No, you senile old coot. You are the one who gets all lathered up by PCA. You were probably in heat for the entire 4 day series.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:50 pmYou also like the idea of tickling buttholesJuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:08 pmExactly. I thought the op was a funny representation of how ridiculous some of oli's decisions seem at times. And funnier that it ruffled the feathers of some posters.Chitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:02 pmAs if hitting Walker 2nd in this lineup behind OPS monster, speed demons like Jordan and Crooks isn’t idiotic?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:47 amIt is...moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:46 am the obsession with Oli and Mo on here is something else
In a Stunning Move
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 8130
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
-
scoutyjones2
- Forum User
- Posts: 11452
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
You posted it, you own it. Here for all to read.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:52 pmNope. You were the one giddy over PCA's. I bet you got all sorts of excited when he homered Wednesday night. You probably squealed and blushed like a true little groupiescoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:49 pmDon't you have buttholes you want to tickle. You were fascinated with thatJuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:04 pmStop being an (donkey)(pit) and go away. The poster was joking. Lighten up. Maybe you can go cuddle with your boy oli.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:45 amKeep your day job.lined2left wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:43 am Oli, with the help of his iPad, has decided to eschew the designated hitter; and bat the pitcher.
4th.
He will bat the pitcher 4th in the batting order.
“We believe strongly in the analytics that the Apple Company provides us. We believe with the help of our iPad, we will revolutionize baseball” -Oliver Marmol.
In a subsequent move, the MLB leader in RBI’s just one month ago, Jordan Walker, will be moved to 9th in the batting order.
Make sure my fries are hot.
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 8130
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
Yep. Everyone can read how hot you are for PCA.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:56 pmYou posted it, you own it. Here for all to read.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:52 pmNope. You were the one giddy over PCA's. I bet you got all sorts of excited when he homered Wednesday night. You probably squealed and blushed like a true little groupiescoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:49 pmDon't you have buttholes you want to tickle. You were fascinated with thatJuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:04 pmStop being an (donkey)(pit) and go away. The poster was joking. Lighten up. Maybe you can go cuddle with your boy oli.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:45 amKeep your day job.lined2left wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:43 am Oli, with the help of his iPad, has decided to eschew the designated hitter; and bat the pitcher.
4th.
He will bat the pitcher 4th in the batting order.
“We believe strongly in the analytics that the Apple Company provides us. We believe with the help of our iPad, we will revolutionize baseball” -Oliver Marmol.
In a subsequent move, the MLB leader in RBI’s just one month ago, Jordan Walker, will be moved to 9th in the batting order.
Make sure my fries are hot.
-
Chitownredbird
- Forum User
- Posts: 278
- Joined: 21 Apr 2025 20:55 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
Not clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.
-
HorseTrader
- Forum User
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
I don't want him anywhere close to my friesscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:45 amKeep your day job.lined2left wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:43 am Oli, with the help of his iPad, has decided to eschew the designated hitter; and bat the pitcher.
4th.
He will bat the pitcher 4th in the batting order.
“We believe strongly in the analytics that the Apple Company provides us. We believe with the help of our iPad, we will revolutionize baseball” -Oliver Marmol.
In a subsequent move, the MLB leader in RBI’s just one month ago, Jordan Walker, will be moved to 9th in the batting order.
Make sure my fries are hot.
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 8130
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
HorseTrader wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:05 pmI don't want him anywhere close to my friesscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:45 amKeep your day job.lined2left wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 10:43 am Oli, with the help of his iPad, has decided to eschew the designated hitter; and bat the pitcher.
4th.
He will bat the pitcher 4th in the batting order.
“We believe strongly in the analytics that the Apple Company provides us. We believe with the help of our iPad, we will revolutionize baseball” -Oliver Marmol.
In a subsequent move, the MLB leader in RBI’s just one month ago, Jordan Walker, will be moved to 9th in the batting order.
Make sure my fries are hot.
Why does everyone have to belittle fast food employees? I (like probably many others on here), worked fast food in hs. Yeah, the job isn't glamorous. But at least those employees have jobs. They aren't sitting at home freeloading the system. Nor are they worthless, entitled nepo babies or trust funders providing no productivity. Why make fun of people's livelihood?
-
cosmo.kramer
- Forum User
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025 17:51 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
Just as expectedChitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:04 pmNot clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 8130
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
Awesome offense. Let's keep running the same [fork]ing order out there. Maybe win under 15 post All Star Break.
-
11WSChamps
- Forum User
- Posts: 6564
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
Ignore these morons who have to hide their ignorance of the game.Chitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:04 pmNot clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.
-
cosmo.kramer
- Forum User
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025 17:51 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:37 pmIgnore these morons who have to hide their ignorance of the game.Chitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:04 pmNot clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.
-
11WSChamps
- Forum User
- Posts: 6564
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
Figures.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:38 pm11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:37 pmIgnore these morons who have to hide their ignorance of the game.Chitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:04 pmNot clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.![]()
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 13786
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: In a Stunning Move
LMAO
This entire thread needs to be archived somewhere for future generations!
This entire thread needs to be archived somewhere for future generations!
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 8130
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
Analytics are valuable. Problem is, some people try to be cute and point to nonsense as being more important than the meaningful stuff.11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:39 pmFigures.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:38 pm11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:37 pmIgnore these morons who have to hide their ignorance of the game.Chitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:04 pmNot clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.![]()
-
WeeVikes
- Forum User
- Posts: 889
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:06 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
Juan — I am in no way arguing or disagreeing with you. Although I think analytics are very useful tools, they are just that — tools.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:44 pmAnalytics are valuable. Problem is, some people try to be cute and point to nonsense as being more important than the meaningful stuff.11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:39 pmFigures.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:38 pm11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:37 pmIgnore these morons who have to hide their ignorance of the game.Chitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:04 pmNot clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.![]()
I’m curious which ones you believe to be “nonsense” and what stats you consider valuable and important.
Thanks.
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 8130
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
WeeVikes, we had a poster downplaying rbi's earlier. As multiple posters have pointed out, that is a valuable part of the game. Yet your stat geeks will fawn over walk rates while downplaying batting average. Let me ask you, in the bottom of the 8th, down a run with risp, do you prefer a guy looking for a walk? Or do you want a guy looking to drive in a run?WeeVikes wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 17:18 pmJuan — I am in no way arguing or disagreeing with you. Although I think analytics are very useful tools, they are just that — tools.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:44 pmAnalytics are valuable. Problem is, some people try to be cute and point to nonsense as being more important than the meaningful stuff.11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:39 pmFigures.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:38 pm11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:37 pmIgnore these morons who have to hide their ignorance of the game.Chitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:04 pmNot clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.![]()
I’m curious which ones you believe to be “nonsense” and what stats you consider valuable and important.
Thanks.
-
WeeVikes
- Forum User
- Posts: 889
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:06 pm
Re: In a Stunning Move
While in general I value OBP, clearly in this situation I want someone to drive in the run.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 17:27 pmWeeVikes, we had a poster downplaying rbi's earlier. As multiple posters have pointed out, that is a valuable part of the game. Yet your stat geeks will fawn over walk rates while downplaying batting average. Let me ask you, in the bottom of the 8th, down a run with risp, do you prefer a guy looking for a walk? Or do you want a guy looking to drive in a run?WeeVikes wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 17:18 pmJuan — I am in no way arguing or disagreeing with you. Although I think analytics are very useful tools, they are just that — tools.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:44 pmAnalytics are valuable. Problem is, some people try to be cute and point to nonsense as being more important than the meaningful stuff.11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:39 pmFigures.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:38 pm11WSChamps wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 16:37 pmIgnore these morons who have to hide their ignorance of the game.Chitownredbird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 13:04 pmNot clear what the last bit is supposed to mean but I’m 80 and an avid follower of the team since 1954. The object of the game is to score runs. Stan the Man always said his goal every year was to score 100 runs and drive in a 100 runs because that was most valuable for the team.cosmo.kramer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2026 12:09 pm The obsession with RBI's in the year 2026 is something else
Though I suppose it's expected given the demographics of internet message boards
For the first 100 games with a top of the order of JJ, Ivan, Burly, Walker, our 1-2 hitters following the bottom of the order had 40 or so rbi each. Look at the runs scored by the bottom of the order. You can’t score runs if you’re not on base. Burly & Walker had almost twice as many rbi as the 1-2 hitters because JJ and Ivan were getting on base and scoring runs. I don’t know how to make it any simpler but by stating the obvious.![]()
I’m curious which ones you believe to be “nonsense” and what stats you consider valuable and important.
Thanks.
This is the thing that drives me nuts around here — there is a happy medium between SABR stuff and, for lack of a better term, “counting stats”. They both have value. They both have their uses, depending on the circumstances. For people to completely blow off one or the other is foolishness in my mind. Data is good. Data is useful. But if one just blindly follows something without critical thought, that’s a good way to get beaten.
YMMV.