Mathews up, Svanson down, Hence DFA

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 6243
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Mathews up, Svanson down, Hence DFA

Post by ecleme22 »

CCard wrote: 01 Aug 2026 11:21 am
Strummer Jones wrote: 01 Aug 2026 11:10 am About time on Svanson.

Though curious to see if this means Liberatore is finally going to the bullpen
But I thought Hence was one of the premium young talents in the Cards organization? What happened? He was going to be with the mythical juggernaut that they're going to build from cost controlled minor league players. Just shows the whole lose, draft, lose, draft blah blah is untenable. Some young players here and there can really fit in and help but they shouldn't be the only focus when competing. You build a team with known talent and fill in the gaps with young talent. You don't build a team with young talent and fill in the gaps with veterans, especially waiver wire veterans. Then when a young star transcends, you open a spot for him by trading someone blocking him. I know it might seem like semantics but one way gives you the chance to compete year in and year out, the other way involves tons of losing.
You have to start with young talent. In mlb, AAA and in down.

Once you do that, you bring in’premium’ talent and veterans.


Right now, we are doing the former. The latter will eventually happen.
Wattage
Forum User
Posts: 2328
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm

Re: Mathews up, Svanson down, Hence DFA

Post by Wattage »

moose-and-squirrel wrote: 01 Aug 2026 11:17 am why not use Hence in a trade package?
webhave 7 daysnto trade hence before dfaing so he likely is an addon in trade, but he really doesnt have any value. he has had 6 years in minors and now his velocity is down 8mph from what it usednto be topping out at 90mph. hes toast.
butsir01
Forum User
Posts: 2651
Joined: 23 May 2024 20:36 pm

Re: Mathews up, Svanson down, Hence DFA

Post by butsir01 »

CCard wrote: 01 Aug 2026 11:21 am
Strummer Jones wrote: 01 Aug 2026 11:10 am About time on Svanson.

Though curious to see if this means Liberatore is finally going to the bullpen
But I thought Hence was one of the premium young talents in the Cards organization? What happened? He was going to be with the mythical juggernaut that they're going to build from cost controlled minor league players. Just shows the whole lose, draft, lose, draft blah blah is untenable. Some young players here and there can really fit in and help but they shouldn't be the only focus when competing. You build a team with known talent and fill in the gaps with young talent. You don't build a team with young talent and fill in the gaps with veterans, especially waiver wire veterans. Then when a young star transcends, you open a spot for him by trading someone blocking him. I know it might seem like semantics but one way gives you the chance to compete year in and year out, the other way involves tons of losing.
They are always “going to,” but seldom “are.”
CCard
Forum User
Posts: 2487
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

Re: Mathews up, Svanson down, Hence DFA

Post by CCard »

ecleme22 wrote: 01 Aug 2026 21:03 pm
CCard wrote: 01 Aug 2026 11:21 am
Strummer Jones wrote: 01 Aug 2026 11:10 am About time on Svanson.

Though curious to see if this means Liberatore is finally going to the bullpen
But I thought Hence was one of the premium young talents in the Cards organization? What happened? He was going to be with the mythical juggernaut that they're going to build from cost controlled minor league players. Just shows the whole lose, draft, lose, draft blah blah is untenable. Some young players here and there can really fit in and help but they shouldn't be the only focus when competing. You build a team with known talent and fill in the gaps with young talent. You don't build a team with young talent and fill in the gaps with veterans, especially waiver wire veterans. Then when a young star transcends, you open a spot for him by trading someone blocking him. I know it might seem like semantics but one way gives you the chance to compete year in and year out, the other way involves tons of losing.
You have to start with young talent. In mlb, AAA and in down.

Once you do that, you bring in’premium’ talent and veterans.


Right now, we are doing the former. The latter will eventually happen.
Let's be honest here. Every frigging team in baseball has young talented prospects. Every teams rankings fluctuates constantly. A team is rated highly and then a couple of high prospects fizzle out for what ever reason. Some fairly obscure prospects elevate and become viable MLB players. No one knows for sure, it's one big gamble. They just signed JJ to a long term deal expecting him to play well and improve. What if he doesn't? Now, you expect to build a team of highly volatile minor league prospects and then you want them to be coached properly while them navigating the minors and their personal lives, oh and you expect them to arrive at about the same time. Unlikely scenario, but then to top it off, only then do you want to go out and spend some money on premium talent, assuming said talent is even available and amenable to coming to the armpit of America? Tell me, does this premise sound like fantasy land to you? Or, follow me here, or you could spend up to the level you're capable of and put premium talent on the field for people to watch and cheer on, supplement it with talent from the minors (where applicable) and compete every year for a shot at the playoffs. Or you could try the fantasy land style and wallow in years or more of losing like Cincy and Pitt have done. All to save the owners a few quid.