So you ignore defense in a players value because he hits well. Neat11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:19 pmNo I'm talking to those (bleep) about something that is miniscule when looking at players with those numbers offensively.Horseradish wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:14 pmI don’t see anyone “worried” here, so you’re talking to yourself.11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:04 pm If you're worried about his defense with an OPS of .850 then you should start posting on a board with a different sport.
You're included.
I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Horseradish
- Forum User
- Posts: 367
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:26 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
-
11WSChamps
- Forum User
- Posts: 6830
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:19 pmNo I'm talking to those pointing out something that is miniscule when looking at players with those numbers offensively.Horseradish wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:14 pmI don’t see anyone “worried” here, so you’re talking to yourself.11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:04 pm If you're worried about his defense with an OPS of .850 then you should start posting on a board with a different sport.
You're included.
-
11WSChamps
- Forum User
- Posts: 6830
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
If they have a top 20 OPS I sure do and I guarantee you anyone else should too.Horseradish wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:20 pmSo you ignore defense in a players value because he hits well. Neat11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:19 pmNo I'm talking to those (bleep) about something that is miniscule when looking at players with those numbers offensively.Horseradish wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:14 pmI don’t see anyone “worried” here, so you’re talking to yourself.11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:04 pm If you're worried about his defense with an OPS of .850 then you should start posting on a board with a different sport.
You're included.
-
TopofthePerch
- Forum User
- Posts: 651
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 17:33 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
My point is he is not like having Nick Castellonas in the outfield because he has a good bat. There are a lot worse butchers at positions that play because the bat plays. He is nowhere near that level where you hesitate. So we are on the same page.Horseradish wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:12 pmUh no, I don’t just forget about defense just because someone is a good hitter. His limited range and slow reaction on balls hit near him might have cost runs that you’re choosing to ignore, but that is your prerogative. No one is ignoring his scoops, but most ML 1B make those plays.TopofthePerch wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 12:42 pmThis is likely true but he doesn't cost you games so can we just forget about the defense. He is the most consistent offensive threat for the last three years in a team that has struggled to find that. Also he has definitely made some good scoops and plays at first and we can't pretend that didn't happen just because of the metrics.Horseradish wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 12:14 pmLiterally every single defensive metric available says he’s a below-average defender. Just saying he’s good because he makes plays a 1B is supposed to make doesn’t change that. Maybe you should watch some other teams and you’d see he’s not as good as most 1B defensively.Ace Hollister wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 11:55 amTell me you haven’t played baseball wo saying it!Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 11:44 amI love Burleson and his bat. His defense stinks. Well below average.OldRed wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 08:48 amI also believe he improved at first base also. I like watching him bat because he hits so many pitches that aren't strikes. The home run yesterday was a pitch out of the strike zone.ggnoobs wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 08:43 am I think the Cardinals real competitive window will open in 2028, and I think you want Burly for that window. As it is 2028 would be his walk year. I think sign him through 2031 and then let him walk at 32 years old. He's only gotten better each of the previous few seasons. The guy can just plain hit and I think you want/need him to be in the lineup when the window opens.
5/100?
I agree on 4 or 5 years on a contract.
Burly is a solid defensive 1st baseman.
You guys should have listened to Shady about Burly/Baez!
None of that would scare me from extending him though, good player, just need to be honest about who he is.
-
Pura Vida
- Forum User
- Posts: 562
- Joined: 04 Jul 2024 13:26 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
I am well on CT record saying Burly is the best pure hitter on the team. His hand/eye coordination is beyond most players, and he can hit the ball where thrown. He has high average, RBIs, slugging and OBP is all at the top of MLB. His D is improving with every game and will continue. Lock him up!
-
bgwinn01
- Forum User
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: 31 Aug 2018 22:13 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
rockondlouie wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 08:59 am He's headed into his age 28 season
He's become the best hitter on the team and his stock is still on the upswing.
I'd have no issue seeing him get a $90-100M/5 yr deal w/a sixth year mutual option.
This right here, Louie. We both agree so it must be.
-
casey1024
- Forum User
- Posts: 194
- Joined: 12 Jun 2024 10:59 am
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
Agreed!ggnoobs wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 08:43 am I think the Cardinals real competitive window will open in 2028, and I think you want Burly for that window. As it is 2028 would be his walk year. I think sign him through 2031 and then let him walk at 32 years old. He's only gotten better each of the previous few seasons. The guy can just plain hit and I think you want/need him to be in the lineup when the window opens.
5/100?
-
ecleme22
- Forum User
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
3 year, 60 mil. Buying out last two years, of course.
If he doesn't take it, listen to offers this winter.
If he doesn't take it, listen to offers this winter.
-
RamFan08NY
- Forum User
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
Not me. Burly has got yo be the starter. Period. Dont screw him up by platooning him. The more LH he sees, the more chance of improving. Plus if a LH starts, good chance he'll only see him twice.
Theres a reason why Oli gets criticized for platooning hot bats. Its because its stupid to do it!
-
RamFan08NY
- Forum User
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
That’s fair. I personally would keep him because I think he is going to break out offensively once he figures out the proper place between being aggressive early and doing damage and being patient and getting getting on base at a high percentage and because the 1-4 has carried the team pretty much alone this season and if they can get a decent 5-9 then the offense will be great. But you make good points and if they knock them over with an offer then sure trade him and maybe move burly to DH and look for a first basemanRonnie Dobbs wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:17 pmYea, I may be getting ahead of myself there, and I really like Herrera, but I’m thinking that Rainiel Rodriguez is going to be in the majors next year, and it’s going to be a lot sooner than Baez was this year. It seems like between Herrera, Burleson, Crooks, Bernal, and RR, we are going to be pretty crowded at catcher, 1B, and DH, and all those guys need as many ABs as they can get. I think that the team should at least be exploring the idea this offseason. Especially if he continues to hitting like he has this year, rather than he did last year.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 14:00 pmI wouldn’t trade either of them. The reason burly and walker have so many RBIs is because JJ and Herrera are running up counts and getting on base. I wouldn’t mess with the 1-5 now that Baez is here. The 1-4 has been the strength of the team and driving the offense all season. As for burly yea sign him his defense isn’t great but he’s far from a disaster and the bat more than plays
-
Rosie's Rule
- Forum User
- Posts: 240
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:35 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
Extend Burley if feasible to do so.
He’ll continue to improve defensively at 1st.
He’s certainly not a liability as it stands.
He’s proving he can hit lefties as he gets more abs.
He’ll continue to improve defensively at 1st.
He’s certainly not a liability as it stands.
He’s proving he can hit lefties as he gets more abs.
-
ecleme22
- Forum User
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
I didn’t say ‘move’. I said ‘listen.’RamFan08NY wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 15:47 pmListen to offers and move your best hitter a d start over? Am I on a Pirate msg board?
And let’s pump the brakes a little. Is AB our best hitter or hottest hitter?
Ops in July: .751.
Ops on July 30: .801
Ops in August: around 1.250 with a .350 BA.
AB is white hot right now. I just don’t think any good player is a hot month away from getting a $100mil extension.
Would like to see how the rest of the year plays out, and maybe even the beginning of next year.
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 3054
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
Look up anyone of his defense rankings. He’s First in errors. And he’s in the bottom 3 in other catagories. I don’t know how you can fool yourself by thinking he’s a good at first base. He has no range.Ace Hollister wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 11:55 amTell me you haven’t played baseball wo saying it!Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 11:44 amI love Burleson and his bat. His defense stinks. Well below average.OldRed wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 08:48 amI also believe he improved at first base also. I like watching him bat because he hits so many pitches that aren't strikes. The home run yesterday was a pitch out of the strike zone.ggnoobs wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 08:43 am I think the Cardinals real competitive window will open in 2028, and I think you want Burly for that window. As it is 2028 would be his walk year. I think sign him through 2031 and then let him walk at 32 years old. He's only gotten better each of the previous few seasons. The guy can just plain hit and I think you want/need him to be in the lineup when the window opens.
5/100?
I agree on 4 or 5 years on a contract.
Burly is a solid defensive 1st baseman.
You guys should have listened to Shady about Burly/Baez!
-
Cardinals4Life
- Forum User
- Posts: 6051
- Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
Would he be good at PREVENTING runs?C-Unit wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 11:31 amAnd then Condom for centerfieldTheFantasyStud wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 09:10 am If we lock up burly the core is going to be a big core
1) Wetherholt
2) Herrera
3) Burleson
4) Walker
5) Rodriquez
6) Baez
7) Baez
Pete ?
9) Winn
Should be beautiful with a major focus on perfecting the pitching staff being our biggest objective and hurdle.
-
Ace Hollister
- Forum User
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:50 pm
Re: I think you have to lock Burly up for ~5 years
ecleme22 wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 15:59 pmI didn’t say ‘move’. I said ‘listen.’RamFan08NY wrote: ↑17 Aug 2026 15:47 pmListen to offers and move your best hitter a d start over? Am I on a Pirate msg board?
And let’s pump the brakes a little. Is AB our best hitter or hottest hitter?
Ops in July: .751.
Ops on July 30: .801
Ops in August: around 1.250 with a .350 BA.
AB is white hot right now. I just don’t think any good player is a hot month away from getting a $100mil extension.
Would like to see how the rest of the year plays out, and maybe even the beginning of next year.
Just admit you were wrong and Shady was right.