Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 3635
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by STL fan in MN »

As for Command, he’s a good young center and I expect him to shoot up some rankings due to his good U18 tourney but not all the way into the top-10. I see him more in the 15-20 range. I was thinking more of a 3C projection but I can see him maybe becoming a 2C now. He’s a dependable player but it’ll depend on how well the offensive skills develop and translate to the pros.

But he’s a center and 6’1” so I bet he goes a little higher than he’s ranked, especially in a draft shallow on centers…but I’d still be pretty surprised if he was taken top-10.
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1913
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by BalotelliMassive »

STL fan in MN wrote: 15 May 2026 13:37 pm I think it’s much more likely Anaheim tries to get him to level up a bit than to cut bait and sell low on him.

His defensive play isn’t currently good enough but that’s fairly normal for a younger player. I think some have called his effort into question as well though. Maybe he just needs a good mentor and some maturing…but maybe he needs a change of scenery. I honestly haven’t paid a ton of attention to Anaheim this season to say much more than that though.
Good read that's not behind a paywall...

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/726727 ... ower-play/
Bluesfan1978
Forum User
Posts: 1482
Joined: 17 Jan 2021 16:44 pm

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by Bluesfan1978 »

The Ducks and Blues don’t look like matching trade partners whether it’s for players or prospects.
Rollin' on the River
Banned User
Posts: 2911
Joined: 24 May 2024 00:27 am

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by Rollin' on the River »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 15 May 2026 10:26 am
noted wrote: 15 May 2026 10:20 am Why would a Blackhawk’s fan hang out in a Blues talk forum?
Please...put me on ignore.
It’s not like you’ve been here for basically a decade or nothing.

Dudes a clown.
TruBlueFan_1970
Forum User
Posts: 2447
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by TruBlueFan_1970 »

noted wrote: 15 May 2026 10:58 am
BalotelliMassive wrote: 15 May 2026 10:26 am
noted wrote: 15 May 2026 10:20 am Why would a Blackhawk’s fan hang out in a Blues talk forum?
Please...put me on ignore.
I can but my question still stands…
While I don't always agree with his takes, he does follow both teams and comment here quite a bit. Knowledgeable and respectful poster. Don't mind seeing his opinions at all, especially on some of the younger Hawks that I don't follow. My two cents....no need to reply.
noted
Forum User
Posts: 856
Joined: 29 Jul 2021 16:13 pm

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by noted »

TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: 16 May 2026 08:11 am
noted wrote: 15 May 2026 10:58 am
BalotelliMassive wrote:15 May 2026 10:26 am
noted wrote: 15 May 2026 10:20 am Why would a Blackhawk’s fan hang out in a Blues talk forum?
Please...put me on ignore.
I can but my question still stands…
While I don't always agree with his takes, he does follow both teams and comment here quite a bit. Knowledgeable and respectful poster. Don't mind seeing his opinions at all, especially on some of the younger Hawks that I don't follow. My two cents....no need to reply.
Gotcha. My knowledge of the forum is not that great. Know about the one troll and thought this was another. I apologize
TruBlueFan_1970
Forum User
Posts: 2447
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by TruBlueFan_1970 »

Bluesfan1978 wrote: 15 May 2026 15:06 pm The Ducks and Blues don’t look like matching trade partners whether it’s for players or prospects.
I tend to agree, other than they have an aging defensive core that are all UFAs. Maybe they would look at Parayko for the final few years of his contract to have a veteran presence at a locked in rate. They were paying a 36 year old Carlson $8.0 million after the trade, Trouba (32) $8.0 million and Gudas (35) $4.0 million. Parayko at 33 years old and only $6.5 million might intrigue them. Just not sure what return we might get, so I don't know if they are a good fit for us.

Seattle, Columbus and Ottawa still seem best.

As for Command, haven't followed him much, but seems like he would fit in as a 3C. Problem is, until we know where Dvo finally lands (2c or 3c), we should shoot for higher potential. In that range, I wonder if Morozov is a better pick with a bit higher potential??
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 3635
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by STL fan in MN »

TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: 16 May 2026 08:18 am
Bluesfan1978 wrote: 15 May 2026 15:06 pm The Ducks and Blues don’t look like matching trade partners whether it’s for players or prospects.
I tend to agree, other than they have an aging defensive core that are all UFAs. Maybe they would look at Parayko for the final few years of his contract to have a veteran presence at a locked in rate. They were paying a 36 year old Carlson $8.0 million after the trade, Trouba (32) $8.0 million and Gudas (35) $4.0 million. Parayko at 33 years old and only $6.5 million might intrigue them. Just not sure what return we might get, so I don't know if they are a good fit for us.

Seattle, Columbus and Ottawa still seem best.

As for Command, haven't followed him much, but seems like he would fit in as a 3C. Problem is, until we know where Dvo finally lands (2c or 3c), we should shoot for higher potential. In that range, I wonder if Morozov is a better pick with a bit higher potential??
I’d prefer Command over Morozov by quite a bit. Questionable if Morozov is actually more skilled and I really like Command’s two-way game and compete level. That said, both probably will fall into that range between picks 15 and 31.
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1913
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by BalotelliMassive »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 15 May 2026 10:14 am
zoiks wrote: 15 May 2026 09:21 am My hope is that the Blues end up with a center prospect from the 11th pick that can battle with Dvorsky in a couple years for the 2nd line center spot in the Blues lineup and then with the 15th pick they draft whoever is the best forward or defenseman available.
Why not trade for Mason MacTavish? It appears that he's available and would step in immediately.
8)
BluesDom
Forum User
Posts: 1086
Joined: 19 Jun 2024 18:16 pm

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by BluesDom »

I think people love him because he has a really bad (donkey) name
BluesDom
Forum User
Posts: 1086
Joined: 19 Jun 2024 18:16 pm

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by BluesDom »

Sorry, I didn’t realize this was an old thread. People were gushing over this command guy. And it looks like we did sign Mason McTavish. You called it. How about that?
DIAMONDINTHEROUGH
Forum User
Posts: 449
Joined: 25 May 2024 01:04 am

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by DIAMONDINTHEROUGH »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 15 May 2026 10:14 am
zoiks wrote: 15 May 2026 09:21 am My hope is that the Blues end up with a center prospect from the 11th pick that can battle with Dvorsky in a couple years for the 2nd line center spot in the Blues lineup and then with the 15th pick they draft whoever is the best forward or defenseman available.
Why not trade for Mason MacTavish? It appears that he's available and would step in immediately.
Good suggestion.
Old_Goat
Forum User
Posts: 1519
Joined: 28 Dec 2024 08:46 am

Re: Command Number 9 in Sportsnet’s latest top 45

Post by Old_Goat »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 29 Jul 2026 14:49 pm
BalotelliMassive wrote: 15 May 2026 10:14 am
zoiks wrote: 15 May 2026 09:21 am My hope is that the Blues end up with a center prospect from the 11th pick that can battle with Dvorsky in a couple years for the 2nd line center spot in the Blues lineup and then with the 15th pick they draft whoever is the best forward or defenseman available.
Why not trade for Mason MacTavish? It appears that he's available and would step in immediately.
8)
Indeed you did.