These McTavish threads might have the potential to become part of Blues lore.....kind of like the Oshie "oh my God, we drafted a roller hockey player" thread, the fried food thread, and maybe the hugging at the airport thread!UMR-alum-05 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 09:46 am I'm not sure why some folks like to predict the future as if it's already fact.
Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
Frank Underwood
- Forum User
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
-
zamadoo
- Forum User
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
I hadn't yet considered this angle...BalotelliMassive wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 08:50 amYou caught me red-handed - I'm obviously trying to get Armstrong to blow a first round pick by posting my opinion on a board that he doesn't read.juan good eye wrote: ↑26 Jun 2026 08:43 am just bc the hawks (bleep) up the blues don’t need to do the same.
-
zamadoo
- Forum User
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm
Re: Rangers Ducks talking McTavish
Someone mentioned #29+Buch for McT+our 2nd - This might be our best offer that could make sense, provided Army and crew know and believe in the player.
Someone posted a scouting report from a re-ranking of his draft, noting that the tools are there and he showed much more in the OHL, but lacks the competitive drive <--if this is true I don't even know why Army would be interested, and certainly not for #11.
No way I'd even trade Buch for a guy with talent but no drive, much less a diva on a big contract. I don't know anything about McTavish though.
Any chance of Fowler back to ANA? New coach. Who knows, but they need D, which is why Schneider might be the deal they take.
Trocheck+Schneider is what I'd be going for if I were ANA talking to NYR. As a Blues fan, I would be fine losing to them.
Someone posted a scouting report from a re-ranking of his draft, noting that the tools are there and he showed much more in the OHL, but lacks the competitive drive <--if this is true I don't even know why Army would be interested, and certainly not for #11.
No way I'd even trade Buch for a guy with talent but no drive, much less a diva on a big contract. I don't know anything about McTavish though.
Any chance of Fowler back to ANA? New coach. Who knows, but they need D, which is why Schneider might be the deal they take.
Trocheck+Schneider is what I'd be going for if I were ANA talking to NYR. As a Blues fan, I would be fine losing to them.