NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:33 pmWait, you don't think it's perfectly sensible--prudent, even--for the Cardinals to build all their future plans around Thomas Saggese?craviduce wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:20 pm3 hits, he finally had a good game. 1 game doesn't make a season.Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:15 pmPlayers can work to improve. And it's not out of the realm of possibility that Saggese's bat and athleticism could get him some eventual starts in LF vs LHP. That's just my opinion. The radio folks on a show were pretty pumped about Saggese today.craviduce wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 15:59 pmHe's not a catcher anymore. He can't handle baserunners, and he has trouble blocking pitches.....essentially, he's slow to get out of the 1 knee crouch.Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 15:54 pm"So again...why are we trying to return Herrera to catching?" If Saggese develops as a really productive hitter. it would open up a spot in the lineup to have Herrera catch against LHP. Also, keeping Donovan and Wetherholt in the lineup.craviduce wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 15:48 pmwhy are we catching Herrera? He can't throw out runners while in the 1 knee kneel crouch. It's the mandatory catching meta now. It's the reason Contreras gladly took to 1B.Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 15:45 pmAs far as using Saggese in the outfield. I assume it would be, possibly, having him in LF in order to get his RH bat in the lineup vs LHP. Wouldn't it help the offense to catch Herrera, Burleson DH and Saggese in LF?Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 13:25 pm I continue to hear chatter of Saggese, possibly, getting some work next spring training in the outfield.To enhance his value of a utility type player. In the radio conversation it was opinionated that Saggese has shown more athleticism in the last couple weeks with the Cardinals.
So again...why are we trying to return Herrera to catching?
People's bats will get them PA's. That's been the standard since the invention of the game.
Saggese will never remove Donovan and Wetherholt....especially Wetherholt. The Pedigree of a #1 pick, #7 overall...now looking like the 1st or 2nd best player from the draft (Kurtz is probably 1A right now. That pedigree carries a lot of weight...and he's backing it up.
You don't give Saggese a position when he hasn't earned it. And you don't try to put a square peg in a round hole to create him an opportunity.
Try a different route. Herrera may want to catch, but he can't. We've been through that as a team this year. The pitcher prefer Pages ability behind the plate...not Herrera's
come on...seriously. I hope Herrera can do whatever he can to improve. Same with Saggese, but I'm not creating playing time built off hope....only rebellion can be built off hope.
Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Not saying that at all. There were some radio hosts today that really like the progress they've seen in Saggese in the last couple weeks. They see more athleticism. And I happen to agree with themShady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 17:06 pmNYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:33 pmWait, you don't think it's perfectly sensible--prudent, even--for the Cardinals to build all their future plans around Thomas Saggese?craviduce wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:20 pm3 hits, he finally had a good game. 1 game doesn't make a season.Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:15 pmPlayers can work to improve. And it's not out of the realm of possibility that Saggese's bat and athleticism could get him some eventual starts in LF vs LHP. That's just my opinion. The radio folks on a show were pretty pumped about Saggese today.craviduce wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 15:59 pmHe's not a catcher anymore. He can't handle baserunners, and he has trouble blocking pitches.....essentially, he's slow to get out of the 1 knee crouch.Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 15:54 pm"So again...why are we trying to return Herrera to catching?" If Saggese develops as a really productive hitter. it would open up a spot in the lineup to have Herrera catch against LHP. Also, keeping Donovan and Wetherholt in the lineup.craviduce wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 15:48 pmwhy are we catching Herrera? He can't throw out runners while in the 1 knee kneel crouch. It's the mandatory catching meta now. It's the reason Contreras gladly took to 1B.Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 15:45 pmAs far as using Saggese in the outfield. I assume it would be, possibly, having him in LF in order to get his RH bat in the lineup vs LHP. Wouldn't it help the offense to catch Herrera, Burleson DH and Saggese in LF?Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 13:25 pm I continue to hear chatter of Saggese, possibly, getting some work next spring training in the outfield.To enhance his value of a utility type player. In the radio conversation it was opinionated that Saggese has shown more athleticism in the last couple weeks with the Cardinals.
So again...why are we trying to return Herrera to catching?
People's bats will get them PA's. That's been the standard since the invention of the game.
Saggese will never remove Donovan and Wetherholt....especially Wetherholt. The Pedigree of a #1 pick, #7 overall...now looking like the 1st or 2nd best player from the draft (Kurtz is probably 1A right now. That pedigree carries a lot of weight...and he's backing it up.
You don't give Saggese a position when he hasn't earned it. And you don't try to put a square peg in a round hole to create him an opportunity.
Try a different route. Herrera may want to catch, but he can't. We've been through that as a team this year. The pitcher prefer Pages ability behind the plate...not Herrera's
come on...seriously. I hope Herrera can do whatever he can to improve. Same with Saggese, but I'm not creating playing time built off hope....only rebellion can be built off hope.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4018
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Awesome! Saggese turned into an athlete this week! Great news.




Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
With all due respect or disrespect. LOL You simply don't get it. Sometimes things seem to click and confidence builds up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 18:03 pm Awesome! Saggese turned into an athlete this week! Great news.![]()
![]()
![]()
Last edited by Shady on 12 Aug 2025 19:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
I think Saggese does show some athleticism but to me until he learns to lay off the inside pitch he will struggle. He swings at everything in and I think I could jam him with my 73 year old fastball. Even his hits all seem to be off the handle.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Good observation. I've noticed the same thing. Evidently, he's very astute and is working on it.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
What does any of that have to do with alleged “progress” in “athleticism” purportedly achieved in just the last two weeks?Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 19:05 pmWith all due respect or disrespect. LOL You simply don't get it. Sometimes things seem to click and confidence builds up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 18:03 pm Awesome! Saggese turned into an athlete this week! Great news.![]()
![]()
![]()
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4018
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
I get plenty, but don't make everything into some mysterious revelation. You seem to have to get some attention any old way. How the mighty have fallen. You could have been a contender.Shady wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 19:05 pmWith all due respect or disrespect. LOL You simply don't get it. Sometimes things seem to click and confidence builds up.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 18:03 pm Awesome! Saggese turned into an athlete this week! Great news.![]()
![]()
![]()
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Winn didn't have a sad first season. He had a sad late season call-up to get his feet wet, which has happened to many players in baseball history.DwaininAztec wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 20:46 pm With these kinds of standards, Winn would never have been back after his sad first season.
Winn's first season was very good considering his overall production - league average bat at a premium defensive position with... premium defense.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Because it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Thank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Eat a dick, your passive-aggressive (bleep) is always overflowing.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:34 amThank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
What a classy post. You must be very proud of yourself.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:35 amEat a dick, your passive-aggressive (bleep) is always overflowing.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:34 amThank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
I am, as it isn't some snide passive-aggressive (bleep).Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:37 amWhat a classy post. You must be very proud of yourself.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:35 amEat a dick, your passive-aggressive (bleep) is always overflowing.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:34 amThank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Proud of yourself for being disgusting? LOL. Oh brother.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:55 amI am, as it isn't some snide passive-aggressive (bleep).Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:37 amWhat a classy post. You must be very proud of yourself.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:35 amEat a dick, your passive-aggressive (bleep) is always overflowing.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:34 amThank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: Saggese looks solid at 3B and 2B defensively
Yup, and even prouder for it being directed at you.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:56 amProud of yourself for being disgusting? LOL. Oh brother.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:55 amI am, as it isn't some snide passive-aggressive (bleep).Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:37 amWhat a classy post. You must be very proud of yourself.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:35 amEat a dick, your passive-aggressive (bleep) is always overflowing.Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:34 amThank you for your kind post, AEP. Your graciousness is overflowing.AnExParrot wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:28 amBecause it's absolutely none of your business, you creepy old man.Cranny wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:55 amI don’t troll, NY. I just post like everyone else.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 11:31 amNo, I was clearly (and directly) replying to and criticizing Shady’s comparison of those three largely unrelated players based on their batting averages. I then provided the same comparison based on their overall offensive productivity, and then asked “What’s your point?” to make clear I thought the comparison itself lacked context and was pointless (I even noted how small the sample size is for Saggese). Interesting how you chose to snip all of that context out of your reply above.
If you have an issue with comparing those three particular players, why don’t (didn’t) you take it up with Shady—you know, the guy who was actually making the comparison? But no, you were perfectly fine with Shady’s post—in fact, you even replied favorably to it. Then, in the next breath, you go out of your way to try to pick an argument with me for criticizing that comparison.
Per AnExParrot’s prior comment in this thread, and for the sake of variety, maybe try actually reading posts carefully before you respond to them for a change. And because I know how exceedingly important is to you to always have the last word, I will now gladly cede the floor and end this “conversation” from my end. Find someone else to troll.
By the way, why are you so secretive about where you live in New York? Or came from in New York?
It’s bizarre why you won’t answer such a simple and innocent question.