You're right. Pay no attention to the stats in front of you. Instead justify your answer by looking at past performance.CCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:36 pmLook at his career stats and sneer. Where would he be on the depth chart for the Cards?
Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Maplebutterworth
- Forum User
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 14 May 2022 16:52 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 11918
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
So spend stupidly but at least you’re trying lol spend 175 million on a .713 ops hitter but at least you’re trying lol thank god you aren’t running the team the team would be screwed for yearsCCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:47 pmYou don't know how he'll turn out. He may well slow down some, but at least the Cubs are trying. Enjoy Blaze Jordan and his 1 homerun.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:44 pm32 year old with league average OPS+, making $175 over the next 5 yearsCCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:36 pmLook at his career stats and sneer. Where would he be on the depth chart for the Cards?![]()
Keep believing in his career numbers, and ignoring his injury history
-
Adam2
- Forum User
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: 26 Jun 2024 11:40 am
-
MIDMOBIRDTWO
- Forum User
- Posts: 5646
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
Buttermaker, are you shady?Maplebutterworth wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 18:21 pmYou're right. Pay no attention to the stats in front of you. Instead justify your answer by looking at past performance.CCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:36 pmLook at his career stats and sneer. Where would he be on the depth chart for the Cards?
-
Kelledr
- Forum User
- Posts: 44
- Joined: 12 Jun 2023 21:35 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
Of the 10 hits in the series, if I counted correctly 9 were hit the other way. Many of the Cub's hits were to the opposite field something JJ needs to do, again if I counted only one of his hits went the other way. He just continues to ground out to second or sometimes first.
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 8132
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
Strategy sometimes eludes oli when hes giggling with Dirty Dan.bccardsfan wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:23 pmYes, plus it sets up the DP. Whatever...JuanAgosto wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:15 pmYou aren't wrong. And if we ever had a hitter go 9-17 in a series, im confident the opposing manager would be smart enough to walk him in a key extra inning spot. Our dugout dumb[ash] doesn't get it. OLI BALL
-
Maplebutterworth
- Forum User
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 14 May 2022 16:52 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
I've had this account for several years and created the name as a mockey of hardmaple and whatever other name he had.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 18:26 pmButtermaker, are you shady?Maplebutterworth wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 18:21 pmYou're right. Pay no attention to the stats in front of you. Instead justify your answer by looking at past performance.CCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:36 pmLook at his career stats and sneer. Where would he be on the depth chart for the Cards?
-
imyourhuckleberry
- Forum User
- Posts: 936
- Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
Give me a break. If Bregman had THOSE numbers and THAT contract and was wearing a Cardinal uniform, he'd be far and away the daily forum whipping boy.
Daily posts titled, 'We have how many more years or this bum?' or 'Bloom is just as bad at spending DeWallet's money as Mo!' or 'Why doesn't Oli bench this stiff and play Blaze Jordan!
You know it l's true.
Daily posts titled, 'We have how many more years or this bum?' or 'Bloom is just as bad at spending DeWallet's money as Mo!' or 'Why doesn't Oli bench this stiff and play Blaze Jordan!
You know it l's true.
-
mattmitchl44
- Forum User
- Posts: 4151
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
This thread is a bit unhinged.
Signing FAs to bad contracts is NOT how you compete.
Signing FAs to bad contracts is NOT how you compete.
-
AtillaTheBlue1
- Forum User
- Posts: 1416
- Joined: 13 May 2018 08:13 am
-
AZ_Cardsfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: 26 May 2024 00:49 am
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
Why do you start dumb threads. And this one is really dumb.
Is Bregman a superstar worth 5/$175 or $35m per year in his ages 32-36? No. Not a great bargain. Betting he isn't close to the star he was aged 28-31. Putting aside that he isn't a great use of money......
STL is in a rebuild. You don't throw money at aging stars on their down slope during a rebuild. And the rebuild is going quite well but seems you are missing or dissing it. When the new Owner/Player contract is signed next year and STL has figured out who is real (and I think they are close) then they can spend money on some veteran talent to make a run. Might still be a year early and might want to stay the course on getting talent at a batter cost basis than Bregman.
Based on current obligations they have a lot of room to spend. Hopefully money better spent than what the Cubs are getting from Bregman.
-
MIDMOBIRDTWO
- Forum User
- Posts: 5646
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
Thanks for clarifying that. Good plan.Maplebutterworth wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 18:52 pmI've had this account for several years and created the name as a mockey of hardmaple and whatever other name he had.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 18:26 pmButtermaker, are you shady?Maplebutterworth wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 18:21 pmYou're right. Pay no attention to the stats in front of you. Instead justify your answer by looking at past performance.CCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:36 pmLook at his career stats and sneer. Where would he be on the depth chart for the Cards?
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 11918
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
I don’t mind a rookie making the minimum and sucking at hitting I wouldn’t like a veteran making 35 million sucking at hitting. I guess you think it’s better if a guy sucks as long as they pay him a lot of money?when your money is tied up in bad contracts like that it makes improving the team hard You must have loved Fowlers contractCCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:47 pmYou don't know how he'll turn out. He may well slow down some, but at least the Cubs are trying. Enjoy Blaze Jordan and his 1 homerun.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:44 pm32 year old with league average OPS+, making $175 over the next 5 yearsCCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:36 pmLook at his career stats and sneer. Where would he be on the depth chart for the Cards?![]()
Keep believing in his career numbers, and ignoring his injury history
-
Bomber1
- Forum User
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:27 pm
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
You get dumber every day.
Congratulations.
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2494
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
You are sooooo dumb! St Louis is in a rebuild blah blah blah blah. Not beating this dead horse with you. You obviously feel it's okay for the team to tank so go buy some overpriced merch and beers while ownership sits back and puffs on a big ole stogie and laughs their collective a$$e$ off at you. Enjoy.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 19:09 pmWhy do you start dumb threads. And this one is really dumb.
Is Bregman a superstar worth 5/$175 or $35m per year in his ages 32-36? No. Not a great bargain. Betting he isn't close to the star he was aged 28-31. Putting aside that he isn't a great use of money......
STL is in a rebuild. You don't throw money at aging stars on their down slope during a rebuild. And the rebuild is going quite well but seems you are missing or dissing it. When the new Owner/Player contract is signed next year and STL has figured out who is real (and I think they are close) then they can spend money on some veteran talent to make a run. Might still be a year early and might want to stay the course on getting talent at a batter cost basis than Bregman.
Based on current obligations they have a lot of room to spend. Hopefully money better spent than what the Cubs are getting from Bregman.
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2494
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: Bregman sure would have looked good at 3rd for the Cards.
He beat the Cards today. At least the Cubs are trying. The Cards stuck a guy that has 1 homerun at 3rd. Why? Because he's cheap.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 18:23 pmSo spend stupidly but at least you’re trying lol spend 175 million on a .713 ops hitter but at least you’re trying lol thank god you aren’t running the team the team would be screwed for yearsCCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:47 pmYou don't know how he'll turn out. He may well slow down some, but at least the Cubs are trying. Enjoy Blaze Jordan and his 1 homerun.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:44 pm32 year old with league average OPS+, making $175 over the next 5 yearsCCard wrote: ↑30 Jul 2026 17:36 pmLook at his career stats and sneer. Where would he be on the depth chart for the Cards?![]()
Keep believing in his career numbers, and ignoring his injury history