So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Bad14
Forum User
Posts: 202
Joined: 19 Jun 2024 11:53 am

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Bad14 »

Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 19 May 2025 18:09 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
I don’t understand what the big deal is with this. It is something that has happened throughout the history of the game. Stan Musial moved down in the order as he got older and his skills slipped. It’s not some grave insult.

And it’s not as if this is some out of nowhere decision. Arenado has pretty steadily declined offensively, particularly in regards to power, in his two years previous to this. It’s looking like this year is going to be a continuation of this. It’s not an insult to hit him 6th. Especially when you have others on the team that appear to be ascending and are playing much better this year.
Because everything's a big deal here. It's the smart move. Wouldn't surprise me if Arenado does better in lower spot.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 4424
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

Bad14 wrote: 19 May 2025 19:14 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 19 May 2025 18:09 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
I don’t understand what the big deal is with this. It is something that has happened throughout the history of the game. Stan Musial moved down in the order as he got older and his skills slipped. It’s not some grave insult.

And it’s not as if this is some out of nowhere decision. Arenado has pretty steadily declined offensively, particularly in regards to power, in his two years previous to this. It’s looking like this year is going to be a continuation of this. It’s not an insult to hit him 6th. Especially when you have others on the team that appear to be ascending and are playing much better this year.
Because everything's a big deal here. It's the smart move. Wouldn't surprise me if Arenado does better in lower spot.
From the way he talked it doesn’t sound like he has much confidence he will do any better
Monsieur De Treville
On probation
Posts: 7676
Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Monsieur De Treville »

Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
How's 11 runs through 7 looking?
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4210
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by ramfandan »

First night the new order looked even better and Nado
Contributed.. hustling was good too!
Looks like he enjoyed being 6th !
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 9238
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Cusecards »

sdaltons wrote: 19 May 2025 19:10 pm What are you hoping to get out of this thread and why is it only the "haters" that can give it to you?
You beat me to it.
Very confusing OP. What is the point???
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4210
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by ramfandan »

Cmon Graceffo!
Throw BP type strikes.
Even if you allow 7 or 8 runs thr odds are you will get 3 outs before they get to 11
Lol
icon
Forum User
Posts: 3360
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by icon »

Arenado the only Cardinal starter without a hit tonight and a signature popup with 1st and 3rd and 0 outs. So the change had no effect...on Arenado.
Jatalk
Forum User
Posts: 1089
Joined: 05 Apr 2024 08:33 am

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Jatalk »

Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
Are you really arguing he should bat 4th?
blackinkbiz
Forum User
Posts: 3800
Joined: 05 May 2020 14:17 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by blackinkbiz »

Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
I think the real question is, what is your obsession with Arenado and your inability to deal with the fact he's no longer an MVP-caliber player?

And why are you taking your childlike disdain out on other posters who can simply see the situation for the reality it is?
Ike Hammett
Forum User
Posts: 581
Joined: 24 Dec 2022 11:20 am

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Ike Hammett »

blackinkbiz wrote: 19 May 2025 22:05 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
I think the real question is, what is your obsession with Arenado and your inability to deal with the fact he's no longer an MVP-caliber player?

And why are you taking your childlike disdain out on other posters who can simply see the situation for the reality it is?
Nobody pushed harder on sites like this to get Arenado to St. Louis, I believe the team read some of my comments and did what they could to get him here and he chose to come here. I owe a certain loyalty and responsibility to push back against people that bash on them. I think if people go out of their way to do what you like and want you must defend it. I have a real dislike to a lot of the negativity and hate of a lot of these posters. Not just Arenado but they way they all bashed on Matt Carpenter, Dexter Fowler, Mikolas, Kolten Wong, Goldy, Shildt ownership and management etc.

Whiz on these spoiled brats who never shut up about how rough they have it as Cards "fans". I really don't care if Nado gets moved down in the batting order, that's part of the game and the way things work. I have issues with the way these guys get treated by weak anonymous haters and will return some back.
Ike Hammett
Forum User
Posts: 581
Joined: 24 Dec 2022 11:20 am

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Ike Hammett »

Monsieur De Treville wrote: 19 May 2025 21:45 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
How's 11 runs through 7 looking?
Looks good to me and like some of our other games during this hot streak. So can you answer the original question?
Monsieur De Treville
On probation
Posts: 7676
Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Monsieur De Treville »

Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 22:44 pm
blackinkbiz wrote: 19 May 2025 22:05 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
I think the real question is, what is your obsession with Arenado and your inability to deal with the fact he's no longer an MVP-caliber player?

And why are you taking your childlike disdain out on other posters who can simply see the situation for the reality it is?
Nobody pushed harder on sites like this to get Arenado to St. Louis, I believe the team read some of my comments and did what they could to get him here and he chose to come here. I owe a certain loyalty and responsibility to push back against people that bash on them. I think if people go out of their way to do what you like and want you must defend it. I have a real dislike to a lot of the negativity and hate of a lot of these posters. Not just Arenado but they way they all bashed on Matt Carpenter, Dexter Fowler, Mikolas, Kolten Wong, Goldy, Shildt ownership and management etc.

Whiz on these spoiled brats who never shut up about how rough they have it as Cards "fans". I really don't care if Nado gets moved down in the batting order, that's part of the game and the way things work. I have issues with the way these guys get treated by weak anonymous haters and will return some back.
It's a weird take.

Pointing out Nado's dissipating power is not hatred..rather it's observation. An observation apparently shared by Nado himself.

Again...it's a weird take on the situation.
Ike Hammett
Forum User
Posts: 581
Joined: 24 Dec 2022 11:20 am

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Ike Hammett »

Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 19 May 2025 18:09 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
I don’t understand what the big deal is with this. It is something that has happened throughout the history of the game. Stan Musial moved down in the order as he got older and his skills slipped. It’s not some grave insult.

And it’s not as if this is some out of nowhere decision. Arenado has pretty steadily declined offensively, particularly in regards to power, in his two years previous to this. It’s looking like this year is going to be a continuation of this. It’s not an insult to hit him 6th. Especially when you have others on the team that appear to be ascending and are playing much better this year.
Right! What's the big deal with where he is hitting? Cards are playing really good baseball doing a lot of winning and scoring. Why is every other post about how they need to fix things?
Monsieur De Treville
On probation
Posts: 7676
Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Monsieur De Treville »

Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 22:48 pm
Monsieur De Treville wrote: 19 May 2025 21:45 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
How's 11 runs through 7 looking?
Looks good to me and like some of our other games during this hot streak. So can you answer the original question?
I doubt if we'll do better than 12-2. But that's largely irrelevant. The question you should've asked is will the Cards offense improve with Nado hitting 6th vs 4th and will we see more production out of the cleanup spot without Nado hitting there.

You see...the 12-2 record is also a reflection on the pitching as well as the strength of schedule.
Monsieur De Treville
On probation
Posts: 7676
Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Monsieur De Treville »

Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 22:52 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 19 May 2025 18:09 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
I don’t understand what the big deal is with this. It is something that has happened throughout the history of the game. Stan Musial moved down in the order as he got older and his skills slipped. It’s not some grave insult.

And it’s not as if this is some out of nowhere decision. Arenado has pretty steadily declined offensively, particularly in regards to power, in his two years previous to this. It’s looking like this year is going to be a continuation of this. It’s not an insult to hit him 6th. Especially when you have others on the team that appear to be ascending and are playing much better this year.
Right! What's the big deal with where he is hitting? Cards are playing really good baseball doing a lot of winning and scoring. Why is every other post about how they need to fix things?
So...you're saying teams should stop attempting to improve?
peterman'srealitytour
Forum User
Posts: 228
Joined: 26 May 2024 17:41 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by peterman'srealitytour »

Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 22:44 pm
blackinkbiz wrote: 19 May 2025 22:05 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
I think the real question is, what is your obsession with Arenado and your inability to deal with the fact he's no longer an MVP-caliber player?

And why are you taking your childlike disdain out on other posters who can simply see the situation for the reality it is?
Nobody pushed harder on sites like this to get Arenado to St. Louis, I believe the team read some of my comments and did what they could to get him here and he chose to come here. I owe a certain loyalty and responsibility to push back against people that bash on them. I think if people go out of their way to do what you like and want you must defend it. I have a real dislike to a lot of the negativity and hate of a lot of these posters. Not just Arenado but they way they all bashed on Matt Carpenter, Dexter Fowler, Mikolas, Kolten Wong, Goldy, Shildt ownership and management etc.

Whiz on these spoiled brats who never shut up about how rough they have it as Cards "fans". I really don't care if Nado gets moved down in the batting order, that's part of the game and the way things work. I have issues with the way these guys get treated by weak anonymous haters and will return some back.
Yes, of course the team “read your comments.” I mean you’re the self proclaimed “mayor of ballpark village” Do the kids on the playground know all of that?
Post Reply