No suter in our plans
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 784
- Joined: 04 Jul 2018 15:33 pm
No suter in our plans
Just saw on prohockeyrumors the blues don’t intend to sign D Suter
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: No suter in our plans
Army said the top 7 dmen are here,TampaBlues78 wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 15:04 pm Just saw on prohockeyrumors the blues don’t intend to sign D Suter
CP, Fowler, Broberg, Faulk, Leddy, Tucker, Kessel
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 784
- Joined: 04 Jul 2018 15:33 pm
Re: No suter in our plans
Makes sense, I did think he played well hereHarry S Deals wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 15:08 pmArmy said the top 7 dmen are here,TampaBlues78 wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 15:04 pm Just saw on prohockeyrumors the blues don’t intend to sign D Suter
CP, Fowler, Broberg, Faulk, Leddy, Tucker, Kessel
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 599
- Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am
Re: No suter in our plans
According to Strickland it won't be a surprise if Suter decides to retire. I guess it's never a surprise when a 40 year old retires from hockey.
Re: No suter in our plans
D coach? Just asking.b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 15:17 pm According to Strickland it won't be a surprise if Suter decides to retire. I guess it's never a surprise when a 40 year old retires from hockey.
Re: No suter in our plans
Good call Doug
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1293
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
Re: No suter in our plans
So that means that Army will trade for a top 4 Dman tomorrow!!Harry S Deals wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 15:08 pmArmy said the top 7 dmen are here,TampaBlues78 wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 15:04 pm Just saw on prohockeyrumors the blues don’t intend to sign D Suter
CP, Fowler, Broberg, Faulk, Leddy, Tucker, Kessel

Re: No suter in our plans
If not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.
I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
Re: No suter in our plans
bud white wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:01 pmIf not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.
I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
I wish I could agree with something from you. But not this one. I think he was stable. That's all.
I also think Tucker was fine last year if one is looking at the arc of growth. Whether Suter, Kessel or anyone else. Tucker was getting experience and that, more then teammate is what brought him along enough of not for Monty management had him doing the Mikkola route.
Re: No suter in our plans
You may want to think back on the injuries we had on the blueline - and don't forget that we were without Fowler for half of our season, and Leddy for a substantial chunk of the season. Sure, Suter lost a step - but the veteran stability was needed. He had more than a few stretches where he saw a ton of time. IF Tucker and Kessel were fully NHL ready, Suter wouldn't have played at all. But they weren't and Suter's contributions should be acknowledged.Cahokanut wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:14 pmbud white wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:01 pmIf not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.
I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
I wish I could agree with something from you. But not this one. I think he was stable. That's all.
I also think Tucker was fine last year if one is looking at the arc of growth. Whether Suter, Kessel or anyone else. Tucker was getting experience and that, more then teammate is what brought him along enough of not for Monty management had him doing the Mikkola route.
I'm not looking to be confrontational. We can agree to disagree.
Re: No suter in our plans
That's a shame. Sutter was better than I expected.
I hope he has a great retirement.
I hope he has a great retirement.
Re: No suter in our plans
For a last year of hockey, if that what it turns out to be....he's going out with very decent bang.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 951
- Joined: 24 May 2024 17:50 pm
Re: No suter in our plans
+1 He was a pleasant productive surprise. I don't want to backhand slap him, but what he did at his age in this league was incredible. I wish him the best. I think it would be great if he was part of the staff.bud white wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:01 pmIf not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.
I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
Re: No suter in our plans
Lidstrom played to 42 (and I think he still had a few left in the tank), Chelios played to 48 (but I think he was "chemically" enhanced). I'm sure Suter will be talking to a few teams and he might get some legit interest.hockey jedi wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:49 pm+1 He was a pleasant productive surprise. I don't want to backhand slap him, but what he did at his age in this league was incredible. I wish him the best. I think it would be great if he was part of the staff.bud white wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:01 pmIf not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.
I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 867
- Joined: 23 May 2024 19:52 pm
Re: No suter in our plans
He was one of the MVPs of the team in the early going. You are 100% correct that he was massive in helping them cover up under production of others and injuries. He did show his age and tail off at the end becoming a liability. It’s time for some of the kids to sink or swim if we are going to take that next step I keep saying this team is ready to take. Suter isn’t getting them there.bud white wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:01 pmIf not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.
I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
Re: No suter in our plans
Maybe, but he didn’t have any last year. He should hang ‘em up though unless the Panthers say come get your name on a cup. It would be weird if he kept playing with not much to play forbud white wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 17:13 pmLidstrom played to 42 (and I think he still had a few left in the tank), Chelios played to 48 (but I think he was "chemically" enhanced). I'm sure Suter will be talking to a few teams and he might get some legit interest.hockey jedi wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:49 pm+1 He was a pleasant productive surprise. I don't want to backhand slap him, but what he did at his age in this league was incredible. I wish him the best. I think it would be great if he was part of the staff.bud white wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025 16:01 pmIf not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.
I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.