Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
BrummerStealsHome
- Forum User
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Git 'er done tonight, Redbirds.
Remarkably, they haven't been below .500 all year.
Remarkably, they haven't been below .500 all year.
-
dugoutrex
- Forum User
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: 24 Jun 2025 13:18 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
last year we were 54-52 after 106 games
-
stlbirdlover
- Forum User
- Posts: 854
- Joined: 24 May 2024 19:53 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
They soon will be!!!!!!!!!!BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑27 Jul 2026 18:28 pm Git 'er done tonight, Redbirds.
Remarkably, they haven't been below .500 all year.
-
casey1024
- Forum User
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 12 Jun 2024 10:59 am
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
I think we all need to recall at the start of the season, almost every pundit and almost everyone on this site predicted a 90 loss(or somewhere close to that) for this team. Seems to me we should all be thankful.....but I'm often wrong.
-
GOLDFINGER123
- Forum User
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 14 Jan 2019 07:19 am
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
I hope they tank the rest of their games. At least we'll get better draft picks for the rebuild.
-
butsir01
- Forum User
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: 23 May 2024 20:36 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
If so, I hope that they get three in attendance for each game: II, III & Bloom.GOLDFINGER123 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2026 06:25 am I hope they tank the rest of their games. At least we'll get better draft picks for the rebuild.
-
dugoutrex
- Forum User
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: 24 Jun 2025 13:18 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
at least they are soooooo fun to watch!
-
BrummerStealsHome
- Forum User
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Yes, good point. I am still very pleased with this season, and have resisted the urges to succumb to playoff/wild-card hype, but still this latest stretch has been a little frustrating. It seems some of the youthful exuberance and life has been sucked out of this team. A good win or two could change that, but someone needs to step up.
-
bccardsfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: 25 May 2024 11:11 am
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
Well Brummer my friend, you know the drill. This is what .500 teams look like. They pitch well for a stretch, but don't hit, or they hit and don't pitch, or they play great D, but the ball finds the weak defender who the manager tried to sneak in for his bat..... I figured they might sniff 85 wins if all went well. Now not so sure..... Still, I am enjoying watching JJ, Walker's breakout, Winn play D, Pallante not regress, Leahy improve, etc... I think Blaze can hit too and will. So these are fun things to watch. The organization is on a good trajectory now.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑28 Jul 2026 13:06 pmYes, good point. I am still very pleased with this season, and have resisted the urges to succumb to playoff/wild-card hype, but still this latest stretch has been a little frustrating. It seems some of the youthful exuberance and life has been sucked out of this team. A good win or two could change that, but someone needs to step up.
-
82birds
- Forum User
- Posts: 23230
- Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm
-
sp25
- Forum User
- Posts: 881
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:20 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
I'm on board with all 3 of you. Hopefully they can find some balance and finish the season strong. A .500 record at the end of the year is still a step in the right direction.bccardsfan wrote: ↑28 Jul 2026 13:11 pmWell Brummer my friend, you know the drill. This is what .500 teams look like. They pitch well for a stretch, but don't hit, or they hit and don't pitch, or they play great D, but the ball finds the weak defender who the manager tried to sneak in for his bat..... I figured they might sniff 85 wins if all went well. Now not so sure..... Still, I am enjoying watching JJ, Walker's breakout, Winn play D, Pallante not regress, Leahy improve, etc... I think Blaze can hit too and will. So these are fun things to watch. The organization is on a good trajectory now.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑28 Jul 2026 13:06 pmYes, good point. I am still very pleased with this season, and have resisted the urges to succumb to playoff/wild-card hype, but still this latest stretch has been a little frustrating. It seems some of the youthful exuberance and life has been sucked out of this team. A good win or two could change that, but someone needs to step up.
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 13792
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
-
BrummerStealsHome
- Forum User
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 13792
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
I hear yaBrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 12:53 pmMy goal at season's start was simple. Build for the future and avoid last place. I'm satisfied with the former, but the latter has crept into uncertainty, partly because the division is much stronger than anyone expected.
If you asked me my biggest concern right now:
It would be NOT getting clarity on certain players.
In other words.....keep or get rid of??
Example- before ST I wanted direction on Walker & Gorman. No more kicking the can down the road!
I would say YES for Walker and NO for Gorman.
Obviously we want more YES votes than NO votes.
But...at least a NO defines a need Bloom can address next offseason.
-
BrummerStealsHome
- Forum User
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
One area where we disagree. I think Gorman is not a "no" but a "hell no!" We also need clarity on our catching prospects but don't have that yet. Burly? He's a keeper in my book (a yes, not a hell yes). Nootbaar. I like Noot but I'd like to see them trade him for worthy prospect.Cusecards wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 13:28 pmI hear yaBrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 12:53 pmMy goal at season's start was simple. Build for the future and avoid last place. I'm satisfied with the former, but the latter has crept into uncertainty, partly because the division is much stronger than anyone expected.
If you asked me my biggest concern right now:
It would be NOT getting clarity on certain players.
In other words.....keep or get rid of??
Example- before ST I wanted direction on Walker & Gorman. No more kicking the can down the road!
I would say YES for Walker and NO for Gorman.
Obviously we want more YES votes than NO votes.
But...at least a NO defines a need Bloom can address next offseason.
-
bccardsfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: 25 May 2024 11:11 am
Re: Cards haven't been at .500 since April 13
IMHO Noot is who he is and will not improve. A decent fourth OFer, or a third OFer on a really stacked team. He is not going to be any sort of key piece moving forward. If Bloom can get any decent return he should be dealt. Church gets a little more runway to see if he can improve, mainly because current options are limited. Hopefully some of the guys in the system can make it to the show and be more effective, but that is not for a while.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 08:43 amOne area where we disagree. I think Gorman is not a "no" but a "hell no!" We also need clarity on our catching prospects but don't have that yet. Burly? He's a keeper in my book (a yes, not a hell yes). Nootbaar. I like Noot but I'd like to see them trade him for worthy prospect.Cusecards wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 13:28 pmI hear yaBrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑29 Jul 2026 12:53 pmMy goal at season's start was simple. Build for the future and avoid last place. I'm satisfied with the former, but the latter has crept into uncertainty, partly because the division is much stronger than anyone expected.
If you asked me my biggest concern right now:
It would be NOT getting clarity on certain players.
In other words.....keep or get rid of??
Example- before ST I wanted direction on Walker & Gorman. No more kicking the can down the road!
I would say YES for Walker and NO for Gorman.
Obviously we want more YES votes than NO votes.
But...at least a NO defines a need Bloom can address next offseason.