I guess some folks don’t mind dragging themselves into the sewer. Might want to take a good long shower when you decide to come out.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:47 amYup, and even prouder for it being directed at you.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:56 amProud of yourself for being disgusting? LOL. Oh brother.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:55 amI am, as it isn't some snide passive-aggressive (bleep).Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:37 amWhat a classy post. You must be very proud of yourself.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:35 amEat a dick, your passive-aggressive (bleep) is always overflowing.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:34 amThank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
If only you were nearly half as entertaining to others as you are to yourself, if only. But, since you're not, go [fork] yourself you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 10:18 amI guess some folks don’t mind dragging themselves into the sewer. Might want to take a good long shower when you decide to come out.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:47 amYup, and even prouder for it being directed at you.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:56 amProud of yourself for being disgusting? LOL. Oh brother.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:55 amI am, as it isn't some snide passive-aggressive (bleep).Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:37 amWhat a classy post. You must be very proud of yourself.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:35 amEat a dick, your passive-aggressive (bleep) is always overflowing.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:34 amThank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Another totally classless post. You just seem to go lower and lower into the muck. Typical anonymous forum faux tough guy.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 11:44 amIf only you were nearly half as entertaining to others as you are to yourself, if only. But, since you're not, go [fork] yourself you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 10:18 amI guess some folks don’t mind dragging themselves into the sewer. Might want to take a good long shower when you decide to come out.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:47 amYup, and even prouder for it being directed at you.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:56 amProud of yourself for being disgusting? LOL. Oh brother.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:55 amI am, as it isn't some snide passive-aggressive (bleep).Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:37 amWhat a classy post. You must be very proud of yourself.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:35 amEat a dick, your passive-aggressive (bleep) is always overflowing.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:34 amThank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Saggese after that awful stretch when recalled has been rebounding a bit lately. 6 game hit streak and 8 for his last 18
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Nice defense, too. At both 2B and 3B. Wonder how he'd do in LF. My guess is, with some work, he'd be good there, too. He has the makings of a fine utility player.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4018
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
He would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Stay tuned on Saggese's progress. You are lost as a talent evaluator. I realize it's mostly an anti-Shady thing. Grow up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:52 pmHe would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4018
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:55 pmMIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:52 pmHe would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
[/quot
You can't fix stupid, not going to try anymore. You used to be somebody, but you lost your mind along the way. Good luck growing a brain.
Stay tuned on Saggese's progress. You are lost as a talent evaluator. I realize it's mostly an anti-Shady thing. Grow up.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
That’s right, Shady, not everyone can be an elite “talent evaluator” like you—the super-scout who “sees things others don’t.” For example,Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:55 pmStay tuned on Saggese's progress. You are lost as a talent evaluator. I realize it's mostly an anti-Shady thing. Grow up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:52 pmHe would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
Burleson: “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”
Gorman: “the next Eddie Mathews”
Walker: “Frank Robinson”
Yepez: “a prime-Pujols”
Rom: “Tudor-like”
Pallante: “a righty Chris Carpenter”
Roby: “a young Tom Seaver”
Saggese: “Steve Garvey” and “Jeff Bagwell”
Scott II: “Lou Brock”
Carlson: “will be the best hitter on the MLB team from day-one”
The list goes on and on. “Stay tuned.”
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 15:11 pmThat’s right, Shady, not everyone can be an elite “talent evaluator” like you—the super-scout who “sees things others don’t.” For example,Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:55 pmStay tuned on Saggese's progress. You are lost as a talent evaluator. I realize it's mostly an anti-Shady thing. Grow up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:52 pmHe would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
Burleson: “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”
Gorman: “the next Eddie Mathews”
Walker: “Frank Robinson”
Yepez: “a prime-Pujols”
Rom: “Tudor-like”
Pallante: “a righty Chris Carpenter”
Roby: “a young Tom Seaver”
Saggese: “Steve Garvey” and “Jeff Bagwell”
Scott II: “Lou Brock”
Carlson: “will be the best hitter on the MLB team from day-one”
The list goes on and on. “Stay tuned.”
[/quote
Wow ! This is undeniable proof just how obsessed you are with me as a CT poster. You take me way to seriously. I'm just having some fun on an innocent message board. Lighten up a little.
Last edited by Shady on 13 Aug 2025 16:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
You keep telling us you’re a superior “talent evaluator”—in fact, you’ve said many times that the rest of us are “not on your level”—so I would think a noted super-scout like you (“who sees things others don’t”) would welcome scrutiny of your track record, rather than always cowardly dodging any accountability for your “evaluations” and prognostications.Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:04 pmWow ! This is undeniable proof just how obsessed you are with me as a CT poster. You take me way to seriously. I'm just having some fun on an innocent message board. Lighten up a little.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 15:11 pmThat’s right, Shady, not everyone can be an elite “talent evaluator” like you—the super-scout who “sees things others don’t.” For example,Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:55 pmStay tuned on Saggese's progress. You are lost as a talent evaluator. I realize it's mostly an anti-Shady thing. Grow up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:52 pmHe would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
Burleson: “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”
Gorman: “the next Eddie Mathews”
Walker: “Frank Robinson”
Yepez: “a prime-Pujols”
Rom: “Tudor-like”
Pallante: “a righty Chris Carpenter”
Roby: “a young Tom Seaver”
Saggese: “Steve Garvey” and “Jeff Bagwell”
Scott II: “Lou Brock”
Carlson: “will be the best hitter on the MLB team from day-one”
The list goes on and on. “Stay tuned.”
Given your endless spam threads/posts about your unique ability to evaluate talent, I figured you’d welcome the opportunity to man-up, put on your big-boy Depends, and take some responsibility for your consistently wrong and frequently hilarious “evaluations.”
Instead, it appears you’re once again resorting (or is it shrinking?) back to your “clown-nose-on/clown-nose-off” routine when confronted with your “scouting”/“evaluation” buffoonery.
“Stay tuned.”
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
You don't seem to be able to comprehend what having some fun on an innocent message board means. You think I should have to take a pay cut for all my miscalculations on Cards Talk? LOLNYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:33 pmYou keep telling us you’re a superior “talent evaluator”—in fact, you’ve said many times that the rest of us are “not on your level”—so I would think a noted super-scout like you (“who sees things others don’t”) would welcome scrutiny of your track record, rather than always cowardly dodging any accountability for your “evaluations” and prognostications.Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:04 pmWow ! This is undeniable proof just how obsessed you are with me as a CT poster. You take me way to seriously. I'm just having some fun on an innocent message board. Lighten up a little.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 15:11 pmThat’s right, Shady, not everyone can be an elite “talent evaluator” like you—the super-scout who “sees things others don’t.” For example,Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:55 pmStay tuned on Saggese's progress. You are lost as a talent evaluator. I realize it's mostly an anti-Shady thing. Grow up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:52 pmHe would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
Burleson: “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”
Gorman: “the next Eddie Mathews”
Walker: “Frank Robinson”
Yepez: “a prime-Pujols”
Rom: “Tudor-like”
Pallante: “a righty Chris Carpenter”
Roby: “a young Tom Seaver”
Saggese: “Steve Garvey” and “Jeff Bagwell”
Scott II: “Lou Brock”
Carlson: “will be the best hitter on the MLB team from day-one”
The list goes on and on. “Stay tuned.”
Given your endless spam threads/posts about your unique ability to evaluate talent, I figured you’d welcome the opportunity to man-up, put on your big-boy Depends, and take some responsibility for your consistently wrong and frequently hilarious “evaluations.”
Instead, it appears you’re once again resorting (or is it shrinking?) back to your “clown-nose-on/clown-nose-off” routine when confronted with your “scouting”/“evaluation” buffoonery.
“Stay tuned.”
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Clown-nose-on, clown-nose-off.Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:39 pmYou don't seem to be able to comprehend what having some fun on an innocent message board means. You think I should get a pay cut for all my miscalculations? LOLNYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:33 pmYou keep telling us you’re a superior “talent evaluator”—in fact, you’ve said many times that the rest of us are “not on your level”—so I would think a noted super-scout like you (“who sees things others don’t”) would welcome scrutiny of your track record, rather than always cowardly dodging any accountability for your “evaluations” and prognostications.Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:04 pmWow ! This is undeniable proof just how obsessed you are with me as a CT poster. You take me way to seriously. I'm just having some fun on an innocent message board. Lighten up a little.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 15:11 pmThat’s right, Shady, not everyone can be an elite “talent evaluator” like you—the super-scout who “sees things others don’t.” For example,Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:55 pmStay tuned on Saggese's progress. You are lost as a talent evaluator. I realize it's mostly an anti-Shady thing. Grow up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:52 pmHe would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
Burleson: “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”
Gorman: “the next Eddie Mathews”
Walker: “Frank Robinson”
Yepez: “a prime-Pujols”
Rom: “Tudor-like”
Pallante: “a righty Chris Carpenter”
Roby: “a young Tom Seaver”
Saggese: “Steve Garvey” and “Jeff Bagwell”
Scott II: “Lou Brock”
Carlson: “will be the best hitter on the MLB team from day-one”
The list goes on and on. “Stay tuned.”
Given your endless spam threads/posts about your unique ability to evaluate talent, I figured you’d welcome the opportunity to man-up, put on your big-boy Depends, and take some responsibility for your consistently wrong and frequently hilarious “evaluations.”
Instead, it appears you’re once again resorting (or is it shrinking?) back to your “clown-nose-on/clown-nose-off” routine when confronted with your “scouting”/“evaluation” buffoonery.
“Stay tuned.”
Before: “I’m a superior talent evaluator who ‘sees things others don’t.’” “The rest of you aren’t on my level.” “I have the b@lls to stick my neck out.” “Stay tuned.”
[All your predictions/evaluations turn out to be spectacularly wrong.]
After: “So what?” “I’m just an enthusiastic fan having fun on an innocent message board.”
Tell us, Shady, how is it “having b@lls” or “sticking your neck out” if you never take any subsequent accountability for being (consistently and galactically) wrong? Where are your b@lls now?
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Shady, do you really wear a Clown Nose while on the internet?
You be you
You be you
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
No, but you should with your continuous Burleson denial attempts. You were and continue to be woefully mistaken on your Burleson projections. Come on, Guru, get with the program. LOL
Last edited by Shady on 13 Aug 2025 17:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Settle down, man. Take your meds. Or at least have a couple cocktails. Sheesh! Try to have some fun at posting on a silly message board. It's not that big of a deal. LOLNYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:52 pmClown-nose-on, clown-nose-off.Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:39 pmYou don't seem to be able to comprehend what having some fun on an innocent message board means. You think I should get a pay cut for all my miscalculations? LOLNYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:33 pmYou keep telling us you’re a superior “talent evaluator”—in fact, you’ve said many times that the rest of us are “not on your level”—so I would think a noted super-scout like you (“who sees things others don’t”) would welcome scrutiny of your track record, rather than always cowardly dodging any accountability for your “evaluations” and prognostications.Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 16:04 pmWow ! This is undeniable proof just how obsessed you are with me as a CT poster. You take me way to seriously. I'm just having some fun on an innocent message board. Lighten up a little.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 15:11 pmThat’s right, Shady, not everyone can be an elite “talent evaluator” like you—the super-scout who “sees things others don’t.” For example,Shady wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:55 pmStay tuned on Saggese's progress. You are lost as a talent evaluator. I realize it's mostly an anti-Shady thing. Grow up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 14:52 pmHe would likely not get into the lineup for many division rivals. Just not much talent on this Cardinal team. He has done a little better lately. Shady likey.
Burleson: “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”
Gorman: “the next Eddie Mathews”
Walker: “Frank Robinson”
Yepez: “a prime-Pujols”
Rom: “Tudor-like”
Pallante: “a righty Chris Carpenter”
Roby: “a young Tom Seaver”
Saggese: “Steve Garvey” and “Jeff Bagwell”
Scott II: “Lou Brock”
Carlson: “will be the best hitter on the MLB team from day-one”
The list goes on and on. “Stay tuned.”
Given your endless spam threads/posts about your unique ability to evaluate talent, I figured you’d welcome the opportunity to man-up, put on your big-boy Depends, and take some responsibility for your consistently wrong and frequently hilarious “evaluations.”
Instead, it appears you’re once again resorting (or is it shrinking?) back to your “clown-nose-on/clown-nose-off” routine when confronted with your “scouting”/“evaluation” buffoonery.
“Stay tuned.”
Before: “I’m a superior talent evaluator who ‘sees things others don’t.’” “The rest of you aren’t on my level.” “I have the b@lls to stick my neck out.” “Stay tuned.”
[All your predictions/evaluations turn out to be spectacularly wrong.]
After: “So what?” “I’m just an enthusiastic fan having fun on an innocent message board.”
Tell us, Shady, how is it “having b@lls” or “sticking your neck out” if you never take any subsequent accountability for being (consistently and galactically) wrong? Where are your b@lls now?
Last edited by Shady on 13 Aug 2025 17:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.