Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
BrummerStealsHome
- Forum User
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Let's go Cards. Win today and don't look back.
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 13787
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
LOL....I was being kind just saying NO to Gorman.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 08:43 amOne area where we disagree. I think Gorman is not a "no" but a "hell no!" We also need clarity on our catching prospects but don't have that yet. Burly? He's a keeper in my book (a yes, not a hell yes). Nootbaar. I like Noot but I'd like to see them trade him for worthy prospect.Cusecards wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 13:28 pmI hear yaBrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 12:53 pmMy goal at season's start was simple. Build for the future and avoid last place. I'm satisfied with the former, but the latter has crept into uncertainty, partly because the division is much stronger than anyone expected.
If you asked me my biggest concern right now:
It would be NOT getting clarity on certain players.
In other words.....keep or get rid of??
Example- before ST I wanted direction on Walker & Gorman. No more kicking the can down the road!
I would say YES for Walker and NO for Gorman.
Obviously we want more YES votes than NO votes.
But...at least a NO defines a need Bloom can address next offseason.
As for Catching?
Crooks currently getting his “turn” but not encouraging.
I could see Bernal soon!
He might be the answer? Rodriquez probably a year away?
Noot? Who knows?
-
BrummerStealsHome
- Forum User
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
The good news is there are a lot of candidates in the catching pipeline. That should light a fire under every one of them as opportunities won't be near as many as they were for the likes of Gorman, or Walker for that matter.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 09:30 amLOL....I was being kind just saying NO to Gorman.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 08:43 amOne area where we disagree. I think Gorman is not a "no" but a "hell no!" We also need clarity on our catching prospects but don't have that yet. Burly? He's a keeper in my book (a yes, not a hell yes). Nootbaar. I like Noot but I'd like to see them trade him for worthy prospect.Cusecards wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 13:28 pmI hear yaBrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 12:53 pmMy goal at season's start was simple. Build for the future and avoid last place. I'm satisfied with the former, but the latter has crept into uncertainty, partly because the division is much stronger than anyone expected.
If you asked me my biggest concern right now:
It would be NOT getting clarity on certain players.
In other words.....keep or get rid of??
Example- before ST I wanted direction on Walker & Gorman. No more kicking the can down the road!
I would say YES for Walker and NO for Gorman.
Obviously we want more YES votes than NO votes.
But...at least a NO defines a need Bloom can address next offseason.
As for Catching?
Crooks currently getting his “turn” but not encouraging.
I could see Bernal soon!
He might be the answer? Rodriquez probably a year away?
Noot? Who knows?
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 13787
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
My hope:BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 12:32 pmThe good news is there are a lot of candidates in the catching pipeline. That should light a fire under every one of them as opportunities won't be near as many as they were for the likes of Gorman, or Walker for that matter.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 09:30 amLOL....I was being kind just saying NO to Gorman.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 08:43 amOne area where we disagree. I think Gorman is not a "no" but a "hell no!" We also need clarity on our catching prospects but don't have that yet. Burly? He's a keeper in my book (a yes, not a hell yes). Nootbaar. I like Noot but I'd like to see them trade him for worthy prospect.Cusecards wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 13:28 pmI hear yaBrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 12:53 pmMy goal at season's start was simple. Build for the future and avoid last place. I'm satisfied with the former, but the latter has crept into uncertainty, partly because the division is much stronger than anyone expected.
If you asked me my biggest concern right now:
It would be NOT getting clarity on certain players.
In other words.....keep or get rid of??
Example- before ST I wanted direction on Walker & Gorman. No more kicking the can down the road!
I would say YES for Walker and NO for Gorman.
Obviously we want more YES votes than NO votes.
But...at least a NO defines a need Bloom can address next offseason.
As for Catching?
Crooks currently getting his “turn” but not encouraging.
I could see Bernal soon!
He might be the answer? Rodriquez probably a year away?
Noot? Who knows?
Bernal takes the job.
In a year Rodriquez could be a great DH or other position change?
-
BrummerStealsHome
- Forum User
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Funny, I am 64 and was just thinking about all the catching prospects I have seen come up through the Cardinals system. Like Terry Kennedy, who had RoY hype surrounding him. I was at Busch for his major league debut. Standing O. Todd Zeile, Tom Pagnozzi, Eli Marrero, and then Yadi.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 12:35 pmMy hope:BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 12:32 pmThe good news is there are a lot of candidates in the catching pipeline. That should light a fire under every one of them as opportunities won't be near as many as they were for the likes of Gorman, or Walker for that matter.Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 09:30 amLOL....I was being kind just saying NO to Gorman.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 08:43 amOne area where we disagree. I think Gorman is not a "no" but a "hell no!" We also need clarity on our catching prospects but don't have that yet. Burly? He's a keeper in my book (a yes, not a hell yes). Nootbaar. I like Noot but I'd like to see them trade him for worthy prospect.Cusecards wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 13:28 pmI hear yaBrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 12:53 pmMy goal at season's start was simple. Build for the future and avoid last place. I'm satisfied with the former, but the latter has crept into uncertainty, partly because the division is much stronger than anyone expected.
If you asked me my biggest concern right now:
It would be NOT getting clarity on certain players.
In other words.....keep or get rid of??
Example- before ST I wanted direction on Walker & Gorman. No more kicking the can down the road!
I would say YES for Walker and NO for Gorman.
Obviously we want more YES votes than NO votes.
But...at least a NO defines a need Bloom can address next offseason.
As for Catching?
Crooks currently getting his “turn” but not encouraging.
I could see Bernal soon!
He might be the answer? Rodriquez probably a year away?
Noot? Who knows?
Bernal takes the job.
In a year Rodriquez could be a great DH or other position change?
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 18120
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
What they do. They smile in your face all the time they wanna take your place. The Backstabbers.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑27 Jul 2026 18:28 pm Git 'er done tonight, Redbirds.
Remarkably, they haven't been below .500 all year.
-
BrummerStealsHome
- Forum User
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Ah, the O'Jays. Oh, the phonetic irony.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑03 Aug 2026 05:53 amWhat they do. They smile in your face all the time they wanna take your place. The Backstabbers.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑27 Jul 2026 18:28 pm Git 'er done tonight, Redbirds.
Remarkably, they haven't been below .500 all year.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 18120
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Yea. Thought you’d get it. And enjoy an oldie but goodie.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑03 Aug 2026 07:26 amAh, the O'Jays. Oh, the phonetic irony.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑03 Aug 2026 05:53 amWhat they do. They smile in your face all the time they wanna take your place. The Backstabbers.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑27 Jul 2026 18:28 pm Git 'er done tonight, Redbirds.
Remarkably, they haven't been below .500 all year.
What they do.