However, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them? Check who is batting clean up today.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
Last edited by Shady on 28 Feb 2025 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
Foolish how? Nobody ever said he didn’t have talent. But he wasn’t what you hyped him up to be. He is a DH that can’t hit LHP and has average power, no speed, and no ability to take a walk. He had a .735 OPS, 1.2 bWAR, 21 HR, and 78 RBI in 595 PA. Those are hardly jaw dropping numbers.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:17 amHowever, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them?Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
What's really funny is you just made my point.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
"I think X player is going to be really good. Funny how most of you don't see that..."
Also, Burleson always had talent, which is why is started most 2024 games from day one. But I wouldn't necessarily spike the ball on his 2024, .733 OPS season...
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
Apparently, there are exactly two people who "feel" that: LastWordOnSport blogger Jeff Dahdah and CardsTalk troll Shady Dodo.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd those people are idiots.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:14 am No need to be catty. Actually, I was impressed by Munoz' '24 highlights. He is relatively young and has some talent. Many of you doubted Burleson going into last season. And gave me a hard time for promoting his potential.Spoiler
Some feel he was the Cardinals' most productive hitter last season.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
If I recall. Many on CT proclaimed Burleson was a dreadful player and should be sent down to AAA. 78 RBIs to lead to team wasn't dreadful. Now some say, we knew Burleson had some talent, we just didn't post it. Too funny. By the way, look who is batting clean up today,Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:19 amFoolish how? Nobody ever said he didn’t have talent. But he wasn’t what you hyped him up to be. He is a DH that can’t hit LHP and has average power, no speed, and no ability to take a walk. He had a .735 OPS, 1.2 bWAR, 21 HR, and 78 RBI in 595 PA. Those are hardly jaw dropping numbers.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:17 amHowever, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them?Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
I’ve never seen someone pimp a .735 OPS and 78 RBI so much. The fact that 78 RBI led the team is in fact dreadful. It’s a road game in ST and the Astros pitcher is a RHP, of course he should hit 4th in this lineup.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:22 amIf I recall. Many on CT proclaimed Burleson was a dreadful player and should be sent down to AAA. 78 RBIs to lead to team wasn't dreadful. Now some say, we knew Burleson had some talent, we just didn't post it. Too funny. By the way, look who is batting clean up today,Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:19 amFoolish how? Nobody ever said he didn’t have talent. But he wasn’t what you hyped him up to be. He is a DH that can’t hit LHP and has average power, no speed, and no ability to take a walk. He had a .735 OPS, 1.2 bWAR, 21 HR, and 78 RBI in 595 PA. Those are hardly jaw dropping numbers.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:17 amHowever, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them?Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
Burleson did not at all. He had a .735 ops. The league average was .711. But for dhs it is .760. For 1b is is .726Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:17 amHowever, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them? Check who is batting clean up today.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
For lf .722 but hes way below average in the field and nkt a big enough bat to make up for it.
At best hes an average 1b or below average dh and hes blocked at 1b. He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish
He really wasnt that good last seaspn. All he did is look the bare minimum or a mlb bench player. Which i gues sis better tham he did in 2023, but not worth your hype. Carlson and gorman had way better yeats in previous years than the one burleson had in 2024 only to both fall flat.
Heck nootbaar who younhyped at one time then abandoned had a better ywar than burleson.. youd have done better and got more credit for hanging onto your nootbaar prediction as he wasnt a hyped player coming up through the minors.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
"He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish". Burleson was hitting at an All Star level at the break last season. Yes, he did make many doubters on CT look foolish. They didn't say much then. But when he cooled off in the second half of the season, they came back out of the woodwork to degrade him again. Short memories, indeed. Too funny.Wattage wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:42 amBurleson did not at all. He had a .735 ops. The league average was .711. But for dhs it is .760. For 1b is is .726Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:17 amHowever, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them? Check who is batting clean up today.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
For lf .722 but hes way below average in the field and nkt a big enough bat to make up for it.
At best hes an average 1b or below average dh and hes blocked at 1b. He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish
He really wasnt that good last seaspn. All he did is look the bare minimum or a mlb bench player. Which i gues sis better tham he did in 2023, but not worth your hype. Carlson and gorman had way better yeats in previous years than the one burleson had in 2024 only to both fall flat.
Heck nootbaar who younhyped at one time then abandoned had a better ywar than burleson.. youd have done better and got more credit for hanging onto your nootbaar prediction as he wasnt a hyped player coming up through the minors.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
So I guess he made the ASG?Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 12:10 pm"He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish". Burleson was hitting at an All Star level at the break last season. Yes, he did make many doubters on CT look foolish. They didn't say much then. But when he cooled off in the second half of the season, they came back out of the woodwork to degrade him again. Short memories, indeed. Too funny.Wattage wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:42 amBurleson did not at all. He had a .735 ops. The league average was .711. But for dhs it is .760. For 1b is is .726Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:17 amHowever, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them? Check who is batting clean up today.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
For lf .722 but hes way below average in the field and nkt a big enough bat to make up for it.
At best hes an average 1b or below average dh and hes blocked at 1b. He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish
He really wasnt that good last seaspn. All he did is look the bare minimum or a mlb bench player. Which i gues sis better tham he did in 2023, but not worth your hype. Carlson and gorman had way better yeats in previous years than the one burleson had in 2024 only to both fall flat.
Heck nootbaar who younhyped at one time then abandoned had a better ywar than burleson.. youd have done better and got more credit for hanging onto your nootbaar prediction as he wasnt a hyped player coming up through the minors.
(By the way, an .814 OPS is decent, but not AS level.)
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 12:59 pmSo I guess he made the ASG?Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 12:10 pm "He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish". Burleson was hitting at an All Star level at the break last season. Yes, he did make many doubters on CT look foolish. They didn't say much then. But when he cooled off in the second half of the season, they came back out of the woodwork to degrade him again. Short memories, indeed. Too funny.
(By the way, an .814 OPS is decent, but not AS level.)
He's made this silly, fact-free claim before. He knows he's full of it; he's just a sad little troll.
NYCardsFan wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:56 amNarrator: Burleson never had "All-Star caliber" production. Shady is once again weaving fact-free fiction.Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
At the All Star break, Burleson was sitting at 1.4 fWAR, which (generously) extrapolates to somewhere between 2.0-2.5 fWAR for a full season if he were able to maintain the same pace. 2.0-2.5 fWAR is basically the production of a lower-end solid starter, but well short of "All Star"-level production. Of course, the reality is that the AS break was pretty close to the high water mark for Burleson in 2024, he was not able to maintain the same pace, and he ended the year at 0.6 fWAR.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
Poor Roddery Munoz’s one shining moment on CT has once again turned into a Burleson thread. Thanks a lot Shady.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
1. No he didnt come close to allstar production. A .814 ops is nice, and may be better than weaker hitting positions on allstar team but as a 1b/dh/or corner outfielder with poor defense.se, that production isnt close to alkstar, and he didnt come close nor was he ever in consideration for the all star team, but i would have been pleasantly surprised and happy with him as a starter if he hit like that for the year.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 12:10 pm"He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish". Burleson was hitting at an All Star level at the break last season. Yes, he did make many doubters on CT look foolish. They didn't say much then. But when he cooled off in the second half of the season, they came back out of the woodwork to degrade him again. Short memories, indeed. Too funny.Wattage wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:42 amBurleson did not at all. He had a .735 ops. The league average was .711. But for dhs it is .760. For 1b is is .726Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:17 amHowever, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them? Check who is batting clean up today.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
For lf .722 but hes way below average in the field and nkt a big enough bat to make up for it.
At best hes an average 1b or below average dh and hes blocked at 1b. He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish
He really wasnt that good last seaspn. All he did is look the bare minimum or a mlb bench player. Which i gues sis better tham he did in 2023, but not worth your hype. Carlson and gorman had way better yeats in previous years than the one burleson had in 2024 only to both fall flat.
Heck nootbaar who younhyped at one time then abandoned had a better ywar than burleson.. youd have done better and got more credit for hanging onto your nootbaar prediction as he wasnt a hyped player coming up through the minors.
2 yes- he cooled off. And its part of the sample. He had a hot streak at the beginning of the 2024 season them went back to being the burleson we saw in 2023. I wpuldnt champion him being a good player for half a season but miserable for amother half. You are so desperate to claim victory on burleson and hype whatever he does that you are championing one half of a season even though he sucked the rest now? Thats sad and just shows how much you overhyped burleson and wont let your obsession with him go.
The results arent there.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
To be fair, it was silly that roddery.munoz even had a shining cards talk moment off 1 spring inning over his 5+ and 6.5+ minor and major leagues eras.
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
I will say I wouldn’t necessarily say he cooled off in the “second half”, I would say he had a really bad September. Could be his luck ran out, could be he needs to be conditioned better for a full season, but it is what it is.Wattage wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 14:27 pm1. No he didnt come close to allstar production. A .814 ops is nice, and may be better than weaker hitting positions on allstar team but as a 1b/dh/or corner outfielder with poor defense.se, that production isnt close to alkstar, and he didnt come close nor was he ever in consideration for the all star team, but i would have been pleasantly surprised and happy with him as a starter if he hit like that for the year.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 12:10 pm"He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish". Burleson was hitting at an All Star level at the break last season. Yes, he did make many doubters on CT look foolish. They didn't say much then. But when he cooled off in the second half of the season, they came back out of the woodwork to degrade him again. Short memories, indeed. Too funny.Wattage wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:42 amBurleson did not at all. He had a .735 ops. The league average was .711. But for dhs it is .760. For 1b is is .726Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:17 amHowever, Burleson made many CT posters look pretty foolish last season. Were you one of them? Check who is batting clean up today.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:16 amI know he’s not the next Joey Votto or Tony Gwynn.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:15 amAnd you probably still don't have a clue as to Burleson's talent.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:11 amI give you credit, it took 2 pages before you brought Burleson into the thread.Shady wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 11:02 amDid you recognize Burleson's talent going into last season? Yes or No. If you did, good. Because there weren't many that did on Cards Talk. And, evidently, still don't.ecleme22 wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:54 amHe's not that diabolical.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 10:26 am. . . and immediately thought “this is an opportunity to start another entirely pretextual new thread just to get attention,” and raced to click “New Topic” without lifting a finger to do any basic research (or thinking) before posting. (And per usual, then proceeded to edit the mindless post multiple times subsequently).
He's just one of those guys (narcissists?) who loves the "me against the world" narrative. He likes to think he sees talent no one else yet realizes.
He's been doing it for years.
For lf .722 but hes way below average in the field and nkt a big enough bat to make up for it.
At best hes an average 1b or below average dh and hes blocked at 1b. He will need to hit way better to make people look foolish
He really wasnt that good last seaspn. All he did is look the bare minimum or a mlb bench player. Which i gues sis better tham he did in 2023, but not worth your hype. Carlson and gorman had way better yeats in previous years than the one burleson had in 2024 only to both fall flat.
Heck nootbaar who younhyped at one time then abandoned had a better ywar than burleson.. youd have done better and got more credit for hanging onto your nootbaar prediction as he wasnt a hyped player coming up through the minors.
2 yes- he cooled off. And its part of the sample. He had a hot streak at the beginning of the 2024 season them went back to being the burleson we saw in 2023. I wpuldnt champion him being a good player for half a season but miserable for amother half. You are so desperate to claim victory on burleson and hype whatever he does that you are championing one half of a season even though he sucked the rest now? Thats sad and just shows how much you overhyped burleson and wont let your obsession with him go.
The results arent there.
April: .718 OPS
May: .738 OPS
June: .824 OPS
July: .817 OPS
August: .752 OPS (ironically was probably his best all-around line: .278/.340/.412)
Sept: .510 OPS
Re: Where could Roddery Munoz fit in?
So, are you doubters still convinced Roddery Munoz doesn't have much going for him? Like myself, Ricky Horton speaks positively in what he sees in Roddery Munoz.
Last edited by Shady on 05 Mar 2025 14:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.