Cranny wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 08:04 amLet me understand this. You’re recommending that other posters on an anonymous baseball forum get a “new understanding of life”. Is that what you’re saying?OldRed wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 07:09 amI'm 80 and remain very active. What bothers me with some older people is they think they know everything just because they are old. Running a business in your 80's seems strange to me when it should be a time of relaxation, gardening, smelling the flowers and being thankful you are still around to enjoy it. It may be time for new leadership with the Cardinals and a new understanding of life with some that post here.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 06:51 amWLTFE wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 06:41 amGood points.. people in their 80s often become set in their ways and don't like change...and become petty and will argue with anyone who has a different opinion...I think some become socially isolated and seek out attention...it's very sad to watchsikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2025 06:28 am Old people get paranoid about everything, especially loss. And if mental disorder is present, even more so.
It might take a death or sale to get additional funding.
I fall close into the socially isolated, as I live in a big house alone. Everyone is gone.
I get out daily, and do tidbits around the yard. Two cats.
I like to communicate and see and hear others perspective and so I start a thread for that purpose.
Of course, I’m not 80 yet.
Strange thing to say.
Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
But in fairness Thompson apparently started a AAA all-star game 5 or 6 years ago.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
I'm not her defending Mr. Dewitt who admitted you doubled dated with in high school. Two bad some of the older posters are no longer here to verify what you said.Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 13:10 pmLook in the mirror, Red. You'll see a person with the same characteristics as you say other older people have. What goes around comes around.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 12:19 pmEven if I was, so what. I guess I hurt your feelings and hit a sore spot. Like I said some older people are stuck in the mud, can't admit change or they are wrong. YOU have never in all your years posting admitted being wrong, not once!Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 12:15 pmActually that's not what he said, SB. He was making a comment about older people in general. Read it again.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:19 amNot how I took it. He said he couldn’t understand why some people in their eighties are resistant to big change, and think they are right all the time. I don’t think he was referencing himself.Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:13 amSo, in your own words, you can’t handle change and you think you’re right all the time? LOL.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:35 amI'm 80 years young.Bully4you wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:07 amPersonal question for you OldRed.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:04 amOn my end I'm not stalking. We just have a completely different viewpoint on the status on how the Cardinals are run and our interest in Major League baseball. If a person doesn't agree with you, you don't consider it a "constructive baseball discussion". As I have said, older people often can't handle change and think they are right all the time. That includes you and Mr. DeWitt your friend, who you vehemently agree with.
Your title is oldred, but how old are you exactly?
He’s right to an extent. Some old people are that way. And. Some are not.
As for why they are that way, my take, as you age you get paranoid about loss. Simple side effect of aging.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Yes, Bomber it is too bad that he ran into arm problems. Here were his stats in 2024 at Memphis -
Games started - 20
IP - 90
Hits given - 68
Ks - 108
Ws - 56 (unfortunately)
ERA - 4.60 (too many walks)
Hits given were very low, strike outs were high, but he had control issues.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
I'm waiting for a denial.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 15:55 pmI'm not her defending Mr. Dewitt who admitted you doubled dated with in high school. Two bad some of the older posters are no longer here to verify what you said.Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 13:10 pmLook in the mirror, Red. You'll see a person with the same characteristics as you say other older people have. What goes around comes around.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 12:19 pmEven if I was, so what. I guess I hurt your feelings and hit a sore spot. Like I said some older people are stuck in the mud, can't admit change or they are wrong. YOU have never in all your years posting admitted being wrong, not once!Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 12:15 pmActually that's not what he said, SB. He was making a comment about older people in general. Read it again.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:19 amNot how I took it. He said he couldn’t understand why some people in their eighties are resistant to big change, and think they are right all the time. I don’t think he was referencing himself.Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:13 amSo, in your own words, you can’t handle change and you think you’re right all the time? LOL.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:35 amI'm 80 years young.Bully4you wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:07 amPersonal question for you OldRed.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:04 amOn my end I'm not stalking. We just have a completely different viewpoint on the status on how the Cardinals are run and our interest in Major League baseball. If a person doesn't agree with you, you don't consider it a "constructive baseball discussion". As I have said, older people often can't handle change and think they are right all the time. That includes you and Mr. DeWitt your friend, who you vehemently agree with.
Your title is oldred, but how old are you exactly?
He’s right to an extent. Some old people are that way. And. Some are not.
As for why they are that way, my take, as you age you get paranoid about loss. Simple side effect of aging.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Yes, the Cardinals have made some good moves and some bad moves. It sure seems like a number of moves over the past few years haven’t worked out. Sure hope Bloom does well. And sooner better than later.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 16:26 pmI'm waiting for a denial.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 15:55 pmI'm not her defending Mr. Dewitt who admitted you doubled dated with in high school. Two bad some of the older posters are no longer here to verify what you said.Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 13:10 pmLook in the mirror, Red. You'll see a person with the same characteristics as you say other older people have. What goes around comes around.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 12:19 pmEven if I was, so what. I guess I hurt your feelings and hit a sore spot. Like I said some older people are stuck in the mud, can't admit change or they are wrong. YOU have never in all your years posting admitted being wrong, not once!Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 12:15 pmActually that's not what he said, SB. He was making a comment about older people in general. Read it again.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:19 amNot how I took it. He said he couldn’t understand why some people in their eighties are resistant to big change, and think they are right all the time. I don’t think he was referencing himself.Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:13 amSo, in your own words, you can’t handle change and you think you’re right all the time? LOL.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:35 amI'm 80 years young.Bully4you wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:07 amPersonal question for you OldRed.OldRed wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:04 amOn my end I'm not stalking. We just have a completely different viewpoint on the status on how the Cardinals are run and our interest in Major League baseball. If a person doesn't agree with you, you don't consider it a "constructive baseball discussion". As I have said, older people often can't handle change and think they are right all the time. That includes you and Mr. DeWitt your friend, who you vehemently agree with.
Your title is oldred, but how old are you exactly?
He’s right to an extent. Some old people are that way. And. Some are not.
As for why they are that way, my take, as you age you get paranoid about loss. Simple side effect of aging.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
When cornered...just change the subject!


Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
cash strapped? why does the OP think he is cash strapped?
lol
weirdo
the Cards owners always had the money to spend like the Dodgers. they choose not to do so and make more money off you the St. Louis Cardinal fan base. they have been doing this for many years now. They checked out years ago.
the only way the Cardinals ever win an NL pennant again is if they get new owners. this was common knowledge for any baseball fan many years ago now.
the Dodgers will probably get Murakami next and soon in many years the St. Louis Cardinals historic legacy of being the winningest National League World Series Team will be gone.
lol
weirdo
the Cards owners always had the money to spend like the Dodgers. they choose not to do so and make more money off you the St. Louis Cardinal fan base. they have been doing this for many years now. They checked out years ago.
the only way the Cardinals ever win an NL pennant again is if they get new owners. this was common knowledge for any baseball fan many years ago now.
the Dodgers will probably get Murakami next and soon in many years the St. Louis Cardinals historic legacy of being the winningest National League World Series Team will be gone.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Question. What’s the difference in cable contracts now compared to the past? Is it a problem?YNWA2016 wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:14 pm cash strapped? why does the OP think he is cash strapped?
lol
weirdo
the Cards owners always had the money to spend like the Dodgers. they choose not to do so and make more money off you the St. Louis Cardinal fan base. they have been doing this for many years now. They checked out years ago.
the only way the Cardinals ever win an NL pennant again is if they get new owners. this was common knowledge for any baseball fan many years ago now.
the Dodgers will probably get Murakami next and soon in many years the St. Louis Cardinals historic legacy of being the winningest National League World Series Team will be gone.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
28mil in 2006Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:33 pmQuestion. What’s the difference in cable contracts now compared to the past? Is it a problem?YNWA2016 wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:14 pm cash strapped? why does the OP think he is cash strapped?
lol
weirdo
the Cards owners always had the money to spend like the Dodgers. they choose not to do so and make more money off you the St. Louis Cardinal fan base. they have been doing this for many years now. They checked out years ago.
the only way the Cardinals ever win an NL pennant again is if they get new owners. this was common knowledge for any baseball fan many years ago now.
the Dodgers will probably get Murakami next and soon in many years the St. Louis Cardinals historic legacy of being the winningest National League World Series Team will be gone.
58mil in 2025……down from an expected 75mil from original contract signed in 2018
So just that we’re all clear, on the the same page, seeing the same number which apparently is the difference in being able to afford a 180-190mil payroll and a 100mil payroll
That number is 17 MILLION
17MILLION
17MILLION
Is Cranny’s favorite number and excuse why BDW can’t afford a competitive payroll
17MILLION
17MILLION
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Now please Also disregard the the National TV contract has TRIPLED since 2006Goldfan wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:44 pm28mil in 2006Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:33 pmQuestion. What’s the difference in cable contracts now compared to the past? Is it a problem?YNWA2016 wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:14 pm cash strapped? why does the OP think he is cash strapped?
lol
weirdo
the Cards owners always had the money to spend like the Dodgers. they choose not to do so and make more money off you the St. Louis Cardinal fan base. they have been doing this for many years now. They checked out years ago.
the only way the Cardinals ever win an NL pennant again is if they get new owners. this was common knowledge for any baseball fan many years ago now.
the Dodgers will probably get Murakami next and soon in many years the St. Louis Cardinals historic legacy of being the winningest National League World Series Team will be gone.
58mil in 2025……down from an expected 75mil from original contract signed in 2018
So just that we’re all clear, on the the same page, seeing the same number which apparently is the difference in being able to afford a 180-190mil payroll and a 100mil payroll
That number is 17 MILLION
17MILLION
17MILLION
Is Cranny’s favorite number and excuse why BDW can’t afford a competitive payroll
17MILLION
17MILLION
Ticket prices and concessions have more that DOUBLED since 2006
Payroll 2006 96MILLION
Logical 2026 PAYROLL……….180mil???
But Cranny expects you to believe that a 17mil decrease from 75mil annually is THE reason BDW can’t spend on ML roster
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Who says he can’t spend this off season on the ML roster?Goldfan wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:48 pmNow please Also disregard the the National TV contract has TRIPLED since 2006Goldfan wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:44 pm28mil in 2006Cranny wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:33 pmQuestion. What’s the difference in cable contracts now compared to the past? Is it a problem?YNWA2016 wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 17:14 pm cash strapped? why does the OP think he is cash strapped?
lol
weirdo
the Cards owners always had the money to spend like the Dodgers. they choose not to do so and make more money off you the St. Louis Cardinal fan base. they have been doing this for many years now. They checked out years ago.
the only way the Cardinals ever win an NL pennant again is if they get new owners. this was common knowledge for any baseball fan many years ago now.
the Dodgers will probably get Murakami next and soon in many years the St. Louis Cardinals historic legacy of being the winningest National League World Series Team will be gone.
58mil in 2025……down from an expected 75mil from original contract signed in 2018
So just that we’re all clear, on the the same page, seeing the same number which apparently is the difference in being able to afford a 180-190mil payroll and a 100mil payroll
That number is 17 MILLION
17MILLION
17MILLION
Is Cranny’s favorite number and excuse why BDW can’t afford a competitive payroll
17MILLION
17MILLION
Ticket prices and concessions have more that DOUBLED since 2006
Payroll 2006 96MILLION
Logical 2026 PAYROLL……….180mil???![]()
![]()
![]()
But Cranny expects you to believe that a 17mil decrease from 75mil annually is THE reason BDW can’t spend on ML roster
Suggest we wait and see.