Page 3 of 4

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 12 Aug 2025 08:46 am
by sikeston bulldog2
rockondlouie wrote: 12 Aug 2025 08:40 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 05:49 am No hitter into sixth and trailing when he left in the seventh. No decision.
Against an 88 lose team headed for 100+ loses.
But still a MLB team?

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 12 Aug 2025 08:47 am
by OldRed
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 08:46 am
rockondlouie wrote: 12 Aug 2025 08:40 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 05:49 am No hitter into sixth and trailing when he left in the seventh. No decision.
Against an 88 lose team headed for 100+ loses.
But still a MLB team?
Cardinals are loaded with #5 pitchers.

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 12 Aug 2025 09:32 am
by rockondlouie
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 08:46 am
rockondlouie wrote: 12 Aug 2025 08:40 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 05:49 am No hitter into sixth and trailing when he left in the seventh. No decision.
Against an 88 lose team headed for 100+ loses.
But still a MLB team?
AAAA team :wink:

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 08:55 am
by rockondlouie
I owe M. Mikolas an apology

A. Pallante is WORSE than Mikolas! :x

Pallante
5.04 ERA
1.38 WHiP

Mikolas
4.97 ERA
1.28 WHiP

Mikolas gone after next month, Pallante needs to be right behind him w/a DFA.

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am
by 12xu
The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:14 am
by sikeston bulldog2
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.
I get the Pallante doubts. I see him as a number five. Every team needs one. He makes a great great. When he’s on, he’s unbeatable. There is that potential.

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:18 am
by 12xu
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:14 am
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.
I get the Pallante doubts. I see him as a number five. Every team needs one. He makes a great great. When he’s on, he’s unbeatable. There is that potential.
He is only "on" about 1 in 5 starts, and like last night, after he had already surrendered 4 early runs. Not good enough for even a #5 starter. Use him in long relief, or trade him in a package. I have seen enough of him.

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:21 am
by sikeston bulldog2
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:18 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:14 am
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.
I get the Pallante doubts. I see him as a number five. Every team needs one. He makes a great great. When he’s on, he’s unbeatable. There is that potential.
He is only "on" about 1 in 5 starts, and like last night, after he had already surrendered 4 early runs. Not good enough for even a #5 starter. Use him in long relief, or trade him in a package. I have seen enough of him.
I tout your stats input. I didn’t think it was one in five, that is a bit strong. I hear ya, surrendered runs early is a drag. But 8 K’s and a decent four addition innings. That’s close if not three times thru the lineup.

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:31 am
by The Nard
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:21 am
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:18 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:14 am
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.
I get the Pallante doubts. I see him as a number five. Every team needs one. He makes a great great. When he’s on, he’s unbeatable. There is that potential.
He is only "on" about 1 in 5 starts, and like last night, after he had already surrendered 4 early runs. Not good enough for even a #5 starter. Use him in long relief, or trade him in a package. I have seen enough of him.
I tout your stats input. I didn’t think it was one in five, that is a bit strong. I hear ya, surrendered runs early is a drag. But 8 K’s and a decent four addition innings. That’s close if not three times thru the lineup.
I see a lot of potential with Pallante. Reminds me a bit of the early Kyle Lohse type, who matured as a good starter only when reaching age 29 with the Cardinals, after struggling earlier in his career with inconsistency.

Perhaps his warm up routine needs a closer examination. It’s time for him to “ask a veteran”; Wainwright, maybe ( although his warmups were brief)?

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:38 am
by sikeston bulldog2
The Nard wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:31 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:21 am
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:18 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:14 am
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.
I get the Pallante doubts. I see him as a number five. Every team needs one. He makes a great great. When he’s on, he’s unbeatable. There is that potential.
He is only "on" about 1 in 5 starts, and like last night, after he had already surrendered 4 early runs. Not good enough for even a #5 starter. Use him in long relief, or trade him in a package. I have seen enough of him.
I tout your stats input. I didn’t think it was one in five, that is a bit strong. I hear ya, surrendered runs early is a drag. But 8 K’s and a decent four addition innings. That’s close if not three times thru the lineup.
I see a lot of potential with Pallante. Reminds me a bit of the early Kyle Lohse type, who matured as a good starter only when reaching age 29 with the Cardinals, after struggling earlier in his career with inconsistency.

Perhaps his warm up routine needs a closer examination. It’s time for him to “ask a veteran”; Wainwright, maybe ( although his warmups were brief)?
Good write. Fair. I like Pallante because- who else you gonna get to do a better job as a five. There are 180 starting pitchers. 30 number fives. Which will do better?

Here’s an idea- if the other four starters did their jobs, effectively, the number five would then be a- target of opportunity rather than a doom game.

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:44 am
by rockondlouie
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.
Yep

Gray
Libby
McG
Leahy (reportedly being converted to a starter)
Bloom trades for or signs (an inexpensive starter)

Doyle should be on a very fast track, "Q" could be as well.

Plenty of starters but one things for sure, Pallante must go!

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:46 am
by rockondlouie
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:14 am
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.
I get the Pallante doubts. I see him as a number five. Every team needs one. He makes a great great. When he’s on, he’s unbeatable. There is that potential.
Sorry BDog I know he's been your guy and we've had many chats about him

But he's JAG, not even a #5.

He has no trade value, might not want to go back to the pen', DFA and move on.

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:49 am
by sikeston bulldog2
rockondlouie wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:44 am
12xu wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:12 am The Cardinals only have three starting pitchers currently in St. Louis who should be starting next season: Gray, Liberatore, and McGreevy. Bloom has to add some new arms this winter - one way or another.
Yep

Gray
Libby
McG
Leahy (reportedly being converted to a starter)
Bloom trades for or signs (an inexpensive starter)

Doyle should be on a very fast track, "Q" could be as well.

Plenty of starters but one things for sure, Pallante must go!
I’m still gonna disagree. You get four solid starters above number five and five becomes a non factor.

Plus, where is this great number five you want to replace him. I don’t see where another will do much better.

And the potential is greater than the downside.

My thoughts

Re: Pallante = Mikolas

Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:53 am
by CCard
rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
    2026 starting rotation plans.

    He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

    Pallante
    23 GS
    4.95 ERA
    4.51 FiP
    1.37 WHiP
    5.8 SO9

    Mikolas
    22 GS
    5.11 ERA
    4.90 FiP
    1.32 WHiP
    6.2 SO9

    Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
    Yeah, I was surprised to see that Pallante had struck out 8. That's more than usual but he still doesn't consistently miss enough bats. He really needs to develop a split finger or some kind of out pitch. It may be too late in the game for him to do that I guess. Imanaga just kills batters with that split. It would be nice to see some Cards pitchers develop that.

    Re: Pallante = Mikolas

    Posted: 16 Aug 2025 09:56 am
    by rockondlouie
    CCard wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:53 am
    rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
      2026 starting rotation plans.

      He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

      Pallante
      23 GS
      4.95 ERA
      4.51 FiP
      1.37 WHiP
      5.8 SO9

      Mikolas
      22 GS
      5.11 ERA
      4.90 FiP
      1.32 WHiP
      6.2 SO9

      Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
      Yeah, I was surprised to see that Pallante had struck out 8. That's more than usual but he still doesn't consistently miss enough bats. He really needs to develop a split finger or some kind of out pitch. It may be too late in the game for him to do that I guess. Imanaga just kills batters with that split. It would be nice to see some Cards pitchers develop that.
      Yankees hitters have been struggling lately, 45 KO's in their last 160 AB's!

      Re: Pallante = Mikolas

      Posted: 16 Aug 2025 10:00 am
      by sikeston bulldog2
      rockondlouie wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:56 am
      CCard wrote: 16 Aug 2025 09:53 am
      rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
        2026 starting rotation plans.

        He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

        Pallante
        23 GS
        4.95 ERA
        4.51 FiP
        1.37 WHiP
        5.8 SO9

        Mikolas
        22 GS
        5.11 ERA
        4.90 FiP
        1.32 WHiP
        6.2 SO9

        Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
        Yeah, I was surprised to see that Pallante had struck out 8. That's more than usual but he still doesn't consistently miss enough bats. He really needs to develop a split finger or some kind of out pitch. It may be too late in the game for him to do that I guess. Imanaga just kills batters with that split. It would be nice to see some Cards pitchers develop that.
        Yankees hitters have been struggling lately, 45 KO's in their last 160 AB's!
        Not fair. He also struck out eight in five innings/ and it was a better team of hitters. For a five, four runs in five innings is too many. Three runs, for a five, is reasonable.