Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Jobu's Rum
Forum User
Posts: 561
Joined: 26 May 2024 10:10 am

Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Jobu's Rum »

As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Bully4you
Forum User
Posts: 2447
Joined: 23 Nov 2022 12:50 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Bully4you »

Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.
Jobu's Rum
Forum User
Posts: 561
Joined: 26 May 2024 10:10 am

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Jobu's Rum »

Bully4you wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:24 am
Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.

Yeah either minor league deal or a 1 year prove it deal.
Bully4you
Forum User
Posts: 2447
Joined: 23 Nov 2022 12:50 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Bully4you »

Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:45 am
Bully4you wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:24 am
Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.

Yeah either minor league deal or a 1 year prove it deal.
I just think he can't handle pressure.
He's very talented, just too much anxiety.
Bomber1
Forum User
Posts: 1080
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:27 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Bomber1 »

Bully4you wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:24 am
Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.
It was reported here that Helsley wanted a “Josh Hader” type deal.

He’ll be lucky to get any multi-year deal.

1. Thank goodness they didn’t keep him and offer a QO to “get the draft pick”. He would have accepted the QO so fast the ink wouldn’t have dried before he signed.

2. Agree with your last sentence.
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 4373
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Cardinals4Life »

Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:45 am
Bully4you wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:24 am
Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.

Yeah either minor league deal or a 1 year prove it deal.
He isn't going to have to take a minor league deal. C'mon, guy!!
icon
Forum User
Posts: 4209
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by icon »

He faced 4 batters against the Tigers yesterday and allowed 1 run on 2 hits on just 5 pitches before he was removed.
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 2289
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Carp4Cy »

Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Do they though? So far Baez has a .676 OPS at A+. So that's a long way to go to even reach the majors, and if he makes it, doesn't he currently project as just another MIer who doesn't have a MOTO bat?
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1378
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

Some Oklahoma boys don't like it in New York City.
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 12232
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Absolut »

Fernandez is jealous of that success.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3478
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by ecleme22 »

Bully4you wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:24 am
Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.
Hard to know if Helsley could’ve gotten you more in the offseason.
njcardfan
Forum User
Posts: 93
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:19 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by njcardfan »

ecleme22 wrote: 02 Sep 2025 12:12 pm
Bully4you wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:24 am
Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.
Hard to know if Helsley could’ve gotten you more in the offseason.
How could he not? He was the best closer in the game last year. He was meh at this year’s trade deadline.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 5525
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

njcardfan wrote: 02 Sep 2025 12:26 pm
ecleme22 wrote: 02 Sep 2025 12:12 pm
Bully4you wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:24 am
Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.
Hard to know if Helsley could’ve gotten you more in the offseason.
How could he not? He was the best closer in the game last year. He was meh at this year’s trade deadline.
Yea it’s not hard to figure out he would have brought more when he was coming off of an All-Star dominating season had a full season of control and could be offered a QO as opposed to two months of control had already blown more saves than he had the entire previous season couldn’t be offered a QO and hitters were hitting well over .300 against his fastball. Mo was dumb and wasn’t interested in trading him or fedde because he thought this team was a post season contender
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1262
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by ClassicO »

Melville wrote: ↑30 May 2025 08:41 am

Offer 4 year extension.
17M a year, with 3M deferred annually and payable beginning in 2030.
5th year team option with 2M buyout.
Player opt out after year one and two.
He would sign it.
And it would be a smart move for STL.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 5525
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

ClassicO wrote: 02 Sep 2025 12:33 pm Melville wrote: ↑30 May 2025 08:41 am

Offer 4 year extension.
17M a year, with 3M deferred annually and payable beginning in 2030.
5th year team option with 2M buyout.
Player opt out after year one and two.
He would sign it.
And it would be a smart move for STL.
Yea he was the one leading the pounding of drums to keep helsley in the offseason and extend him
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3478
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Helsley has given up 11 ER in 10.1 IP for NYM

Post by ecleme22 »

Ozziesfan41 wrote: 02 Sep 2025 12:30 pm
njcardfan wrote: 02 Sep 2025 12:26 pm
ecleme22 wrote: 02 Sep 2025 12:12 pm
Bully4you wrote: 02 Sep 2025 02:24 am
Jobu's Rum wrote: 02 Sep 2025 01:45 am As opposed to the 12 ER in 36 IP with STL.

Finally, a trade where the Cards aren't the immediate loser lol

Baez and Dohm look promising. Based on that promise alone, that already makes this a rare win for them.
Yeah, Helsley is not a keeper long-term.
Mets won't resign him either.
He also won't get the big payday he was expecting.
Should have traded him last offseason for more.
Hard to know if Helsley could’ve gotten you more in the offseason.
How could he not? He was the best closer in the game last year. He was meh at this year’s trade deadline.
Yea it’s not hard to figure out he would have brought more when he was coming off of an All-Star dominating season had a full season of control and could be offered a QO as opposed to two months of control had already blown more saves than he had the entire previous season couldn’t be offered a QO and hitters were hitting well over .300 against his fastball. Mo was dumb and wasn’t interested in trading him or fedde because he thought this team was a post season contender
Let's remember, while RH was a lot more hittable with STL in 2025, he was still decent, with a 3.00 ERA / 21 SV / 1.1 WAR.

Unless MO/Bloom formally rejected a deal during the offseason, we don't really know.

The reason I raise this argument is based on the demand during the trade deadline potentially increasing.

So while RH's stats weren't as sexy as March, his market potentially increased based on a team's desperation.
Post Reply