Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 2427
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by Carp4Cy »

Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Voldemort
Forum User
Posts: 3866
Joined: 06 Aug 2022 18:21 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by Voldemort »

Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Wouldn't that depend upon how much McGreevey develops?
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 830
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/stats/pitching

Liberatore ERA 4.27
McGreevey ERA 4-43.

Not bad for their age but far from dominant. We need someone to step up and be an ace or at least a solid #2.
CorneliusWolfe
Forum User
Posts: 938
Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by CorneliusWolfe »

We’ve got our #3-5 set at least. If Sonny sticks around.
Braund241
Forum User
Posts: 751
Joined: 24 May 2024 17:52 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by Braund241 »

Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Libby’s problem is he throws way too many non competitive pitches. And is behind in the count to often. He should know that better by now. McGreevey looks to be to hittable, kind of like Miles.
walkingeagle
Forum User
Posts: 67
Joined: 29 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by walkingeagle »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:59 pm https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/stats/pitching

Liberatore ERA 4.27
McGreevey ERA 4-43.

Not bad for their age but far from dominant. We need someone to step up and be an ace or at least a solid #2.
They both will probably be much better when Dusty is gone
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 2427
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by Carp4Cy »

Voldemort wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:51 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Wouldn't that depend upon how much McGreevey develops?
He’s 25 years old already. My point is we used to develop our pitching prospects must faster and much stronger and more dominant and durable to begin with before their age 25 season.


Also see Lance Lynn. 18-7 and 3.x era at age 25.
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 13170
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by An Old Friend »

Braund241 wrote: 25 Aug 2025 22:27 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Libby’s problem is he throws way too many non competitive pitches. And is behind in the count to often. He should know that better by now. McGreevey looks to be to hittable, kind of like Miles.
Liberatore is in his first full season as a starter and McGreevy is a rookie.

Our culture of impatience knows no bounds.
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 2427
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by Carp4Cy »

An Old Friend wrote: 25 Aug 2025 22:50 pm
Braund241 wrote: 25 Aug 2025 22:27 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Libby’s problem is he throws way too many non competitive pitches. And is behind in the count to often. He should know that better by now. McGreevey looks to be to hittable, kind of like Miles.
Liberatore is in his first full season as a starter and McGreevy is a rookie.

Our culture of impatience knows no bounds.
I just listed several other pitchers in their first full seasons

By the time they’re 25 and 27 theres already been a lot of patience
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 13170
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by An Old Friend »

Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 23:03 pm
An Old Friend wrote: 25 Aug 2025 22:50 pm
Braund241 wrote: 25 Aug 2025 22:27 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Libby’s problem is he throws way too many non competitive pitches. And is behind in the count to often. He should know that better by now. McGreevey looks to be to hittable, kind of like Miles.
Liberatore is in his first full season as a starter and McGreevy is a rookie.

Our culture of impatience knows no bounds.
I just listed several other pitchers in their first full seasons

By the time they’re 25 and 27 theres already been a lot of patience
If you say so.
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 13247
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Mcg-First year. Ten starts. Fanned a personal high. A good performance. He’s a number 3/4. We take that.

The talent difference between pirates and Dodgers is razor thin. At this level, it’s truly a team event for success. More will than desire.
alw80
Forum User
Posts: 971
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:50 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by alw80 »

They're cheap options to have in the back of your rotation and that can be valuable. Look at how much we're paying MM to basically give us that production. Need to develop and/or sign/trade for a couple of top end options.
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 13247
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

alw80 wrote: 26 Aug 2025 06:22 am They're cheap options to have in the back of your rotation and that can be valuable. Look at how much we're paying MM to basically give us that production. Need to develop and/or sign/trade for a couple of top end options.
Yes. They work well for the 3/4/5 slots. Some days they throw a 5, some days they throw a 3.
russellhammond
Forum User
Posts: 554
Joined: 12 Apr 2019 09:08 am

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by russellhammond »

Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
What you fail to mention is that, other than Martinez who had his own set of problems, each of these pitches faced significant injury problems following those seasons. Morris and Benes each missed more than an entire season immediately following those early successes. Wacha had shoulder trouble even while he was pitching well. Not saying that Liberatore and McGreevey won't face injury problems but it's not accurate to compare their development with these pitchers unless you include the information regarding their injury history, too.
BrockFloodMaris
Forum User
Posts: 2497
Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by BrockFloodMaris »

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 26 Aug 2025 06:20 am
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Mcg-First year. Ten starts. Fanned a personal high. A good performance. He’s a number 3/4. We take that.

The talent difference between pirates and Dodgers is razor thin. At this level, it’s truly a team event for success. More will than desire.
My takeaway from Carp's post is that neither of these guys gets a postseason start on a good playoff team. They each look like a #4 or #5 starter. Most of the Cards MLB roster look like complimentary pieces on a playoff roster. We used to be better at drafting and developing starting pitchers.
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 13247
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

BrockFloodMaris wrote: 26 Aug 2025 06:36 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 26 Aug 2025 06:20 am
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.

Compare to

Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP

Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA

Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP

Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA

All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Mcg-First year. Ten starts. Fanned a personal high. A good performance. He’s a number 3/4. We take that.

The talent difference between pirates and Dodgers is razor thin. At this level, it’s truly a team event for success. More will than desire.
My takeaway from Carp's post is that neither of these guys gets a postseason start on a good playoff team. They each look like a #4 or #5 starter. Most of the Cards MLB roster look like complimentary pieces on a playoff roster. We used to be better at drafting and developing starting pitchers.
I agree on the post season starts, might not even get a post season start here. But you got to have them and on any given day they could throw a gem.

Better offense output might cure some ails, as will not giving up early runs.
Post Reply