Need a league level Ace. From where I do not know. But to compete at that level, we will need a Wheeler type.Cranny wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 11:21 amTime for the Gray, Pallante, Liberatore, McGreevy, and Roby era.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 10:32 amYour facts sustain your argument. I’m no match for them. I have a thought that a capable human in the right environment can thrive. Now that he has experience, I expect better results. We needed an over haul. We were stale.thetank2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 10:26 amI think the anti-Mo sentiment on here has tainted your rationale. His Red Sox teams finished last 3 times and he left before his 4th season was over. So are the Sox thriving? No.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 09:55 amNew environment. Another chance bases on experience. He did some good things in Boston. Much of the Red Sox misfortunes is coaching and lack of performance. Add to that a hot Yankee team and it seems worse.thetank2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 09:45 amBloom's ex-team, the Red Sox, aren't doing as well as Mo's current team. With Bloom we are not as smart as most. What are you basing your opinion? Hope and a prayer?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:22 amWith the addition of having somewhat more payroll muscle. Therein lies a key.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:18 amTeams like the Rays, Guardians, and Brewers (all typically in the bottom 1/3 in ML payroll) have shown an ability to outperform their payrolls by just being smarter than everyone else. The Cardinals (typically a middle 1/3 in ML payroll team) need to be smart like those teams, with the addition of having somewhat more payroll muscle to use.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:10 amThis assumes the big money guys have not the smarts we do. I’d say they do. Plus the money.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:05 amI have to believe that they can - but it will be a matter of making up for any lack of ML payroll compared to the Dodgers, Phillies, Mets, etc. by just being smarter in their decisions than other organizations.
Even if we are smart we compete against just as smart.
Brains and Bucks- B2.
The money will be there. With Bloom, I think we are as smart as most.
I truly see us as a power in 2027.
Once the SP staff loses Matz, Miles, Fedde and RP Helsley we will be counting on rookies for next year.
We were moving like pond water.
Go for it. Eff the retool
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13067
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Go for it. Eff the retool
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Go for it. Eff the retool
I have a favorite- but I don't know how to get him. Eury Perez of the Marlins. 22 years old, 6'8". throws 100 mph. True #1 coming off TJ surgery. Four more years before free agency.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 11:29 amNeed a league level Ace. From where I do not know. But to compete at that level, we will need a Wheeler type.Cranny wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 11:21 amTime for the Gray, Pallante, Liberatore, McGreevy, and Roby era.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 10:32 amYour facts sustain your argument. I’m no match for them. I have a thought that a capable human in the right environment can thrive. Now that he has experience, I expect better results. We needed an over haul. We were stale.thetank2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 10:26 amI think the anti-Mo sentiment on here has tainted your rationale. His Red Sox teams finished last 3 times and he left before his 4th season was over. So are the Sox thriving? No.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 09:55 amNew environment. Another chance bases on experience. He did some good things in Boston. Much of the Red Sox misfortunes is coaching and lack of performance. Add to that a hot Yankee team and it seems worse.thetank2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 09:45 amBloom's ex-team, the Red Sox, aren't doing as well as Mo's current team. With Bloom we are not as smart as most. What are you basing your opinion? Hope and a prayer?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:22 amWith the addition of having somewhat more payroll muscle. Therein lies a key.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:18 amTeams like the Rays, Guardians, and Brewers (all typically in the bottom 1/3 in ML payroll) have shown an ability to outperform their payrolls by just being smarter than everyone else. The Cardinals (typically a middle 1/3 in ML payroll team) need to be smart like those teams, with the addition of having somewhat more payroll muscle to use.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:10 amThis assumes the big money guys have not the smarts we do. I’d say they do. Plus the money.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:05 amI have to believe that they can - but it will be a matter of making up for any lack of ML payroll compared to the Dodgers, Phillies, Mets, etc. by just being smarter in their decisions than other organizations.
Even if we are smart we compete against just as smart.
Brains and Bucks- B2.
The money will be there. With Bloom, I think we are as smart as most.
I truly see us as a power in 2027.
Once the SP staff loses Matz, Miles, Fedde and RP Helsley we will be counting on rookies for next year.
We were moving like pond water.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13067
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Go for it. Eff the retool
There ya go. Take a chance.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 11:32 amI have a favorite- but I don't know how to get him. Eury Perez of the Marlins. 22 years old, 6'8". throws 100 mph. True #1 coming off TJ surgery. Four more years before free agency.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 11:29 amNeed a league level Ace. From where I do not know. But to compete at that level, we will need a Wheeler type.Cranny wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 11:21 amTime for the Gray, Pallante, Liberatore, McGreevy, and Roby era.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 10:32 amYour facts sustain your argument. I’m no match for them. I have a thought that a capable human in the right environment can thrive. Now that he has experience, I expect better results. We needed an over haul. We were stale.thetank2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 10:26 amI think the anti-Mo sentiment on here has tainted your rationale. His Red Sox teams finished last 3 times and he left before his 4th season was over. So are the Sox thriving? No.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 09:55 amNew environment. Another chance bases on experience. He did some good things in Boston. Much of the Red Sox misfortunes is coaching and lack of performance. Add to that a hot Yankee team and it seems worse.thetank2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 09:45 amBloom's ex-team, the Red Sox, aren't doing as well as Mo's current team. With Bloom we are not as smart as most. What are you basing your opinion? Hope and a prayer?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:22 amWith the addition of having somewhat more payroll muscle. Therein lies a key.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:18 amTeams like the Rays, Guardians, and Brewers (all typically in the bottom 1/3 in ML payroll) have shown an ability to outperform their payrolls by just being smarter than everyone else. The Cardinals (typically a middle 1/3 in ML payroll team) need to be smart like those teams, with the addition of having somewhat more payroll muscle to use.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:10 amThis assumes the big money guys have not the smarts we do. I’d say they do. Plus the money.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025 09:05 amI have to believe that they can - but it will be a matter of making up for any lack of ML payroll compared to the Dodgers, Phillies, Mets, etc. by just being smarter in their decisions than other organizations.
Even if we are smart we compete against just as smart.
Brains and Bucks- B2.
The money will be there. With Bloom, I think we are as smart as most.
I truly see us as a power in 2027.
Once the SP staff loses Matz, Miles, Fedde and RP Helsley we will be counting on rookies for next year.
We were moving like pond water.
Re: Go for it. Eff the retool
You must keep his age in mind.VegasVinny wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 09:50 amI'd love that for us, but I think that's a bit too team-friendly.Melville wrote: ↑30 May 2025 19:03 pmOffer 4 year extension.VegasVinny wrote: ↑30 May 2025 10:10 am20 years ago, I would've agreed with you. However, the number of closers who throw 100+ mph that enjoy long careers are becoming fewer and fewer. Reliever volatility is real and if the Cardinals can get close to a Chapman-like return for Helsley, they'd be crazy not to do it.Melville wrote: ↑30 May 2025 08:41 amThe CORRECT BASBEBALL DECISION is to extend Helsley for another 4 years sometime in the next 30 days.VegasVinny wrote: ↑30 May 2025 08:26 am If a respectable return presents itself, I’d still move Helsley regardless of the standings.
17M a year, with 3M deferred annually and payable beginning in 2030.
5th year team option with 2M buyout.
Player opt out after year one and two.
He would sign it.
And it would be a smart move for STL.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
He turns 31 in a few weeks.
Which will impact his value to a degree on the FA market.
My perfect proposal would guarantee him 70 million dollars through the end of his age 35 season - and 13M more for his age 36 season if he is still performing at a high level.
I suspect he would jump all over that.
And with 3M deferred annually, STL would not take a payroll hit above 14M in any of the next 4 seasons.
It is a perfectly balanced, perfectly practical, and perfectly mutually advantageous proposal.
Re: Go for it. Eff the retool
Like all your other dumb predictions - it won’t happen.Melville wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 13:26 pmYou must keep his age in mind.VegasVinny wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 09:50 amI'd love that for us, but I think that's a bit too team-friendly.Melville wrote: ↑30 May 2025 19:03 pmOffer 4 year extension.VegasVinny wrote: ↑30 May 2025 10:10 am20 years ago, I would've agreed with you. However, the number of closers who throw 100+ mph that enjoy long careers are becoming fewer and fewer. Reliever volatility is real and if the Cardinals can get close to a Chapman-like return for Helsley, they'd be crazy not to do it.Melville wrote: ↑30 May 2025 08:41 amThe CORRECT BASBEBALL DECISION is to extend Helsley for another 4 years sometime in the next 30 days.VegasVinny wrote: ↑30 May 2025 08:26 am If a respectable return presents itself, I’d still move Helsley regardless of the standings.
17M a year, with 3M deferred annually and payable beginning in 2030.
5th year team option with 2M buyout.
Player opt out after year one and two.
He would sign it.
And it would be a smart move for STL.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
He turns 31 in a few weeks.
Which will impact his value to a degree on the FA market.
My perfect proposal would guarantee him 70 million dollars through the end of his age 35 season - and 13M more for his age 36 season if he is still performing at a high level.
I suspect he would jump all over that.
And with 3M deferred annually, STL would not take a payroll hit above 14M in any of the next 4 seasons.
It is a perfectly balanced, perfectly practical, and perfectly mutually advantageous proposal.