Um did you know Mo is retired after this year and there is new management in STL? Yeah. It's happening.BigBoy12 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 13:32 pm Do you actually think the FO will make moves in the winter? We hear that every year at the deadline. "Easier to make moves in the winter'. Then it doesn't happen.
This winter ownership and the FO will talk themselves into being a fringe contender and they need to wait and see. Then get to the deadline. Sell off a reliever or two. And rinse and repeat.
Last trade
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 811
- Joined: 26 May 2024 00:49 am
Re: Last trade
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 293
- Joined: 27 May 2024 13:22 pm
Re: Last trade
You sure are.Cranny wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 13:31 pmWhat a terrible poster.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 13:11 pm So stupid to even let that putz be conducting trades. What a lazy (donkey) blowhard.
Honest question; do you have one single person that respects you around here, or finds your content meaningful in any way?
Re: Last trade
But that was without The Great Lars Nootbaar. He's getting closer to returning. Watch out league!!
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 375
- Joined: 24 May 2024 11:23 am
Re: Last trade
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 554
- Joined: 26 May 2024 10:10 am
Re: Last trade
The fact that he thinks Nootbaar is a core piece is why this org has been run into the dirt. A case COULD be made for Burleson, but he seems like a role player/platoon guy to me still. His bat hasn't reached that level yet
Re: Last trade
Agree. The problem with Burleson is he's the only OF we have that produces runs. If he's gone, then what?Jobu's Rum wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 14:09 pm
The fact that he thinks Nootbaar is a core piece is why this org has been run into the dirt. A case COULD be made for Burleson, but he seems like a role player/platoon guy to me still. His bat hasn't reached that level yet
So sure I would move him if something good were offered, but it really shines a light on how terrible this OF is.
Re: Last trade
"Putz. Lazy (donkey) blowhard". That's a terrible and childish post by JA, Shakey. If complaining about that kind of stupidity in a post causes me to lose the respect of posters, so be it. And if you don't care for me, so be that too. Just put me on ignore so I don't bother you. Deal?ShakeyWalton wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 14:03 pmYou sure are.Cranny wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 13:31 pmWhat a terrible poster.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 13:11 pm So stupid to even let that putz be conducting trades. What a lazy (donkey) blowhard.
Honest question; do you have one single person that respects you around here, or finds your content meaningful in any way?
Re: Last trade
so basically we traded an all star closer for three 20 something minor leaguers still single A ball.
Re: Last trade
Why did people seriously think they were gonna blow it all up in a transition year? Bloom is going to start with this group next year and see what he has and wants to do with this group. A big sell was never going to happen
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 7699
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Last trade
You'd just (buzz) about the trade anyway. No trade, trade..JuanAgosto wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 13:11 pm So stupid to even let that putz be conducting trades. What a lazy (donkey) blowhard.
(buzz) (buzz) (buzz)
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:55 pm
Re: Last trade
Oh lord, we still need to see what we have?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: Last trade
That's funny coming from someone who's only purpose on here is to (buzz).scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 14:19 pmYou'd just (A female canine animal, especially a dog) about the trade anyway. No trade, trade..JuanAgosto wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 13:11 pm So stupid to even let that putz be conducting trades. What a lazy (donkey) blowhard.
(A female canine animal, especially a dog) (A female canine animal, especially a dog) (A female canine animal, especially a dog)
Re: Last trade
Think Mo, in collaboration with the Cardinal owners, destroyed this franchise. Nobody goes to the games anymore. Or, not many