Ha! I thought the same thing.
I think it would have bombed in general.
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Let's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
Mailloux's name was toxic yesterday.BalotelliMassive wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:34 pmWant a laugh - do a search for Bolduc and look at how the opinions differed less than a week ago.
Also the staff that has had some pretty bad whiffs on the defensive side for 5 years or so. Outside of Broberg, they’d basically be an solid D grade or so since the CupTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:36 pmLet's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
This trade stings and this is coming from a guy that always repeats the mantras: wingers are the easiest position to fill & you have to give to get.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it coming.
I really like Bolduc.
I don't like Kyrou & Buchnevich.
The trade would have been much more palatable if Army squeezed Hughes for one of his 2nd rounders next year as well.
Hopefully LM turns out to be a better RHD than Gilbert Delorme
He has the size and certainly not only fills a team need, but an organizational need.
He's surrounded by veteran d-men so hopefully he will learn and turn into a stud.
Feeling better already because we landed a young RHD.
Already been to goodwill?theograce wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:56 pmFrom bragging about talking hockey to searching images and not talking hockeyWalter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:53 pmLive look?theograce wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:33 pmScratched 10 timesWalter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmI understand you need a life and aren't interested in actually talking hockey.theograce wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:27 pmBuchneveich … a veteran was awful and blew the series for the Blues. Now what?Walter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:23 pm Do people forget Bolduc was healthy scratched ~10 times last season.. had 1 point in 7 playoff games and took two terrible penalties?
A 21/22 year old playing 70+ games and scoring 20 goals averaging 12 minutes. 100+ hits.
You understand this is impressive right?
Laughing
![]()
Scratched 10 times
Hahahah
Interesting, based on what? Because the Blues and others feel like the organization has some really good defensive prospects. Lindstein, Fischer, Ralph, Jiricek, Burns, Paul Fischer (Edm) Weird opinion but you do like to (buzz) and moan a lotMiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:38 pmAlso the staff that has had some pretty bad whiffs on the defensive side for 5 years or so. Outside of Broberg, they’d basically be an solid D grade or so since the CupTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:36 pmLet's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
This trade stings and this is coming from a guy that always repeats the mantras: wingers are the easiest position to fill & you have to give to get.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it coming.
I really like Bolduc.
I don't like Kyrou & Buchnevich.
The trade would have been much more palatable if Army squeezed Hughes for one of his 2nd rounders next year as well.
Hopefully LM turns out to be a better RHD than Gilbert Delorme
He has the size and certainly not only fills a team need, but an organizational need.
He's surrounded by veteran d-men so hopefully he will learn and turn into a stud.
Feeling better already because we landed a young RHD.
I’ll let you review the d five years ago vs today and figure it out budHarry S Deals wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 19:02 pmInteresting, based on what? Because the Blues and others feel like the organization has some really good defensive prospects. Lindstein, Fischer, Ralph, Jiricek, Burns, Paul Fischer (Edm) Weird opinion but you do like to (buzz) and moan a lotMiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:38 pmAlso the staff that has had some pretty bad whiffs on the defensive side for 5 years or so. Outside of Broberg, they’d basically be an solid D grade or so since the CupTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:36 pmLet's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
This trade stings and this is coming from a guy that always repeats the mantras: wingers are the easiest position to fill & you have to give to get.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it coming.
I really like Bolduc.
I don't like Kyrou & Buchnevich.
The trade would have been much more palatable if Army squeezed Hughes for one of his 2nd rounders next year as well.
Hopefully LM turns out to be a better RHD than Gilbert Delorme
He has the size and certainly not only fills a team need, but an organizational need.
He's surrounded by veteran d-men so hopefully he will learn and turn into a stud.
Feeling better already because we landed a young RHD.
There was definitely a hangover after the Cup with their decisions.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:38 pmAlso the staff that has had some pretty bad whiffs on the defensive side for 5 years or so. Outside of Broberg, they’d basically be an solid D grade or so since the CupTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:36 pmLet's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
This trade stings and this is coming from a guy that always repeats the mantras: wingers are the easiest position to fill & you have to give to get.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it coming.
I really like Bolduc.
I don't like Kyrou & Buchnevich.
The trade would have been much more palatable if Army squeezed Hughes for one of his 2nd rounders next year as well.
Hopefully LM turns out to be a better RHD than Gilbert Delorme
He has the size and certainly not only fills a team need, but an organizational need.
He's surrounded by veteran d-men so hopefully he will learn and turn into a stud.
Feeling better already because we landed a young RHD.
Last year was undoubtedly a step back to competence but it was a rough ride for sure. People do tend to forget that every team has prospects tho. AgreedTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 19:09 pmThere was definitely a hangover after the Cup with their decisions.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:38 pmAlso the staff that has had some pretty bad whiffs on the defensive side for 5 years or so. Outside of Broberg, they’d basically be an solid D grade or so since the CupTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:36 pmLet's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
This trade stings and this is coming from a guy that always repeats the mantras: wingers are the easiest position to fill & you have to give to get.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it coming.
I really like Bolduc.
I don't like Kyrou & Buchnevich.
The trade would have been much more palatable if Army squeezed Hughes for one of his 2nd rounders next year as well.
Hopefully LM turns out to be a better RHD than Gilbert Delorme
He has the size and certainly not only fills a team need, but an organizational need.
He's surrounded by veteran d-men so hopefully he will learn and turn into a stud.
Feeling better already because we landed a young RHD.
They need to be careful what kind of term and dollars they offer to Fowler.
He's the shiny new toy that everyone loves...for now.
His situation can easily turn into Nick Leddy the Sequel.
We have all of those LHD in the pipeline so hopefully Army/Steen are smart.
The west isn't getting any easier.
Edmonton, Vegas, Dallas, and Colorado are still above us and then you have the Mammoth & Kraken really pushing to make the playoffs this year to keep their new fan bases engaged and growing.
Anaheim is spending foolishly but their young talent level is very impressive and now they have a very good coach.
They could make the playoffs in 26. They will in 27 for sure.
San Jose & Chicago are still a few years away but when they get there, they'll be dynamite for years.
Calgary is starting to stockpile good young players, but they need to cycle thru those overpaid veteran players for a few more years.
Nashville's cupboard isn't as filled as Calgary but they're somewhat similar because of the older overpaid players.
Winnipeg & Minnesota are decent now, but I see those 2 teams dropping behind most teams in the west within 2-3 years.
I like Minny long term a lot more than the Jets because of Faber & Buium.
Byfield better turn into a stud center or else LA will have major problems once Kopitar hangs them up .
Same goes for Clarke-Doughty.
Vancouver is a mess unless Pettersson grows a pair and turns into a legit 1C.
If not, Hughes will leave for sure and they'll be bottom feeders for years.
Cam Fowler.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:38 pmAlso the staff that has had some pretty bad whiffs on the defensive side for 5 years or so. Outside of Broberg, they’d basically be an solid D grade or so since the CupTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:36 pmLet's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
This trade stings and this is coming from a guy that always repeats the mantras: wingers are the easiest position to fill & you have to give to get.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it coming.
I really like Bolduc.
I don't like Kyrou & Buchnevich.
The trade would have been much more palatable if Army squeezed Hughes for one of his 2nd rounders next year as well.
Hopefully LM turns out to be a better RHD than Gilbert Delorme
He has the size and certainly not only fills a team need, but an organizational need.
He's surrounded by veteran d-men so hopefully he will learn and turn into a stud.
Feeling better already because we landed a young RHD.
Yea fair he really thrived.imyourhuckleberry wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 19:16 pmCam Fowler.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:38 pmAlso the staff that has had some pretty bad whiffs on the defensive side for 5 years or so. Outside of Broberg, they’d basically be an solid D grade or so since the CupTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:36 pmLet's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
This trade stings and this is coming from a guy that always repeats the mantras: wingers are the easiest position to fill & you have to give to get.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it coming.
I really like Bolduc.
I don't like Kyrou & Buchnevich.
The trade would have been much more palatable if Army squeezed Hughes for one of his 2nd rounders next year as well.
Hopefully LM turns out to be a better RHD than Gilbert Delorme
He has the size and certainly not only fills a team need, but an organizational need.
He's surrounded by veteran d-men so hopefully he will learn and turn into a stud.
Feeling better already because we landed a young RHD.
Yeah Bouwmeester retired. Petro retired. Gunnarsson retired. It happens.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 19:04 pmI’ll let you review the d five years ago vs today and figure it out budHarry S Deals wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 19:02 pmInteresting, based on what? Because the Blues and others feel like the organization has some really good defensive prospects. Lindstein, Fischer, Ralph, Jiricek, Burns, Paul Fischer (Edm) Weird opinion but you do like to (A female canine animal, especially a dog) and moan a lotMiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:38 pmAlso the staff that has had some pretty bad whiffs on the defensive side for 5 years or so. Outside of Broberg, they’d basically be an solid D grade or so since the CupTheHighHat wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 18:36 pmLet's hope our scout(s) that gave Army the report on LM isn't the same scout that convinced Army to jump the TDL and trade Barbashev straight up for Dean on that Sunday morning a couple of years ago.bluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:32 pmSo where do NHL GMs and scouts fit into it? Less than the folks on Habs boards?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:31 pmThey know much more about him than almost all of usbluetunehead wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:28 pmMontreal fans thought they’d get Kyrou for Mike Matheson and Kirby Dach. Forgive me for not trusting their fans opinions above anyone else’s.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 17:25 pm Bottom line: If LM was as valuable as some here are now saying he is, Habs fans would be saying what a lot of the people supporting the trade are saying here: “gotta give to get”; “hate to lose LM but Bolduc has a ton of upside”; etc.
Go to the MTL boards and see if you see that.
This trade stings and this is coming from a guy that always repeats the mantras: wingers are the easiest position to fill & you have to give to get.
Maybe it's because I didn't see it coming.
I really like Bolduc.
I don't like Kyrou & Buchnevich.
The trade would have been much more palatable if Army squeezed Hughes for one of his 2nd rounders next year as well.
Hopefully LM turns out to be a better RHD than Gilbert Delorme
He has the size and certainly not only fills a team need, but an organizational need.
He's surrounded by veteran d-men so hopefully he will learn and turn into a stud.
Feeling better already because we landed a young RHD.
My problem is Mailloux is also proven. Proven that he could not secure a starting lineup with the Habs who were dreadful on defense. People on here are assuming he will step into the bottom pairing, but he has yet to prove he will even make a roster spot. He was sent down twice with the Habs.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 15:36 pm All I can say is this kid better be REALLY (Ef'En) good. Bolduc has at least perennial 50 pt potential and who knows what he could become in 5+ years.
Bolduc's proven. Mailoux is still proving.
I don't have time to scroll through everything right now. His 5 pts in 8 career games is impressive but why has he barely played any NHL games spread over the last 2 seasons?