We are watching a AAA team

[Cranny]

With trying to compete on a Major League level.

I think a more accurate assessment is that we are watching a AAAA team. They are better than a AAA team and will only win about half their MLB games.

So, it’s a very average major league team. I’ll buy that. Half the teams above it and half the teams below it.

[WLTFE]

With trying to compete on a Major League level.

I think a more accurate assessment is that we are watching a AAAA team. They are better than a AAA team and will only win about half their MLB games.

I agree...but DeTwit and Mo-ran act like fans should still support an average, boring team with no stars...and the fans are letting them know.

[Cranny]

Hope there aren’t childish nicknames in blocked posts that are hidden.

[OldRed]

Hope there aren’t childish nicknames in blocked posts that are hidden.

Why don't you just admit you don't have anyone blocked. You make way too many posts not to have someone blocked.

[sikeston bulldog2]

Hope there aren’t childish nicknames in blocked posts that are hidden.

Instigation at its finest. If you didn’t have so many on block, you’d know what is said about you. Then you wouldn’t have to hope. You’d know.

[Cranny]

Hope there aren’t childish nicknames in blocked posts that are hidden.

Why don't you just admit you don't have anyone blocked. You make way too many posts not to have someone blocked.

Why admit something that isn’t so? I was told to add foe, and that’s what I did. Remains so. By the way, Red, what business is it of yours?

[sdaltons]

The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

<Crickets>

Just quoting so he doesn't have to pretend he didn't read it

[WLTFE]

Hope there aren’t childish nicknames in blocked posts that are hidden.

Why don't you just admit you don't have anyone blocked. You make way too many posts not to have someone blocked.

...he got caught...I do have him blocked and can read what he posted when he's quoted which is. .every time by someone on every thread ...to continue this lie is sad....but at least enough people have pointed this out

[Cranny]

What inane childish silliness. I won’t comment on that shadowing troll again. He’ll be firing into a void.

[sdaltons]

In other words, he has no explanation for how it was possible.

[OldRed]

What inane childish silliness. I won’t comment on that shadowing troll again. He’ll be firing into a void.

An idea:

Just put everyone on foe and you will have no one disagree with you.

[Imperial Capitalist]

Cranny complains about "W" posting after him, blah, blah, blah, then does precisely the same thing

As to Red's suggestion per "C" and the 'universal foe' list,

[Cranny]

What inane childish silliness. I won’t comment on that shadowing troll again. He’ll be firing into a void.

An idea:

Just put everyone on foe and you will have no one disagree with you.

That’s silly, Red. And you know it. Sometimes I agree with things the Cardinals do, and sometimes I don’t. I just try to be objective. Some don’t like that. They want agreement with their constant negativity, and they get frustrated when they don’t
get it.

[WLTFE]

In other words, he has no explanation for how it was possible.

+1

[OldRed]

What inane childish silliness. I won’t comment on that shadowing troll again. He’ll be firing into a void.

An idea:

Just put everyone on foe and you will have no one disagree with you.

That’s silly, Red. And you know it. Sometimes I agree with things the Cardinals do, and sometimes I don’t. I just try to be objective. Some don’t like that. They want agreement with their constant negativity, and they get frustrated when they don’t
get it.

Not really since most posters disagree with you.

[WLTFE]

The evidence in clear in this and the Saggese thread...same pattern...ad nauseum