STLtoday.com

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:13 am

WLTFE wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:07 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

He constantly calls out others about how they post...then attacks them...calls then trolls...ask personal questions..lies about putting people on ignore..whines about being a victim ...SSDD...and you'll now be chastised as well...

Fortunately...he's harmless...but it is sad and pathetic to watch

I read all of you alls banter. The fact that several parties continue to communicate in this dialog indicates to me all is well. There are choices.

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:18 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

No sir. Read what I wrote. Those were your pointed words. They won’t nor have they served you well.

I’m on the side of effective communication. You are not alone in this circle jerk.

OldRed wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 10:10 am Personally, I can't see any the Cardinals can trade for. We all know they will never sign another good free agent. So again, do you trade for prospects, average pitching or is it just a salary dump?

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:30 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:18 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

No sir. Read what I wrote. Those were your pointed words. They won’t nor have they served you well.

I’m on the side of effective communication. You are not alone in this circle jerk.

Simple question, SB. As a former military warrior, what do you do when hostiles fire at you? On an ongoing basis over many months, if not several years? And you criticize me for firing back?

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:30 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:18 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

No sir. Read what I wrote. Those were your pointed words. They won’t nor have they served you well.

I’m on the side of effective communication. You are not alone in this circle jerk.

Simple question, SB. As a former military warrior, what do you do when hostiles fire at you? On an ongoing basis over many months, if not several years? And you criticize me for firing back?

OldRed wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:40 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:30 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:18 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

No sir. Read what I wrote. Those were your pointed words. They won’t nor have they served you well.

I’m on the side of effective communication. You are not alone in this circle jerk.

Simple question, SB. As a former military warrior, what do you do when hostiles fire at you? On an ongoing basis over many months, if not several years? And you criticize me for firing back?

This not war. Just be honest and admit when you are wrong. So now I'm considered hostiles firing at you . . . . WOW!

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:39 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:30 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:18 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

No sir. Read what I wrote. Those were your pointed words. They won’t nor have they served you well.

I’m on the side of effective communication. You are not alone in this circle jerk.

Simple question, SB. As a former military warrior, what do you do when hostiles fire at you? On an ongoing basis over many months, if not several years? And you criticize me for firing back?

Simple answer. I’d move my operations to a safer place.

WLTFE wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:42 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:39 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:30 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:18 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

No sir. Read what I wrote. Those were your pointed words. They won’t nor have they served you well.

I’m on the side of effective communication. You are not alone in this circle jerk.

Simple question, SB. As a former military warrior, what do you do when hostiles fire at you? On an ongoing basis over many months, if not several years? And you criticize me for firing back?

Simple answer. I’d move my operations to a safer place.

Good advice...or perhaps they enjoy arguing with numerous people on a anonymous site...I'm guessing this is their social interaction...very sad and pathetic.

Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:53 am Most certainly will have to get him young and groom him. Maybe a A level player who they can develop into one. That IMO is best case, I can't see a scenario where a team is willing to trade a legit power hitter AA or higher for a player. He'd have to be special and the Cardinals don't possess that type of player currently.

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:51 am

WLTFE wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:42 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:39 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:30 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:18 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:14 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:02 am

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:50 am Tag team stalker trolls out first thing this morning? Their wives must be really happy that they’re glued to a computer screen, wasting their time like this.

Rule 101- when debating, calling another a name, tag team stalker trolls, defeats rule number one. Then you address a personal issue, wives, then use the word glued, then wasting. It’s hard to effectively communicate when constantly throwing jabs.

SB - you’re on the wrong side. Surprisingly.

No sir. Read what I wrote. Those were your pointed words. They won’t nor have they served you well.

I’m on the side of effective communication. You are not alone in this circle jerk.

Simple question, SB. As a former military warrior, what do you do when hostiles fire at you? On an ongoing basis over many months, if not several years? And you criticize me for firing back?

Simple answer. I’d move my operations to a safer place.

Good advice...or perhaps they enjoy arguing with numerous people on a anonymous site...I'm guessing this is their social interaction...very sad and pathetic.

The fella is older. Physical social interaction could be limited. As for sad and pathetic, sometimes, particularly as we age, we diminish. In all things. It’s very heartbreaking, sad doesn’t quite say it.

Pathetic is too progressive. Requires intent. A choice. I think The human condition will encompass us all if you live long enough.

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:55 am

Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:53 am Most certainly will have to get him young and groom him. Maybe a A level player who they can develop into one. That IMO is best case, I can't see a scenario where a team is willing to trade a legit power hitter AA or higher for a player. He'd have to be special and the Cardinals don't possess that type of player currently.

Good write. And correct. Who would just hand over a future stud. Truthfully you almost need a pujols type scenerio to compete. Man were we fortunate.

Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:58 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:55 am

Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:53 am Most certainly will have to get him young and groom him. Maybe a A level player who they can develop into one. That IMO is best case, I can't see a scenario where a team is willing to trade a legit power hitter AA or higher for a player. He'd have to be special and the Cardinals don't possess that type of player currently.

Good write. And correct. Who would just hand over a future stud. Truthfully you almost need a pujols type scenerio to compete. Man were we fortunate.

So (drat) true. That era of ball was one for the ages. Heck I'd take a Reggie Sanders at this point, lol.

Cranny wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 10:01 am

Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:58 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:55 am

Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 09:53 am Most certainly will have to get him young and groom him. Maybe a A level player who they can develop into one. That IMO is best case, I can't see a scenario where a team is willing to trade a legit power hitter AA or higher for a player. He'd have to be special and the Cardinals don't possess that type of player currently.

Good write. And correct. Who would just hand over a future stud. Truthfully you almost need a pujols type scenerio to compete. Man were we fortunate.

So (drat) true. That era of ball was one for the ages. Heck I'd take a Reggie Sanders at this point, lol.

Wouldn’t it be great if Walker turns it around, Joshua Baez is for real, and Scott comes on offensively.