Connor Bedard
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
pucknugget
- Forum User
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 25 Aug 2025 11:46 am
Connor Bedard
Bedard is currently a RFA.
An offer sheet over $11.939 million would require 4 1sts in return if not matched.
Just starting a discussion whether this would be something STL would be thinking about. I see a few reasons why this would be a nice fit right now with STL, and ultimately it forces Chicago into making a long-term decision one way or the other in the next 7 days. Would they possible every consider not matching?
If the Blues were in on Robertson at $15, what offer would Bedard command to make Chicago pause?
An offer sheet over $11.939 million would require 4 1sts in return if not matched.
Just starting a discussion whether this would be something STL would be thinking about. I see a few reasons why this would be a nice fit right now with STL, and ultimately it forces Chicago into making a long-term decision one way or the other in the next 7 days. Would they possible every consider not matching?
If the Blues were in on Robertson at $15, what offer would Bedard command to make Chicago pause?
-
Younghopp1991
- Forum User
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: 10 Apr 2022 22:23 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
No. Chicago has plenty of cap space it would just be a waste of time unless Bedard is actually unhappy.pucknugget wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:31 pm Bedard is currently a RFA.
An offer sheet over $11.939 million would require 4 1sts in return if not matched.
Just starting a discussion whether this would be something STL would be thinking about. I see a few reasons why this would be a nice fit right now with STL, and ultimately it forces Chicago into making a long-term decision one way or the other in the next 7 days. Would they possible every consider not matching?
If the Blues were in on Robertson at $15, what offer would Bedard command to make Chicago pause?
-
STL fan in MN
- Forum User
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
It would also invite potential retaliation as the Hawks would be primed to be able to do it. Match our Bedard offer but then go and offer sheet McMichael or Snuggy a year from now.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:36 pmNo. Chicago has plenty of cap space it would just be a waste of time unless Bedard is actually unhappy.pucknugget wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:31 pm Bedard is currently a RFA.
An offer sheet over $11.939 million would require 4 1sts in return if not matched.
Just starting a discussion whether this would be something STL would be thinking about. I see a few reasons why this would be a nice fit right now with STL, and ultimately it forces Chicago into making a long-term decision one way or the other in the next 7 days. Would they possible every consider not matching?
If the Blues were in on Robertson at $15, what offer would Bedard command to make Chicago pause?
Just not a good idea.
-
Army's Mom
- Forum User
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: Connor Bedard
Agreed. Three reasons this is a terrible idea:STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:56 pmIt would also invite potential retaliation as the Hawks would be primed to be able to do it. Match our Bedard offer but then go and offer sheet McMichael or Snuggy a year from now.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:36 pmNo. Chicago has plenty of cap space it would just be a waste of time unless Bedard is actually unhappy.pucknugget wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:31 pm Bedard is currently a RFA.
An offer sheet over $11.939 million would require 4 1sts in return if not matched.
Just starting a discussion whether this would be something STL would be thinking about. I see a few reasons why this would be a nice fit right now with STL, and ultimately it forces Chicago into making a long-term decision one way or the other in the next 7 days. Would they possible every consider not matching?
If the Blues were in on Robertson at $15, what offer would Bedard command to make Chicago pause?
Just not a good idea.
1. Ineffective. They're loaded with space and will match anything. I'm not sure there's an individual-cap-compliant figure they would balk at.
2. Retaliation. We don't need more teams (governors) upset with us. We're young and will have several opportunities for other teams to pay us back, no need to poke proverbial bears.
3. Astronomical. They're saying Makar could command $20M. I've got to think Bedard expects to emerge as one of the five best players over the course of his next contract, and will want to be paid similarly. For Chicago to think twice, you'd likely have to go north of $20M - if you even can (what is the individual limit, 20% of the annual cap?).
No way.
-
Frank Underwood
- Forum User
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
Army pretty much dismissed this rumor. He didn't specifically say Robertson, but it seemed clear he was talking about Jim Nill and the Robertson situation.pucknugget wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:31 pm Bedard is currently a RFA.
An offer sheet over $11.939 million would require 4 1sts in return if not matched.
Just starting a discussion whether this would be something STL would be thinking about. I see a few reasons why this would be a nice fit right now with STL, and ultimately it forces Chicago into making a long-term decision one way or the other in the next 7 days. Would they possible every consider not matching?
If the Blues were in on Robertson at $15, what offer would Bedard command to make Chicago pause?
-
bluetunehead
- Forum User
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
The Hawks can and would match anything. Waste of time.
-
dhsux
- Forum User
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
I'm guessing Chicago will want to offer a longer term contract right about now?
I wouldn't think they would want a bridge. But I'm not sure about what Bedard would want?
Will this team ever get off the mat?
I wouldn't think they would want a bridge. But I'm not sure about what Bedard would want?
Will this team ever get off the mat?
-
STL fan in MN
- Forum User
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
Yes, the max is 20%. The Cap is currently at $104M so the individual max would be $20.8M.Army's Mom wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 15:14 pmAgreed. Three reasons this is a terrible idea:STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:56 pmIt would also invite potential retaliation as the Hawks would be primed to be able to do it. Match our Bedard offer but then go and offer sheet McMichael or Snuggy a year from now.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:36 pmNo. Chicago has plenty of cap space it would just be a waste of time unless Bedard is actually unhappy.pucknugget wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 14:31 pm Bedard is currently a RFA.
An offer sheet over $11.939 million would require 4 1sts in return if not matched.
Just starting a discussion whether this would be something STL would be thinking about. I see a few reasons why this would be a nice fit right now with STL, and ultimately it forces Chicago into making a long-term decision one way or the other in the next 7 days. Would they possible every consider not matching?
If the Blues were in on Robertson at $15, what offer would Bedard command to make Chicago pause?
Just not a good idea.
1. Ineffective. They're loaded with space and will match anything. I'm not sure there's an individual-cap-compliant figure they would balk at.
2. Retaliation. We don't need more teams (governors) upset with us. We're young and will have several opportunities for other teams to pay us back, no need to poke proverbial bears.
3. Astronomical. They're saying Makar could command $20M. I've got to think Bedard expects to emerge as one of the five best players over the course of his next contract, and will want to be paid similarly. For Chicago to think twice, you'd likely have to go north of $20M - if you even can (what is the individual limit, 20% of the annual cap?).
No way.
No player has ever gotten the max.
-
TAFKAP
- Forum User
- Posts: 2785
- Joined: 10 May 2018 17:44 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
God I hope not. Their fanbase got enough, let them wait a couple more decades.
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 3241
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
-
Unfathomable
- Forum User
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:29 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
Believe its his other shoulder... had to of at least seperated it he's starting to get a injury history.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 19:54 pm Injured today
https://chicago.suntimes.com/blackhawks ... -vancouver
-
STL fan in MN
- Forum User
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 19:54 pm Injured today
https://chicago.suntimes.com/blackhawks ... -vancouver

In all seriousness though, the video there didn’t look good. Looks like he caught an edge and fell on his own into the boards, adding awkwardly on his shoulder.
-
BalotelliMassive
- Forum User
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am
Re: Connor Bedard
Obvious AIPierre McGuire wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 19:54 pm Injured today
https://chicago.suntimes.com/blackhawks ... -vancouver
-
Natl20
- Forum User
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: 23 Feb 2019 00:00 am
Re: Connor Bedard
Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 19:54 pm Injured today
https://chicago.suntimes.com/blackhawks ... -vancouver
-
TruBlueFan_1970
- Forum User
- Posts: 2447
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
Re: Connor Bedard
He must be part Russian! Sorry, couldn’t resist a Bleedr reference to Vladdy.Unfathomable wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 20:13 pmBelieve its his other shoulder... had to of at least seperated it he's starting to get a injury history.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑02 Jul 2026 19:54 pm Injured today
https://chicago.suntimes.com/blackhawks ... -vancouver
-
Natl20
- Forum User
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: 23 Feb 2019 00:00 am
Re: Connor Bedard
Shocked a physical presence of his nature would get hurt
Give him 20mm a year lmao
Give him 20mm a year lmao