!!
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:36 am
Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.
Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.
He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?
Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?
They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.
Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?
Cranny wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 08:09 am
Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.
So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.
You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.
As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?
Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.
What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:36 am
Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.
Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.
He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?
Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?
They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.
Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?
Cranny wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 08:09 am
Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.
So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.
You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.
As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?
Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.
What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?
The post I quoted above was at 11:01am. You posted IN THIS THREAD at 3:25pm. Don't lie, it's quite unbecoming. You have no intention of answering the question.
I am participating because I'm curious what the answer is, even though I know we'll never get it.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
That may be AN answer but it isn't THE answer. At least not to the question posed.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:36 am
Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.
Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.
He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?
Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?
They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.
Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?
Cranny wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 08:09 am
Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.
So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.
You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.
As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?
Evidently he doesn't have an answer. What a shocker.
What a shocker that I don't spend 24 hours on here, sdaltons. And why are you participating in this discussion? Is piling on you your thing? Is it how you get your jollies?
You did it again. Set yourself up for failure. You ask a poster why he participated? I told you, it’s an open Net. An open Mic. Anyone can join at any time.
Then you go with the negativity- is “piling” on your thing; “ is it how you get your jollies.”
Fighting words that will invite that person into your discussion, already littered with numerous posters.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
That may be AN answer but it isn't THE answer. At least not to the question posed.
I have him on ignore...can read a quoted post...but can't read any posts he initiates...Methinks someone has been caught....time for the victimization response!
