Yea the problem with Goldfan is he invents his own reality. Sure bloom could have picked up healthy bodies but they would have been only low ceiling high floor types like pallante who max out as fifth starters and at worst are meh relievers. He ignored the reality that the players traded had limited no traded clauses only a few teams they would waive to go to and of those teams they would have the need desire and payroll to take on the contracts which further reduces the number of teams they would also have to have pitching prospects the cards wanted which even further reduces the number of teams. People mistakenly think bloom thinks all these injured high upside arms will pay off he doesn’t. Early on Bernie said bloom is going to go with the numbers game that’s what he did. He doesn’t need all these high upside arms to pay off he just needs one to pay off. And with the numbers he’s brought in one will. And when that one hits he builds the rotation around them. If two payoff look out. The Cardinals previously would gamble on one high upside arm like it’s Reyes becomes a number one or bust flarehty becomes an ace or bust he’s not gambling on one paying off all his eggs in one basket he’s got a lot of potential number ones potentially and all he needs is one to pay off. That’s the plan it will workCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:33 pmLMAO.....Oz I asked him WHO SPECIFICALLY he would have wanted in return!Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:26 pmand he could have but they haven’t given up any healthy bodies that have anything like high upsideGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:35 pmAnd my point was/is that Bloom should’ve requested different HEALTHY bodies. If I’m reading correctly Clarke has never pitched a full season ANYWHERE. TJ(major), TOS(Major), Fractured shoulder(Major), Circulatory issues/numb arm/aneurysm(Major)Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:31 pmI think they got the best they could get because i dont blatantly ignore the facts of the situation. If i ignored facts like you love to do then yes i probably would be dumb like you and think they could have done betterGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:24 pmSo you 2 think it’s a good thing to receive “not that great of prospects anyway” AND that they have serious injuries?? This is what you’re cheering for??Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:21 pmLMAO....yes....Oz and I are goobers!Goldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:14 pmDo you two goobers understand the difference between contracts being bad for Cardinals and their needs and a general MLB market value for a player?Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:00 pmLOL....can you imagine having to sit NEXT to him at Busch for nine innings???Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 13:31 pmlol no if the player is a cardinals he says they suck are no good And are overpaid and the cardinals are stupid for having them if they trade that same player suddenly they are good and the contract is fair and the cardinals are stupid for trading them and should have got elite prospects for the players he said suck. So it’s pretty much if they play for the cardinals they suck until they are traded then suddenly he thinks they are goodCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 12:11 pmOz...I think he needs a new dart board to throw at in order to “formulate” his opinions?? LOLOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 09:57 amNot by you you said the contracts sucked ever since the cardinals signed them and said they were way overpaid and the cardinals were stupid for overpaying them you said that repeatedly just how stupid the cardinals were for overpaying them said it from the time they signed to the time they were traded then instantly once traded you decided the contracts were fairly valued lol hilarious. If they had kept them you would still be whining and complaining about how overpaid and terrible they are
Either that or improve his aim?????
Talk about a great time at the ballpark!!!!!
Cards pitching could get real interesting by the end of the season?
Fitts then Dobbins then Mathews.
Doyle/Clarke/Cijntje(sp??) are the high leverage guys coming soon.
Good stuff!!
The Cards had Herrera waiting years for Yadi to retire. He and KNiz could’ve handle catcher. The GREAT need was offense, not “good hitting catcher” offense but real offense.
In Grays case if MO was spending what he did…..the Cards needs a true #1 so he should’ve spent a little more and signed one….not an aging soft tosser
Does that mean Gray and WS had no MLB value?? No it means they weren’t the right contracts and players for the Cardinals team. Again is this a difficult concept for you??
Having said that....we actually carry on legit conversations with multiple other posters.
You on the other hand have been called a “whiner, crybaby, and dumb” by 90% of the replies you get in return.
As for me I’ll take being a “goober”.
Take care Mr. Emoji!
![]()
Because either you dont think its a good return in a trade or you do ??
And I get HEALTHY BODIES!
Is this guy serious??????? SMH
Just as I thought.....he’s got NOTHING which fits with the whining and babbling.
Pitchers received from Sox
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 8040
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
-
11WSChamps
- Forum User
- Posts: 4798
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
Bloom unloaded payroll plain and simple.
If Fitts and Dobbins had any kind of major upside I doubt Red Sox would have included them in a deal.
The younger prospects acquired we won't know about for a couple of years at least.
The importance in the deals is working capital in giving possible extensions to buy out arbitration years to young players who are deemed to be part of the future or perhaps sign a player to fill a need once they are in position to contend.
The sheer number of pitchers someone is bound to shake out and perhaps be a difference maker among the prospects but again I believe thecreal value comes in the money freed up.
If Fitts and Dobbins had any kind of major upside I doubt Red Sox would have included them in a deal.
The younger prospects acquired we won't know about for a couple of years at least.
The importance in the deals is working capital in giving possible extensions to buy out arbitration years to young players who are deemed to be part of the future or perhaps sign a player to fill a need once they are in position to contend.
The sheer number of pitchers someone is bound to shake out and perhaps be a difference maker among the prospects but again I believe thecreal value comes in the money freed up.
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
Can’t wait until we get somebody worth buying out.11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:28 pm Bloom unloaded payroll plain and simple.
If Fitts and Dobbins had any kind of major upside I doubt Red Sox would have included them in a deal.
The younger prospects acquired we won't know about for a couple of years at least.
The importance in the deals is working capital in giving possible extensions to buy out arbitration years to young players who are deemed to be part of the future or perhaps sign a player to fill a need once they are in position to contend.
The sheer number of pitchers someone is bound to shake out and perhaps be a difference maker among the prospects but again I believe thecreal value comes in the money freed up.
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 6779
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
I wonder if Bloom got confused over the winter and thought at least one trade was being made with the White Sox? Might explain his run of multiple deals with Boston.
For the record, im glad he didn't acquire any White Sox pitchers. That team sucks!

For the record, im glad he didn't acquire any White Sox pitchers. That team sucks!
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11637
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
“Own reality” is certainly a nice/diplomatic way of putting it.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:25 pmYea the problem with Goldfan is he invents his own reality. Sure bloom could have picked up healthy bodies but they would have been only low ceiling high floor types like pallante who max out as fifth starters and at worst are meh relievers. He ignored the reality that the players traded had limited no traded clauses only a few teams they would waive to go to and of those teams they would have the need desire and payroll to take on the contracts which further reduces the number of teams they would also have to have pitching prospects the cards wanted which even further reduces the number of teams. People mistakenly think bloom thinks all these injured high upside arms will pay off he doesn’t. Early on Bernie said bloom is going to go with the numbers game that’s what he did. He doesn’t need all these high upside arms to pay off he just needs one to pay off. And with the numbers he’s brought in one will. And when that one hits he builds the rotation around them. If two payoff look out. The Cardinals previously would gamble on one high upside arm like it’s Reyes becomes a number one or bust flarehty becomes an ace or bust he’s not gambling on one paying off all his eggs in one basket he’s got a lot of potential number ones potentially and all he needs is one to pay off. That’s the plan it will workCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:33 pmLMAO.....Oz I asked him WHO SPECIFICALLY he would have wanted in return!Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:26 pmand he could have but they haven’t given up any healthy bodies that have anything like high upsideGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:35 pmAnd my point was/is that Bloom should’ve requested different HEALTHY bodies. If I’m reading correctly Clarke has never pitched a full season ANYWHERE. TJ(major), TOS(Major), Fractured shoulder(Major), Circulatory issues/numb arm/aneurysm(Major)Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:31 pmI think they got the best they could get because i dont blatantly ignore the facts of the situation. If i ignored facts like you love to do then yes i probably would be dumb like you and think they could have done betterGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:24 pmSo you 2 think it’s a good thing to receive “not that great of prospects anyway” AND that they have serious injuries?? This is what you’re cheering for??Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:21 pmLMAO....yes....Oz and I are goobers!Goldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:14 pmDo you two goobers understand the difference between contracts being bad for Cardinals and their needs and a general MLB market value for a player?Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:00 pmLOL....can you imagine having to sit NEXT to him at Busch for nine innings???Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 13:31 pmlol no if the player is a cardinals he says they suck are no good And are overpaid and the cardinals are stupid for having them if they trade that same player suddenly they are good and the contract is fair and the cardinals are stupid for trading them and should have got elite prospects for the players he said suck. So it’s pretty much if they play for the cardinals they suck until they are traded then suddenly he thinks they are goodCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 12:11 pmOz...I think he needs a new dart board to throw at in order to “formulate” his opinions?? LOLOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 09:57 am
Not by you you said the contracts sucked ever since the cardinals signed them and said they were way overpaid and the cardinals were stupid for overpaying them you said that repeatedly just how stupid the cardinals were for overpaying them said it from the time they signed to the time they were traded then instantly once traded you decided the contracts were fairly valued lol hilarious. If they had kept them you would still be whining and complaining about how overpaid and terrible they are
Either that or improve his aim?????
Talk about a great time at the ballpark!!!!!
Cards pitching could get real interesting by the end of the season?
Fitts then Dobbins then Mathews.
Doyle/Clarke/Cijntje(sp??) are the high leverage guys coming soon.
Good stuff!!
The Cards had Herrera waiting years for Yadi to retire. He and KNiz could’ve handle catcher. The GREAT need was offense, not “good hitting catcher” offense but real offense.
In Grays case if MO was spending what he did…..the Cards needs a true #1 so he should’ve spent a little more and signed one….not an aging soft tosser
Does that mean Gray and WS had no MLB value?? No it means they weren’t the right contracts and players for the Cardinals team. Again is this a difficult concept for you??
Having said that....we actually carry on legit conversations with multiple other posters.
You on the other hand have been called a “whiner, crybaby, and dumb” by 90% of the replies you get in return.
As for me I’ll take being a “goober”.
Take care Mr. Emoji!
![]()
Because either you dont think its a good return in a trade or you do ??
And I get HEALTHY BODIES!
Is this guy serious??????? SMH
Just as I thought.....he’s got NOTHING which fits with the whining and babbling.
I like Bloom taking shots at the higher upside guys even with their issues.
Like you said....if only one or two hits it’s a win!
-
Goldfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 14195
- Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
Fellas I posted a “Walkers Swing” thread about a month ago……got the usual dumb[ash] comments from y’all….Cusecards wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:43 am“Own reality” is certainly a nice/diplomatic way of putting it.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:25 pmYea the problem with Goldfan is he invents his own reality. Sure bloom could have picked up healthy bodies but they would have been only low ceiling high floor types like pallante who max out as fifth starters and at worst are meh relievers. He ignored the reality that the players traded had limited no traded clauses only a few teams they would waive to go to and of those teams they would have the need desire and payroll to take on the contracts which further reduces the number of teams they would also have to have pitching prospects the cards wanted which even further reduces the number of teams. People mistakenly think bloom thinks all these injured high upside arms will pay off he doesn’t. Early on Bernie said bloom is going to go with the numbers game that’s what he did. He doesn’t need all these high upside arms to pay off he just needs one to pay off. And with the numbers he’s brought in one will. And when that one hits he builds the rotation around them. If two payoff look out. The Cardinals previously would gamble on one high upside arm like it’s Reyes becomes a number one or bust flarehty becomes an ace or bust he’s not gambling on one paying off all his eggs in one basket he’s got a lot of potential number ones potentially and all he needs is one to pay off. That’s the plan it will workCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:33 pmLMAO.....Oz I asked him WHO SPECIFICALLY he would have wanted in return!Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:26 pmand he could have but they haven’t given up any healthy bodies that have anything like high upsideGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:35 pmAnd my point was/is that Bloom should’ve requested different HEALTHY bodies. If I’m reading correctly Clarke has never pitched a full season ANYWHERE. TJ(major), TOS(Major), Fractured shoulder(Major), Circulatory issues/numb arm/aneurysm(Major)Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:31 pmI think they got the best they could get because i dont blatantly ignore the facts of the situation. If i ignored facts like you love to do then yes i probably would be dumb like you and think they could have done betterGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:24 pmSo you 2 think it’s a good thing to receive “not that great of prospects anyway” AND that they have serious injuries?? This is what you’re cheering for??Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:21 pmLMAO....yes....Oz and I are goobers!Goldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:14 pmDo you two goobers understand the difference between contracts being bad for Cardinals and their needs and a general MLB market value for a player?Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:00 pmLOL....can you imagine having to sit NEXT to him at Busch for nine innings???Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 13:31 pmlol no if the player is a cardinals he says they suck are no good And are overpaid and the cardinals are stupid for having them if they trade that same player suddenly they are good and the contract is fair and the cardinals are stupid for trading them and should have got elite prospects for the players he said suck. So it’s pretty much if they play for the cardinals they suck until they are traded then suddenly he thinks they are good
Talk about a great time at the ballpark!!!!!
Cards pitching could get real interesting by the end of the season?
Fitts then Dobbins then Mathews.
Doyle/Clarke/Cijntje(sp??) are the high leverage guys coming soon.
Good stuff!!
The Cards had Herrera waiting years for Yadi to retire. He and KNiz could’ve handle catcher. The GREAT need was offense, not “good hitting catcher” offense but real offense.
In Grays case if MO was spending what he did…..the Cards needs a true #1 so he should’ve spent a little more and signed one….not an aging soft tosser
Does that mean Gray and WS had no MLB value?? No it means they weren’t the right contracts and players for the Cardinals team. Again is this a difficult concept for you??
Having said that....we actually carry on legit conversations with multiple other posters.
You on the other hand have been called a “whiner, crybaby, and dumb” by 90% of the replies you get in return.
As for me I’ll take being a “goober”.
Take care Mr. Emoji!
![]()
Because either you dont think its a good return in a trade or you do ??
And I get HEALTHY BODIES!
Is this guy serious??????? SMH
Just as I thought.....he’s got NOTHING which fits with the whining and babbling.
I like Bloom taking shots at the higher upside guys even with their issues.
Like you said....if only one or two hits it’s a win!
I just posted this thread about “Pitchers Received from Sox” and today Dick Fitts is optioned to AAA, he couldn’t even beat out Pallante for the final spot in rotation.
Yes Goldfan makes his own reality…..and apparently it closely aligns REAL LIFE
Keep following along boys
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11637
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
“Fellas”??Goldfan wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:54 amFellas I posted a “Walkers Swing” thread about a month ago……got the usual dumb[ash] comments from y’all….Cusecards wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:43 am“Own reality” is certainly a nice/diplomatic way of putting it.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:25 pmYea the problem with Goldfan is he invents his own reality. Sure bloom could have picked up healthy bodies but they would have been only low ceiling high floor types like pallante who max out as fifth starters and at worst are meh relievers. He ignored the reality that the players traded had limited no traded clauses only a few teams they would waive to go to and of those teams they would have the need desire and payroll to take on the contracts which further reduces the number of teams they would also have to have pitching prospects the cards wanted which even further reduces the number of teams. People mistakenly think bloom thinks all these injured high upside arms will pay off he doesn’t. Early on Bernie said bloom is going to go with the numbers game that’s what he did. He doesn’t need all these high upside arms to pay off he just needs one to pay off. And with the numbers he’s brought in one will. And when that one hits he builds the rotation around them. If two payoff look out. The Cardinals previously would gamble on one high upside arm like it’s Reyes becomes a number one or bust flarehty becomes an ace or bust he’s not gambling on one paying off all his eggs in one basket he’s got a lot of potential number ones potentially and all he needs is one to pay off. That’s the plan it will workCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:33 pmLMAO.....Oz I asked him WHO SPECIFICALLY he would have wanted in return!Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:26 pmand he could have but they haven’t given up any healthy bodies that have anything like high upsideGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:35 pmAnd my point was/is that Bloom should’ve requested different HEALTHY bodies. If I’m reading correctly Clarke has never pitched a full season ANYWHERE. TJ(major), TOS(Major), Fractured shoulder(Major), Circulatory issues/numb arm/aneurysm(Major)Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:31 pmI think they got the best they could get because i dont blatantly ignore the facts of the situation. If i ignored facts like you love to do then yes i probably would be dumb like you and think they could have done betterGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:24 pmSo you 2 think it’s a good thing to receive “not that great of prospects anyway” AND that they have serious injuries?? This is what you’re cheering for??Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:21 pmLMAO....yes....Oz and I are goobers!Goldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:14 pmDo you two goobers understand the difference between contracts being bad for Cardinals and their needs and a general MLB market value for a player?Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:00 pmLOL....can you imagine having to sit NEXT to him at Busch for nine innings???Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 13:31 pm
lol no if the player is a cardinals he says they suck are no good And are overpaid and the cardinals are stupid for having them if they trade that same player suddenly they are good and the contract is fair and the cardinals are stupid for trading them and should have got elite prospects for the players he said suck. So it’s pretty much if they play for the cardinals they suck until they are traded then suddenly he thinks they are good
Talk about a great time at the ballpark!!!!!
Cards pitching could get real interesting by the end of the season?
Fitts then Dobbins then Mathews.
Doyle/Clarke/Cijntje(sp??) are the high leverage guys coming soon.
Good stuff!!
The Cards had Herrera waiting years for Yadi to retire. He and KNiz could’ve handle catcher. The GREAT need was offense, not “good hitting catcher” offense but real offense.
In Grays case if MO was spending what he did…..the Cards needs a true #1 so he should’ve spent a little more and signed one….not an aging soft tosser
Does that mean Gray and WS had no MLB value?? No it means they weren’t the right contracts and players for the Cardinals team. Again is this a difficult concept for you??
Having said that....we actually carry on legit conversations with multiple other posters.
You on the other hand have been called a “whiner, crybaby, and dumb” by 90% of the replies you get in return.
As for me I’ll take being a “goober”.
Take care Mr. Emoji!
![]()
Because either you dont think its a good return in a trade or you do ??
And I get HEALTHY BODIES!
Is this guy serious??????? SMH
Just as I thought.....he’s got NOTHING which fits with the whining and babbling.
I like Bloom taking shots at the higher upside guys even with their issues.
Like you said....if only one or two hits it’s a win!![]()
and today most of CT agrees his swing is a complete disaster.
I just posted this thread about “Pitchers Received from Sox” and today Dick Fitts is optioned to AAA, he couldn’t even beat out Pallante for the final spot in rotation.
Yes Goldfan makes his own reality…..and apparently it closely aligns REAL LIFE![]()
![]()
Keep following along boys
“Y’all”???
Are you pushing to be the new modern day Will Rogers??
By my unofficial count about 90% of CT thinks you’re either a whiner or a person of “subpar intellect”.
Stick with the emojis....they are your best feature!
-
Goldfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 14195
- Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
You’re right Cuse….I just get lucky with all these Calls that turn out to actually happen weeks or months later. Keep following buddy. You disagrees with everything I type just adds to you looking like a fool when it happens. Cheers and Go CardsCusecards wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 11:31 am“Fellas”??Goldfan wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:54 amFellas I posted a “Walkers Swing” thread about a month ago……got the usual dumb[ash] comments from y’all….Cusecards wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:43 am“Own reality” is certainly a nice/diplomatic way of putting it.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:25 pmYea the problem with Goldfan is he invents his own reality. Sure bloom could have picked up healthy bodies but they would have been only low ceiling high floor types like pallante who max out as fifth starters and at worst are meh relievers. He ignored the reality that the players traded had limited no traded clauses only a few teams they would waive to go to and of those teams they would have the need desire and payroll to take on the contracts which further reduces the number of teams they would also have to have pitching prospects the cards wanted which even further reduces the number of teams. People mistakenly think bloom thinks all these injured high upside arms will pay off he doesn’t. Early on Bernie said bloom is going to go with the numbers game that’s what he did. He doesn’t need all these high upside arms to pay off he just needs one to pay off. And with the numbers he’s brought in one will. And when that one hits he builds the rotation around them. If two payoff look out. The Cardinals previously would gamble on one high upside arm like it’s Reyes becomes a number one or bust flarehty becomes an ace or bust he’s not gambling on one paying off all his eggs in one basket he’s got a lot of potential number ones potentially and all he needs is one to pay off. That’s the plan it will workCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:33 pmLMAO.....Oz I asked him WHO SPECIFICALLY he would have wanted in return!Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:26 pmand he could have but they haven’t given up any healthy bodies that have anything like high upsideGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:35 pmAnd my point was/is that Bloom should’ve requested different HEALTHY bodies. If I’m reading correctly Clarke has never pitched a full season ANYWHERE. TJ(major), TOS(Major), Fractured shoulder(Major), Circulatory issues/numb arm/aneurysm(Major)Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:31 pmI think they got the best they could get because i dont blatantly ignore the facts of the situation. If i ignored facts like you love to do then yes i probably would be dumb like you and think they could have done betterGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:24 pmSo you 2 think it’s a good thing to receive “not that great of prospects anyway” AND that they have serious injuries?? This is what you’re cheering for??Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:21 pmLMAO....yes....Oz and I are goobers!Goldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:14 pmDo you two goobers understand the difference between contracts being bad for Cardinals and their needs and a general MLB market value for a player?Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:00 pm
LOL....can you imagine having to sit NEXT to him at Busch for nine innings???
Talk about a great time at the ballpark!!!!!
Cards pitching could get real interesting by the end of the season?
Fitts then Dobbins then Mathews.
Doyle/Clarke/Cijntje(sp??) are the high leverage guys coming soon.
Good stuff!!
The Cards had Herrera waiting years for Yadi to retire. He and KNiz could’ve handle catcher. The GREAT need was offense, not “good hitting catcher” offense but real offense.
In Grays case if MO was spending what he did…..the Cards needs a true #1 so he should’ve spent a little more and signed one….not an aging soft tosser
Does that mean Gray and WS had no MLB value?? No it means they weren’t the right contracts and players for the Cardinals team. Again is this a difficult concept for you??
Having said that....we actually carry on legit conversations with multiple other posters.
You on the other hand have been called a “whiner, crybaby, and dumb” by 90% of the replies you get in return.
As for me I’ll take being a “goober”.
Take care Mr. Emoji!
![]()
Because either you dont think its a good return in a trade or you do ??
And I get HEALTHY BODIES!
Is this guy serious??????? SMH
Just as I thought.....he’s got NOTHING which fits with the whining and babbling.
I like Bloom taking shots at the higher upside guys even with their issues.
Like you said....if only one or two hits it’s a win!![]()
and today most of CT agrees his swing is a complete disaster.
I just posted this thread about “Pitchers Received from Sox” and today Dick Fitts is optioned to AAA, he couldn’t even beat out Pallante for the final spot in rotation.
Yes Goldfan makes his own reality…..and apparently it closely aligns REAL LIFE![]()
![]()
Keep following along boys
“Y’all”???
Are you pushing to be the new modern day Will Rogers??
By my unofficial count about 90% of CT thinks you’re either a whiner or a person of “subpar intellect”.
Stick with the emojis....they are your best feature!
![]()
Weren’t you so captivated and excited about how Fitts would look in the rotation?? If you think back I said he was a 5.00ERA guy with control issues. Perhaps you should’ve listened instead of this clownshow you and OZ tag team
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 8040
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
lol what calls have you been right about?Goldfan wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 11:40 amYou’re right Cuse….I just get lucky with all these Calls that turn out to actually happen weeks or months later. Keep following buddy. You disagrees with everything I type just adds to you looking like a fool when it happens. Cheers and Go CardsCusecards wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 11:31 am“Fellas”??Goldfan wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:54 amFellas I posted a “Walkers Swing” thread about a month ago……got the usual dumb[ash] comments from y’all….Cusecards wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:43 am“Own reality” is certainly a nice/diplomatic way of putting it.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:25 pmYea the problem with Goldfan is he invents his own reality. Sure bloom could have picked up healthy bodies but they would have been only low ceiling high floor types like pallante who max out as fifth starters and at worst are meh relievers. He ignored the reality that the players traded had limited no traded clauses only a few teams they would waive to go to and of those teams they would have the need desire and payroll to take on the contracts which further reduces the number of teams they would also have to have pitching prospects the cards wanted which even further reduces the number of teams. People mistakenly think bloom thinks all these injured high upside arms will pay off he doesn’t. Early on Bernie said bloom is going to go with the numbers game that’s what he did. He doesn’t need all these high upside arms to pay off he just needs one to pay off. And with the numbers he’s brought in one will. And when that one hits he builds the rotation around them. If two payoff look out. The Cardinals previously would gamble on one high upside arm like it’s Reyes becomes a number one or bust flarehty becomes an ace or bust he’s not gambling on one paying off all his eggs in one basket he’s got a lot of potential number ones potentially and all he needs is one to pay off. That’s the plan it will workCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:33 pmLMAO.....Oz I asked him WHO SPECIFICALLY he would have wanted in return!Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:26 pmand he could have but they haven’t given up any healthy bodies that have anything like high upsideGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:35 pmAnd my point was/is that Bloom should’ve requested different HEALTHY bodies. If I’m reading correctly Clarke has never pitched a full season ANYWHERE. TJ(major), TOS(Major), Fractured shoulder(Major), Circulatory issues/numb arm/aneurysm(Major)Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:31 pmI think they got the best they could get because i dont blatantly ignore the facts of the situation. If i ignored facts like you love to do then yes i probably would be dumb like you and think they could have done betterGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:24 pmSo you 2 think it’s a good thing to receive “not that great of prospects anyway” AND that they have serious injuries?? This is what you’re cheering for??Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:21 pmLMAO....yes....Oz and I are goobers!Goldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:14 pm
Do you two goobers understand the difference between contracts being bad for Cardinals and their needs and a general MLB market value for a player?
The Cards had Herrera waiting years for Yadi to retire. He and KNiz could’ve handle catcher. The GREAT need was offense, not “good hitting catcher” offense but real offense.
In Grays case if MO was spending what he did…..the Cards needs a true #1 so he should’ve spent a little more and signed one….not an aging soft tosser
Does that mean Gray and WS had no MLB value?? No it means they weren’t the right contracts and players for the Cardinals team. Again is this a difficult concept for you??
Having said that....we actually carry on legit conversations with multiple other posters.
You on the other hand have been called a “whiner, crybaby, and dumb” by 90% of the replies you get in return.
As for me I’ll take being a “goober”.
Take care Mr. Emoji!
![]()
Because either you dont think its a good return in a trade or you do ??
And I get HEALTHY BODIES!
Is this guy serious??????? SMH
Just as I thought.....he’s got NOTHING which fits with the whining and babbling.
I like Bloom taking shots at the higher upside guys even with their issues.
Like you said....if only one or two hits it’s a win!![]()
and today most of CT agrees his swing is a complete disaster.
I just posted this thread about “Pitchers Received from Sox” and today Dick Fitts is optioned to AAA, he couldn’t even beat out Pallante for the final spot in rotation.
Yes Goldfan makes his own reality…..and apparently it closely aligns REAL LIFE![]()
![]()
Keep following along boys
“Y’all”???
Are you pushing to be the new modern day Will Rogers??
By my unofficial count about 90% of CT thinks you’re either a whiner or a person of “subpar intellect”.
Stick with the emojis....they are your best feature!
![]()
Weren’t you so captivated and excited about how Fitts would look in the rotation?? If you think back I said he was a 5.00ERA guy with control issues. Perhaps you should’ve listened instead of this clownshow you and OZ tag team
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11637
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
1) STILL waiting on those SPECIFIC players that Bloom should have targeted instead of who he did target?Goldfan wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 11:40 amYou’re right Cuse….I just get lucky with all these Calls that turn out to actually happen weeks or months later. Keep following buddy. You disagrees with everything I type just adds to you looking like a fool when it happens. Cheers and Go CardsCusecards wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 11:31 am“Fellas”??Goldfan wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:54 amFellas I posted a “Walkers Swing” thread about a month ago……got the usual dumb[ash] comments from y’all….Cusecards wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 10:43 am“Own reality” is certainly a nice/diplomatic way of putting it.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:25 pmYea the problem with Goldfan is he invents his own reality. Sure bloom could have picked up healthy bodies but they would have been only low ceiling high floor types like pallante who max out as fifth starters and at worst are meh relievers. He ignored the reality that the players traded had limited no traded clauses only a few teams they would waive to go to and of those teams they would have the need desire and payroll to take on the contracts which further reduces the number of teams they would also have to have pitching prospects the cards wanted which even further reduces the number of teams. People mistakenly think bloom thinks all these injured high upside arms will pay off he doesn’t. Early on Bernie said bloom is going to go with the numbers game that’s what he did. He doesn’t need all these high upside arms to pay off he just needs one to pay off. And with the numbers he’s brought in one will. And when that one hits he builds the rotation around them. If two payoff look out. The Cardinals previously would gamble on one high upside arm like it’s Reyes becomes a number one or bust flarehty becomes an ace or bust he’s not gambling on one paying off all his eggs in one basket he’s got a lot of potential number ones potentially and all he needs is one to pay off. That’s the plan it will workCusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:33 pmLMAO.....Oz I asked him WHO SPECIFICALLY he would have wanted in return!Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 19:26 pmand he could have but they haven’t given up any healthy bodies that have anything like high upsideGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:35 pmAnd my point was/is that Bloom should’ve requested different HEALTHY bodies. If I’m reading correctly Clarke has never pitched a full season ANYWHERE. TJ(major), TOS(Major), Fractured shoulder(Major), Circulatory issues/numb arm/aneurysm(Major)Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:31 pmI think they got the best they could get because i dont blatantly ignore the facts of the situation. If i ignored facts like you love to do then yes i probably would be dumb like you and think they could have done betterGoldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:24 pmSo you 2 think it’s a good thing to receive “not that great of prospects anyway” AND that they have serious injuries?? This is what you’re cheering for??Cusecards wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:21 pmLMAO....yes....Oz and I are goobers!Goldfan wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 17:14 pm
Do you two goobers understand the difference between contracts being bad for Cardinals and their needs and a general MLB market value for a player?
The Cards had Herrera waiting years for Yadi to retire. He and KNiz could’ve handle catcher. The GREAT need was offense, not “good hitting catcher” offense but real offense.
In Grays case if MO was spending what he did…..the Cards needs a true #1 so he should’ve spent a little more and signed one….not an aging soft tosser
Does that mean Gray and WS had no MLB value?? No it means they weren’t the right contracts and players for the Cardinals team. Again is this a difficult concept for you??
Having said that....we actually carry on legit conversations with multiple other posters.
You on the other hand have been called a “whiner, crybaby, and dumb” by 90% of the replies you get in return.
As for me I’ll take being a “goober”.
Take care Mr. Emoji!
![]()
Because either you dont think its a good return in a trade or you do ??
And I get HEALTHY BODIES!
Is this guy serious??????? SMH
Just as I thought.....he’s got NOTHING which fits with the whining and babbling.
I like Bloom taking shots at the higher upside guys even with their issues.
Like you said....if only one or two hits it’s a win!![]()
and today most of CT agrees his swing is a complete disaster.
I just posted this thread about “Pitchers Received from Sox” and today Dick Fitts is optioned to AAA, he couldn’t even beat out Pallante for the final spot in rotation.
Yes Goldfan makes his own reality…..and apparently it closely aligns REAL LIFE![]()
![]()
Keep following along boys
“Y’all”???
Are you pushing to be the new modern day Will Rogers??
By my unofficial count about 90% of CT thinks you’re either a whiner or a person of “subpar intellect”.
Stick with the emojis....they are your best feature!
![]()
Weren’t you so captivated and excited about how Fitts would look in the rotation?? If you think back I said he was a 5.00ERA guy with control issues. Perhaps you should’ve listened instead of this clownshow you and OZ tag team
2) Here’s an actual quote from Will Rogers that pretty much sums up your posts: “Never miss a good chance to shut up!”
Y’all have a nice day there fella!
Excited about reading your LIST of SPECIFIC players!!!
-
casey1024
- Forum User
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 12 Jun 2024 10:59 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
If you're looking only at short term.....then you are correct. I'm thinking long term is where the benefit lies. Just so I know.....what the heck did we win with Sonny and Wilson? Let it go man.
-
Cranny
- Forum User
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
Bloom wanted to get pitchers who were ML ready.11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:28 pm Bloom unloaded payroll plain and simple.
If Fitts and Dobbins had any kind of major upside I doubt Red Sox would have included them in a deal.
The younger prospects acquired we won't know about for a couple of years at least.
The importance in the deals is working capital in giving possible extensions to buy out arbitration years to young players who are deemed to be part of the future or perhaps sign a player to fill a need once they are in position to contend.
The sheer number of pitchers someone is bound to shake out and perhaps be a difference maker among the prospects but again I believe thecreal value comes in the money freed up.
And he got them. Pitchers that were under control for multiple years. Value for value.
-
Goldfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 14195
- Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
What pitchers acquired in trades this offseason are ML ready?? Fitts was just sent to AAA, Clarkes arm is a mess recovering from ANOTHER surgery/out til JUNE, Dobbins is just off his 2nd ACL repair, on IL, and not sure he can play the field. Those are MLB ready arms??Cranny wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 18:49 pmBloom wanted to get pitchers who were ML ready.11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:28 pm Bloom unloaded payroll plain and simple.
If Fitts and Dobbins had any kind of major upside I doubt Red Sox would have included them in a deal.
The younger prospects acquired we won't know about for a couple of years at least.
The importance in the deals is working capital in giving possible extensions to buy out arbitration years to young players who are deemed to be part of the future or perhaps sign a player to fill a need once they are in position to contend.
The sheer number of pitchers someone is bound to shake out and perhaps be a difference maker among the prospects but again I believe thecreal value comes in the money freed up.
And he got them. Pitchers that were under control for multiple years. Value for value.
Fitts couldn’t beat out Pallante….who was as bad as Miles and Fedde last season.
-
OldRed
- Forum User
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:53 pm
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
Goldfan wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 19:03 pmWhat pitchers acquired in trades this offseason are ML ready?? Fitts was just sent to AAA, Clarkes arm is a mess recovering from ANOTHER surgery/out til JUNE, Dobbins is just off his 2nd ACL repair, on IL, and not sure he can play the field. Those are MLB ready arms??Cranny wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026 18:49 pmBloom wanted to get pitchers who were ML ready.11WSChamps wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026 22:28 pm Bloom unloaded payroll plain and simple.
If Fitts and Dobbins had any kind of major upside I doubt Red Sox would have included them in a deal.
The younger prospects acquired we won't know about for a couple of years at least.
The importance in the deals is working capital in giving possible extensions to buy out arbitration years to young players who are deemed to be part of the future or perhaps sign a player to fill a need once they are in position to contend.
The sheer number of pitchers someone is bound to shake out and perhaps be a difference maker among the prospects but again I believe thecreal value comes in the money freed up.
And he got them. Pitchers that were under control for multiple years. Value for value.
Fitts couldn’t beat out Pallante….who was as bad as Miles and Fedde last season.
Who were they?
-
Goldfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 14195
- Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
“Alex Cora and the Red Sox — and all of Boston, for that matter — knew that ace and Cy Young runner up Garrett Crochet would get the ball as the Opening Day starter for the club later this month in Cincinnati.
But this past weekend came with Cora's decision on who will follow Crochet in the Red Sox rotation, with veteran offseason addition Sonny Gray tabbed to be Boston's No. 2 pitcher in the rotation to begin the 2026 season.”
Ahead of the 130mil stud Ranger Suárez
Boston Rotation
Crochet-Cy Young runner up
Sonny(no trade value)Gray
Ranger Suárez
But this past weekend came with Cora's decision on who will follow Crochet in the Red Sox rotation, with veteran offseason addition Sonny Gray tabbed to be Boston's No. 2 pitcher in the rotation to begin the 2026 season.”
Ahead of the 130mil stud Ranger Suárez
Boston Rotation
Crochet-Cy Young runner up
Sonny(no trade value)Gray
Ranger Suárez
-
Horseradish
- Forum User
- Posts: 277
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:26 pm
Re: Pitchers received from Sox
This is the correct outlook. I’m slightly optimistic that our revamped development in the minors also increases the odds that one or more of these high-ceiling arms becomes valuable.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑16 Mar 2026 10:13 amBloom obviously has taken a "high risk, high ceiling" strategy into roster building. I'm ok with it. Mo was a "low risk, high floor, low ceiling" guy. This roster needed an influx of power arms and power hitters. Bloom has brought them in. Again, I'm ok with the associated risk. It will take a re-calibration of perspective to get on board. There will be some washouts along the way, but the potential upside is much greater than a Mo roster. A roster made up of mostly AAAA guys cannot compete in MLB.rockondlouie wrote: ↑16 Mar 2026 10:05 amTo be fair GF he didn't "pay up".
WillyC & S. Gray were ordered salary dumps by BDWJr and Bloom got back five need arms for the major league and minor league pitching staffs.
Clarke/22 yrs old--HUGE upside (Top 10 Red Sox prospect) w/a 99 MPH fastball, known at the time of trade he wouldn't be ready until mid season
Dobbins/26 yrs old---HUGE upside as a starter, threw 5 inning simulated game just awaiting clearance to begin PFP
Fitts/25 yrs old---Should be the Cardinals #4 starter this year
They also got:
Yhoiker Fajardo (RHP): A 19-year-old prospect
&
Blake Aita (RHP): A 22-year-old minor-league pitcher.