Winn still at #4
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
imetsatchelpaige
- Forum User
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Winn still at #4
I don't get it, but there it is.
The GDT's are in good hands, so this is just a placeholder...
STL Lineup
J Wetherholt (L) 2B
I Herrera (R) DH
A Burleson (L) 1B
M Winn (R) SS
N Gorman (L) 3B
J Walker (R) RF
N Church (L) LF
P Pagés (R) C
V Scott II (L) CF
The GDT's are in good hands, so this is just a placeholder...
STL Lineup
J Wetherholt (L) 2B
I Herrera (R) DH
A Burleson (L) 1B
M Winn (R) SS
N Gorman (L) 3B
J Walker (R) RF
N Church (L) LF
P Pagés (R) C
V Scott II (L) CF
-
C-Unit
- Forum User
- Posts: 639
- Joined: 27 Sep 2025 01:05 am
Re: Winn still at #4
I think Winn is nothing more than a placeholder there. They seem to like the 3 guys they have at the top. They also like the L-R-L-R thing. And I guess they don't want to vaunt Walker into the 4 spot yet.
-
Basil Shabazz
- Forum User
- Posts: 1604
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
I suspect he stays at 4 until the sample size becomes big enough to determine whether he should continue to stay there. One thing I would not do is mess with Gorman or Walker at this stage.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
-
jcgmoi
- Forum User
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
I think that's exactly right. No one is claiming Winn looks like any kind of cleanup hitter but the team is smartly bunching their best hitters at the top of the lineup and someone has to hit fourth.I think Winn is nothing more than a placeholder there.
btw, posters who obsess over LR lineup sequences should look at how the Mets set up.
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Winn still at #4
Agree 100%Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:10 pm I suspect he stays at 4 until the sample size becomes big enough to determine whether he should continue to stay there. One thing I would not do is mess with Gorman or Walker at this stage.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
Especially swapping Winn and Herrera.
And by all means.....leave Walker & Gorman alone
-
redbirdfan51
- Forum User
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:45 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
If JW continues hitting, that will be his spot at 4 or they could move Herrera there and bat Winn 2nd.
-
C-Unit
- Forum User
- Posts: 639
- Joined: 27 Sep 2025 01:05 am
Re: Winn still at #4
In that situation you could then have Walker at 5 right after themredbirdfan51 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:17 pmIf JW continues hitting, that will be his spot at 4 or they could move Herrera there and bat Winn 2nd.
-
renostl
- Forum User
- Posts: 3925
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:40 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
It is a difficult debate when the current Winn belongs in neither spot, imo.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:16 pmAgree 100%Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:10 pm I suspect he stays at 4 until the sample size becomes big enough to determine whether he should continue to stay there. One thing I would not do is mess with Gorman or Walker at this stage.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
Especially swapping Winn and Herrera.
And by all means.....leave Walker & Gorman alone
To date the very SSS.
JJW with 3 PA LO an inning, only his first ab so far.
IH has 1 PA LO an inning
AB 2 PA LO an inning
MW 4 PA LO an inning
In theory with the wrap around at the bottom of the lineup
the first 3 are encountering PA with men on more than the #4 spot
JJW 15 PA's 8 with men on 3 PA's there couldn't be men on
IH 14 PA's 8 with men on
AB 14 PA's 7 with men on
MW 14 PA's 6 with men on
After the 1st inning I'm ok with Winn not being in the 2 spot
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Winn still at #4
That is true.renostl wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:00 pmIt is a difficult debate when the current Winn belongs in neither spot, imo.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:16 pmAgree 100%Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:10 pm I suspect he stays at 4 until the sample size becomes big enough to determine whether he should continue to stay there. One thing I would not do is mess with Gorman or Walker at this stage.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
Especially swapping Winn and Herrera.
And by all means.....leave Walker & Gorman alone
To date the very SSS.
JJW with 3 PA LO an inning, only his first ab so far.
IH has 1 PA LO an inning
AB 2 PA LO an inning
MW 4 PA LO an inning
In theory with the wrap around at the bottom of the lineup
the first 3 are encountering PA with men on more than the #4 spot
JJW 15 PA's 8 with men on 3 PA's there couldn't be men on
IH 14 PA's 8 with men on
AB 14 PA's 7 with men on
MW 14 PA's 6 with men on
After the 1st inning I'm ok with Winn not being in the 2 spot
Not exactly sure where he belongs but it will sort itself out
as we progress.
I usually don’t get too wrapped up in the lineup especially this early in the season.
Makes sense to group JJ/Herrera/Burleson but after that?
Gorman/Walker?- probably just leave them alone and hope they continue to produce?
Church? Who knows?
Scott? So far so good.
-
Shady
- Forum User
- Posts: 7909
- Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
If Walker keeps hitting. And Winn improves to a respectable OBP. And steals some bases. I like the potential of that scenario.C-Unit wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:22 pmIn that situation you could then have Walker at 5 right after themredbirdfan51 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:17 pmIf JW continues hitting, that will be his spot at 4 or they could move Herrera there and bat Winn 2nd.
Last edited by Shady on 30 Mar 2026 16:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
renostl
- Forum User
- Posts: 3925
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:40 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
Agree,Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:10 pmThat is true.renostl wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:00 pmIt is a difficult debate when the current Winn belongs in neither spot, imo.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:16 pmAgree 100%Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:10 pm I suspect he stays at 4 until the sample size becomes big enough to determine whether he should continue to stay there. One thing I would not do is mess with Gorman or Walker at this stage.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
Especially swapping Winn and Herrera.
And by all means.....leave Walker & Gorman alone
To date the very SSS.
JJW with 3 PA LO an inning, only his first ab so far.
IH has 1 PA LO an inning
AB 2 PA LO an inning
MW 4 PA LO an inning
In theory with the wrap around at the bottom of the lineup
the first 3 are encountering PA with men on more than the #4 spot
JJW 15 PA's 8 with men on 3 PA's there couldn't be men on
IH 14 PA's 8 with men on
AB 14 PA's 7 with men on
MW 14 PA's 6 with men on
After the 1st inning I'm ok with Winn not being in the 2 spot
Not exactly sure where he belongs but it will sort itself out
as we progress.
I usually don’t get too wrapped up in the lineup especially this early in the season.
Makes sense to group JJ/Herrera/Burleson but after that?
Gorman/Walker?- probably just leave them alone and hope they continue to produce?
Church? Who knows?
Scott? So far so good.
I think somebody will need to leapfrog Winn,
which is a win Winn for the team.
The only on the current roster exception is IF Church an LO
and JJW moves down a spot or two.
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Winn still at #4
I like JJ at #2 as I believe he will hit with RISP.renostl wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:33 pmAgree,Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:10 pmThat is true.renostl wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:00 pmIt is a difficult debate when the current Winn belongs in neither spot, imo.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:16 pmAgree 100%Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:10 pm I suspect he stays at 4 until the sample size becomes big enough to determine whether he should continue to stay there. One thing I would not do is mess with Gorman or Walker at this stage.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
Especially swapping Winn and Herrera.
And by all means.....leave Walker & Gorman alone
To date the very SSS.
JJW with 3 PA LO an inning, only his first ab so far.
IH has 1 PA LO an inning
AB 2 PA LO an inning
MW 4 PA LO an inning
In theory with the wrap around at the bottom of the lineup
the first 3 are encountering PA with men on more than the #4 spot
JJW 15 PA's 8 with men on 3 PA's there couldn't be men on
IH 14 PA's 8 with men on
AB 14 PA's 7 with men on
MW 14 PA's 6 with men on
After the 1st inning I'm ok with Winn not being in the 2 spot
Not exactly sure where he belongs but it will sort itself out
as we progress.
I usually don’t get too wrapped up in the lineup especially this early in the season.
Makes sense to group JJ/Herrera/Burleson but after that?
Gorman/Walker?- probably just leave them alone and hope they continue to produce?
Church? Who knows?
Scott? So far so good.
I think somebody will need to leapfrog Winn,
which is a win Winn for the team.
The only on the current roster exception is IF Church an LO
and JJW moves down a spot or two.
That pushes Herrera/Burly back to #3/#4 or vice versa?
LO could be an issue all season?
Winn? Church? Scott? Even Noot when he comes back??
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 3129
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
Exactly.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:10 pmThat is true.renostl wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:00 pmIt is a difficult debate when the current Winn belongs in neither spot, imo.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:16 pmAgree 100%Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:10 pm I suspect he stays at 4 until the sample size becomes big enough to determine whether he should continue to stay there. One thing I would not do is mess with Gorman or Walker at this stage.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
Especially swapping Winn and Herrera.
And by all means.....leave Walker & Gorman alone
To date the very SSS.
JJW with 3 PA LO an inning, only his first ab so far.
IH has 1 PA LO an inning
AB 2 PA LO an inning
MW 4 PA LO an inning
In theory with the wrap around at the bottom of the lineup
the first 3 are encountering PA with men on more than the #4 spot
JJW 15 PA's 8 with men on 3 PA's there couldn't be men on
IH 14 PA's 8 with men on
AB 14 PA's 7 with men on
MW 14 PA's 6 with men on
After the 1st inning I'm ok with Winn not being in the 2 spot
Not exactly sure where he belongs but it will sort itself out
as we progress.
I usually don’t get too wrapped up in the lineup especially this early in the season.
Makes sense to group JJ/Herrera/Burleson but after that?
Gorman/Walker?- probably just leave them alone and hope they continue to produce?
Church? Who knows?
Scott? So far so good.
They aren't reshuffling the lineup after one series.
-
RamFan08NY
- Forum User
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
The team is averaging 7 runs per game, and everybody seems to be coming up to bat with men on base every game. For a team that presently does not employ a true cleanup hitter, why the fuss over it? As long as all the players continue to come up with runners on base, does it really matter who bats 4th in the first inning?
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Winn still at #4
I think everyone(including Winn & Oli) know that Winn will not be our cleanup hitter long term.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 17:08 pmExactly.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:10 pmThat is true.renostl wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:00 pmIt is a difficult debate when the current Winn belongs in neither spot, imo.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:16 pmAgree 100%Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:10 pm I suspect he stays at 4 until the sample size becomes big enough to determine whether he should continue to stay there. One thing I would not do is mess with Gorman or Walker at this stage.
The fallback plan would probably just be swapping Herrera and Winn at 2/4.
Especially swapping Winn and Herrera.
And by all means.....leave Walker & Gorman alone
To date the very SSS.
JJW with 3 PA LO an inning, only his first ab so far.
IH has 1 PA LO an inning
AB 2 PA LO an inning
MW 4 PA LO an inning
In theory with the wrap around at the bottom of the lineup
the first 3 are encountering PA with men on more than the #4 spot
JJW 15 PA's 8 with men on 3 PA's there couldn't be men on
IH 14 PA's 8 with men on
AB 14 PA's 7 with men on
MW 14 PA's 6 with men on
After the 1st inning I'm ok with Winn not being in the 2 spot
Not exactly sure where he belongs but it will sort itself out
as we progress.
I usually don’t get too wrapped up in the lineup especially this early in the season.
Makes sense to group JJ/Herrera/Burleson but after that?
Gorman/Walker?- probably just leave them alone and hope they continue to produce?
Church? Who knows?
Scott? So far so good.
They aren't reshuffling the lineup after one series.
Having said that:
*Probably don’t want to put too much pressure on JJ right off the bat so leadoff works!
*Herrera at #2 to ease him back in after not a lot of ST AB’s?
*Gorman & Walker?- They have the potential to hit there but again just trying to ease them in and give them the best chance to emerge?
*Where does Noot factor in when he returns??
I see the lineup being fluid just like a lot of other stuff with this team.
-
2ninr
- Forum User
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: 24 May 2024 15:04 pm
Re: Winn still at #4
If VS 2 keeps getting on base move him to leadoff and Church ninth. Leave the rest alone.