Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 1869
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by bluetunehead »

EKFMGA wrote: 06 May 2026 12:45 pm With a team like SJ that has 42M in cap space why not offer Kyrou, And Buch, Col 1st and anyone down on the farm not named Carbo, Stenberg. Linstein, Juricek they have the cap space and need veterans. that would leave 11 & 15 and what's left of the prospects after SJ at #2 to move up (rangers at #5) for a center Malhotra.

Now that would be a legacy last move for Army. Just a thought and a pipe dream.
Quantity won't get you quality.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 9400
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by DawgDad »

STL fan in MN wrote: 06 May 2026 12:32 pm
callitwhatyouwant wrote: 06 May 2026 12:03 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 06 May 2026 11:41 am Link please?
he says that the sheet they have (we have posted one thats probably somewhat similar) has their calculations that the team can move up into the top 5. I believe those 2 get you as far as 3-4-5 it might just be 4-5. But it's not far from 3. He said it's still dependent on what they are interested in drafting. But he does think the top 4 picks are more fluid than previous years because there aren't consensus top picks.
Yes, I’m well aware of the historical draft pick value charts and yes, the value of those 2 picks together would be around or a bit higher than the value of 1 pick around the 4-5 range…but you need a team in that range to actually want to make such a move. My point would be that historically, there’s near zero precedence for a team being willing to move down that much.

One reason for that is it’s simply quite rare for a team to have 2 picks in the 11-15ish range. But beyond that, if you expand it to the ~ 11th pick and another asset around the same value as the 15th (and even another asset on top of that if you want), there’s still basically zero examples of a team being willing to drop down that much.
A team willing to trade out of the top-5 is likely interested in NHL players not lower picks. Toronto, SJ. Rangers? They probably want top-5 pick. Chicago? Don't know that I'd trade with them. Vancouver might bite on multiple #1s but I doubt it.

Toronto may want now players, more than one. They might want the 11-pick to draft a center or RD for development. Blues are getting short on now players without tapping the top-line. Would Toronto still be interested in the Blues veterans?
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 2740
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by skilles »

bluetunehead wrote: 06 May 2026 12:53 pm
EKFMGA wrote: 06 May 2026 12:45 pm With a team like SJ that has 42M in cap space why not offer Kyrou, And Buch, Col 1st and anyone down on the farm not named Carbo, Stenberg. Linstein, Juricek they have the cap space and need veterans. that would leave 11 & 15 and what's left of the prospects after SJ at #2 to move up (rangers at #5) for a center Malhotra.

Now that would be a legacy last move for Army. Just a thought and a pipe dream.
Quantity won't get you quality.
Actually in reality that is exactly what almost always actually happens in trades.

That trade is just not the right quantity for them to make the move.
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 2740
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by skilles »

DawgDad wrote: 06 May 2026 12:58 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 06 May 2026 12:32 pm
callitwhatyouwant wrote: 06 May 2026 12:03 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 06 May 2026 11:41 am Link please?
he says that the sheet they have (we have posted one thats probably somewhat similar) has their calculations that the team can move up into the top 5. I believe those 2 get you as far as 3-4-5 it might just be 4-5. But it's not far from 3. He said it's still dependent on what they are interested in drafting. But he does think the top 4 picks are more fluid than previous years because there aren't consensus top picks.
Yes, I’m well aware of the historical draft pick value charts and yes, the value of those 2 picks together would be around or a bit higher than the value of 1 pick around the 4-5 range…but you need a team in that range to actually want to make such a move. My point would be that historically, there’s near zero precedence for a team being willing to move down that much.

One reason for that is it’s simply quite rare for a team to have 2 picks in the 11-15ish range. But beyond that, if you expand it to the ~ 11th pick and another asset around the same value as the 15th (and even another asset on top of that if you want), there’s still basically zero examples of a team being willing to drop down that much.
A team willing to trade out of the top-5 is likely interested in NHL players not lower picks. Toronto, SJ. Rangers? They probably want top-5 pick. Chicago? Don't know that I'd trade with them. Vancouver might bite on multiple #1s but I doubt it.

Toronto may want now players, more than one. They might want the 11-pick to draft a center or RD for development. Blues are getting short on now players without tapping the top-line. Would Toronto still be interested in the Blues veterans?
I would think the Blues would be interested in young "now" players more than better picks to be honest.
Rollin' on the River
Banned User
Posts: 2911
Joined: 24 May 2024 00:27 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by Rollin' on the River »

Harry S Deals wrote: 06 May 2026 11:44 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 06 May 2026 11:41 am Link please?
101 interview just now Army stated that based on the value of #11 + #15 they feel like they could move into the Top 5. My assumption is that means perhaps 2-5. You may be able to listen to the interview later on 101 Espns website.

Would you take, Stenberg, Malhotra, etc? Not sure what team would be interested maybe SJ? Would it be a larger package, i found that comment interesting
That depends obviously on what you can actually get. I don’t think you move into the top two I do think you could get I think you could get four or five considering that the Canucks need a defenseman and they’re more than likely gonna take one at three
aslord
Forum User
Posts: 670
Joined: 24 May 2024 11:01 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by aslord »

Harry S Deals wrote: 06 May 2026 12:06 pm
Frank Underwood wrote: 06 May 2026 12:02 pm Stenberg would be the most likely target, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was targeting Chase Reid.
I gotta think the chance to have both brothers is going to be worth it to the Blues. Someone online mentioned SJs need for D, Mailloux? Parayko, Lindstein id entertain those packages
Why does anybody care about getting both brothers? I mean, ok, get a great player and if Ivar is truly that, then good, but the notion that anyone should give a (bleep) about having both brothers perplexes me. IMO it would be more of a distraction than anything else.
LGB73
Forum User
Posts: 673
Joined: 29 May 2024 15:18 pm

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by LGB73 »

The 11+15 looks like it slots into being of equal value to 4th. If that's the case, I'd rather have last year's 4th pick. Solving the C depth is a bigger issue than adding a winger or even another RD which is important as well.
Rollin' on the River
Banned User
Posts: 2911
Joined: 24 May 2024 00:27 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by Rollin' on the River »

aslord wrote: 06 May 2026 13:36 pm
Harry S Deals wrote: 06 May 2026 12:06 pm
Frank Underwood wrote: 06 May 2026 12:02 pm Stenberg would be the most likely target, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was targeting Chase Reid.
I gotta think the chance to have both brothers is going to be worth it to the Blues. Someone online mentioned SJs need for D, Mailloux? Parayko, Lindstein id entertain those packages
Why does anybody care about getting both brothers? I mean, ok, get a great player and if Ivar is truly that, then good, but the notion that anyone should give a (bleep) about having both brothers perplexes me. IMO it would be more of a distraction than anything else.
Do you feel the same way about the Ruck Brothers?
blues2112
Forum User
Posts: 4385
Joined: 27 Apr 2018 18:17 pm

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by blues2112 »

TheJackBurton wrote: 06 May 2026 12:41 pm There's simply no way I'm trading Parayko in any package for a draft pick.

We already have to sign a RHD why make it that much harder by needing to sign potentially 2?

That makes no sense is anyway shape or form.
Agree 2,112 percent, especially at 6.5 cap hit.

Move Parayko and Mailloux (I guess) is 1 RHD, with
XXXXX as 2RHD and
YYYYY as 3RHD?
sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 4652
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by sdaltons »

TheJackBurton wrote: 06 May 2026 12:41 pm There's simply no way I'm trading Parayko in any package for a draft pick.

We already have to sign a RHD why make it that much harder by needing to sign potentially 2?

That makes no sense is anyway shape or form.
Glad someone said this. I would love to move up but trading Parayko to do so doesn't make a lot of sense.
aslord
Forum User
Posts: 670
Joined: 24 May 2024 11:01 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by aslord »

Rollin' on the River wrote: 06 May 2026 13:41 pm
aslord wrote: 06 May 2026 13:36 pm
Harry S Deals wrote: 06 May 2026 12:06 pm
Frank Underwood wrote: 06 May 2026 12:02 pm Stenberg would be the most likely target, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was targeting Chase Reid.
I gotta think the chance to have both brothers is going to be worth it to the Blues. Someone online mentioned SJs need for D, Mailloux? Parayko, Lindstein id entertain those packages
Why does anybody care about getting both brothers? I mean, ok, get a great player and if Ivar is truly that, then good, but the notion that anyone should give a (bleep) about having both brothers perplexes me. IMO it would be more of a distraction than anything else.
Do you feel the same way about the Ruck Brothers?
why wouldn't I?
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 3528
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by Harry S Deals »

LGB73 wrote: 06 May 2026 13:38 pm The 11+15 looks like it slots into being of equal value to 4th. If that's the case, I'd rather have last year's 4th pick. Solving the C depth is a bigger issue than adding a winger or even another RD which is important as well.
So perhaps Malhotra?
Rollin' on the River
Banned User
Posts: 2911
Joined: 24 May 2024 00:27 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by Rollin' on the River »

aslord wrote: 06 May 2026 13:44 pm
Rollin' on the River wrote: 06 May 2026 13:41 pm
aslord wrote: 06 May 2026 13:36 pm
Harry S Deals wrote: 06 May 2026 12:06 pm
Frank Underwood wrote: 06 May 2026 12:02 pm Stenberg would be the most likely target, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was targeting Chase Reid.
I gotta think the chance to have both brothers is going to be worth it to the Blues. Someone online mentioned SJs need for D, Mailloux? Parayko, Lindstein id entertain those packages
Why does anybody care about getting both brothers? I mean, ok, get a great player and if Ivar is truly that, then good, but the notion that anyone should give a (bleep) about having both brothers perplexes me. IMO it would be more of a distraction than anything else.
Do you feel the same way about the Ruck Brothers?
why wouldn't I?
Different scenario.

They played on the same team ans have really good chemistry. Vs the Stenbergs who haven’t been on the same team in like 6 years.
aslord
Forum User
Posts: 670
Joined: 24 May 2024 11:01 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by aslord »

Rollin' on the River wrote: 06 May 2026 13:49 pm
aslord wrote: 06 May 2026 13:44 pm
Rollin' on the River wrote: 06 May 2026 13:41 pm
aslord wrote: 06 May 2026 13:36 pm
Harry S Deals wrote: 06 May 2026 12:06 pm
Frank Underwood wrote: 06 May 2026 12:02 pm Stenberg would be the most likely target, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was targeting Chase Reid.
I gotta think the chance to have both brothers is going to be worth it to the Blues. Someone online mentioned SJs need for D, Mailloux? Parayko, Lindstein id entertain those packages
Why does anybody care about getting both brothers? I mean, ok, get a great player and if Ivar is truly that, then good, but the notion that anyone should give a (bleep) about having both brothers perplexes me. IMO it would be more of a distraction than anything else.
Do you feel the same way about the Ruck Brothers?
why wouldn't I?
Different scenario.

They played on the same team ans have really good chemistry. Vs the Stenbergs who haven’t been on the same team in like 6 years.
To be honest, I wouldn't take either of them.
Walter Sobchak00
Forum User
Posts: 646
Joined: 24 Jun 2018 09:25 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by Walter Sobchak00 »

He did say based on the Blues sheet and he had no idea what the other teams thought.
TBone
Forum User
Posts: 1593
Joined: 28 May 2024 09:00 am

Re: Army is indicating they can move into the top five

Post by TBone »

Pierre McGuire wrote: 06 May 2026 11:55 am
Harry S Deals wrote: 06 May 2026 11:53 am I have a nagging feeling that its going to be:


To SJ:

#11
#15
Lindstein (or similar 1B type of Blues prospect)

To STL:
Ivar Stenberg
If I’m San Jose I’m asking for more than that.
And I tell 'em to pack fudge.