Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.
Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.
Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.
I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
Transition year Red. I don't like losing any more than anyone else on here, but I always try to look for something positive that could affect the future for the Cardinals. It's why I follow the minor leagues so closely. And why right now I'm looking forward to Bloom taking the reins in several months. Granted, things had gotten stale.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.
Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.
I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.
Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.
I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.
Red -
I'm as competitive as anyone on this site. I don't like to see the Cardinals lose. But I always try to look for something positive that may improve things in the future. That's why I follow the minor leagues so closely. And why I'm looking forward to Bloom taking over in several months. Granted, things have gotten stale.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.
Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.
I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.
Cranny is like the meme of the dog in the house that is burning down saying, "this is fine."
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.
Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.
I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.
Cranny is like the meme of the dog in the house that is burning down saying, "this is fine."
I just said things have gotten stale, sdaltons. Guess you missed that. They’ve gotten stale with both Mo and Gary Laroque. Looking forward to seeing Bloom moves. Have a pleasant day.
Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm
The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.
But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
