Because everything's a big deal here. It's the smart move. Wouldn't surprise me if Arenado does better in lower spot.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑19 May 2025 18:09 pmI don’t understand what the big deal is with this. It is something that has happened throughout the history of the game. Stan Musial moved down in the order as he got older and his skills slipped. It’s not some grave insult.Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
And it’s not as if this is some out of nowhere decision. Arenado has pretty steadily declined offensively, particularly in regards to power, in his two years previous to this. It’s looking like this year is going to be a continuation of this. It’s not an insult to hit him 6th. Especially when you have others on the team that appear to be ascending and are playing much better this year.
So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
From the way he talked it doesn’t sound like he has much confidence he will do any betterBad14 wrote: ↑19 May 2025 19:14 pmBecause everything's a big deal here. It's the smart move. Wouldn't surprise me if Arenado does better in lower spot.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑19 May 2025 18:09 pmI don’t understand what the big deal is with this. It is something that has happened throughout the history of the game. Stan Musial moved down in the order as he got older and his skills slipped. It’s not some grave insult.Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
And it’s not as if this is some out of nowhere decision. Arenado has pretty steadily declined offensively, particularly in regards to power, in his two years previous to this. It’s looking like this year is going to be a continuation of this. It’s not an insult to hit him 6th. Especially when you have others on the team that appear to be ascending and are playing much better this year.
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
How's 11 runs through 7 looking?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
First night the new order looked even better and Nado
Contributed.. hustling was good too!
Looks like he enjoyed being 6th !
Contributed.. hustling was good too!
Looks like he enjoyed being 6th !
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
Cmon Graceffo!
Throw BP type strikes.
Even if you allow 7 or 8 runs thr odds are you will get 3 outs before they get to 11
Lol
Throw BP type strikes.
Even if you allow 7 or 8 runs thr odds are you will get 3 outs before they get to 11
Lol
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
Arenado the only Cardinal starter without a hit tonight and a signature popup with 1st and 3rd and 0 outs. So the change had no effect...on Arenado.
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
Are you really arguing he should bat 4th?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: 05 May 2020 14:17 pm
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
I think the real question is, what is your obsession with Arenado and your inability to deal with the fact he's no longer an MVP-caliber player?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
And why are you taking your childlike disdain out on other posters who can simply see the situation for the reality it is?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 583
- Joined: 24 Dec 2022 11:20 am
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
Nobody pushed harder on sites like this to get Arenado to St. Louis, I believe the team read some of my comments and did what they could to get him here and he chose to come here. I owe a certain loyalty and responsibility to push back against people that bash on them. I think if people go out of their way to do what you like and want you must defend it. I have a real dislike to a lot of the negativity and hate of a lot of these posters. Not just Arenado but they way they all bashed on Matt Carpenter, Dexter Fowler, Mikolas, Kolten Wong, Goldy, Shildt ownership and management etc.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑19 May 2025 22:05 pmI think the real question is, what is your obsession with Arenado and your inability to deal with the fact he's no longer an MVP-caliber player?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
And why are you taking your childlike disdain out on other posters who can simply see the situation for the reality it is?
Whiz on these spoiled brats who never shut up about how rough they have it as Cards "fans". I really don't care if Nado gets moved down in the batting order, that's part of the game and the way things work. I have issues with the way these guys get treated by weak anonymous haters and will return some back.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 583
- Joined: 24 Dec 2022 11:20 am
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
Looks good to me and like some of our other games during this hot streak. So can you answer the original question?Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑19 May 2025 21:45 pmHow's 11 runs through 7 looking?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
It's a weird take.Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 22:44 pmNobody pushed harder on sites like this to get Arenado to St. Louis, I believe the team read some of my comments and did what they could to get him here and he chose to come here. I owe a certain loyalty and responsibility to push back against people that bash on them. I think if people go out of their way to do what you like and want you must defend it. I have a real dislike to a lot of the negativity and hate of a lot of these posters. Not just Arenado but they way they all bashed on Matt Carpenter, Dexter Fowler, Mikolas, Kolten Wong, Goldy, Shildt ownership and management etc.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑19 May 2025 22:05 pmI think the real question is, what is your obsession with Arenado and your inability to deal with the fact he's no longer an MVP-caliber player?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
And why are you taking your childlike disdain out on other posters who can simply see the situation for the reality it is?
Whiz on these spoiled brats who never shut up about how rough they have it as Cards "fans". I really don't care if Nado gets moved down in the batting order, that's part of the game and the way things work. I have issues with the way these guys get treated by weak anonymous haters and will return some back.
Pointing out Nado's dissipating power is not hatred..rather it's observation. An observation apparently shared by Nado himself.
Again...it's a weird take on the situation.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 583
- Joined: 24 Dec 2022 11:20 am
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
Right! What's the big deal with where he is hitting? Cards are playing really good baseball doing a lot of winning and scoring. Why is every other post about how they need to fix things?Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑19 May 2025 18:09 pmI don’t understand what the big deal is with this. It is something that has happened throughout the history of the game. Stan Musial moved down in the order as he got older and his skills slipped. It’s not some grave insult.Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
And it’s not as if this is some out of nowhere decision. Arenado has pretty steadily declined offensively, particularly in regards to power, in his two years previous to this. It’s looking like this year is going to be a continuation of this. It’s not an insult to hit him 6th. Especially when you have others on the team that appear to be ascending and are playing much better this year.
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
I doubt if we'll do better than 12-2. But that's largely irrelevant. The question you should've asked is will the Cards offense improve with Nado hitting 6th vs 4th and will we see more production out of the cleanup spot without Nado hitting there.Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 22:48 pmLooks good to me and like some of our other games during this hot streak. So can you answer the original question?Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑19 May 2025 21:45 pmHow's 11 runs through 7 looking?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
You see...the 12-2 record is also a reflection on the pitching as well as the strength of schedule.
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
So...you're saying teams should stop attempting to improve?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 22:52 pmRight! What's the big deal with where he is hitting? Cards are playing really good baseball doing a lot of winning and scoring. Why is every other post about how they need to fix things?Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑19 May 2025 18:09 pmI don’t understand what the big deal is with this. It is something that has happened throughout the history of the game. Stan Musial moved down in the order as he got older and his skills slipped. It’s not some grave insult.Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
And it’s not as if this is some out of nowhere decision. Arenado has pretty steadily declined offensively, particularly in regards to power, in his two years previous to this. It’s looking like this year is going to be a continuation of this. It’s not an insult to hit him 6th. Especially when you have others on the team that appear to be ascending and are playing much better this year.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 26 May 2024 17:41 pm
Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?
Yes, of course the team “read your comments.” I mean you’re the self proclaimed “mayor of ballpark village” Do the kids on the playground know all of that?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 22:44 pmNobody pushed harder on sites like this to get Arenado to St. Louis, I believe the team read some of my comments and did what they could to get him here and he chose to come here. I owe a certain loyalty and responsibility to push back against people that bash on them. I think if people go out of their way to do what you like and want you must defend it. I have a real dislike to a lot of the negativity and hate of a lot of these posters. Not just Arenado but they way they all bashed on Matt Carpenter, Dexter Fowler, Mikolas, Kolten Wong, Goldy, Shildt ownership and management etc.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑19 May 2025 22:05 pmI think the real question is, what is your obsession with Arenado and your inability to deal with the fact he's no longer an MVP-caliber player?Ike Hammett wrote: ↑19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
And why are you taking your childlike disdain out on other posters who can simply see the situation for the reality it is?
Whiz on these spoiled brats who never shut up about how rough they have it as Cards "fans". I really don't care if Nado gets moved down in the batting order, that's part of the game and the way things work. I have issues with the way these guys get treated by weak anonymous haters and will return some back.