No suter in our plans

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

TampaBlues78
Forum User
Posts: 784
Joined: 04 Jul 2018 15:33 pm

No suter in our plans

Post by TampaBlues78 »

Just saw on prohockeyrumors the blues don’t intend to sign D Suter
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1643
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by Harry S Deals »

TampaBlues78 wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:04 pm Just saw on prohockeyrumors the blues don’t intend to sign D Suter
Army said the top 7 dmen are here,

CP, Fowler, Broberg, Faulk, Leddy, Tucker, Kessel
TampaBlues78
Forum User
Posts: 784
Joined: 04 Jul 2018 15:33 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by TampaBlues78 »

Harry S Deals wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:08 pm
TampaBlues78 wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:04 pm Just saw on prohockeyrumors the blues don’t intend to sign D Suter
Army said the top 7 dmen are here,

CP, Fowler, Broberg, Faulk, Leddy, Tucker, Kessel
Makes sense, I did think he played well here
b-a-a-a-rclay
Forum User
Posts: 599
Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by b-a-a-a-rclay »

According to Strickland it won't be a surprise if Suter decides to retire. I guess it's never a surprise when a 40 year old retires from hockey.
wiscrev
Forum User
Posts: 925
Joined: 23 Nov 2018 23:26 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by wiscrev »

b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:17 pm According to Strickland it won't be a surprise if Suter decides to retire. I guess it's never a surprise when a 40 year old retires from hockey.
D coach? Just asking.
Cahokanut
Forum User
Posts: 187
Joined: 15 Jun 2024 06:19 am

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by Cahokanut »

Good call Doug
TruBlueFan_1970
Forum User
Posts: 1293
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by TruBlueFan_1970 »

Harry S Deals wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:08 pm
TampaBlues78 wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:04 pm Just saw on prohockeyrumors the blues don’t intend to sign D Suter
Army said the top 7 dmen are here,

CP, Fowler, Broberg, Faulk, Leddy, Tucker, Kessel
So that means that Army will trade for a top 4 Dman tomorrow!! :lol: He never shows his cards.
bud white
Forum User
Posts: 1994
Joined: 26 Oct 2018 21:25 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by bud white »

Cahokanut wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:22 pm Good call Doug
If not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.

I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
Cahokanut
Forum User
Posts: 187
Joined: 15 Jun 2024 06:19 am

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by Cahokanut »

bud white wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:01 pm
Cahokanut wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:22 pm Good call Doug
If not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.

I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.

I wish I could agree with something from you. But not this one. I think he was stable. That's all.
I also think Tucker was fine last year if one is looking at the arc of growth. Whether Suter, Kessel or anyone else. Tucker was getting experience and that, more then teammate is what brought him along enough of not for Monty management had him doing the Mikkola route.
bud white
Forum User
Posts: 1994
Joined: 26 Oct 2018 21:25 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by bud white »

Cahokanut wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:14 pm
bud white wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:01 pm
Cahokanut wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:22 pm Good call Doug
If not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.

I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.

I wish I could agree with something from you. But not this one. I think he was stable. That's all.
I also think Tucker was fine last year if one is looking at the arc of growth. Whether Suter, Kessel or anyone else. Tucker was getting experience and that, more then teammate is what brought him along enough of not for Monty management had him doing the Mikkola route.
You may want to think back on the injuries we had on the blueline - and don't forget that we were without Fowler for half of our season, and Leddy for a substantial chunk of the season. Sure, Suter lost a step - but the veteran stability was needed. He had more than a few stretches where he saw a ton of time. IF Tucker and Kessel were fully NHL ready, Suter wouldn't have played at all. But they weren't and Suter's contributions should be acknowledged.

I'm not looking to be confrontational. We can agree to disagree.
HighStick
Forum User
Posts: 5246
Joined: 13 Jan 2018 10:03 am

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by HighStick »

That's a shame. Sutter was better than I expected.
I hope he has a great retirement.
dhsux
Forum User
Posts: 2993
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by dhsux »

For a last year of hockey, if that what it turns out to be....he's going out with very decent bang.
hockey jedi
Forum User
Posts: 951
Joined: 24 May 2024 17:50 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by hockey jedi »

bud white wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:01 pm
Cahokanut wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:22 pm Good call Doug
If not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.

I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
+1 He was a pleasant productive surprise. I don't want to backhand slap him, but what he did at his age in this league was incredible. I wish him the best. I think it would be great if he was part of the staff.
bud white
Forum User
Posts: 1994
Joined: 26 Oct 2018 21:25 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by bud white »

hockey jedi wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:49 pm
bud white wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:01 pm
Cahokanut wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:22 pm Good call Doug
If not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.

I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
+1 He was a pleasant productive surprise. I don't want to backhand slap him, but what he did at his age in this league was incredible. I wish him the best. I think it would be great if he was part of the staff.
Lidstrom played to 42 (and I think he still had a few left in the tank), Chelios played to 48 (but I think he was "chemically" enhanced). I'm sure Suter will be talking to a few teams and he might get some legit interest.
Stlcardsblues
Forum User
Posts: 867
Joined: 23 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by Stlcardsblues »

bud white wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:01 pm
Cahokanut wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:22 pm Good call Doug
If not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.

I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
He was one of the MVPs of the team in the early going. You are 100% correct that he was massive in helping them cover up under production of others and injuries. He did show his age and tail off at the end becoming a liability. It’s time for some of the kids to sink or swim if we are going to take that next step I keep saying this team is ready to take. Suter isn’t getting them there.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 4354
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: No suter in our plans

Post by theograce »

bud white wrote: 23 Jun 2025 17:13 pm
hockey jedi wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:49 pm
bud white wrote: 23 Jun 2025 16:01 pm
Cahokanut wrote: 23 Jun 2025 15:22 pm Good call Doug
If not for Suter, Blues wouldn't have sniffed the playoffs. He was really, really good. And played far more minutes than I expected. A little respect is in order.

I hope he stays around as a D / Development coach. He has a lot to offer as evidenced by what he did with Tucker.
+1 He was a pleasant productive surprise. I don't want to backhand slap him, but what he did at his age in this league was incredible. I wish him the best. I think it would be great if he was part of the staff.
Lidstrom played to 42 (and I think he still had a few left in the tank), Chelios played to 48 (but I think he was "chemically" enhanced). I'm sure Suter will be talking to a few teams and he might get some legit interest.
Maybe, but he didn’t have any last year. He should hang ‘em up though unless the Panthers say come get your name on a cup. It would be weird if he kept playing with not much to play for
Post Reply