We are watching a AAA team

[sikeston bulldog2]

Their pitcher is 3-12, 5.16 era, 1.49 whip with 80 strikeouts.

Goes 7.1 five hits. 2 walks.

Double A.

[Imperial Capitalist]

It was his longest outing of the yr and only the 2nd one where he gave up 0 R. He is a lefty and threw a knuckle-curve, which on tv seemed to be a successful weapon vs Cardinal swings.

[Cranny]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

[sikeston bulldog2]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Why are you saying posters are rodents. That’s horrible. You could have said- “ red, being contrary is not your best posture.”

Same message.

[OldRed]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

[Cranny]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

[OldRed]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

[Cranny]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

[Rojo Johnson]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Ha, ha. You put him on ignore and you still take shots at him? Ha, ha. Even though, most likely, the mods have told you to quit your jawing with him? Man, this place is dysfunctional. The leader of the Don’t Call Posters Names crowd is out there calling posters rodents. Must be a compliment I’m unaware of.

[Cranny]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Ha, ha. You put him on ignore and you still take shots at him? Ha, ha. Even though, most likely, the mods have told you to quit your jawing with him? Man, this place is dysfunctional. The leader of the Don’t Call Posters Names crowd is out there calling posters rodents. Must be a compliment I’m unaware of.

Funny you put me down, Rojo, but don’t put down the poster who told me to eat a Richard. Why is that?

[WLTFE]

If you have time, read this and the Saggese thread...the similarities are [fork]ing awesome!

[sikeston bulldog2]

If you have time, read this and the Saggese thread...the similarities are [fork]ing awesome!

Must be plagiarism.

[WLTFE]

If you have time, read this and the Saggese thread...the similarities are [fork]ing awesome!

Must be plagiarism.

Or a weird time warp!

[NYCardsFan]

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see/read his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?

See here:

apparently Baghdad Bob doesn't like poopie words and is a self appointed mod!

I can’t read your post, but you’ve been warned to stop stalking by the moderators (like I’ve been warned) so I suggest you stop before you’re banned.

And here:

Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.

So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.

You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.

As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?

[WLTFE]

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

Guilty complex? Not once was your name mentioned.

He won’t mention it, Red, because he’s been warned by the powers to be and doesn’t want to get banned. But the references are obvious, don’t you think?

Only because you reported him. Didn't they tell you the same thing?

They did, and that’s why I have him on ignore per their demand, and will keep him there.

Serious question: If you have him on “ignore” (i.e., Foe List) and therefore allegedly can’t see his posts, then how is possible for you to directly quote-reply to him?

See here:

apparently Baghdad Bob doesn't like poopie words and is a self appointed mod!

I can’t read your post, but you’ve been warned to stop stalking by the moderators (like I’ve been warned) so I suggest you stop before you’re banned.

And here:

Be careful, stalker troll. You’ve been warned by the powers to be. You were told to put me on ignore.
You might want to follow their advice.

So were you...and you continue to follow my posts...so go and report us both.

You follow with a post after every one of my posts. Not vice versa. Stop the stalking and trolling before it’s too late for you.

As a purely technical matter, it is impossible to directly quote-reply to a post without being able to see/read it. How do you explain this apparent discrepancy?

I caught that as well...apparently, it's easier to play the victim while arguing with multiple posters as well.. The hypocrisy is overwhelming.

[Quincy Varnish]

Looking at the Saggese thread.. you see the same pattern...argue, call other posters trolls, accuse them of the same actions they do...whine about someone being mean on an anonymous internet site...and claim to be the victim...and will have to have last word...and then threaten to report...yawn...SSDD

I just read the Saggese thread. Yes the same pattern.

Red - you run with rodents, you become a rodent.

I thought you were too sophisticated and holy to resort to name calling, Cranny. Disappointing. Very disappointing.