Actually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:16 pmDude, you demanded the explanation. Don’t be a dooosh because you didn’t like the answer.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:09 pmOK, brilliant one. Now "educate" us, again, on how great Contreras is. LOLMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:25 pmYour ignorance on nearly every baseball matter is astounding.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:03 pmPlease explain.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:46 pmThis is Wetherholt's age-22 season, Saggese age-23.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:44 pmBoth Wetherholt and Saggese are 22. Let's hope Wetherholt can get to Saggese's level as a hitter, professionally, by the time both are 23.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:39 pm Don’t know how he did on the backfields, but dating back to Spring training he’s 0 for his last 27 in games that we can actually see.
Went 2 for 3 in that first game in spring training when people wanted him to skip right to the MLB and then finished spring 0 for 17.
But...allow me to try and educate you once again.
A player's age in any given season is based upon how old they are on June 30th. Saggese turns 23 in two days and therefore, this is his age 23 season.
JJ turns 23 on September 10th, therefore this is his age 22 season.
With that said, their perspective ages are largely irrelevant. Wetherholt is the better prospect for a variety of reasons. Doesn't mean he will be the better player, but scouts like his ceiling much more than Saggesse's. Let's hope they both become great hitters.
Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 3000
- Joined: 24 May 2018 18:01 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Straight to AA where the most talented minor leaguers are after missing a ton of time due to injury last year seems aggressive.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 12462
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
You said they were the same age. It had to then be explained to you, at your request, how their age is different.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.
So just say thanks and admit that you were wrong.
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
He's off to a bad start. It happens.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:09 pmOK, brilliant one. Now "educate" us, once again, on how great Contreras is. LOLMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:25 pmYour ignorance on nearly every baseball matter is astounding.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:03 pmPlease explain.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:46 pmThis is Wetherholt's age-22 season, Saggese age-23.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:44 pmBoth Wetherholt and Saggese are 22. Let's hope Wetherholt can get to Saggese's level as a hitter, professionally, by the time both are 23.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:39 pm Don’t know how he did on the backfields, but dating back to Spring training he’s 0 for his last 27 in games that we can actually see.
Went 2 for 3 in that first game in spring training when people wanted him to skip right to the MLB and then finished spring 0 for 17.
But...allow me to try and educate you once again.
A player's age in any given season is based upon how old they are on June 30th. Saggese turns 23 in two days and therefore, this is his age 23 season.
JJ turns 23 on September 10th, therefore this is his age 22 season.
With that said, their perspective ages are largely irrelevant. Wetherholt is the better prospect for a variety of reasons. Doesn't mean he will be the better player, but scouts like his ceiling much more than Saggesse's. Let's hope they both become great hitters.
Example: in 2022 Paul Goldschmidt was the NL MVP. However, he got off to an awful start. Didn't hit his first HR until April 29th. Ended the season with 35 bombs.
Point is...Contreras has a 10 year track record of success. He will come around. He's hardly the first player to have a bad couple of weeks. He'll hardly be the last.
Juan Soto will make just under $52 million this season. He has 1 HR and 4 RBI so far.
Now...what else can explain to you? I promise I'll use small words so you're not confused.
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
He doesn't do that. But watch...within a day or two he'll be repeating the same nonsense.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:57 pmYou said they were the same age. It had to then be explained to you, at your request, how their age is different.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.
So just say thanks and admit that you were wrong.
![]()
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Doesn't mean Saggese will stay ahead. Saggesse has had 1,691 ABs as a pro. JJ has had 115. Of course, Saggesse is ahead of him now. Duh!Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:16 pmDude, you demanded the explanation. Don’t be a dooosh because you didn’t like the answer.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:09 pmOK, brilliant one. Now "educate" us, again, on how great Contreras is. LOLMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:25 pmYour ignorance on nearly every baseball matter is astounding.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:03 pmPlease explain.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:46 pmThis is Wetherholt's age-22 season, Saggese age-23.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:44 pmBoth Wetherholt and Saggese are 22. Let's hope Wetherholt can get to Saggese's level as a hitter, professionally, by the time both are 23.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:39 pm Don’t know how he did on the backfields, but dating back to Spring training he’s 0 for his last 27 in games that we can actually see.
Went 2 for 3 in that first game in spring training when people wanted him to skip right to the MLB and then finished spring 0 for 17.
But...allow me to try and educate you once again.
A player's age in any given season is based upon how old they are on June 30th. Saggese turns 23 in two days and therefore, this is his age 23 season.
JJ turns 23 on September 10th, therefore this is his age 22 season.
With that said, their perspective ages are largely irrelevant. Wetherholt is the better prospect for a variety of reasons. Doesn't mean he will be the better player, but scouts like his ceiling much more than Saggesse's. Let's hope they both become great hitters.
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Somebody else has been very wrong regarding who he has claimed, over and over again, is the best hitter on the team.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:04 pmHe doesn't do that. But watch...within a day or two he'll be repeating the same nonsense.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:57 pmYou said they were the same age. It had to then be explained to you, at your request, how their age is different.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.
So just say thanks and admit that you were wrong.
![]()
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
How have they been wrong? Contreras led the Cardinals in OPS in 2023 and 2024. Yes, he’s gotten off to a terrible start in 2025 (after looking great in the spring I might add, which says how little Spring means), but the guy that has 3 consecutive .800+ OPS seasons on the team prior to the 12 games in 2025 has been very CLEARLY the best hitter on the team. Burleson has a .660 OPS this year. He holds a career .707 OPS in 1033 PAs coming into today’s 1 for 4 day.Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:00 pmSomebody else has been very wrong regarding who he claims is the best hitter on the team.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:04 pmHe doesn't do that. But watch...within a day or two he'll be repeating the same nonsense.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:57 pmYou said they were the same age. It had to then be explained to you, at your request, how their age is different.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.
So just say thanks and admit that you were wrong.
![]()
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Evidently, you've had blinders on this season. Contreras is NOT, currently, the best hitter on the team like a certain poster bloviated about continuously.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:06 pmHow have they been wrong? Contreras led the Cardinals in OPS in 2023 and 2024. Yes, he’s gotten off to a terrible start in 2025 (after looking great in the spring I might add, which says how little Spring means), but the guy that has 3 consecutive .800+ OPS seasons on the team prior to the 12 games in 2025 has been very CLEARLY the best hitter on the team. Burleson has a .660 OPS this year. He holds a career .707 OPS in 1033 PAs coming into today’s 1 for 4 day.Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:00 pmSomebody else has been very wrong regarding who he claims is the best hitter on the team.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:04 pmHe doesn't do that. But watch...within a day or two he'll be repeating the same nonsense.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:57 pmYou said they were the same age. It had to then be explained to you, at your request, how their age is different.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.
So just say thanks and admit that you were wrong.
![]()
Last edited by Shady on 09 Apr 2025 16:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4415
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
I dont know scouty said the college was JJs minor leagues and it was dumb for him not make the team out of spring training lolMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:08 pmDoesn't mean Saggese will stay ahead. Saggesse has had 1,691 ABs as a pro. JJ has had 115. Of course, Saggesse is ahead of him now. Duh!Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:16 pmDude, you demanded the explanation. Don’t be a dooosh because you didn’t like the answer.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:09 pmOK, brilliant one. Now "educate" us, again, on how great Contreras is. LOLMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:25 pmYour ignorance on nearly every baseball matter is astounding.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:03 pmPlease explain.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:46 pmThis is Wetherholt's age-22 season, Saggese age-23.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:44 pmBoth Wetherholt and Saggese are 22. Let's hope Wetherholt can get to Saggese's level as a hitter, professionally, by the time both are 23.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:39 pm Don’t know how he did on the backfields, but dating back to Spring training he’s 0 for his last 27 in games that we can actually see.
Went 2 for 3 in that first game in spring training when people wanted him to skip right to the MLB and then finished spring 0 for 17.
But...allow me to try and educate you once again.
A player's age in any given season is based upon how old they are on June 30th. Saggese turns 23 in two days and therefore, this is his age 23 season.
JJ turns 23 on September 10th, therefore this is his age 22 season.
With that said, their perspective ages are largely irrelevant. Wetherholt is the better prospect for a variety of reasons. Doesn't mean he will be the better player, but scouts like his ceiling much more than Saggesse's. Let's hope they both become great hitters.
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Well our 2 best hitters are on the IL. I guess Pozo is now our best hitter.Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:07 pmEvidently, you've had blinders on this season. Contreras is NOT, currently, the best hitter on the team like a certain poster bloviated about continuously.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:06 pmHow have they been wrong? Contreras led the Cardinals in OPS in 2023 and 2024. Yes, he’s gotten off to a terrible start in 2025 (after looking great in the spring I might add, which says how little Spring means), but the guy that has 3 consecutive .800+ OPS seasons on the team prior to the 12 games in 2025 has been very CLEARLY the best hitter on the team. Burleson has a .660 OPS this year. He holds a career .707 OPS in 1033 PAs coming into today’s 1 for 4 day.Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:00 pmSomebody else has been very wrong regarding who he claims is the best hitter on the team.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:04 pmHe doesn't do that. But watch...within a day or two he'll be repeating the same nonsense.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:57 pmYou said they were the same age. It had to then be explained to you, at your request, how their age is different.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.
So just say thanks and admit that you were wrong.
![]()
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Regardless of their preparation. What it comes down to is. Right now, Saggese and Wetherholt are pretty close to the same age. One is in the MLB and hitting well. The other is struggling at AA.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:07 pmI dont know scouty said the college was JJs minor leagues and it was dumb for him not make the team out of spring training lolMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:08 pmDoesn't mean Saggese will stay ahead. Saggesse has had 1,691 ABs as a pro. JJ has had 115. Of course, Saggesse is ahead of him now. Duh!Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:16 pmDude, you demanded the explanation. Don’t be a dooosh because you didn’t like the answer.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:09 pmOK, brilliant one. Now "educate" us, again, on how great Contreras is. LOLMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:25 pmYour ignorance on nearly every baseball matter is astounding.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:03 pmPlease explain.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:46 pmThis is Wetherholt's age-22 season, Saggese age-23.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:44 pmBoth Wetherholt and Saggese are 22. Let's hope Wetherholt can get to Saggese's level as a hitter, professionally, by the time both are 23.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:39 pm Don’t know how he did on the backfields, but dating back to Spring training he’s 0 for his last 27 in games that we can actually see.
Went 2 for 3 in that first game in spring training when people wanted him to skip right to the MLB and then finished spring 0 for 17.
But...allow me to try and educate you once again.
A player's age in any given season is based upon how old they are on June 30th. Saggese turns 23 in two days and therefore, this is his age 23 season.
JJ turns 23 on September 10th, therefore this is his age 22 season.
With that said, their perspective ages are largely irrelevant. Wetherholt is the better prospect for a variety of reasons. Doesn't mean he will be the better player, but scouts like his ceiling much more than Saggesse's. Let's hope they both become great hitters.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Yep, according to Shady’s “right now”/“currently” standard, Burleson is the 10th (OPS) or 11th (wRC+) best hitter on the active roster, with the top two players on the list now inactive. So according to Shady, Burleson is the Cardinals’ 12th or 13th best hitter overall.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:11 pmWell our 2 best hitters are on the IL. I guess Pozo is now our best hitter.Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:07 pmEvidently, you've had blinders on this season. Contreras is NOT, currently, the best hitter on the team like a certain poster bloviated about continuously.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:06 pmHow have they been wrong? Contreras led the Cardinals in OPS in 2023 and 2024. Yes, he’s gotten off to a terrible start in 2025 (after looking great in the spring I might add, which says how little Spring means), but the guy that has 3 consecutive .800+ OPS seasons on the team prior to the 12 games in 2025 has been very CLEARLY the best hitter on the team. Burleson has a .660 OPS this year. He holds a career .707 OPS in 1033 PAs coming into today’s 1 for 4 day.Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:00 pmSomebody else has been very wrong regarding who he claims is the best hitter on the team.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:04 pmHe doesn't do that. But watch...within a day or two he'll be repeating the same nonsense.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:57 pmYou said they were the same age. It had to then be explained to you, at your request, how their age is different.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.
So just say thanks and admit that you were wrong.
![]()
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4415
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
What is the point?Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:12 pmRegardless of their preparation. What it comes down to is. Right now, Saggese and Wetherholt are pretty close to the same age. One is in the MLB and hitting well. The other is struggling at AA.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:07 pmI dont know scouty said the college was JJs minor leagues and it was dumb for him not make the team out of spring training lolMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:08 pmDoesn't mean Saggese will stay ahead. Saggesse has had 1,691 ABs as a pro. JJ has had 115. Of course, Saggesse is ahead of him now. Duh!Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:16 pmDude, you demanded the explanation. Don’t be a dooosh because you didn’t like the answer.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:09 pmOK, brilliant one. Now "educate" us, again, on how great Contreras is. LOLMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:25 pmYour ignorance on nearly every baseball matter is astounding.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:03 pmPlease explain.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:46 pmThis is Wetherholt's age-22 season, Saggese age-23.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:44 pmBoth Wetherholt and Saggese are 22. Let's hope Wetherholt can get to Saggese's level as a hitter, professionally, by the time both are 23.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:39 pm Don’t know how he did on the backfields, but dating back to Spring training he’s 0 for his last 27 in games that we can actually see.
Went 2 for 3 in that first game in spring training when people wanted him to skip right to the MLB and then finished spring 0 for 17.
But...allow me to try and educate you once again.
A player's age in any given season is based upon how old they are on June 30th. Saggese turns 23 in two days and therefore, this is his age 23 season.
JJ turns 23 on September 10th, therefore this is his age 22 season.
With that said, their perspective ages are largely irrelevant. Wetherholt is the better prospect for a variety of reasons. Doesn't mean he will be the better player, but scouts like his ceiling much more than Saggesse's. Let's hope they both become great hitters.
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
What do you consider "currently"?Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:07 pmEvidently, you've had blinders on this season. Contreras is NOT, currently, the best hitter on the team like a certain poster bloviated about continuously.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:06 pmHow have they been wrong? Contreras led the Cardinals in OPS in 2023 and 2024. Yes, he’s gotten off to a terrible start in 2025 (after looking great in the spring I might add, which says how little Spring means), but the guy that has 3 consecutive .800+ OPS seasons on the team prior to the 12 games in 2025 has been very CLEARLY the best hitter on the team. Burleson has a .660 OPS this year. He holds a career .707 OPS in 1033 PAs coming into today’s 1 for 4 day.Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:00 pmSomebody else has been very wrong regarding who he claims is the best hitter on the team.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:04 pmHe doesn't do that. But watch...within a day or two he'll be repeating the same nonsense.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:57 pmYou said they were the same age. It had to then be explained to you, at your request, how their age is different.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.
So just say thanks and admit that you were wrong.
![]()
This game today? The past week? This season? The past couple of years? The past decade?
Tell me Marshall, what are the goalposts for you today?
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: Report on JJ at Springfield AA ?
Means. Absolutely. Nothing.Shady wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:12 pmRegardless of their preparation. What it comes down to is. Right now, Saggese and Wetherholt are pretty close to the same age. One is in the MLB and hitting well. The other is struggling at AA.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025 16:07 pmI dont know scouty said the college was JJs minor leagues and it was dumb for him not make the team out of spring training lolMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 18:08 pmDoesn't mean Saggese will stay ahead. Saggesse has had 1,691 ABs as a pro. JJ has had 115. Of course, Saggesse is ahead of him now. Duh!Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:33 pmActually, there's not really that much age difference between Saggese and Wetherholt. Regardless of the slight age difference. Saggese is, obviously, ahead of Wetherholt as a professional baseball hitter. I, too, wish them both tremendous future success as Cardinals players.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:16 pmDude, you demanded the explanation. Don’t be a dooosh because you didn’t like the answer.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 17:09 pmOK, brilliant one. Now "educate" us, again, on how great Contreras is. LOLMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:25 pmYour ignorance on nearly every baseball matter is astounding.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:03 pmPlease explain.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:46 pmThis is Wetherholt's age-22 season, Saggese age-23.Shady wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:44 pmBoth Wetherholt and Saggese are 22. Let's hope Wetherholt can get to Saggese's level as a hitter, professionally, by the time both are 23.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:39 pm Don’t know how he did on the backfields, but dating back to Spring training he’s 0 for his last 27 in games that we can actually see.
Went 2 for 3 in that first game in spring training when people wanted him to skip right to the MLB and then finished spring 0 for 17.
But...allow me to try and educate you once again.
A player's age in any given season is based upon how old they are on June 30th. Saggese turns 23 in two days and therefore, this is his age 23 season.
JJ turns 23 on September 10th, therefore this is his age 22 season.
With that said, their perspective ages are largely irrelevant. Wetherholt is the better prospect for a variety of reasons. Doesn't mean he will be the better player, but scouts like his ceiling much more than Saggesse's. Let's hope they both become great hitters.
How many times do people have to explain this to you?
Maybe you'll want wait a few years before making any declarations regarding their abilities or their careers.