Quinn Hughes
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 3241
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Quinn Hughes
How many players would you rather have over this dude? I honestly don’t know that I would take anybody over him. Obviously McDavid and Nate MacK are outliers because they are dominant centers but man, I don’t think there is a player in the league that controls the game like Hughes.
-
Frank Underwood
- Forum User
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm
Re: Quinn Hughes
He is fantastic and really fun to watch. I honestly didn't realize how good he is.
-
rbirules
- Forum User
- Posts: 895
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: Quinn Hughes
If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 3942
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Quinn Hughes
It continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.rbirules wrote: ↑01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 3241
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Quinn Hughes
Yes..Celebrini, thanks for mentioning him.rbirules wrote: ↑01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
-
BalotelliMassive
- Forum User
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am
Re: Quinn Hughes
Reminds me of watching peak Housley, Coffey or Keith but he might be better than all of them.
-
Midnight Ryder
- Forum User
- Posts: 63
- Joined: 24 Mar 2025 16:13 pm
Re: Quinn Hughes
Quinn Hughes is an outlier also
-
DawgDad
- Forum User
- Posts: 9400
- Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am
Re: Quinn Hughes
Well, there's goaltending for starters.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑01 May 2026 10:59 amIt continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.rbirules wrote: ↑01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 3942
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Quinn Hughes
The Oilers and the Flyers weren't exactly running Fuhr and Quick other there.DawgDad wrote: ↑01 May 2026 11:13 amWell, there's goaltending for starters.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑01 May 2026 10:59 amIt continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.rbirules wrote: ↑01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
-
DawgDad
- Forum User
- Posts: 9400
- Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am
Re: Quinn Hughes
Irrelevant. What happened to the President's Cup team, and the next season's team? Roman Turek.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑01 May 2026 11:15 amThe Oilers and the Flyers weren't exactly running Fuhr and Quick other there.DawgDad wrote: ↑01 May 2026 11:13 amWell, there's goaltending for starters.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑01 May 2026 10:59 amIt continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.rbirules wrote: ↑01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 3942
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Quinn Hughes
Sure. However, there were other opportunities that didn't include Turek, but... Detroit.DawgDad wrote: ↑01 May 2026 11:19 amIrrelevant. What happened to the President's Cup team, and the next season's team? Roman Turek.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑01 May 2026 11:15 amThe Oilers and the Flyers weren't exactly running Fuhr and Quick other there.DawgDad wrote: ↑01 May 2026 11:13 amWell, there's goaltending for starters.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑01 May 2026 10:59 amIt continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.rbirules wrote: ↑01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
-
keithinwr
- Forum User
- Posts: 55
- Joined: 18 Sep 2025 09:38 am
Re: Quinn Hughes
Imagine how good he would be if he had been drafted in the "Top 5" instead of 7th.
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 3674
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Quinn Hughes
Let me tell you what likely everyone else is thinking.
There is a difference between
A) An elite NHL player
B) Selecting TOP5 in the NHL Draft
B does not GUARANTEE A.
A can be acquired without B.
The chances of acquiring A are greatly increased by B.
A brings keen advantage in Stanley Cups. It is ALMOST a requirement for the Stanley Cup Winner per history.
A brings fun and thrill to every NHL game.
The St Louis Blues are ignoring all of these facts for the sake of the cash register. Some fans care. Some don't.
Some fans know the value of Stan Musial in their life in sports. Some fans think that a roomful of Maxvilles' and McCarvers' is just the same.
So go ahead and fascinate over Quinn Hughes, Sports Fans. You should--BECAUSE YOU WILL NEVER EVER SEE THAT SORT OF TALENT IN A BLUES JERSEY.
-
DawgDad
- Forum User
- Posts: 9400
- Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am
Re: Quinn Hughes
I'm glad you brought up Stan Musial, Dal Maxvill, and Tim McCarver. I saw Musial play in person late in 1963, his last season. The next sason the Cardinals won their first pennant in 18 seasons. During the 1960's, my school years, the Cardinals won THREE pennants and TWO World Series with Maxvill and McCarver. I had TWO signature bats growing up, a Dal Maxvill model and a Tim McCarver model. Facts.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑01 May 2026 12:14 pmLet me tell you what likely everyone else is thinking.
There is a difference between
A) An elite NHL player
B) Selecting TOP5 in the NHL Draft
B does not GUARANTEE A.
A can be acquired without B.
The chances of acquiring A are greatly increased by B.
A brings keen advantage in Stanley Cups. It is ALMOST a requirement for the Stanley Cup Winner per history.
A brings fun and thrill to every NHL game.
The St Louis Blues are ignoring all of these facts for the sake of the cash register. Some fans care. Some don't.
Some fans know the value of Stan Musial in their life in sports. Some fans think that a roomful of Maxvilles' and McCarvers' is just the same.
So go ahead and fascinate over Quinn Hughes, Sports Fans. You should--BECAUSE YOU WILL NEVER EVER SEE THAT SORT OF TALENT IN A BLUES JERSEY.
-
Army's Mom
- Forum User
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: Quinn Hughes
-
Tony Palazzolo
- Forum User
- Posts: 390
- Joined: 24 May 2024 10:13 am
Re: Quinn Hughes
I think outside of one playoff either Pronger or MacInnis were hurt. I don't remember having them both healthy for the playoffs.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑01 May 2026 10:59 amIt continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.rbirules wrote: ↑01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.
It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.