Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

theograce
Forum User
Posts: 4354
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by theograce »

Harry York 37 wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:03 pm there is a hell of a lot more involved in winning a playoff series than getting open and firing off a few great shots.
Like not being selfish/dumb and icing the puck at a key time in Game 7.

Agreed
stlblues1979
Forum User
Posts: 679
Joined: 28 Jun 2022 14:38 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by stlblues1979 »

skilles wrote: 27 Jun 2025 14:43 pm
bud white wrote: 27 Jun 2025 14:38 pm Kyrou WAS on the table for JJ Petelka - per Frank Seravelli.

I would love to see Anderson (CGY), but it might be Nemec. Anderson has one year left and Blues are currently closer than CGY.
Maybe Petelka and Byram
I was wondering when this came out if there wasn't a third team involved. The basis of it being Kyrou for Petelka and Byram with Byram going to a third team for a legitimate right handed defenseman?
bud white
Forum User
Posts: 1994
Joined: 26 Oct 2018 21:25 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by bud white »

theograce wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:34 pm
Harry York 37 wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:03 pm there is a hell of a lot more involved in winning a playoff series than getting open and firing off a few great shots.
Like not being selfish/dumb and icing the puck at a key time in Game 7.

Agreed
Or having the opposing team down to 5 D - knocking out their top D... and then performing "fly bys" the rest of the game and into OT ... and then getting called out on national tv for "lack of compete" in a Game 7?
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 4354
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by theograce »

bud white wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:36 pm
theograce wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:34 pm
Harry York 37 wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:03 pm there is a hell of a lot more involved in winning a playoff series than getting open and firing off a few great shots.
Like not being selfish/dumb and icing the puck at a key time in Game 7.

Agreed
Or having the opposing team down to 5 D - knocking out their top D... and then performing "fly bys" the rest of the game and into OT ... and then getting called out on national tv for "lack of compete" in a Game 7?
You didn’t explain golden child very well.
zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 1568
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by zamadoo »

noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:32 pm https://x.com/NHLRumourReport/status/19 ... 0818240889

Friedman apparently said it on the radio. I don't believe it would be 1 for 1. Sabres would probably have to add 9th overall pick and Jack Quinn or something else. Maybe Blues can offload Leddy too...
"Elliotte Friedman: If St. Louis is in on Bowen Byram, you could see them talking about Jordan Kyrou and/or a defenseman - SN 590"

Which defenseman is he talking about in an "or" scenario?

I'd be interested in a few of their guys like Kulich, McCleod, maybe Benson.

If we're able to land Byram and the #9OA for Kyrou, I think that's a deal worth making.

Honestly, I think I'd rather have Samuelsson. We should also try to offload Krug, Leddy, and Faulk in this deal if we're going to do them a favor by taking Byram off their hands.
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 1387
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by seattleblue »

noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:32 pm https://x.com/NHLRumourReport/status/19 ... 0818240889

Friedman apparently said it on the radio. I don't believe it would be 1 for 1. Sabres would probably have to add 9th overall pick and Jack Quinn or something else. Maybe Blues can offload Leddy too...
That isn't even clear with snytax what the hell he's saying. What a pointless garble. Who is "they"? who wants the defenseman from whom?
noted
Forum User
Posts: 482
Joined: 29 Jul 2021 16:13 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by noted »

seattleblue wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:49 pm
noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:32 pm https://x.com/NHLRumourReport/status/19 ... 0818240889

Friedman apparently said it on the radio. I don't believe it would be 1 for 1. Sabres would probably have to add 9th overall pick and Jack Quinn or something else. Maybe Blues can offload Leddy too...
That isn't even clear with snytax what the hell he's saying. What a pointless garble. Who is "they"? who wants the defenseman from whom?
Well it's a tweet. I didn't hear the radio hit.
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 1387
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by seattleblue »

noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 16:03 pm
seattleblue wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:49 pm
noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:32 pm https://x.com/NHLRumourReport/status/19 ... 0818240889

Friedman apparently said it on the radio. I don't believe it would be 1 for 1. Sabres would probably have to add 9th overall pick and Jack Quinn or something else. Maybe Blues can offload Leddy too...
That isn't even clear with snytax what the hell he's saying. What a pointless garble. Who is "they"? who wants the defenseman from whom?
Well it's a tweet. I didn't hear the radio hit.
no issue with your post I am glad you posted it.
AtillaTheBlue1
Forum User
Posts: 1053
Joined: 13 May 2018 08:13 am

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by AtillaTheBlue1 »

Trade the Blues all star, leading goal scorer
says more about the lack of talent that was on the wings(before holloway)
ManitobaBlues
Forum User
Posts: 912
Joined: 21 Jan 2022 08:54 am

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by ManitobaBlues »

The Islanders are a tight-checking, defense-first team under Patrick Roy, and Kyrou doesn’t fit that mold easily. If St. Louis was offering Kyrou in a package for someone like Noah Dobson or even a top-tier piece, Lou Lamoriello may have balked.

So if teams are hesitant, it's probably not that they don't want him—it's that the risk-reward equation (especially at that cap hit) makes them cautious. Teams want cost certainty, and if they’re unsure he’s a true driver on a contending team, they’re not going to give up high-end assets.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 499
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by 2forDiving »

seattleblue wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:49 pm
noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:32 pm https://x.com/NHLRumourReport/status/19 ... 0818240889

Friedman apparently said it on the radio. I don't believe it would be 1 for 1. Sabres would probably have to add 9th overall pick and Jack Quinn or something else. Maybe Blues can offload Leddy too...
That isn't even clear with snytax what the hell he's saying. What a pointless garble. Who is "they"? who wants the defenseman from whom?
I agree with you. The way EF wrote it it sounds like it would be Kyrou+ for Byram and that is laughable.
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 1387
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by seattleblue »

2forDiving wrote: 27 Jun 2025 16:05 pm
seattleblue wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:49 pm
noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:32 pm https://x.com/NHLRumourReport/status/19 ... 0818240889

Friedman apparently said it on the radio. I don't believe it would be 1 for 1. Sabres would probably have to add 9th overall pick and Jack Quinn or something else. Maybe Blues can offload Leddy too...
That isn't even clear with snytax what the hell he's saying. What a pointless garble. Who is "they"? who wants the defenseman from whom?
I agree with you. The way he wrote it it sounds like it would be Kyrou+ for Byram and that is laughable.
We're loaded at LD so let's get an LD who's one hit from done and also kind of not that special and let's use our biggest trade chip to do it? That's insane. What a terrible idea if it is truly under consideration.
zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 1568
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by zamadoo »

2forDiving wrote: 27 Jun 2025 16:05 pm
seattleblue wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:49 pm
noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:32 pm https://x.com/NHLRumourReport/status/19 ... 0818240889

Friedman apparently said it on the radio. I don't believe it would be 1 for 1. Sabres would probably have to add 9th overall pick and Jack Quinn or something else. Maybe Blues can offload Leddy too...
That isn't even clear with snytax what the hell he's saying. What a pointless garble. Who is "they"? who wants the defenseman from whom?
I agree with you. The way EF wrote it it sounds like it would be Kyrou+ for Byram and that is laughable.
Kyrou+Krug
bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 1138
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by bluetunehead »

ManitobaBlues wrote: 27 Jun 2025 16:05 pm The Islanders are a tight-checking, defense-first team under Patrick Roy, and Kyrou doesn’t fit that mold easily. If St. Louis was offering Kyrou in a package for someone like Noah Dobson or even a top-tier piece, Lou Lamoriello may have balked.

So if teams are hesitant, it's probably not that they don't want him—it's that the risk-reward equation (especially at that cap hit) makes them cautious. Teams want cost certainty, and if they’re unsure he’s a true driver on a contending team, they’re not going to give up high-end assets.
Lou is no longer in charge of the Islanders (as of this offseason). Mathieu Darche is the GM now. Lou's contract was not renewed.
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 1387
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by seattleblue »

I have interest in two Buffalo defensemen, their names don't have 'Byram' in them
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 499
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Kyrou for Byram. . .seriously?

Post by 2forDiving »

zamadoo wrote: 27 Jun 2025 16:08 pm
2forDiving wrote: 27 Jun 2025 16:05 pm
seattleblue wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:49 pm
noted wrote: 27 Jun 2025 15:32 pm https://x.com/NHLRumourReport/status/19 ... 0818240889

Friedman apparently said it on the radio. I don't believe it would be 1 for 1. Sabres would probably have to add 9th overall pick and Jack Quinn or something else. Maybe Blues can offload Leddy too...
That isn't even clear with snytax what the hell he's saying. What a pointless garble. Who is "they"? who wants the defenseman from whom?
I agree with you. The way EF wrote it it sounds like it would be Kyrou+ for Byram and that is laughable.
Kyrou+Krug
Not sure how that’s a good deal. Byram is one hit away from being Krug at a higher AAV probably. I don’t see what the interest in Byram is. It would be like kicking the tires on Adin Hill, why? The position is already filled.
Post Reply