Pallante = Mikolas

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 11602
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Pallante = Mikolas

Post by rockondlouie »

NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
    2026 starting rotation plans.

    He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

    Pallante
    23 GS
    4.95 ERA
    4.51 FiP
    1.37 WHiP
    5.8 SO9

    Mikolas
    22 GS
    5.11 ERA
    4.90 FiP
    1.32 WHiP
    6.2 SO9

    Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
    skeezix
    Forum User
    Posts: 269
    Joined: 23 May 2024 14:29 pm

    Re: Pallante = Mikolas

    Post by skeezix »

    rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
      2026 starting rotation plans.

      He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

      Pallante
      23 GS
      4.95 ERA
      4.51 FiP
      1.37 WHiP
      5.8 SO9

      Mikolas
      22 GS
      5.11 ERA
      4.90 FiP
      1.32 WHiP
      6.2 SO9

      Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
      They truly are a matched set. Other that MM's hideous salary.
      bccardsfan
      Forum User
      Posts: 562
      Joined: 25 May 2024 11:11 am

      Re: Pallante = Mikolas

      Post by bccardsfan »

      rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
        2026 starting rotation plans.

        He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

        Pallante
        23 GS
        4.95 ERA
        4.51 FiP
        1.37 WHiP
        5.8 SO9

        Mikolas
        22 GS
        5.11 ERA
        4.90 FiP
        1.32 WHiP
        6.2 SO9

        Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
        Yeah, I didn't even need the numbers. The eye test is enough. Ugghhhh. When you consistently put your team behind after the first inning or two.... The team seems deflated most games when they are down by a crooked number going into their first AB. It is nice when we get out of the first inning not behind!
        redbirdfan51
        Forum User
        Posts: 671
        Joined: 23 May 2024 13:45 pm

        Re: Pallante = Mikolas

        Post by redbirdfan51 »

        I am not that big a fan of Pallante being a starter. I still think he is either a 5th starter or a long reliever. Cards have 3 starters going into next season. Gray, Lib, and McGreevy. Maybe LHP Matthews and perhaps even Doyle may work their way in the rotation sometime during the 2026 season. Stating the obvious,Cards will need to acquire more pitching in the off season.
        rockondlouie
        Forum User
        Posts: 11602
        Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

        Re: Pallante = Mikolas

        Post by rockondlouie »

        bccardsfan wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:09 am
        rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
          2026 starting rotation plans.

          He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

          Pallante
          23 GS
          4.95 ERA
          4.51 FiP
          1.37 WHiP
          5.8 SO9

          Mikolas
          22 GS
          5.11 ERA
          4.90 FiP
          1.32 WHiP
          6.2 SO9

          Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
          Yeah, I didn't even need the numbers. The eye test is enough. Ugghhhh. When you consistently put your team behind after the first inning or two.... The team seems deflated most games when they are down by a crooked number going into their first AB. It is nice when we get out of the first inning not behind!
          That's been a huge problem all season, the offense has been behind early too often.
          rockondlouie
          Forum User
          Posts: 11602
          Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

          Re: Pallante = Mikolas

          Post by rockondlouie »

          redbirdfan51 wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:30 am I am not that big a fan of Pallante being a starter. I still think he is either a 5th starter or a long reliever. Cards have 3 starters going into next season. Gray, Lib, and McGreevy. Maybe LHP Matthews and perhaps even Doyle may work their way in the rotation sometime during the 2026 season. Stating the obvious,Cards will need to acquire more pitching in the off season.
          That could be C. Bloom's first trade rf51, dealing for a starter.
          ilcubuffs
          Forum User
          Posts: 742
          Joined: 30 May 2024 16:48 pm

          Re: Pallante = Mikolas

          Post by ilcubuffs »

          Currently, P is a 4 or 5 pitcher in starting rotation. Long reliever - very well good be.

          Mikolas believes (as stated on numerous occasions ( also stated by the Marmot) he pitched very well except for a couple pitches. P has stated he is working on correcting his performance. He owns his performance - that alone makes me want to keep him on the staff.

          Before assigning him to any particular spot in the pitching staff, I would wait and see who Bloom gets as manager, pitching coach, and pitching support staff. Have those new hires eval P. Have zip faith in Marmot and Blake, et al.
          Futuregm2
          Forum User
          Posts: 7832
          Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

          Re: Pallante = Mikolas

          Post by Futuregm2 »

          rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
            2026 starting rotation plans.

            He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

            Pallante
            23 GS
            4.95 ERA
            4.51 FiP
            1.37 WHiP
            5.8 SO9

            Mikolas
            22 GS
            5.11 ERA
            4.90 FiP
            1.32 WHiP
            6.2 SO9

            Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
            Our entire rotation aside from Gray sucks at striking out players. So they’re all pretty much Mikolas clones.

            Libby: 6.8 K/9 *5.87 K/9 over his last 14 starts*
            Mikolas: 6.2/ K/9
            Pallante: 5.8 K/9
            Fedde: 5.6 K/9 *gone*
            McGreevy: 5.2 K/9
            Cusecards
            Forum User
            Posts: 10156
            Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

            Re: Pallante = Mikolas

            Post by Cusecards »

            I actually think Pallante had been very respectable as a SP prior to 2025.
            This season.....clearly a step back.
            Depending on the off season moves I could see him opening the season as a #5.
            But if the team hopes to compete they will need him to be better just to be a #5!
            BP most likely in his future.
            VegasVinny
            Forum User
            Posts: 218
            Joined: 23 May 2024 14:47 pm

            Re: Pallante = Mikolas

            Post by VegasVinny »

            Futuregm2 wrote: 10 Aug 2025 15:08 pm
            rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
              2026 starting rotation plans.

              He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

              Pallante
              23 GS
              4.95 ERA
              4.51 FiP
              1.37 WHiP
              5.8 SO9

              Mikolas
              22 GS
              5.11 ERA
              4.90 FiP
              1.32 WHiP
              6.2 SO9

              Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
              Our entire rotation aside from Gray sucks at striking out players. So they’re all pretty much Mikolas clones.

              Libby: 6.8 K/9 *5.87 K/9 over his last 14 starts*
              Mikolas: 6.2/ K/9
              Pallante: 5.8 K/9
              Fedde: 5.6 K/9 *gone*
              McGreevy: 5.2 K/9
              Yet it was two years ago, I believe, when the front office admitted that the team's pitch-to-contact philosophy - a budget-friendly one I might add - was perhaps outdated and they needed to add some strikeout arms. That to me is the boldest example of Mo and Co. saying one thing and doing another.
              greyhawk
              Forum User
              Posts: 669
              Joined: 23 May 2024 13:34 pm

              Re: Pallante = Mikolas

              Post by greyhawk »

              Pallante i believe has earned another shot next year because of how hard he worked last offseason and will likely work this off season with the 'tread and driveline' folks. He may need to earn his spot next spring which would be fine but he for sure should get the opportunity -- his cost is team friendly also.
              CCard
              Forum User
              Posts: 1055
              Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

              Re: Pallante = Mikolas

              Post by CCard »

              rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
                2026 starting rotation plans.

                He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

                Pallante
                23 GS
                4.95 ERA
                4.51 FiP
                1.37 WHiP
                5.8 SO9

                Mikolas
                22 GS
                5.11 ERA
                4.90 FiP
                1.32 WHiP
                6.2 SO9

                Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
                He is what he is. A pitch to contact ground ball machine that is subject to a lot of batted ball luck. If his luck holds out he looks almost dominant, unfortunately nobody is that lucky. He's a reliever that comes in to get a double play ball or if a game is out of hand. Nothing more. He has value, but only in limited play. He just doesn't miss enough bats to be a starter.
                greyhawk
                Forum User
                Posts: 669
                Joined: 23 May 2024 13:34 pm

                Re: Pallante = Mikolas

                Post by greyhawk »

                CCard wrote: 10 Aug 2025 17:29 pm
                rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
                  2026 starting rotation plans.

                  He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

                  Pallante
                  23 GS
                  4.95 ERA
                  4.51 FiP
                  1.37 WHiP
                  5.8 SO9

                  Mikolas
                  22 GS
                  5.11 ERA
                  4.90 FiP
                  1.32 WHiP
                  6.2 SO9

                  Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
                  He is what he is. A pitch to contact ground ball machine that is subject to a lot of batted ball luck. If his luck holds out he looks almost dominant, unfortunately nobody is that lucky. He's a reliever that comes in to get a double play ball or if a game is out of hand. Nothing more. He has value, but only in limited play. He just doesn't miss enough bats to be a starter.
                  he has failed miserably as a reliever --- he doesn't have an out pitch, he might be able to live as a long reliever/spot starter but you are better off trading him instead of putting him in the pen.
                  rockondlouie
                  Forum User
                  Posts: 11602
                  Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

                  Re: Pallante = Mikolas

                  Post by rockondlouie »

                  CCard wrote: 10 Aug 2025 17:29 pm
                  rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
                    2026 starting rotation plans.

                    He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

                    Pallante
                    23 GS
                    4.95 ERA
                    4.51 FiP
                    1.37 WHiP
                    5.8 SO9

                    Mikolas
                    22 GS
                    5.11 ERA
                    4.90 FiP
                    1.32 WHiP
                    6.2 SO9

                    Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
                    He is what he is. A pitch to contact ground ball machine that is subject to a lot of batted ball luck. If his luck holds out he looks almost dominant, unfortunately nobody is that lucky. He's a reliever that comes in to get a double play ball or if a game is out of hand. Nothing more. He has value, but only in limited play. He just doesn't miss enough bats to be a starter.
                    Bingo
                    rockondlouie
                    Forum User
                    Posts: 11602
                    Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

                    Re: Pallante = Mikolas

                    Post by rockondlouie »

                    Futuregm2 wrote: 10 Aug 2025 15:08 pm
                    rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
                      2026 starting rotation plans.

                      He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

                      Pallante
                      23 GS
                      4.95 ERA
                      4.51 FiP
                      1.37 WHiP
                      5.8 SO9

                      Mikolas
                      22 GS
                      5.11 ERA
                      4.90 FiP
                      1.32 WHiP
                      6.2 SO9

                      Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
                      Our entire rotation aside from Gray sucks at striking out players. So they’re all pretty much Mikolas clones.

                      Libby: 6.8 K/9 *5.87 K/9 over his last 14 starts*
                      Mikolas: 6.2/ K/9
                      Pallante: 5.8 K/9
                      Fedde: 5.6 K/9 *gone*
                      McGreevy: 5.2 K/9
                      For sure

                      Other than Gray, Mo stuck to the "pitch to contact" pitchers while the rest of MLB (at least the smart teams) went to power pitchers.

                      Why I was sooooooooooooo glad to see C. Bloom/R. Flores drafting pitchers w/KO power.

                      Sure other than Doyle they have some rough edges but now that the Bloom system is in place and R. Cerfolio is overseeing it we could actually sand off those rough edges and have some power pitchers!
                      Futuregm2
                      Forum User
                      Posts: 7832
                      Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

                      Re: Pallante = Mikolas

                      Post by Futuregm2 »

                      rockondlouie wrote: 11 Aug 2025 08:44 am
                      Futuregm2 wrote: 10 Aug 2025 15:08 pm
                      rockondlouie wrote: 10 Aug 2025 09:01 am NO WAY A. Pallante can be in the
                        2026 starting rotation plans.

                        He's got similar stats to one of the worst starters in MLB, M. Mikolas:

                        Pallante
                        23 GS
                        4.95 ERA
                        4.51 FiP
                        1.37 WHiP
                        5.8 SO9

                        Mikolas
                        22 GS
                        5.11 ERA
                        4.90 FiP
                        1.32 WHiP
                        6.2 SO9

                        Back to trying to win a spot in the 2026 bullpen, he's NOT even a #5 major league starter.
                        Our entire rotation aside from Gray sucks at striking out players. So they’re all pretty much Mikolas clones.

                        Libby: 6.8 K/9 *5.87 K/9 over his last 14 starts*
                        Mikolas: 6.2/ K/9
                        Pallante: 5.8 K/9
                        Fedde: 5.6 K/9 *gone*
                        McGreevy: 5.2 K/9
                        For sure

                        Other than Gray, Mo stuck to the "pitch to contact" pitchers while the rest of MLB (at least the smart teams) went to power pitchers.

                        Why I was sooooooooooooo glad to see C. Bloom/R. Flores drafting pitchers w/KO power.

                        Sure other than Doyle they have some rough edges but now that the Bloom system is in place and R. Cerfolio is overseeing it we could actually sand off those rough edges and have some power pitchers!
                        Yep, I was looking at rankings of teams last night of SP’s with regards to ERA, K%, avg FB velo, BB%, and average against. If you averaged the rank of those categories, we came in at 24th. Only teams worse than us were the Nats, White Sox, Athletics, Rockies, Angels, and Orioles. We were saved by being 3rd in BB%. Rest of the rankings were 23rd or worse. Top tier was Phillies, Tigers, Rangers, Reds, and Mariners. Milwaukee was 6th, Pitt was 11th, and Cubs were 16th.
                        Post Reply