Oh you want more analysis?. Let me connect the 6 years of dots for you.2forDiving wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025 12:56 pmIt isn’t that simple. You are so myopic that you only see the two options you have invented. There is a 3rd option the Blues are better at The 3rd RD position than they were at season’s end last year. That they needed a 3rd RD than a 3rd RW. That you don’t even recognize that shows how much hockey knowledge/sense you lack.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025 11:42 amAsk yourself this...STL fan in MN wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025 11:31 amCounterpoint: we are paying attention but just see it much differently than you.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025 11:18 am What bothers me about the trade is the big picture.
Army and the Blues select later in the draft by choice. In that scenario, the ABSOLUTE VERY BEST that you can hope for is a Bolduc type player.
So what the Blues gave up is THE VERY BEST that we can hope for in the draft. Further, they gave up a player who was TRENDING UP on NHL ice. Bolduc was PROVEN. He was our Success Story. He was a young player that we all followed closely from draft day.
What did the Canadiens give up? They traded away an UNPROVEN player. They traded away a player that few looked up to in Montreal. They traded away a player that they selected later in the draft. Not only can Montreal draft BETTER than Mailloux, they HAVE DRAFTED HIGHER than Mailloux often.
Bolduc is GONE. The question now is HOW MANY MORE BOLDUCS are we going to be "GIVING AWAY" in the next 3 years--BECAUSE WE DON"T DRAFT HIGH IN THE DRAFT.
Anybody not PO'd about Bolduc is not paying attention. Anybody that doesn't see an ugly, nasty trend starting is not paying attention.
Draft position doesn’t matter much past draft day. After that, what matters is performance and value. Bolduc performed “more” in that he did well in the 2/3 season under Monty. Mailloux isn’t currently as “proven” but he’s a RD and that position is simply much more valuable than a LW/RW.
Players values fluctuate. What spot they were drafted in doesn’t really matter much past draft day. In the 2021 draft, Bolduc was selected 17th and Mailloux 31st…but that hardly matters today. Values change over time. Tyler Boucher was drafted 10th overall that year. Would it have been better value to trade Bolduc for Boucher instead? No! Because Boucher hasn’t performed well at all and his value is much less now.
In the end, both STL and MTL traded from an area of surplus for a player that could help them more now. Bolduc was a good rookie RW for us last season. Snuggerud should be that for us this season and appears likely to have an even bigger impact. In the meantime, we’ve also added Mailloux, getting younger and someone that should fit much better longterm than Leddy. We’ll just have to see how the 2 of them perform over the years. But overall, I agree with dr0zombie in that this trade is very likely to be a win-win for both teams. Life isn’t a zero sum game. For every winner there doesn’t have to be a loser. I think both MTL and STL did well here, trading for an asset that fit both of their needs better.
Which roster improved the most via this trade?
A) The one that got the other team's best, and a proven NHL talent.
B) The one that got the other team's 3rd best and an unproven NHL talent.
Army has taken a huge chance on the raffle ticket for an RHD. Maybe it will work out, but it was a huge gamble.
1. The Blues need a RHD, since Petro left. Petro was drafted #4 years ago.
2. The Blues don't draft high by choice for money reasons.
3. The Blues can't draft another Petro.
4. The Blues need to get a RHD some other way.
5. The Blues draft an injury-prone Jireck (aka a poor man's Petro) at #18 in 2024, and that didn't work out.
6. Because Jiricek was looking like a failure, they needed to try another route to get a RHD.
7. The Blues traded away one of the best prospects (Bolduc) for a Petro raffle ticket (Mailloux).