CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Cool Papa Con
Forum User
Posts: 1174
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:26 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Cool Papa Con »

An Old Friend wrote: 12 Jul 2024 06:58 am
Cool Papa Con wrote: 12 Jul 2024 06:46 am This is probably a “Captain Obvious” question, but are Pitchers really governed by Games Played and not Innings Pitched?
No, it's innings pitched.

You're allowed a max of 1550 innings pitched. You've thrown 1011 and have 538 remaining, so you're projected to hit the max pretty early.
Ok, I thought that might be the case. I started to cut back recently with an approach that exposes more dominant relievers.
Quincy Varnish
Forum User
Posts: 17117
Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Quincy Varnish »

Cool Papa Con wrote: 12 Jul 2024 07:09 am
An Old Friend wrote: 12 Jul 2024 06:58 am
Cool Papa Con wrote: 12 Jul 2024 06:46 am This is probably a “Captain Obvious” question, but are Pitchers really governed by Games Played and not Innings Pitched?
No, it's innings pitched.

You're allowed a max of 1550 innings pitched. You've thrown 1011 and have 538 remaining, so you're projected to hit the max pretty early.
Ok, I thought that might be the case. I started to cut back recently with an approach that exposes more dominant relievers.
You must mean Luke Weaver?
Cool Papa Con
Forum User
Posts: 1174
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:26 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Cool Papa Con »

Quincy Varnish wrote: 12 Jul 2024 11:48 am
Cool Papa Con wrote: 12 Jul 2024 07:09 am
An Old Friend wrote: 12 Jul 2024 06:58 am
Cool Papa Con wrote: 12 Jul 2024 06:46 am This is probably a “Captain Obvious” question, but are Pitchers really governed by Games Played and not Innings Pitched?
No, it's innings pitched.

You're allowed a max of 1550 innings pitched. You've thrown 1011 and have 538 remaining, so you're projected to hit the max pretty early.
Ok, I thought that might be the case. I started to cut back recently with an approach that exposes more dominant relievers.
You must mean Luke Weaver?
1.3 WAR in the Yankee’s bullpen by mid-July is pretty dominant
Quincy Varnish
Forum User
Posts: 17117
Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Quincy Varnish »

Cool Papa Con wrote: 12 Jul 2024 13:17 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 12 Jul 2024 11:48 am
Cool Papa Con wrote: 12 Jul 2024 07:09 am
An Old Friend wrote: 12 Jul 2024 06:58 am
Cool Papa Con wrote: 12 Jul 2024 06:46 am This is probably a “Captain Obvious” question, but are Pitchers really governed by Games Played and not Innings Pitched?
No, it's innings pitched.

You're allowed a max of 1550 innings pitched. You've thrown 1011 and have 538 remaining, so you're projected to hit the max pretty early.
Ok, I thought that might be the case. I started to cut back recently with an approach that exposes more dominant relievers.
You must mean Luke Weaver?
1.3 WAR in the Yankee’s bullpen by mid-July is pretty dominant
Ya… he’s having a nice season for them. Never thought I’d see the word “dominant” associated with Luke Weaver, but I suppose he could pass for it on paper. He doesn’t have much value in this league though, unless he starts vulturung Ws… hard to do w/ the Yankees recent suck fest.
Quincy Varnish
Forum User
Posts: 17117
Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Quincy Varnish »

ASB Standings

1. Whatashame - 149.5
2. An Old Friend - 127
3. Quincy Varnish - 123
4. Cool Papa Con - 103
5. MattMitchell44 - 102.5
6. Booooyah - 98.5
7. Jeffy25 - 98
8. Barking Lion - 93
9. DJ Davis - 83
10. ggnoobs - 82
11. imadamnman - 80.5
12. SamTheMan - 78.5
13. Dazepster - 76
14. Cardsrmyteam - 74.5
15. sdaltons - 71
Cool Papa Con
Forum User
Posts: 1174
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:26 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Cool Papa Con »

Looking for an Ace-type and I’ve got a lot of options to deal w/guys coming off the IL
Dazepster
Forum User
Posts: 737
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Dazepster »

Cool Papa Con wrote: 26 Jul 2024 05:58 am Looking for an Ace-type and I’ve got a lot of options to deal w/guys coming off the IL


Ace can be a subjective term.

Open to dealing a Starter or 2. Make me an offer.

Will take a look at your team to see if a fit.
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 12460
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by An Old Friend »

Cool Papa Con wrote: 26 Jul 2024 05:58 am Looking for an Ace-type and I’ve got a lot of options to deal w/guys coming off the IL
I have aces and you have Bryce Harper. Let me know what that deal looks like.
sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 2773
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by sdaltons »

Since the big Albies trade with Quincy, I've dropped from 8th to 15th. 8)


Makes me nervous to deal anyone but I'll respond to the offers I received later today.
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 12460
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by An Old Friend »

Tyler Fitzgerald 10-21 with 5 HR since I picked him up on 7/21.

#WinningMove

What a beast.
Quincy Varnish
Forum User
Posts: 17117
Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Quincy Varnish »

sdaltons wrote: 26 Jul 2024 09:49 am Since the big Albies trade with Quincy, I've dropped from 8th to 15th. 8)

Makes me nervous to deal anyone but I'll respond to the offers I received later today.
Albies is out for the season with a wrist fracture. Your ROS projections are much better than they would have been without that trade :wink:
Quincy Varnish
Forum User
Posts: 17117
Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Quincy Varnish »

An Old Friend wrote: 27 Jul 2024 00:35 am Tyler Fitzgerald 10-21 with 5 HR since I picked him up on 7/21.

#WinningMove

What a beast.
This, after Miranda. Lean into your fortune… if ballplayers were equities, you’d be turning 40% 😂
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 11959
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

This thread is headed for double platinum- 1000 post. Bravo.
Cool Papa Con
Forum User
Posts: 1174
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:26 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Cool Papa Con »

Dazepster wrote: 26 Jul 2024 07:54 am
Cool Papa Con wrote: 26 Jul 2024 05:58 am Looking for an Ace-type and I’ve got a lot of options to deal w/guys coming off the IL


Ace can be a subjective term.

Open to dealing a Starter or 2. Make me an offer.

Will take a look at your team to see if a fit.
What would you be interested in obtaining? A position, a stat?

I’ve not had much luck. Good scenarios have come and gone that I hadn’t thought to part with nor pursue.
Quincy Varnish
Forum User
Posts: 17117
Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by Quincy Varnish »

I’m giving thought to a potential roster expansion, possibly in mid-August. We would be adding two additional bench spots + maybe an NA spot, which could be used to stash potential September call ups. The NA spot is also useable for suspended players, or those on emergency leave.

Pros -
- more space to roster a backup catcher
- opportunity to add additional SP, for those who have fallen behind the IP pace
- reduced need for daily roster fidgeting
- more cowbell

Cons -
- not sure

AOF does not like this idea, because something. Curious what the rest of you think…
mattmitchl44
Forum User
Posts: 1672
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm

Re: CT Fantasy Baseball - Interested?

Post by mattmitchl44 »

Quincy Varnish wrote: 01 Aug 2024 04:58 am I’m giving thought to a potential roster expansion, possibly in mid-August. We would be adding two additional bench spots + maybe an NA spot, which could be used to stash potential September call ups. The NA spot is also useable for suspended players, or those on emergency leave.

Pros -
- more space to roster a backup catcher
- opportunity to add additional SP, for those who have fallen behind the IP pace
- reduced need for daily roster fidgeting
- more cowbell

Cons -
- not sure

AOF does not like this idea, because something. Curious what the rest of you think…
I would vote against. Managers should have been managing their rosters all season with an eye toward maximizing their use of position player starts (162) and innings pitched (1550). If they have not, why should they be rewarded now by an opportunity to play catch up with an expanded roster?

If you make that change, 2/3 of the teams won't be paying immediate attention anyway, so the top 1/3 of the teams in the league will likely snap up the top 15-20 available players and just get marginally stronger.
Post Reply