fish wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 18:01 pm
Seriously dude I clearly said I was not comparing them at all. I have no words to help if you think AP came out as a stud right out of the gate. The hearts in your eyes are clouding your memory, or you did not watch him then
Of course you are comparing them. That’s exactly what you did.
It’s funny. Pietrangelo never looked like this defensively…ever. He was better defensively at 16 than mails is now lol
I’m wondering if Mailleaux, Dvorsky and even possibly Snuggy would be better served being in Springfield rather than on this mess of a team surrounded by so many uninspired, underachieving, overpaid players.
fish wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 18:01 pm
Seriously dude I clearly said I was not comparing them at all. I have no words to help if you think AP came out as a stud right out of the gate. The hearts in your eyes are clouding your memory, or you did not watch him then
Serious is not a good word or description of conversation with the agenda guy. He literally has to twist words to suit his responses.
I remember Petro in 2009/10 ..... you are 100% accurate.
Every time people try with this clown it comes back the same way, so don't fret.
fish wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 18:01 pm
Seriously dude I clearly said I was not comparing them at all. I have no words to help if you think AP came out as a stud right out of the gate. The hearts in your eyes are clouding your memory, or you did not watch him then
Serious is not a good word or description of conversation with the agenda guy. He literally has to twist words to suit his responses.
I remember Petro in 2009/10 ..... you are 100% accurate.
Every time people try with this clown it comes back the same way, so don't fret.
I remember Nail Yakupov making lots of mistakes early on too
fish wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 18:01 pm
Seriously dude I clearly said I was not comparing them at all. I have no words to help if you think AP came out as a stud right out of the gate. The hearts in your eyes are clouding your memory, or you did not watch him then
I remember Petro in 2009/10 ..... you are 100% accurate.
Why does 22 year old Mailloux get "200 games to get acclimated to defense in the NHL"?
I see what the Blues hope 23 can be. He is about the only dman we have that physically removes people from in front of the net. Unfortunately, he usually then turns it over in his own zone.
I saw a couple of whacks after the play last night showing potential grit....which is sorely missed on this team.
I've also seen him just up in the play a few times showing some offensive awareness.
All that being said, right now is in an absolute mess and anybody saying pairing him with 75 is a bad idea...I completely agree with that.
gpe13579 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 19:01 pm
I see what the Blues hope 23 can be. He is about the only dman we have that physically removes people from in front of the net. Unfortunately, he usually then turns it over in his own zone.
I saw a couple of whacks after the play last night showing potential grit....which is sorely missed on this team.
I've also seen him just up in the play a few times showing some offensive awareness.
All that being said, right now is in an absolute mess and anybody saying pairing him with 75 is a bad idea...I completely agree with that.
There is hope but that is all it is right now.
You make a lot of good points, but I see more than hope. I see potential.
Breaking in on defense in the NHL is very hard. It's like breaking in at cornerback in the NFL or shortstop in MLB. Case in point, Ozzie Smith made 25 errors his rookie season and he's the best to ever play the position.
Don't get me wrong, Mailloux still has to do it. It's up to him.
I don't think it's much of a decision. I saw it posted several times that he's an AHL all-star with nothing left to prove at that level. We traded for him and now he needs to play to develop. Keep running him out there and coach him up. Wish we had a solid vet like Suter to pair him with but the fact is the team needs CP,Broberg, Fowler and Faulk to man the top 4 spots. Also need to play the 3rd pair to 15ish minutes a game to avoid burning out the top 4 so he should get plenty of development time.
LGB73 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 19:54 pm
I don't think it's much of a decision. I saw it posted several times that he's an AHL all-star with nothing left to prove at that level. We traded for him and now he needs to play to develop. Keep running him out there and coach him up. Wish we had a solid vet like Suter to pair him with but the fact is the team needs CP,Broberg, Fowler and Faulk to man the top 4 spots. Also need to play the 3rd pair to 15ish minutes a game to avoid burning out the top 4 so he should get plenty of development time.
He's on pace to be -100 in a full season (probably about -80 this season)....you want that?