The ban is coming...you can feel it in the air...Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6030
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
Absolutely. Also now is posting as Pure Vida. Meltdown and banning is so close.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:34 amThe ban is coming...you can feel it in the air...Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
Narrator: Burleson never had "All-Star caliber" production. Shady is once again weaving fact-free fiction.Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
At the All Star break, Burleson was sitting at 1.4 fWAR, which (generously) extrapolates to somewhere between 2.0-2.5 fWAR for a full season if he were able to maintain the same pace. 2.0-2.5 fWAR is basically the production of a lower-end solid starter, but well short of "All Star"-level production. Of course, the reality is that the AS break marked pretty close to the high water mark for Burleson in 2024, he was not able to maintain the same pace, and he ended the year at 0.6 fWAR.
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
That's really what Buttercup and Sanusual6 and Robert Shelton always say?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
This thread was heading out of the front page. Gracias for the bump.Drewman+ wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:14 pmThat's really what Buttercup and Sanusual6 and Robert Shelton always say?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
Why do you even care?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:20 pmThis thread was heading out of the front page. Gracias for the bump.Drewman+ wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:14 pmThat's really what Buttercup and Sanusual6 and Robert Shelton always say?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
Unless, of course, your primary purpose on this forum is to get attention . . .
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
Because I enjoy baseball discussion on topics that interest me. Especially, courteous responses. Any other questions?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:26 pmWhy do you even care?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:20 pmThis thread was heading out of the front page. Gracias for the bump.Drewman+ wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:14 pmThat's really what Buttercup and Sanusual6 and Robert Shelton always say?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
Unless, of course, your primary purpose on this forum is to get attention . . .
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
Pure Vida always says that.Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:29 pmBecause I enjoy baseball discussion on topics that interest me. Especially, courteous responses. Any other questions?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:26 pmWhy do you even care?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:20 pmThis thread was heading out of the front page. Gracias for the bump.Drewman+ wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:14 pmThat's really what Buttercup and Sanusual6 and Robert Shelton always say?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
Unless, of course, your primary purpose on this forum is to get attention . . .
#reported
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
For what it's worth, my prediction for TGAB...
12 HR
48 RBI
.248, .297, .386, .683
12 HR
48 RBI
.248, .297, .386, .683
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
If he's a part time player. Some of your numbers are feasible. However, I'd be really surprised if Burleson ends up with a BA under .250 if he sees, primarily, RHP. He could very likely be the best hitter on the current roster against RHP.
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
What are you talking about? This is juvenile!Drewman+ wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:32 pmPure Vida always says that.Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:29 pmBecause I enjoy baseball discussion on topics that interest me. Especially, courteous responses. Any other questions?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:26 pmWhy do you even care?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:20 pmThis thread was heading out of the front page. Gracias for the bump.Drewman+ wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:14 pmThat's really what Buttercup and Sanusual6 and Robert Shelton always say?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
Unless, of course, your primary purpose on this forum is to get attention . . .
#reported
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
We've gone over this before: In 2024 alone, Contreras, Donovan, and Herrera were all better hitters than Burleson vs. RHP. And career-wise, Burleson is not even close to being the best hitter on the current roster vs. RHP. Why do you keep repeating claims that you know aren't true? I don't know, Shady, sure seems like you might be operating in bad faith . . .
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
I have a theory...,NYCardsFan wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 17:10 pmWe've gone over this before: In 2024 alone, Contreras, Donovan, and Herrera were all better hitters than Burleson vs. RHP. And career-wise, Burleson is not even close to being the best hitter on the current roster vs. RHP. Why do you keep repeating claims that you know aren't true? I don't know, Shady, sure seems like you might be operating in bad faith . . .
Since ShadyMapleWallyRobertEtc is incapable of using meaningful data to back up his wild claims, he simply assumes we are as obtuse as he is. Also, he's never been MAN ENOUGH to say, "Wow, thanks for showing me why my claim was wildly wrong by sharing data...Onviously, I was wrong".
It's just not in his DNA.
Therefore, before we know it....he'll be back to saying things like..."Burleson is as good a hitter as Ted Simmons"
or "Burly runs as well as Tommy Edman".
It will never end...
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
2023: 318 PA vs RHP, .243 BA and .699 OPS
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
I have pointed out the adoration Cardinals experts have alluded to about Burleson's hitting ability. And who they would prefer batting in the clutch against outstanding RHP pitching. The doubters have called the experts shills for the organizations. But think about it, why don't they say those same distinct accolades for other players? I don't hear that about Contreras, Donovan, Winn, etc. Burleson seems to be their preference. It kind of reinforces what I've tried to get across for a long time on CT. That's where I'm coming from.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 17:10 pmWe've gone over this before: In 2024 alone, Contreras, Donovan, and Herrera were all better hitters than Burleson vs. RHP. And career-wise, Burleson is not even close to being the best hitter on the current roster vs. RHP. Why do you keep repeating claims that you know aren't true? I don't know, Shady, sure seems like you might be operating in bad faith . . .
Last edited by Shady on 31 Jan 2025 19:01 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: It seems most posters feel Walker and Gorman will be more productive than Burleson
Welcome to the club. We are dealing with some vindictive, twightlight zone individuals. Just ignore them.Pura Vida wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 17:09 pmWhat are you talking about? This is juvenile!Drewman+ wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:32 pmPure Vida always says that.Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:29 pmBecause I enjoy baseball discussion on topics that interest me. Especially, courteous responses. Any other questions?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:26 pmWhy do you even care?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:20 pmThis thread was heading out of the front page. Gracias for the bump.Drewman+ wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 14:14 pmThat's really what Buttercup and Sanusual6 and Robert Shelton always say?Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:30 amThat's exactly my point. "it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24". It will be fascinating to see how all three produce in '25. Walker, Gorman and Burleson.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:24 amHe had 2 great months. 45 of his 78 RBI came in June and July. In the other 4 months he had RBI totals of 10, 8, 9, and 6. Gorman sucked last year and then got sent down and he actually had more 10+ RBI months (4) than Burleson (3).Shady wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025 09:19 am Obviously, it's imperative that Walker and Gorman demonstrate the lofty goals the Cardinals had/have for them. However, it will be almost as important for Burleson to return to the All Star caliber production he had the first half of '24. He was really good. How soon some forget that.
Unless, of course, your primary purpose on this forum is to get attention . . .
#reported
Last edited by Shady on 31 Jan 2025 18:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.