This trade does have a bit of a "get off my lawn" smell to it.
Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
cardstatman
- Forum User
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 14881
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
Guy was a 14th round draft pick who wasn't impressive in his call up, I agree w/you ronnie he had no future here.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:53 pmYeah, that's basically my thought. I don't think our guy had much future, who knows, maybe I'm wrong. I doubt this guy has much future either, but Bloom and his guys maybe see something there, so I don't see the harm.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:32 pm He's another "meh", so it's a "meh" for another "meh" trade.
This was just a "meh" player for a "meh" player.
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 14881
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
No the minor league track record isn't "more valuable" if it's pretty obvious the guy's a AAAA player and his stuff won't play in MLB.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 15:49 pmMinor league track records are far more valuable than a 21 inning stint in the majors. That's an very small sample size. Hardly reliable. Granillo has the makeup to be a strong reliever.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:44 pmMinor league stats are meaningless if they don't translate to MLB, lazy on your part to site them my friend.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:39 pmRock, that's lazy stat grabbing my friend.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:32 pm![]()
Granillo did have a 4.71 ERA/1.38 WHiP/7.7 SO9................last guy in the pen' type reliever.
He's another "meh", so it's a "meh" for another "meh" trade.
Granillo only pitched in like 14 games and like 21 innings. Hard to use those stats to judge the guy.
Look at Granillo's minor league #'s. 12.2 K/9, which is more than the guy we got. Plus Granillo has closed before and has late inning experience in the minors.
Seems like he was on the uptick.
Disappointed in this trade, at least on its face.
He's a "meh", back of the bench reliever who had his cup of coffee who wasn't going to make the Cardinals opening day roster.
Soriano could be the same guy but he does have better MLB strikeout potential and that's what Bloom is going for, power pitching.
The guy we got, from what I can tell so far, is not any better. If he is out of options, he also will lock in a bullpen spot, which I prefer to have flexibility in throughout the season.
That jump in talent, from facing AAA hitters to facing the best hitters in the world is a quantum leap.
The minor leagues are overpopulated w/players who had great stats there only to be "meh" when they attempt (and fail) to see that success translate to MLB.
But we're in agreement, this appears to be a "meh" player for a "meh" player but I'd rather take the shot on the higher octane guys than the guy w/lesser stuff.
-
Cardinals4Life
- Forum User
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
I'm not judging him based on 21 big league innings, which by the way weren't bad.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:41 amNo the minor league track record isn't "more valuable" if it's pretty obvious the guy's a AAAA player and his stuff won't play in MLB.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 15:49 pmMinor league track records are far more valuable than a 21 inning stint in the majors. That's an very small sample size. Hardly reliable. Granillo has the makeup to be a strong reliever.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:44 pmMinor league stats are meaningless if they don't translate to MLB, lazy on your part to site them my friend.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:39 pmRock, that's lazy stat grabbing my friend.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:32 pm![]()
Granillo did have a 4.71 ERA/1.38 WHiP/7.7 SO9................last guy in the pen' type reliever.
He's another "meh", so it's a "meh" for another "meh" trade.
Granillo only pitched in like 14 games and like 21 innings. Hard to use those stats to judge the guy.
Look at Granillo's minor league #'s. 12.2 K/9, which is more than the guy we got. Plus Granillo has closed before and has late inning experience in the minors.
Seems like he was on the uptick.
Disappointed in this trade, at least on its face.
He's a "meh", back of the bench reliever who had his cup of coffee who wasn't going to make the Cardinals opening day roster.
Soriano could be the same guy but he does have better MLB strikeout potential and that's what Bloom is going for, power pitching.
The guy we got, from what I can tell so far, is not any better. If he is out of options, he also will lock in a bullpen spot, which I prefer to have flexibility in throughout the season.
That jump in talent, from facing AAA hitters to facing the best hitters in the world is a quantum leap.
The minor leagues are overpopulated w/players who had great stats there only to be "meh" when they attempt (and fail) to see that success translate to MLB.
But we're in agreement, this appears to be a "meh" player for a "meh" player but I'd rather take the shot on the higher octane guys than the guy w/lesser stuff.
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 14881
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
Weren't good eitherCardinals4Life wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:56 amI'm not judging him based on 21 big league innings, which by the way weren't bad.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:41 amNo the minor league track record isn't "more valuable" if it's pretty obvious the guy's a AAAA player and his stuff won't play in MLB.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 15:49 pmMinor league track records are far more valuable than a 21 inning stint in the majors. That's an very small sample size. Hardly reliable. Granillo has the makeup to be a strong reliever.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:44 pmMinor league stats are meaningless if they don't translate to MLB, lazy on your part to site them my friend.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:39 pmRock, that's lazy stat grabbing my friend.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:32 pm![]()
Granillo did have a 4.71 ERA/1.38 WHiP/7.7 SO9................last guy in the pen' type reliever.
He's another "meh", so it's a "meh" for another "meh" trade.
Granillo only pitched in like 14 games and like 21 innings. Hard to use those stats to judge the guy.
Look at Granillo's minor league #'s. 12.2 K/9, which is more than the guy we got. Plus Granillo has closed before and has late inning experience in the minors.
Seems like he was on the uptick.
Disappointed in this trade, at least on its face.
He's a "meh", back of the bench reliever who had his cup of coffee who wasn't going to make the Cardinals opening day roster.
Soriano could be the same guy but he does have better MLB strikeout potential and that's what Bloom is going for, power pitching.
The guy we got, from what I can tell so far, is not any better. If he is out of options, he also will lock in a bullpen spot, which I prefer to have flexibility in throughout the season.
That jump in talent, from facing AAA hitters to facing the best hitters in the world is a quantum leap.
The minor leagues are overpopulated w/players who had great stats there only to be "meh" when they attempt (and fail) to see that success translate to MLB.
But we're in agreement, this appears to be a "meh" player for a "meh" player but I'd rather take the shot on the higher octane guys than the guy w/lesser stuff.
These are two "meh" players, why all the fuss over them?
-
Cardinals4Life
- Forum User
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
I liked Granillo and have liked him through the minors. Always a guy I thought was destined to close one day. Hate that we are giving him away for a guy out of options, who will likely clog up the pen when he can't get outs consistently. Seems odd to me.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 09:01 amWeren't good eitherCardinals4Life wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:56 amI'm not judging him based on 21 big league innings, which by the way weren't bad.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:41 amNo the minor league track record isn't "more valuable" if it's pretty obvious the guy's a AAAA player and his stuff won't play in MLB.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 15:49 pmMinor league track records are far more valuable than a 21 inning stint in the majors. That's an very small sample size. Hardly reliable. Granillo has the makeup to be a strong reliever.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:44 pmMinor league stats are meaningless if they don't translate to MLB, lazy on your part to site them my friend.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:39 pmRock, that's lazy stat grabbing my friend.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:32 pm![]()
Granillo did have a 4.71 ERA/1.38 WHiP/7.7 SO9................last guy in the pen' type reliever.
He's another "meh", so it's a "meh" for another "meh" trade.
Granillo only pitched in like 14 games and like 21 innings. Hard to use those stats to judge the guy.
Look at Granillo's minor league #'s. 12.2 K/9, which is more than the guy we got. Plus Granillo has closed before and has late inning experience in the minors.
Seems like he was on the uptick.
Disappointed in this trade, at least on its face.
He's a "meh", back of the bench reliever who had his cup of coffee who wasn't going to make the Cardinals opening day roster.
Soriano could be the same guy but he does have better MLB strikeout potential and that's what Bloom is going for, power pitching.
The guy we got, from what I can tell so far, is not any better. If he is out of options, he also will lock in a bullpen spot, which I prefer to have flexibility in throughout the season.
That jump in talent, from facing AAA hitters to facing the best hitters in the world is a quantum leap.
The minor leagues are overpopulated w/players who had great stats there only to be "meh" when they attempt (and fail) to see that success translate to MLB.
But we're in agreement, this appears to be a "meh" player for a "meh" player but I'd rather take the shot on the higher octane guys than the guy w/lesser stuff.
These are two "meh" players, why all the fuss over them?![]()
Not too much fuss, but just didn't seem to be a prudent move. Hope the new guy is good!!
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 14881
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
Gitta be honest w/you my friend I never saw him being more than a back of the pen' guy at best, certainly not a Cardinals closer.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 09:13 amI liked Granillo and have liked him through the minors. Always a guy I thought was destined to close one day. Hate that we are giving him away for a guy out of options, who will likely clog up the pen when he can't get outs consistently. Seems odd to me.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 09:01 amWeren't good eitherCardinals4Life wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:56 amI'm not judging him based on 21 big league innings, which by the way weren't bad.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:41 amNo the minor league track record isn't "more valuable" if it's pretty obvious the guy's a AAAA player and his stuff won't play in MLB.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 15:49 pmMinor league track records are far more valuable than a 21 inning stint in the majors. That's an very small sample size. Hardly reliable. Granillo has the makeup to be a strong reliever.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:44 pmMinor league stats are meaningless if they don't translate to MLB, lazy on your part to site them my friend.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:39 pmRock, that's lazy stat grabbing my friend.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:32 pm![]()
Granillo did have a 4.71 ERA/1.38 WHiP/7.7 SO9................last guy in the pen' type reliever.
He's another "meh", so it's a "meh" for another "meh" trade.
Granillo only pitched in like 14 games and like 21 innings. Hard to use those stats to judge the guy.
Look at Granillo's minor league #'s. 12.2 K/9, which is more than the guy we got. Plus Granillo has closed before and has late inning experience in the minors.
Seems like he was on the uptick.
Disappointed in this trade, at least on its face.
He's a "meh", back of the bench reliever who had his cup of coffee who wasn't going to make the Cardinals opening day roster.
Soriano could be the same guy but he does have better MLB strikeout potential and that's what Bloom is going for, power pitching.
The guy we got, from what I can tell so far, is not any better. If he is out of options, he also will lock in a bullpen spot, which I prefer to have flexibility in throughout the season.
That jump in talent, from facing AAA hitters to facing the best hitters in the world is a quantum leap.
The minor leagues are overpopulated w/players who had great stats there only to be "meh" when they attempt (and fail) to see that success translate to MLB.
But we're in agreement, this appears to be a "meh" player for a "meh" player but I'd rather take the shot on the higher octane guys than the guy w/lesser stuff.
These are two "meh" players, why all the fuss over them?![]()
Not too much fuss, but just didn't seem to be a prudent move. Hope the new guy is good!!
To be honest, I don't think he would've been on the OD roster.
But as always respect your opinions.
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
On face value it doesn't look like a good trade.
Is this a Bloom pixie dust move or is it a blunder?
A Bloom'der if you will.
Is this a Bloom pixie dust move or is it a blunder?
A Bloom'der if you will.
-
stlbirdlover
- Forum User
- Posts: 649
- Joined: 24 May 2024 19:53 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
I don't like this trade at all!
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
What made you think he’d be a closer?Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 09:13 amI liked Granillo and have liked him through the minors. Always a guy I thought was destined to close one day. Hate that we are giving him away for a guy out of options, who will likely clog up the pen when he can't get outs consistently. Seems odd to me.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 09:01 amWeren't good eitherCardinals4Life wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:56 amI'm not judging him based on 21 big league innings, which by the way weren't bad.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:41 amNo the minor league track record isn't "more valuable" if it's pretty obvious the guy's a AAAA player and his stuff won't play in MLB.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 15:49 pmMinor league track records are far more valuable than a 21 inning stint in the majors. That's an very small sample size. Hardly reliable. Granillo has the makeup to be a strong reliever.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:44 pmMinor league stats are meaningless if they don't translate to MLB, lazy on your part to site them my friend.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:39 pmRock, that's lazy stat grabbing my friend.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:32 pm![]()
Granillo did have a 4.71 ERA/1.38 WHiP/7.7 SO9................last guy in the pen' type reliever.
He's another "meh", so it's a "meh" for another "meh" trade.
Granillo only pitched in like 14 games and like 21 innings. Hard to use those stats to judge the guy.
Look at Granillo's minor league #'s. 12.2 K/9, which is more than the guy we got. Plus Granillo has closed before and has late inning experience in the minors.
Seems like he was on the uptick.
Disappointed in this trade, at least on its face.
He's a "meh", back of the bench reliever who had his cup of coffee who wasn't going to make the Cardinals opening day roster.
Soriano could be the same guy but he does have better MLB strikeout potential and that's what Bloom is going for, power pitching.
The guy we got, from what I can tell so far, is not any better. If he is out of options, he also will lock in a bullpen spot, which I prefer to have flexibility in throughout the season.
That jump in talent, from facing AAA hitters to facing the best hitters in the world is a quantum leap.
The minor leagues are overpopulated w/players who had great stats there only to be "meh" when they attempt (and fail) to see that success translate to MLB.
But we're in agreement, this appears to be a "meh" player for a "meh" player but I'd rather take the shot on the higher octane guys than the guy w/lesser stuff.
These are two "meh" players, why all the fuss over them?![]()
Not too much fuss, but just didn't seem to be a prudent move. Hope the new guy is good!!
-
Cardinals4Life
- Forum User
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
He closed games in Springfield and Memphis.Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑12 Feb 2026 00:32 amWhat made you think he’d be a closer?Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 09:13 amI liked Granillo and have liked him through the minors. Always a guy I thought was destined to close one day. Hate that we are giving him away for a guy out of options, who will likely clog up the pen when he can't get outs consistently. Seems odd to me.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 09:01 amWeren't good eitherCardinals4Life wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:56 amI'm not judging him based on 21 big league innings, which by the way weren't bad.rockondlouie wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026 08:41 amNo the minor league track record isn't "more valuable" if it's pretty obvious the guy's a AAAA player and his stuff won't play in MLB.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 15:49 pmMinor league track records are far more valuable than a 21 inning stint in the majors. That's an very small sample size. Hardly reliable. Granillo has the makeup to be a strong reliever.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:44 pmMinor league stats are meaningless if they don't translate to MLB, lazy on your part to site them my friend.Cardinals4Life wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:39 pmRock, that's lazy stat grabbing my friend.rockondlouie wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 14:32 pm![]()
Granillo did have a 4.71 ERA/1.38 WHiP/7.7 SO9................last guy in the pen' type reliever.
He's another "meh", so it's a "meh" for another "meh" trade.
Granillo only pitched in like 14 games and like 21 innings. Hard to use those stats to judge the guy.
Look at Granillo's minor league #'s. 12.2 K/9, which is more than the guy we got. Plus Granillo has closed before and has late inning experience in the minors.
Seems like he was on the uptick.
Disappointed in this trade, at least on its face.
He's a "meh", back of the bench reliever who had his cup of coffee who wasn't going to make the Cardinals opening day roster.
Soriano could be the same guy but he does have better MLB strikeout potential and that's what Bloom is going for, power pitching.
The guy we got, from what I can tell so far, is not any better. If he is out of options, he also will lock in a bullpen spot, which I prefer to have flexibility in throughout the season.
That jump in talent, from facing AAA hitters to facing the best hitters in the world is a quantum leap.
The minor leagues are overpopulated w/players who had great stats there only to be "meh" when they attempt (and fail) to see that success translate to MLB.
But we're in agreement, this appears to be a "meh" player for a "meh" player but I'd rather take the shot on the higher octane guys than the guy w/lesser stuff.
These are two "meh" players, why all the fuss over them?![]()
Not too much fuss, but just didn't seem to be a prudent move. Hope the new guy is good!!
-
Clubmaker2
- Forum User
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: 16 Apr 2021 16:53 pm
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
yea, traded for reasons unstated is also possible.cardstatman wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026 22:26 pmThis trade does have a bit of a "get off my lawn" smell to it.
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
It just doesn't look good initially. The guy is on his 4'th? team since November. Granillo seemed to have potential.
Hopefully Bloomer gets lucky and catches lighting in a bottle.
Re: Andre Granillo traded to Nationals
From D Goold's Cards Extra article in the PD this morning:
Curious trade explained
By trading Andre Granillo to the Washington Nationals earlier this week for right-handed reliever George Soriano, the Cardinals did something unusual for them: They willingly relinquished some elasticity to the roster. Granillo had two minor league options remaining, and that meant he could easily be part of a rotation of relievers to keep the bullpen refreshed throughout the season.
Soriano, 26, is out of options.
He either stays in the majors or goes back on waivers, where he has been claimed multiple times this past offseason. The Cardinals made several attempts to claim him on waivers, but they had a better record than other claiming teams and ultimately had to trade for him.
The lack of options was a factor, Bloom said.
So, too, was the upside of Soriano’s fastball and a bet Bloom said the Cardinals wanted to make — on themselves. The team’s expanding scouting and acquisition group along with the pitching development staff spotted adjustments they thought Soriano could immediately make to improve his big league results.
“We saw an opportunity in Soriano to get someone who we really like, who we think is already better than what his big league results have been, and we saw a few different ways to make improvements there,” Bloom said. “Might be a little more here with this player than what he’s shown. We wanted to stick our neck out there a little bit and have a chance to put that into action this spring training.”
Curious trade explained
By trading Andre Granillo to the Washington Nationals earlier this week for right-handed reliever George Soriano, the Cardinals did something unusual for them: They willingly relinquished some elasticity to the roster. Granillo had two minor league options remaining, and that meant he could easily be part of a rotation of relievers to keep the bullpen refreshed throughout the season.
Soriano, 26, is out of options.
He either stays in the majors or goes back on waivers, where he has been claimed multiple times this past offseason. The Cardinals made several attempts to claim him on waivers, but they had a better record than other claiming teams and ultimately had to trade for him.
The lack of options was a factor, Bloom said.
So, too, was the upside of Soriano’s fastball and a bet Bloom said the Cardinals wanted to make — on themselves. The team’s expanding scouting and acquisition group along with the pitching development staff spotted adjustments they thought Soriano could immediately make to improve his big league results.
“We saw an opportunity in Soriano to get someone who we really like, who we think is already better than what his big league results have been, and we saw a few different ways to make improvements there,” Bloom said. “Might be a little more here with this player than what he’s shown. We wanted to stick our neck out there a little bit and have a chance to put that into action this spring training.”