If you develop a good prospect, wouldn’t it be cheaper to fill the holes with that cost controlled stud. Why trade him?Cranny wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025 16:06 pmIt's not stale at all. Develop good prospects and trade them as necessary to fill holes. Stay away from huge long term FA contracts that put too many eggs into one basket. Sign older free agents as necessary to short term contracts. It's the only way to do it with a smaller budget than many teams.An Old Friend wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025 15:50 pmHas BDW been able to admit that the way the team found success two decades ago may be a bit stale?Cranny wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025 15:42 pmPerhaps, but now they seem to be getting back on track with the developmental system. One thing that folks seem ask for, though, that is not going to happen - is huge long term contracts for free agents. BDW likes to rent and try on before buying, as I've heard him say multiple times.Goldfan wrote: ↑11 Jul 2025 15:11 pm So essentially where they’ve always been in the payroll picking order, only difference now is that the infrastructure was left to rot and who knows if it will ever be what it was. You ad Luhnow with TLR/Dunc…..that’s a world class management team….BDW/MO thought they could do just as good WHILE
BDW went cheap on the farm….and Cranny cries that STL can’t compete with NY and LA payroll…..IT NEVER DID!!!
Cranny stop your lying propaganda. The reason the Cardinals are in the spot they are is IDIOT running the organization
Can you honestly compare TLR/Dunc to Oli/Dusty ???? Who did that??? BDW
BDW admitted they went cheap with their development system….WHO DID THAT??? BDW
Then, no where in your model does it talk about trying to outs to see if we like you. Which part in your above address that. The chemistry clause.
And signing aging free agents is as tricky as long term to youngsters.