Quinn Hughes

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Pierre McGuire
Forum User
Posts: 3241
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm

Quinn Hughes

Post by Pierre McGuire »

How many players would you rather have over this dude? I honestly don’t know that I would take anybody over him. Obviously McDavid and Nate MacK are outliers because they are dominant centers but man, I don’t think there is a player in the league that controls the game like Hughes.
Frank Underwood
Forum User
Posts: 1311
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by Frank Underwood »

He is fantastic and really fun to watch. I honestly didn't realize how good he is.
rbirules
Forum User
Posts: 895
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by rbirules »

If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.

It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 3942
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by TheJackBurton »

rbirules wrote: 01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.

It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
It continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.

Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
Pierre McGuire
Forum User
Posts: 3241
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by Pierre McGuire »

rbirules wrote: 01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.

It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
Yes..Celebrini, thanks for mentioning him.
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1913
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by BalotelliMassive »

Reminds me of watching peak Housley, Coffey or Keith but he might be better than all of them.
Midnight Ryder
Forum User
Posts: 63
Joined: 24 Mar 2025 16:13 pm

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by Midnight Ryder »

Quinn Hughes is an outlier also
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 9400
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by DawgDad »

TheJackBurton wrote: 01 May 2026 10:59 am
rbirules wrote: 01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.

It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
It continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.

Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
Well, there's goaltending for starters.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 3942
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by TheJackBurton »

DawgDad wrote: 01 May 2026 11:13 am
TheJackBurton wrote: 01 May 2026 10:59 am
rbirules wrote: 01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.

It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
It continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.

Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
Well, there's goaltending for starters.
The Oilers and the Flyers weren't exactly running Fuhr and Quick other there.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 9400
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by DawgDad »

TheJackBurton wrote: 01 May 2026 11:15 am
DawgDad wrote: 01 May 2026 11:13 am
TheJackBurton wrote: 01 May 2026 10:59 am
rbirules wrote: 01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.

It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
It continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.

Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
Well, there's goaltending for starters.
The Oilers and the Flyers weren't exactly running Fuhr and Quick other there.
Irrelevant. What happened to the President's Cup team, and the next season's team? Roman Turek.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 3942
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by TheJackBurton »

DawgDad wrote: 01 May 2026 11:19 am
TheJackBurton wrote: 01 May 2026 11:15 am
DawgDad wrote: 01 May 2026 11:13 am
TheJackBurton wrote: 01 May 2026 10:59 am
rbirules wrote: 01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.

It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
It continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.

Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
Well, there's goaltending for starters.
The Oilers and the Flyers weren't exactly running Fuhr and Quick other there.
Irrelevant. What happened to the President's Cup team, and the next season's team? Roman Turek.
Sure. However, there were other opportunities that didn't include Turek, but... Detroit.
keithinwr
Forum User
Posts: 55
Joined: 18 Sep 2025 09:38 am

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by keithinwr »

Midnight Ryder wrote: 01 May 2026 11:13 am Quinn Hughes is an outlier also
Imagine how good he would be if he had been drafted in the "Top 5" instead of 7th.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 3673
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by a smell of green grass »

keithinwr wrote: 01 May 2026 11:29 am
Midnight Ryder wrote: 01 May 2026 11:13 am Quinn Hughes is an outlier also
Imagine how good he would be if he had been drafted in the "Top 5" instead of 7th.
Let me tell you what likely everyone else is thinking.

There is a difference between
A) An elite NHL player
B) Selecting TOP5 in the NHL Draft

B does not GUARANTEE A.
A can be acquired without B.
The chances of acquiring A are greatly increased by B.
A brings keen advantage in Stanley Cups. It is ALMOST a requirement for the Stanley Cup Winner per history.
A brings fun and thrill to every NHL game.

The St Louis Blues are ignoring all of these facts for the sake of the cash register. Some fans care. Some don't.

Some fans know the value of Stan Musial in their life in sports. Some fans think that a roomful of Maxvilles' and McCarvers' is just the same.

So go ahead and fascinate over Quinn Hughes, Sports Fans. You should--BECAUSE YOU WILL NEVER EVER SEE THAT SORT OF TALENT IN A BLUES JERSEY.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 9400
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by DawgDad »

a smell of green grass wrote: 01 May 2026 12:14 pm
keithinwr wrote: 01 May 2026 11:29 am
Midnight Ryder wrote: 01 May 2026 11:13 am Quinn Hughes is an outlier also
Imagine how good he would be if he had been drafted in the "Top 5" instead of 7th.
Let me tell you what likely everyone else is thinking.

There is a difference between
A) An elite NHL player
B) Selecting TOP5 in the NHL Draft

B does not GUARANTEE A.
A can be acquired without B.
The chances of acquiring A are greatly increased by B.
A brings keen advantage in Stanley Cups. It is ALMOST a requirement for the Stanley Cup Winner per history.
A brings fun and thrill to every NHL game.

The St Louis Blues are ignoring all of these facts for the sake of the cash register. Some fans care. Some don't.

Some fans know the value of Stan Musial in their life in sports. Some fans think that a roomful of Maxvilles' and McCarvers' is just the same.

So go ahead and fascinate over Quinn Hughes, Sports Fans. You should--BECAUSE YOU WILL NEVER EVER SEE THAT SORT OF TALENT IN A BLUES JERSEY.
I'm glad you brought up Stan Musial, Dal Maxvill, and Tim McCarver. I saw Musial play in person late in 1963, his last season. The next sason the Cardinals won their first pennant in 18 seasons. During the 1960's, my school years, the Cardinals won THREE pennants and TWO World Series with Maxvill and McCarver. I had TWO signature bats growing up, a Dal Maxvill model and a Tim McCarver model. Facts.
Army's Mom
Forum User
Posts: 1144
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by Army's Mom »

keithinwr wrote: 01 May 2026 11:29 am
Midnight Ryder wrote: 01 May 2026 11:13 am Quinn Hughes is an outlier also
Imagine how good he would be if he had been drafted in the "Top 5" instead of 7th.
Those teams were all too afraid of picking in the Top 5. It's a real thing, everybody's talking about it.
Tony Palazzolo
Forum User
Posts: 389
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:13 am

Re: Quinn Hughes

Post by Tony Palazzolo »

TheJackBurton wrote: 01 May 2026 10:59 am
rbirules wrote: 01 May 2026 09:58 am If we're ignoring contracts (one more year for him, two for McDavid, etc.) and pretending we're signing any player to a max deal he's probably second on the list behind only Celebrini. If you're asking which player would i want to add to a team in the short term he might top the list, top 3-5 for sure.

It would be nice to have him or Broberg on the ice 50 minutes a game, especially in the playoffs.
It continually stuns me that we had MacInnis and Pronger on our backend for multiple years and couldn't get past the second round with them. Just shows you that having superstars isn't the end all be all, even if they are 2 of the most dominant defensemen of their time.

Then after he leaves Pronger essentially takes 2 teams that had no business being the finals to the finals.
I think outside of one playoff either Pronger or MacInnis were hurt. I don't remember having them both healthy for the playoffs.