Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
Wouldn't that depend upon how much McGreevey develops?Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 829
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/stats/pitching
Liberatore ERA 4.27
McGreevey ERA 4-43.
Not bad for their age but far from dominant. We need someone to step up and be an ace or at least a solid #2.
Liberatore ERA 4.27
McGreevey ERA 4-43.
Not bad for their age but far from dominant. We need someone to step up and be an ace or at least a solid #2.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 938
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
We’ve got our #3-5 set at least. If Sonny sticks around.
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
Libby’s problem is he throws way too many non competitive pitches. And is behind in the count to often. He should know that better by now. McGreevey looks to be to hittable, kind of like Miles.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 67
- Joined: 29 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
They both will probably be much better when Dusty is goneScotchMIrish wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:59 pm https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/stats/pitching
Liberatore ERA 4.27
McGreevey ERA 4-43.
Not bad for their age but far from dominant. We need someone to step up and be an ace or at least a solid #2.
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
He’s 25 years old already. My point is we used to develop our pitching prospects must faster and much stronger and more dominant and durable to begin with before their age 25 season.Voldemort wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:51 pmWouldn't that depend upon how much McGreevey develops?Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Also see Lance Lynn. 18-7 and 3.x era at age 25.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13170
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
Liberatore is in his first full season as a starter and McGreevy is a rookie.Braund241 wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 22:27 pmLibby’s problem is he throws way too many non competitive pitches. And is behind in the count to often. He should know that better by now. McGreevey looks to be to hittable, kind of like Miles.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Our culture of impatience knows no bounds.
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
I just listed several other pitchers in their first full seasonsAn Old Friend wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 22:50 pmLiberatore is in his first full season as a starter and McGreevy is a rookie.Braund241 wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 22:27 pmLibby’s problem is he throws way too many non competitive pitches. And is behind in the count to often. He should know that better by now. McGreevey looks to be to hittable, kind of like Miles.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Our culture of impatience knows no bounds.
By the time they’re 25 and 27 theres already been a lot of patience
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13170
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
If you say so.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 23:03 pmI just listed several other pitchers in their first full seasonsAn Old Friend wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 22:50 pmLiberatore is in his first full season as a starter and McGreevy is a rookie.Braund241 wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 22:27 pmLibby’s problem is he throws way too many non competitive pitches. And is behind in the count to often. He should know that better by now. McGreevey looks to be to hittable, kind of like Miles.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
Our culture of impatience knows no bounds.
By the time they’re 25 and 27 theres already been a lot of patience
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13247
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
Mcg-First year. Ten starts. Fanned a personal high. A good performance. He’s a number 3/4. We take that.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
The talent difference between pirates and Dodgers is razor thin. At this level, it’s truly a team event for success. More will than desire.
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
They're cheap options to have in the back of your rotation and that can be valuable. Look at how much we're paying MM to basically give us that production. Need to develop and/or sign/trade for a couple of top end options.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13247
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
Yes. They work well for the 3/4/5 slots. Some days they throw a 5, some days they throw a 3.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 554
- Joined: 12 Apr 2019 09:08 am
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
What you fail to mention is that, other than Martinez who had his own set of problems, each of these pitches faced significant injury problems following those seasons. Morris and Benes each missed more than an entire season immediately following those early successes. Wacha had shoulder trouble even while he was pitching well. Not saying that Liberatore and McGreevey won't face injury problems but it's not accurate to compare their development with these pitchers unless you include the information regarding their injury history, too.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
My takeaway from Carp's post is that neither of these guys gets a postseason start on a good playoff team. They each look like a #4 or #5 starter. Most of the Cards MLB roster look like complimentary pieces on a playoff roster. We used to be better at drafting and developing starting pitchers.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑26 Aug 2025 06:20 amMcg-First year. Ten starts. Fanned a personal high. A good performance. He’s a number 3/4. We take that.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
The talent difference between pirates and Dodgers is razor thin. At this level, it’s truly a team event for success. More will than desire.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13247
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Concerned that Libby or McGreevey won't be quite good enough once the league figures them out?
I agree on the post season starts, might not even get a post season start here. But you got to have them and on any given day they could throw a gem.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑26 Aug 2025 06:36 amMy takeaway from Carp's post is that neither of these guys gets a postseason start on a good playoff team. They each look like a #4 or #5 starter. Most of the Cards MLB roster look like complimentary pieces on a playoff roster. We used to be better at drafting and developing starting pitchers.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑26 Aug 2025 06:20 amMcg-First year. Ten starts. Fanned a personal high. A good performance. He’s a number 3/4. We take that.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Aug 2025 20:14 pm Even a #5 needs to be able to hold down the Pirates or the Rays. And neither one is 22.
Compare to
Matt Morris
age 22 12-9 3.19 ERA 217 IP
Alan Benes
age 24 13-10 4.90 ERA 191 IP AND
age 25 9-9 2.89 ERA
Carlos Martinez
Age 23 14-7 3.01 ERA 180 IP
Machael Wacha
Age 23 17-7 3.38 ERA
All younger than Libby and McGreevey and didn't fade in the 2nd half like Libby.
The talent difference between pirates and Dodgers is razor thin. At this level, it’s truly a team event for success. More will than desire.
Better offense output might cure some ails, as will not giving up early runs.